Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 前端设计

process-docs(流程文档)

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

process-docs 是前端设计类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在前端设计类的 10,216 个 Skill 里排第 5,110。

总安装 734周安装 30GitHub Stars 115下载 238核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:process-docs(流程文档)
来源仓库:https://github.com/shawnpang/startup-founder-skills
仓库路径:skills/process-docs
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/shawnpang/startup-founder-skills --skill process-docs
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/shawnpang/startup-founder-skills --skill process-docs

这个 Skill 是做什么的

前端设计类 Skill 关注页面结构、视觉规范和组件写法,输出通常是可运行的界面代码。

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown 等内容的整理与改写,适合提炼结构和统一术语。适用于需要让 Agent 处理项目说明文或内容稿件的场景。使用时需保留已有事实和路径,避免将未确认信息写成确定结论。涉及对外文案时应控制语气,防止过度营销或夸大能力描述。

安装方式:通过 GitHub 仓库安装,支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。

来源仓库内路径:skills/process-docs

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/shawnpang/startup-founder-skills --skill proce…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

process-docs 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/shawnpang/startup-founder-skills --skill process-docs。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

process-docs 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

process-docs 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

process-docs 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

process-docs 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 734 次,近一周安装 30 次,下载 238 次,GitHub 115 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

process-docs 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理前端设计类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

前端设计类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
frontend-design

前端设计 · Codex、Claude

8,823,360126,072只读MIT通过
vercel-composition-patterns

Vercel 组合模式 · Codex、Claude

3,858,81625,893需要联网MIT通过
vercel-react-native-skills

Vercel React native skills 前端 · Codex、Claude

2,468,66425,878只读MIT通过
adapt

adapt 搜索 · Codex、Claude

2,027,04023,125操作浏览器未明确通过
bolder

bolder 分析 · Codex、Claude

2,004,28823,130只读未明确通过
process-docs

流程文档 · 本页

734115只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Process Documentation

When to Use

Activate when a founder or operator needs to document an internal process so it can be executed consistently by anyone on the team. This includes prompts like "write an SOP for X," "create a runbook for incident response," "document our onboarding playbook," "how do we standardize this process," or any request to turn tribal knowledge into a repeatable procedure.

Context Required

  • From startup-context: company stage, team size, current tools and systems, organizational structure, compliance requirements.
  • From the user: the process to document, who owns and executes it, current pain points or failure modes, frequency of execution, tools involved, and whether this replaces an existing (undocumented) process or is net-new.

Workflow

  1. Identify document type — Determine whether this is an operational SOP (routine procedure), an incident runbook (reactive response), or an onboarding playbook (sequential learning path). Each uses a different template.
  2. Map the process end-to-end — Walk through every step from trigger event to completion. Identify inputs, outputs, decision points, handoffs, and escalation paths.
  3. Define ownership and RACI — Assign a single owner (Responsible), identify who Approves, who is Consulted, and who is Informed for each major step.
  4. Draft the document — Write using the appropriate template below. Use imperative voice ("Open the dashboard," not "The dashboard should be opened").
  5. Add decision trees — For any step with conditional logic, create explicit if/then branches. Never leave ambiguity at a fork.
  6. Include failure modes — Document what to do when each step fails. A process doc without error handling is incomplete.
  7. Set review cadence — Specify when this document should be reviewed and by whom (e.g., quarterly by the process owner).

Output Format

A structured markdown document following one of the three templates below. Every process doc includes a metadata header, and the body is written so that someone with no prior context can execute the process end-to-end.

Template 1: Operational SOP

# [Process Name] — Standard Operating Procedure
**Owner:** [Name / Role]
**Last Updated:** [Date]
**Review Cadence:** [Quarterly / Monthly]
**Version:** [1.0]

## Purpose
Why this process exists and what business outcome it supports.

## Scope
What this SOP covers and explicitly does not cover.

## Prerequisites
Tools, access, permissions, or context needed before starting.

## Procedure
1. Step with specific action
   - Sub-step with detail
   - **Decision point:** If [condition], go to Step X. Otherwise continue.
2. Next step...

## Escalation Path
| Condition | Escalate To | SLA |
|-----------|------------|-----|
| [Trigger] | [Person/Role] | [Timeframe] |

## Success Criteria
How to verify the process was completed correctly.

## Changelog
| Date | Author | Change |
|------|--------|--------|

Template 2: Incident Runbook

# [Incident Type] — Runbook
**Severity:** [P0-P3]
**On-Call Owner:** [Role]
**Last Tested:** [Date]

## Detection
How this incident is identified (alerts, customer reports, monitoring).

## Immediate Actions (First 5 Minutes)
1. Triage step...
2. Communication step...

## Diagnosis
Decision tree for identifying root cause.

## Resolution Steps
Step-by-step fix for each known root cause.

## Post-Incident
Checklist for after the incident is resolved.

Template 3: Onboarding Playbook

# [Role/Process] — Onboarding Playbook
**Duration:** [e.g., 2 weeks]
**Buddy/Owner:** [Role]

## Day 1-2: Orientation
Tasks, access setup, key introductions.

## Day 3-5: Core Training
Hands-on exercises, shadowing, tool walkthroughs.

## Week 2: Guided Practice
Supervised execution of real tasks with checkpoints.

## Graduation Criteria
What the person must demonstrate to be considered onboarded.

Frameworks & Best Practices

  • The "bus factor" test. If the person who usually runs this process is unavailable, can someone else execute it from this document alone? If not, add more detail.
  • Imperative voice only. Every step starts with a verb. "Click the Deploy button" not "The Deploy button should be clicked."
  • One action per step. If a step contains "and," split it into two steps. Compound steps get skipped or half-done.
  • Decision points are explicit. Use if/then language with clear conditions. "If the customer is on an Enterprise plan, skip to Step 7" not "Handle enterprise customers differently."
  • Time estimates matter. Include expected duration for each major phase. This helps people plan and signals when something has gone wrong (step taking 3x longer than expected = escalate).
  • Screenshots decay fast. Prefer text descriptions of UI paths (Settings > Integrations > Slack) over screenshots, which break every redesign. Use screenshots only for genuinely complex interfaces.
  • Version and date everything. A process doc without a last-updated date is assumed to be wrong.
  • Progressive detail. Lead each section with a one-line summary, then expand. Experienced operators scan; new hires read every word. Serve both.
  • Link, don't duplicate. If another SOP covers a sub-process, link to it rather than copying steps inline. Duplication causes drift.
  • Test with a newcomer. The best review is having someone unfamiliar with the process follow the doc and noting where they get stuck.

Related Skills

  • support-docs — Chain when the process being documented is customer-facing and needs a corresponding help center article or troubleshooting guide.
  • board-update — Chain when operational processes need to be summarized for investor or board reporting (e.g., "here is our incident response maturity").

Examples

Example 1: Operational SOP

User: "Write an SOP for processing customer refunds."

Good output excerpt:

## Procedure 1. Open the refund request in Zendesk. Verify the ticket includes: order ID, reason for refund, and customer email. 2. Check eligibility in Stripe. - Decision point: If the order is older than 30 days, escalate to the Support Lead with a note explaining the customer's situation. Do not process the refund. - If within 30 days, continue to Step 3. 3. Issue the refund via Stripe Dashboard > Payments > [Order ID] > Refund. Select "Full refund" unless partial was approved by the Support Lead. 4. Update the ticket with the Stripe refund ID and set status to "Solved." 5. Log the refund in the Refund Tracker spreadsheet (column A: date, B: order ID, C: amount, D: reason code). Estimated time: 5-8 minutes per refund.

Example 2: Incident Runbook

User: "We need a runbook for when our payment processing goes down."

Good output excerpt:

## Immediate Actions (First 5 Minutes) 1. Acknowledge the alert in PagerDuty to stop re-escalation. 2. Check Stripe Status Page (status.stripe.com). If Stripe reports an outage, skip to "External Provider Outage" section. 3. Post in #incidents Slack channel: "Investigating payment processing failures. Updates every 15 min. DRI: [your name]." 4. Enable the maintenance banner via Admin > Feature Flags > payment_maintenance_mode = true. This shows users "Payments temporarily unavailable, please retry shortly" instead of raw errors.

平台分布

Codex

35.47%
按下载量换算84

Claude

30%
按下载量换算71

Cursor

18.44%
按下载量换算44

Gemini CLI

10.02%
按下载量换算24

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills