Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

prd-maker(制造商)

prd-maker 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

prd-maker 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 53,392。

总安装 535周安装 23GitHub Stars 3下载 188核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:prd-maker(制造商)
来源仓库:https://github.com/alpoxdev/hypercore
仓库路径:skills/prd-maker
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/alpoxdev/hypercore --skill prd-maker
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/alpoxdev/hypercore --skill prd-maker

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位候选结果。适用于根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索进行信息检索的场景。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装使用。建议确认权限范围和维护状态,注意是否触发联网或文件读写操作。

prd-maker 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/prd-maker

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/alpoxdev/hypercore --skill prd-maker;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

prd-maker 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/alpoxdev/hypercore --skill prd-maker。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

prd-maker 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

prd-maker 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

prd-maker 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

prd-maker 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 535 次,近一周安装 23 次,下载 188 次,GitHub 3 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

prd-maker 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
prd-maker

制造商 · 本页

5353只读未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

@rules/prd-workflow.md @rules/storage-and-updates.md @rules/validation.md

PRD Maker

Create and maintain living PRDs inside this repository — classify complexity first, then either write directly or track progress through structured phases.
  • Turn a product idea, feature request, or initiative into a reusable PRD folder under .hypercore/prd/.
  • Update existing PRDs in place instead of rewriting them from scratch when the intent is refinement.
  • Keep product reasoning, scope decisions, risks, and source evidence explicit and easy to review.

<routing_rule>

Use prd-maker when the main output is a PRD or an update to an existing PRD.

Use research instead when the job is still fact-finding and there is no PRD deliverable yet.

Use docs-maker instead when the output is a general document, spec, or runbook rather than a PRD folder.

Use plan instead when the user wants planning but does not want the result stored as a PRD under .hypercore/prd/.

Do not use prd-maker when:

  • the user only wants brainstorming with no document output
  • the user only wants market or technical research with no PRD to write
  • the user wants implementation, coding, or debugging rather than product requirements

</routing_rule>

<activation_examples>

Positive requests:

  • "Write a PRD for team inbox assignments."
  • "Create a product requirements doc for the new billing retry flow."
  • "Update the existing PRD with the latest launch scope and open questions."

Negative requests:

  • "Research how competitors handle onboarding."
  • "Implement the billing retry flow."

Boundary request:

  • "Plan this feature before coding." Use prd-maker only if the output should become a stored PRD under .hypercore/prd/. Otherwise route to plan or docs-maker.

</activation_examples>

<trigger_conditions>

SituationMode
A new PRD needs to be createdcreate
An existing PRD needs scope, requirements, metrics, or risks updatedupdate
A product idea needs to be turned into a maintained requirements foldercreate
A release or initiative needs refreshed source-backed requirementsupdate

</trigger_conditions>

<supported_targets>

  • New PRD folders under .hypercore/prd/[slug]/
  • Existing PRD updates under .hypercore/prd/[slug]/
  • prd.md living requirements documents
  • sources.md evidence logs and query logs
  • flow.json phase tracking for complex PRDs
  • Scope changes, assumptions, risks, metrics, dependencies, and open questions

</supported_targets>

<complexity_classification>

Complexity Classification

Classify before starting work:

ComplexitySignalsPath
SimpleSingle feature, clear scope, minimal research needed, few stakeholders, small PRD (≤3 requirements sections)Direct — write prd.md + sources.md without flow tracking
ComplexMulti-feature initiative, extensive research needed, multiple stakeholders, large scope, cross-team dependencies, phased rolloutTracked — add flow.json to the PRD folder

Announce the classification:

Complexity: [simple/complex] — [one-line reason]

When uncertain, classify as complex. It is cheaper to track than to lose progress on a large PRD.

</complexity_classification>

<document_shape>

Default output shape:

.hypercore/prd/[slug]/
├── prd.md
├── sources.md
└── flow.json       (complex path only)
  • prd.md is the living product requirements document.
  • sources.md captures the evidence used to create or update the PRD.
  • flow.json tracks phase progress for complex PRDs. See references/flow-schema.md for the full schema.
  • Keep version history inside prd.md rather than creating extra changelog files.
  • Create the files from assets/prd.template.md and assets/sources.template.md when the folder does not exist yet.

</document_shape>

<flow_tracking>

Flow Tracking (Complex Path Only)

When classified as complex, write flow.json inside the PRD folder and update it as each phase progresses. See references/flow-schema.md for the full schema.

Phase progression

PhaseDescriptionNext
briefGather minimum working brief (problem, users, goals, constraints)research
researchRun live research if needed, or mark as skippeddraft
draftWrite or update prd.md using section reference and templatesources
sourcesWrite or update sources.md with evidence logvalidate
validateRun validation checks, finalizedone

Resume support

If flow.json already exists in the PRD folder, read it first and continue from the last incomplete phase. Do not restart completed phases. This enables multi-session PRD writing for large initiatives.

</flow_tracking>

<support_file_read_order>

Read in this order:

  1. This core SKILL.md to confirm that the job is PRD creation or update.
  2. rules/prd-workflow.md to choose create vs update mode and decide when research is required.
  3. rules/storage-and-updates.md to apply folder, file, slug, and merge rules.
  4. references/prd-sections.md when drafting or updating the PRD body, including optional launch-gating sections such as release criteria.
  5. assets/prd.template.md and assets/sources.template.md when creating a new PRD folder.
  6. instructions/sourcing/reliable-search.md when live research is needed.
  7. rules/validation.md before declaring the PRD complete.

</support_file_read_order>

Simple Path

PhaseTaskOutput
0Confirm PRD deliverable, choose create/update, classify as simpleMode + complexity
1Gather minimum product contextWorking brief
2Create or locate .hypercore/prd/[slug]/Storage target
3Write or update prd.md + sources.mdLiving PRD
4Validate scope, citations, open questionsFinalized PRD folder

Complex Path

PhaseTaskOutput
0Confirm PRD deliverable, choose create/update, classify as complexMode + complexity
1Create or locate .hypercore/prd/[slug]/, write flow.json with brief: in_progressStorage target + flow
2Gather product context → update flow brief: completedWorking brief
3Run live research if needed → update flow research: completed (or skipped)Evidence
4Write or update prd.md → update flow draft: completedLiving PRD
5Write or update sources.md → update flow sources: completedEvidence log
6Validate and finalize → update flow validate: completed, status: completedFinalized PRD folder

Phase rules

  • Prefer updating an existing PRD when the request is a revision, not a brand-new initiative.
  • If the request depends on current market, customer, legal, technical, or competitive facts, run live research with distinct queries before writing.
  • If the user already provided enough reliable context, do not force unnecessary external research.
  • Keep the main PRD concise. Put raw source accumulation in sources.md, not in the main body.
  • Preserve prior decisions unless the new information clearly supersedes them.
  • Complexity classified (simple/complex) before starting work.
  • Store every PRD under .hypercore/prd/[slug]/.
  • Prefer ASCII kebab-case slugs.
  • Keep explicit sections for goals, scope, non-goals, requirements, metrics, risks or dependencies, open questions, and change history.
  • Add links for non-obvious claims when research informed the document.
  • When updating, append a dated change-log row instead of silently overwriting significant decisions.
  • For complex path: maintain flow.json and update after each phase.
  • Writing a PRD only in chat without saving the folder output
  • Rewriting the entire PRD when only one section needs updating
  • Hiding unresolved questions or assumptions
  • Mixing raw research notes into the main PRD body when they belong in sources.md
  • Creating extra README or changelog files for the PRD folder
  • Skipping flow.json updates in complex path

平台分布

Codex

37.43%
按下载量换算70

Claude

28.13%
按下载量换算53

Cursor

16.59%
按下载量换算31

Gemini CLI

9.81%
按下载量换算18

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills