Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

svg-logo-designersvg 标志设计师

Agent Skill

svg-logo-designer 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

238

周安装

10

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

83
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:svg-logo-designer(svg 标志设计师)
来源仓库:https://github.com/prakharmnnit/skills-and-personas
仓库路径:skills/svg-logo-designer
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/prakharmnnit/skills-and-personas --skill svg-logo-designer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/prakharmnnit/skills-and-personas --skill svg-logo-designer

简介

用于查找、检索和筛选 SVG 标志设计相关的资源或工具。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中辅助品牌视觉设计。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从 GitHub 安装并使用。
  • 需确认权限范围和维护状态,避免触发联网或文件操作。
  • 建议结合原始 README 核验具体设计规范和输出要求。

SKILL.md

SVG Logo Designer

Elite SVG logo design skill that produces principal-designer-level vector logos through a rigorous discovery-first process with quality scoring, design system integration, and iterative refinement.

Core Principle

Never generate a logo without completing discovery first. The quality of the output is directly proportional to the quality of the brief. Treat every logo request as a senior design engagement: interview thoroughly, synthesize a brief, confirm alignment, design with intention, score against professional criteria, and iterate until excellence.

Workflow Overview

  1. Discovery Interview -- Extract the user's vision through 2-3 focused question rounds (MANDATORY)
  2. Brief Synthesis -- Summarize requirements, present for confirmation
  3. Concept Development -- Generate 3-5 distinct concepts with design rationale
  4. Quality Scoring -- Self-evaluate each concept against professional rubric
  5. Layout Expansion -- Produce layout variations per selected concept
  6. Color & Mono Systems -- Full-color, monochrome, and reversed versions
  7. Design System Output -- Design tokens, CSS variables, brand spec sheet
  8. File Delivery -- Save optimized SVG files with proper naming
  9. Iterative Refinement -- Structured feedback loop until user confirms satisfaction

Phase 1: Discovery Interview (MANDATORY)

This is the most critical phase. Consult references/discovery-questions.md for the full question bank, adaptive rules, and industry-specific variants.

Ask questions in 2-3 focused rounds. Adapt based on previous answers. Never ask all questions -- select the most relevant.

Round 1: Brand Foundation (always ask these)

  1. Brand name -- Exact text, capitalization, spacing, tagline
  2. Industry / domain -- What the business does, what space it operates in
  3. Logo type preference -- Present: Wordmark, Lettermark, Pictorial, Abstract, Combination, Emblem, or open to suggestions
  4. Emotional keywords -- "Pick 3-5 words that describe how the brand should FEEL"
  5. Existing brand assets -- Colors, fonts, or visual elements that must be respected

Round 2: Design Direction (select based on Round 1)

  1. Visual style -- Which resonates: Minimalist, Geometric, Organic, Bold, Elegant, Tech, Vintage, Brutalist, Playful
  2. Color direction -- Specific hex codes, general preferences, or "propose based on mood"
  3. Competitors / inspiration -- "Name 2-3 logos you admire. What do you like about them?"
  4. Symbols or metaphors -- Imagery to evoke, things to avoid
  5. Target audience -- Who sees this logo, demographics, psychographics

Round 3: Technical & Scope (fill gaps)

  1. Primary use context -- Website, app, print, signage, merchandise
  2. Background requirements -- Light, dark, colored, photographic
  3. Size constraints -- Must it work at favicon (16px)? Mostly large-format?
  4. Number of concepts -- Recommend 3-5
  5. Layout needs -- Horizontal, vertical, square, icon-only, text-only

Minimum Viable Brief

If the user is impatient: brand name + industry + 3 mood words + logo type + color preference. That is the absolute minimum before any design work begins.


Phase 2: Brief Synthesis

After discovery, present a structured brief for confirmation:

## Design Brief: [Brand Name]

**Brand**: [Full name + tagline]
**Industry**: [Sector]
**Logo type**: [Selected type]
**Mood**: [3-5 emotional keywords]
**Visual style**: [Selected style(s)]
**Color direction**: [Hex codes or mood-based direction]
**Audience**: [Target description]
**Key metaphors**: [Symbols/concepts to explore]
**Must avoid**: [Exclusions]
**Inspiration**: [Referenced logos + what user liked]
**Primary context**: [Main usage]
**Layouts**: [Formats needed]
**Concepts**: [Number]

Ask: "Does this brief capture your vision? Anything to adjust before I start designing?"


Phase 3: Concept Development

Generate each concept as a distinct design direction. For each:

  1. Name the concept -- Short evocative title (e.g., "Precision Edge", "Organic Pulse")
  2. Write design rationale -- 3-4 sentences: visual metaphor, why it fits the brand, what makes it distinctive, design thinking process
  3. Specify color system -- Primary, secondary, accent with hex codes and rationale
  4. Generate the SVG -- Production-ready code following standards below
  5. Score against quality rubric -- Rate and explain (Phase 4)

SVG Generation Standards

Consult references/svg-techniques.md for advanced patterns, path construction, filters, blend modes, animations, and optimization.

Structure -- every SVG must include:

  • xmlns, viewBox, role="img", aria-labelledby
  • <title> and <desc> for accessibility
  • Semantic groups: <g id="symbol">, <g id="wordmark">
  • Colors defined via <defs><style> using CSS custom properties
  • <defs> for gradients, clip paths, filters, masks

Quality checklist:

  • Clean, indented, human-readable code
  • No unnecessary attributes or default values
  • Paths optimized (minimal decimals, combined where possible)
  • Colors defined once, reused via classes and custom properties
  • Accessible (title, desc, aria-labelledby)
  • Scalable (viewBox only, no fixed width/height)
  • No raster dependencies
  • Tested mentally at 16px, 64px, 256px, 512px

Phase 4: Quality Scoring Rubric

Self-evaluate EVERY concept against these 7 criteria. Rate each 1-5. Present scores with the concept.

Criterion1 (Poor)3 (Adequate)5 (Exceptional)
SimplicityCluttered, too many elementsClean but could be simplerIrreducible -- nothing to remove
ScalabilityBreaks below 64pxReadable at 32pxCrisp at 16px, stunning at billboard
MemorabilityForgettable, genericDistinctive but not ownableInstantly recognizable, iconic potential
VersatilityWorks in one context onlyWorks in most contextsWorks everywhere: screen, print, mono, color, any background
AppropriatenessMismatched to brand/industryFits the categoryPerfectly captures brand essence and differentiates from competitors
CraftsmanshipRough alignment, inconsistentTechnically correctPixel-perfect, optically adjusted, every curve intentional
TimelessnessFollows a passing trendContemporary but trend-adjacentWill look relevant in 10+ years

Scoring rules:

  • Total possible: 35 points
  • Minimum to present to user: 21/35 (average 3 per criterion)
  • If a concept scores below 21, redesign it before presenting
  • Always explain the lowest-scoring criterion and what would improve it
  • Present scores transparently -- the user benefits from understanding trade-offs

Score presentation format:

### Quality Assessment: [Concept Name]

| Criterion | Score | Notes |
|-----------|-------|-------|
| Simplicity | 4/5 | Two-element composition, nothing extraneous |
| Scalability | 5/5 | Tested at 16px -- reads clearly |
| Memorability | 4/5 | Strong shape, unique silhouette |
| Versatility | 4/5 | Works in all layouts and color variants |
| Appropriateness | 5/5 | Cloud metaphor directly maps to brand promise |
| Craftsmanship | 4/5 | Optically balanced, clean curves |
| Timelessness | 4/5 | Geometric style avoids trend dependency |

**Total: 30/35** -- Strongest in appropriateness and scalability.
Improvement opportunity: simplify the secondary element for a higher simplicity score.

Phase 5: Layout Expansion

For selected concept(s), produce separate SVGs per layout:

LayoutAspect RatioBest For
Horizontal lockup~3.5:1Headers, navigation, business cards
Vertical lockup~1:1.3Social profiles, app stores
Square / circular1:1Favicon, avatar, app icon
Icon only1:1Small sizes, watermarks
Text onlyvariesEditorial, minimal contexts

Do not simply scale the horizontal version. Redesign each layout for its intended context -- adjust spacing, proportions, and element arrangement.


Phase 6: Color & Mono Systems

For each layout, produce:

  1. Full color -- Primary brand expression
  2. Monochrome dark -- Single dark color (#1A1A2E or brand-appropriate near-black)
  3. Monochrome light -- Single light color (#FFFFFF or near-white) for dark backgrounds
  4. Reversed -- Full color adapted for dark backgrounds (adjust contrast as needed)

Phase 7: Design System Output

After final concept approval, generate a complete design system package. Consult references/design-system.md for color psychology, typography guidance, style patterns, design token formats, and Figma spec templates.

Design Tokens (CSS Custom Properties)

:root {
  /* Brand Colors */
  --brand-primary: #HEXVAL;
  --brand-primary-light: #HEXVAL;
  --brand-primary-dark: #HEXVAL;
  --brand-secondary: #HEXVAL;
  --brand-accent: #HEXVAL;
  --brand-text: #HEXVAL;
  --brand-text-inverse: #FFFFFF;
  --brand-bg: #FFFFFF;
  --brand-bg-dark: #1A1A2E;

  /* Typography */
  --brand-font-primary: 'FontName', sans-serif;
  --brand-font-weight-bold: 700;
  --brand-font-weight-regular: 400;
  --brand-letter-spacing: 0.02em;

  /* Spacing */
  --logo-clearspace: 1em; /* minimum = icon height */

  /* Sizing */
  --logo-min-width-digital: 100px;
  --logo-min-width-print: 1in;
}

Design Tokens (JSON)

{
  "color": {
    "brand": {
      "primary": { "value": "#HEXVAL", "type": "color" },
      "secondary": { "value": "#HEXVAL", "type": "color" },
      "accent": { "value": "#HEXVAL", "type": "color" }
    },
    "text": {
      "default": { "value": "#HEXVAL", "type": "color" },
      "inverse": { "value": "#FFFFFF", "type": "color" }
    }
  },
  "typography": {
    "fontFamily": { "primary": { "value": "FontName, sans-serif" } },
    "fontWeight": { "bold": { "value": "700" }, "regular": { "value": "400" } },
    "letterSpacing": { "brand": { "value": "0.02em" } }
  },
  "spacing": {
    "logoClearspace": { "value": "1em" }
  }
}

Figma-Ready Spec Sheet

Present a structured spec sheet with:

  • Exact hex colors with names
  • Font family, weight, size, and letter-spacing
  • Logo dimensions per layout (viewBox values)
  • Clear space rules (expressed as multiples of icon height)
  • Minimum size requirements per context
  • Color usage rules (which variant on which background)
  • Do's and don'ts checklist

Phase 8: File Delivery

Save files using the Write tool:

logos/
  [brand-name]/
    concept-[n]-[concept-name]/
      [brand]-horizontal-color.svg
      [brand]-horizontal-mono-dark.svg
      [brand]-horizontal-mono-light.svg
      [brand]-horizontal-reversed.svg
      [brand]-vertical-color.svg
      [brand]-vertical-mono-dark.svg
      [brand]-icon-color.svg
      [brand]-icon-mono-dark.svg
      [brand]-icon-mono-light.svg
      [brand]-text-only.svg
    design-tokens/
      tokens.css
      tokens.json
    brand-spec.md

After saving, provide:

  • Complete file manifest with paths
  • Export instructions (SVG to PNG via Inkscape, ImageMagick, rsvg-convert)
  • Web implementation examples (inline SVG, img tag, CSS background, responsive patterns)
  • Minimum size recommendations per context
  • Clear space guidelines

Phase 9: Iterative Refinement

After presenting concepts, run a structured feedback loop:

Round 1 Feedback: Concept Selection

Ask:

  1. "Which concept(s) resonate most? What draws you to it?"
  2. "What elements would you keep from each concept?"
  3. "What would you change, remove, or add?"
  4. "Any concepts that are completely off? Why?"

Round 2 Feedback: Direction Refinement

Based on selected concept, ask targeted questions:

  1. "The [element] communicates [intent]. Does that match your vision, or should it shift toward [alternative]?"
  2. "Color-wise, should we stay with [current palette] or explore [specific alternative]?"
  3. "The current weight/thickness feels [description]. Should it be lighter/heavier?"
  4. "Is the icon-to-text proportion right, or should one element be more dominant?"

Round 3 Feedback: Polish

  1. "At this stage, rate your satisfaction 1-10."
  2. "What single change would move that number up?"
  3. "Does this feel like YOUR brand when you look at it?"

Refinement Rules

  • Never argue against feedback -- adapt and explain the adaptation
  • When making changes, explain what changed and why it addresses the feedback
  • If feedback contradicts itself, surface the tension: "You mentioned wanting both X and Y -- here is how I balanced them, but we could lean more toward either"
  • Re-score against the quality rubric after significant changes
  • Maximum 5 refinement rounds before suggesting a concept reset

Design References

Load these on-demand during the workflow. Do NOT load all at once.

  • Color psychology, typography, style patterns, design tokens, Figma specs: Read references/design-system.md
  • Advanced SVG: filters, blend modes, masks, animations, path construction, optimization: Read references/svg-techniques.md
  • Full discovery question bank with situational and industry-specific variants: Read references/discovery-questions.md

Critical Rules

  1. NEVER skip discovery. Even if the user says "just make something," ask at minimum: brand name, industry, mood (3 words), logo type.
  2. NEVER use raster images inside SVGs. Everything must be vector.
  3. NEVER use external font links. Convert to paths or use system fonts (Arial, Helvetica, Georgia, Times New Roman).
  4. ALWAYS explain design decisions. Every concept gets a rationale. Every color gets a reason.
  5. ALWAYS score concepts against the quality rubric before presenting.
  6. ALWAYS test mental scalability. Before delivering: "Will this read at 16px? At billboard size?"
  7. ALWAYS deliver accessible SVGs. Title, desc, ARIA on every file.
  8. ALWAYS use CSS custom properties for colors inside SVGs for easy theming.
  9. ALWAYS deliver design tokens (CSS + JSON) with the final package.
  10. Prefer simplicity. The best logos use the fewest elements necessary.
  11. Present scores transparently. The user benefits from understanding trade-offs.
  12. Never present a concept scoring below 21/35. Redesign first.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

38.25%
按下载量换算32

Claude

28.83%
按下载量换算24

Cursor

18.96%
按下载量换算16

Gemini CLI

9.65%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills