Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

analyzing-experiment-session-replays(分析实验会话回放)

analyzing-experiment-session-replays 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

analyzing-experiment-session-replays 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 43,825。

总安装 955周安装 39GitHub Stars 31下载 309核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:analyzing-experiment-session-replays(分析实验会话回放)
来源仓库:https://github.com/posthog/skills
仓库路径:skills/analyzing-experiment-session-replays
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/posthog/skills --skill analyzing-experiment-session-replays
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/posthog/skills --skill analyzing-experiment-session-replays

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适合根据关键词或任务场景快速定位候选结果。可结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态。analyzing-experiment-session-replays 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/analyzing-experiment-session-replays

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/posthog/skills --skill analyzing-experiment-se…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

analyzing-experiment-session-replays 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/posthog/skills --skill analyzing-experiment-session-repl…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

analyzing-experiment-session-replays 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

analyzing-experiment-session-replays 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

analyzing-experiment-session-replays 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

analyzing-experiment-session-replays 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 955 次,近一周安装 39 次,下载 309 次,GitHub 31 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

analyzing-experiment-session-replays 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
analyzing-experiment-session-replays

分析实验会话回放 · 本页

95531只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Analyzing experiment session replays

This skill guides you through analyzing session recordings for experiment variants to understand behavioral differences between control and test groups.

When to use this skill

Use this skill when:

  • The user asks to analyze session replays for an experiment
  • The user wants to understand how users behave differently across experiment variants
  • The user asks to compare user behavior between control and test variants
  • The user wants qualitative insights to complement experiment metrics
  • The user asks questions like "How are users behaving in my experiment?" or "Show me session replays for variant X"

Prerequisites

Before analyzing session replays:

  1. The experiment must be launched (not in draft state)
  2. Session replay must be enabled for the project
  3. Users must have been exposed to the experiment variants
  4. The experiment must have a start date

Workflow

1. Get experiment details and feature flag variants

First, retrieve the experiment information and the feature flag variants (source of truth).

Step 1a: Get experiment metadata

You can either:

  • Option A: Use the experiment_results_summary tool if you already have the experiment ID from context
  • Option B: Query the experiments table via HogQL:
SELECT
    id,
    name,
    feature_flag_key,
    start_date,
    end_date
FROM system.experiments
WHERE id = <experiment_id>
  AND team_id = <team_id>

From the experiment data, extract:

  • feature_flag_key: The feature flag controlling the experiment
  • start_date and end_date: The experiment's time range

Step 1b: Get variants from the feature flag

IMPORTANT: Always get variants from the feature flag, NOT from experiment.parameters.feature_flag_variants. The parameters can be out of sync or deprecated. The feature flag is the source of truth.

Query the feature flag to get the current variants:

SELECT
    key,
    filters
FROM system.feature_flags
WHERE key = '<feature_flag_key>'
  AND team_id = <team_id>

Extract the variant keys from filters.multivariate.variants array. Example structure: [{"key": "control", "name": "Control", "rollout_percentage": 50}, {"key": "test",...}]

The variant key values (e.g., "control", "test", "variant_a") are what you'll use to filter session recordings.

2. Build session recording filters for each variant

For each variant in the experiment, construct recording filters that match users exposed to that variant.

Filter structure for a variant:

{
  "date_from": "<experiment.start_date>",
  "date_to": "<experiment.end_date or current time>",
  "filter_test_accounts": true,
  "events": [
    {
      "id": "$feature_flag_called",
      "type": "events",
      "properties": [
        {
          "key": "$feature_flag",
          "value": ["<feature_flag_key>"],
          "operator": "exact",
          "type": "event"
        },
        {
          "key": "$feature/<feature_flag_key>",
          "value": ["<variant_key>"],
          "operator": "exact",
          "type": "event"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}

Key points:

  • Filter by $feature_flag_called events where the flag matches the experiment's feature flag
  • Use $feature/<flag_key> property to filter for the specific variant value
  • Set the date range to the experiment's start and end dates
  • Enable filter_test_accounts: true to exclude test users

3. Retrieve recordings for each variant

Use the filter_session_recordings tool with the filters constructed in step 2.

Call the tool once per variant to get recordings for each group:

  • Variant "control" → recordings for control group
  • Variant "test" → recordings for test variant
  • Additional variants if the experiment has more than 2

The tool returns a list of recordings with metadata including:

  • User/distinct_id
  • Session duration
  • Activity metrics (clicks, keypresses)
  • Console errors
  • First URL visited
  • Start time

4. Compare and analyze

Compare the recordings between variants by looking for:

Quantitative patterns:

  • Session duration differences
  • Activity levels (clicks, keypresses)
  • Console error rates
  • Bounce rates

Qualitative insights:

  • User confusion or frustration indicators
  • Different navigation paths
  • Feature discovery patterns
  • Error recovery behavior

5. Present findings

Summarize the behavioral differences between variants, highlighting:

  • Total recordings per variant
  • Notable behavior patterns unique to each variant
  • Usability issues or friction points observed
  • Recommendations based on the qualitative data

Example interaction

User: "How are users behaving in my checkout experiment?"
Agent steps:
1. Query experiment details (ID: 123, feature_flag_key: "checkout-flow-test", date range: 2025-01-01 to 2025-01-31)
2. Query feature flag "checkout-flow-test" to get variants from filters.multivariate.variants
3. Extract variant keys: "control" and "new-checkout"
4. Build filters for control variant:
   - Events: $feature_flag_called with $feature_flag="checkout-flow-test" and $feature/checkout-flow-test="control"
   - Date range: 2025-01-01 to 2025-01-31
5. Call filter_session_recordings with control filters → 147 recordings found
6. Build filters for new-checkout variant and call filter_session_recordings → 152 recordings found
7. Compare patterns:
   - Control: Average 3m 45s session duration, 12% console errors
   - New-checkout: Average 2m 30s session duration, 5% console errors
8. Present findings:
   "I analyzed session replays for your checkout experiment. The new checkout flow shows:
   - 33% faster completion (2m 30s vs 3m 45s)
   - 58% fewer console errors (5% vs 12%)
   - Users in the new variant navigate directly to payment, while control users often backtrack to review cart
   - Recommendation: The new checkout flow reduces friction and errors"

Important notes

Do not make assumptions:

  • Always verify the experiment has recordings before analyzing
  • Check that the experiment is launched (has a start_date)
  • If no recordings are found, inform the user clearly

Filter construction:

  • The $feature/<flag_key> property is how PostHog tracks which variant a user saw
  • Always use $feature_flag_called as the event type
  • Both $feature_flag and $feature/<flag_key> properties are required

Error handling:

  • If the experiment is in draft state, tell the user it hasn't started yet
  • If no recordings exist, suggest enabling session replay or waiting for user traffic
  • If the variant count is unexpected, double-check the experiment configuration

Related tools

  • filter_session_recordings: Core tool for retrieving session recordings with filters
  • experiment_results_summary: Get experiment metadata and statistical results
  • execute_sql: Query experiments table for details via HogQL

平台分布

Codex

36.44%
按下载量换算113

Claude

27.59%
按下载量换算85

Cursor

17.63%
按下载量换算54

Gemini CLI

9.85%
按下载量换算30

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills