Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

positioning-angles(定位角度)

positioning-angles 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

positioning-angles 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 32,795。

总安装 2,470周安装 105GitHub Stars 21下载 865核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:positioning-angles(定位角度)
来源仓库:https://github.com/shipshitdev/library
仓库路径:skills/positioning-angles
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/shipshitdev/library --skill positioning-angles
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/shipshitdev/library --skill positioning-angles

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

positioning-angles 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适合在复杂信息环境中快速定位目标内容。支持在主流 AI 开发工具中作为扩展功能使用。部署前应评估其对系统资源与网络访问的影响。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/positioning-angles

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/shipshitdev/library --skill positioning-angles;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

positioning-angles 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/shipshitdev/library --skill positioning-angles。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

positioning-angles 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

positioning-angles 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

positioning-angles 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

positioning-angles 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,470 次,近一周安装 105 次,下载 865 次,GitHub 21 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

positioning-angles 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
positioning-angles

定位角度 · 本页

2,47021需要联网MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Positioning Angles - Find Your Unique Angle

Overview

Act as a positioning strategist. Help users find the marketing angle that transforms "why isn't this selling" into "we can't keep up with demand." Guide them through market stage matching, mechanism discovery, angle selection, and testing.

Core Principle: "One angle will outperform others 3-10x. Test, don't guess."

Role: Find angles. Name mechanisms. Differentiate positioning.

When This Activates

This skill auto-activates when:

  • User says "why isn't this selling"
  • User asks "how do I stand out"
  • User says "we sound like everyone else"
  • User asks "what's my unique angle"
  • User mentions "I need differentiation"
  • User asks "how do I position this"
  • User says "competitors are saying the same thing"
  • User mentions low conversion or sales issues

The Framework: Positioning Angles

The 4-Step Process:

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                     POSITIONING ANGLES                          │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  1. MATCH MARKET STAGE  →  What promise fits your market?      │
│  2. FIND MECHANISM      →  What do you do that others skip?    │
│  3. PICK ANGLE          →  Which angle type differentiates?    │
│  4. TEST IT             →  Specific? Differentiated? Believable?│
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Execution Workflow

Step 1: Match Your Market Stage

Ask the user:

Tell me about your market: 1. What do you sell? (Quick description) 2. How aware is your audience of solutions like yours? 3. How many competitors are saying similar things? 4. Has your audience been burned before by similar promises?

Market Stage Matrix:

StageDescriptionPromise StrategyTemplate
NEWAudience doesn't know solution existsSimple promise"Now you can [X]"
GROWINGAudience knows solution, few competitorsBigger claim"[X] in [specific time]"
CROWDEDMany competitors, similar claimsShow mechanism"The [method] that works"
JADEDAudience skeptical, been burned beforeProve it"[Data/proof] that shows"
MATURESolution commoditized, price warsSell identity"For [people who are X]"

Stage Indicators:

StageSigns You're Here
NEW"What is this?" / Little competition / Educating market
GROWINGCompetition emerging / Claims escalating / Features matter
CROWDED"I've seen this before" / Many alternatives / Trust declining
JADED"I've tried everything" / Cynicism / Needs proof
MATUREPrice is main factor / Commoditized / Identity-based buying

Discovery Questions:

  • When you describe what you do, do people say "what's that?" (NEW) or "oh yeah, like [competitor]" (CROWDED)?
  • Are competitors making bold claims, or is everyone cautious?
  • Has your audience tried and failed with similar solutions?

Step 2: Find Your Mechanism

The mechanism is what you do that competitors skip.

What makes your approach different: 1. What's one thing you do that others don't bother with? 2. What step do competitors skip that you insist on? 3. What would your best customer say about why you're different? 4. What's the "unfair advantage" in your process?

Mechanism Discovery Framework:

COMPETITORS DO:         YOU DO:
────────────────        ────────────
[Generic approach]  →   [Your specific thing]
[Skip this step]    →   [You always do this]
[Rush this part]    →   [You spend extra time here]

Naming Your Mechanism:

Bad (Generic)Good (Specific)
"Our unique approach""The [X] Method"
"Our proven system""The [X] Framework"
"Our special process""The [X] Protocol"
"What we do differently""[Name] Technique"

Mechanism Formula:

"The [Descriptive Adjective] [Core Action] [Framework Type]"

Examples:
- "The Reverse Funnel Framework"
- "The 3-Layer Positioning Protocol"
- "The Rapid Validation Method"

Step 3: Pick Your Angle

Present 5 angle types. Generate variations for their situation.

Angle Types:

AngleWhen to UseTemplateExample
CONTRARIANAudience believes wrong thing"Everything you know about [X] is wrong""Everything you know about dieting is wrong—it's not about eating less"
TRANSFORMATIONClear before/after exists"From [painful state] to [desired state]""From scattered freelancer to $20k/month agency owner"
ENEMYExternal blame resonates"Stop letting [X] steal your [Y]""Stop letting algorithm changes steal your traffic"
SPEEDTime is the constraint"[Outcome] in [time] without [sacrifice]""Launch in 7 days without hiring developers"
SPECIFICITYCrowded market, need niche"For [exact person] who wants [exact thing]""For B2B SaaS founders who want enterprise clients"

Angle Selection Questions:

  • Does your audience believe something wrong? → CONTRARIAN
  • Is there a clear before/after? → TRANSFORMATION
  • Can you blame something external? → ENEMY
  • Is speed a key desire? → SPEED
  • Is your market crowded? → SPECIFICITY

Generate 3 Variations:

For each angle type that fits, generate a specific version:

ANGLE 1 (Primary recommendation):
"[Complete angle statement]"
Type: [Angle Type]
Why: [Why this fits their situation]

ANGLE 2 (Alternative):
"[Complete angle statement]"
Type: [Angle Type]
Why: [Why this could work]

ANGLE 3 (Alternative):
"[Complete angle statement]"
Type: [Angle Type]
Why: [Why this could work]

Step 4: Test It

Run each angle through the 3-point test:

The 3-Point Angle Test:

TestQuestionPass CriteriaFail Example
Specific?Can I visualize the result?Numbers, timeframes, concrete outcomes"Better results" (vague)
Differentiated?Can a competitor say the same?Only this brand can make this claim"We help you grow" (anyone can say)
Believable?Does mechanism/proof support it?Evidence backs the claim"10x your business overnight" (no proof)

Scoring:

ScoreRatingAction
3/3StrongTest this angle
2/3WeakStrengthen the failing point
1/3Very WeakPick different angle
0/3Don't UseComplete rework needed

Specificity Upgrade Examples:

Before (Vague)After (Specific)
"Better results""20 lbs in 6 weeks"
"More revenue""$50k MRR in 90 days"
"Save time""2 hours back every day"
"Grow your business""Add 10 enterprise clients this quarter"

Output Format

# Positioning Angle Analysis: [Product/Service]

## Market Stage Assessment

**Current Stage:** [NEW/GROWING/CROWDED/JADED/MATURE]

**Evidence:**
- [Sign 1]
- [Sign 2]
- [Sign 3]

**Recommended Promise Strategy:** [Strategy from matrix]

---

## Your Mechanism

**What You Do That Others Skip:**
> [Description of unique approach]

**Mechanism Name:** "The [X] [Method/Framework/Protocol]"

**Why This Works:**
> [Brief explanation]

---

## Angle Recommendations

### Primary Angle (Recommended)

**Statement:**
> "[Complete angle statement]"

**Type:** [Angle Type]

**Test Results:**
| Test | Result | Notes |
|------|--------|-------|
| Specific? | ✅/❌ | [Details] |
| Differentiated? | ✅/❌ | [Details] |
| Believable? | ✅/❌ | [Details] |

**Score:** [X/3]

---

### Alternative Angle 1

**Statement:**
> "[Complete angle statement]"

**Type:** [Angle Type]

**Test Results:**
| Test | Result | Notes |
|------|--------|-------|
| Specific? | ✅/❌ | [Details] |
| Differentiated? | ✅/❌ | [Details] |
| Believable? | ✅/❌ | [Details] |

**Score:** [X/3]

---

### Alternative Angle 2

**Statement:**
> "[Complete angle statement]"

**Type:** [Angle Type]

**Test Results:**
| Test | Result | Notes |
|------|--------|-------|
| Specific? | ✅/❌ | [Details] |
| Differentiated? | ✅/❌ | [Details] |
| Believable? | ✅/❌ | [Details] |

**Score:** [X/3]

---

## Testing Recommendation

**Angle to Test First:** [Primary recommendation]

**Why:** [Rationale]

**How to Test:**
1. [ ] Use in headline A/B test
2. [ ] Test in cold outreach subject lines
3. [ ] Try in social media hooks
4. [ ] Use in ad copy

**Success Metrics:**
- Click-through rate improvement
- Conversion rate improvement
- Response rate improvement

---

## Next Steps

1. [ ] Test primary angle in [specific context]
2. [ ] If underperforms, test alternative angles
3. [ ] Once validated, use in all messaging
4. [ ] Build offer around winning angle with `offer-architect`

Examples

Before/After Transformations

❌ Before (Weak Angles):

ProductWeak AngleProblem
Marketing agency"We help you grow"Generic, anyone can say it
Fitness app"Get fit faster"Vague, not specific
SaaS tool"Save time on [task]"No differentiation
Course"Learn [skill]"No transformation shown

✅ After (Strong Angles):

ProductStrong AngleWhy It Works
Marketing agency"For B2B SaaS founders who want enterprise clients in 90 days using the Account Penetration Method"SPECIFICITY + SPEED + MECHANISM
Fitness app"20 lbs in 6 weeks without giving up the foods you love, using the Metabolic Reset Protocol"SPEED + MECHANISM + SPECIFIC
SaaS tool"Stop letting manual data entry steal 2 hours of your day"ENEMY + SPECIFIC
Course"From complete beginner to first paid client in 30 days"TRANSFORMATION + SPEED

Integration with Other Skills

SkillWhen to Use Together
offer-architectAfter finding angle, build complete offer around it
copywriterWrite headlines and copy using the angle
expert-architectBuild authority positioning that supports the angle
funnel-architectDesign funnel messaging using the angle
channel-validatorValidate where to distribute the angle

Common Mistakes

  1. Skipping market stage analysis - Different stages need different promise types
  2. Generic mechanisms - "Our unique approach" tells nothing
  3. Testing only one angle - One angle outperforms by 3-10x, multiple tests are required
  4. Vague specificity - "Better results" isn't an angle
  5. Claims without proof - JADED markets need evidence
  6. Identity-selling too early - Save this for MATURE markets
  7. Copying competitor angles - If they say it, differentiation is impossible

When to Route Elsewhere

  • If user needs to build complete expert positioning → expert-architect
  • If user needs to validate their positioning → expert-validator
  • If user needs to build the offer → offer-architect
  • If user needs to write copy → copywriter
  • If user is stuck on execution → execution-accelerator
  • If user needs to validate market size → market-sizer

平台分布

Claude Code

30%
按下载量换算260

Gemini CLI

20.93%
按下载量换算181

Antigravity

19.78%
按下载量换算171

OpenCode

11.33%
按下载量换算98

Codex

8.47%
按下载量换算73

windsurf

3.45%
按下载量换算30

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills