Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

polars-dovmed(极地呈半球形)

polars-dovmed 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

polars-dovmed 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,674 个 Skill 里排第 62,606。

总安装 329周安装 14GitHub Stars 1下载 115核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:polars-dovmed(极地呈半球形)
来源仓库:https://github.com/fmschulz/omics-skills
仓库路径:skills/polars-dovmed
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/fmschulz/omics-skills --skill polars-dovmed
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/fmschulz/omics-skills --skill polars-dovmed

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

polars-dovmed 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词快速定位候选结果。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需确认权限和维护状态。使用前建议核验具体用法,注意是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。

涉及敏感操作时,应评估最小权限范围和潜在风险边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/polars-dovmed

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/fmschulz/omics-skills --skill polars-dovmed;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

polars-dovmed 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/fmschulz/omics-skills --skill polars-dovmed。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

polars-dovmed 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

polars-dovmed 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

polars-dovmed 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

polars-dovmed 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 329 次,近一周安装 14 次,下载 115 次,GitHub 1 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

polars-dovmed 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
polars-dovmed

极地呈半球形 · 本页

3291接触敏感数据未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

polars-dovmed

Search the PubMed Central Open Access subset with polars-dovmed.

The preferred workflow is always:

  1. decide execution mode up front
  2. author a structured query JSON directly
  3. inspect and refine the query JSON
  4. run structured discovery first
  5. fetch paper details for candidate PMC IDs
  6. use structured advanced scans only for final refinement when needed

Search execution has two modes:

  • Preferred when available: hosted API over the formatted parquet database
  • Fallback: local dovmed scan over local parquet files

Do not skip the structured-query authoring step unless the user explicitly supplies a ready query JSON file and asks to use it as-is.

For every search prompt, create a dedicated run directory and save:

  • the original prompt text
  • the authored or supplied query JSON
  • the exact payload submitted to the API or local scan
  • the raw results returned
  • any curated summary derived from those results
  • if discovery fallback is used, separate discovery payload and result artifacts

Instructions

  1. Decide execution mode up front.

- Check API availability first. - If POLARS_DOVMED_API_KEY is available in the environment, in the configured polars-dovmed env file, or the user provides an API key, use the hosted API. - Only fall back to local dovmed CLI plus local parquet files if API mode is unavailable.

  1. Author a structured query JSON directly.

- The agent should write the JSON itself instead of calling another helper to generate it. - If the user already gave a query JSON, inspect it before use.

  1. Create a dedicated run directory before searching.

- Use a slug based on the prompt or topic. - Save the original prompt text there as prompt.txt. - Save the authored or supplied query JSON there as query.json.

  1. Review the query JSON before searching.

- Check that concept groups match the biological question. - Remove or tighten noisy groups. - Add disqualifying_terms if obvious acronym or taxonomy collisions exist. - Be especially careful with short isolate names or generic tokens.

  1. Run the search.

- API mode: read the query JSON and send its contents in the JSON request body under primary_queries. Do not upload the file itself. - Local mode: run dovmed scan against the local parquet files using the JSON query file. - Save the exact submitted payload in the run directory before sending it. - Save the raw returned results in the run directory immediately after the search completes. - Default structured API path: - scan_literature_advanced(mode="discovery") - get_paper_details(pmc_ids=[...]) - scan_literature_advanced(mode="advanced") only for final refinement - If advanced refinement is too slow or too noisy, return to discovery-plus-details rather than forcing repeated heavy scans.

  1. Inspect the first results before trusting the full set.

- For targeted questions, review the first 5-10 titles. - If results are noisy, refine the JSON and rerun instead of widening free-text queries.

  1. If the user needs citation-quality output, verify missing metadata in PubMed or PMC before finalizing.

Preferred Workflow

Step 1: Author Query JSON Directly

Always start here unless the user already provided a query JSON file.

Use this structure:

{
  "anchor_entity": [
    ["primary_name"],
    ["alias_1"],
    ["alias_2"]
  ],
  "relation_or_property": [
    ["primary_name", "relation_term"],
    ["alias_1", "relation_term"],
    ["primary_name", "specific_relation_alias"]
  ],
  "disqualifying_terms": [
    ["term_to_exclude"]
  ]
}

Interpretation:

  • outer keys are concept groups
  • each inner list is an AND-group of patterns
  • separate inner lists inside the same key are OR alternatives
  • disqualifying_terms suppresses known false positives

Query Authoring Rules

  • Build searches around anchor concepts first.
  • Use explicit biological names over generic role words.
  • Treat support concepts as refiners, not anchors.
  • Keep relation terms soft in discovery unless they are essential to relevance.
  • Use disqualifying_terms aggressively for acronym collisions or wrong systems.
  • Prefer direct JSON authoring over verbose natural-language planning.

Quick Templates

Anchor plus relation:

{
  "anchor_entity": [
    ["entity_name"],
    ["entity_alias"]
  ],
  "relation_or_property": [
    ["entity_name", "relation_term"],
    ["entity_alias", "relation_term"]
  ]
}

Anchor-only high-recall discovery:

{
  "anchor_entity": [
    ["entity_name"],
    ["entity_alias_1"],
    ["entity_alias_2"]
  ]
}

Example: "hosts of Klosneuvirinae"

{
  "anchor_klosneuvirinae": [
    ["klosneuvirinae"],
    ["klosneuvirus"]
  ],
  "host_relation": [
    ["klosneuvirinae", "host"],
    ["klosneuvirus", "infect"]
  ]
}

Example: "Mirusviricota and the eukaryotic nucleus"

{
  "anchor_mirusviricota": [
    ["mirusviricota"],
    ["mirusvirus"],
    ["mirusviruses"]
  ],
  "nucleus_association": [
    ["mirusviricota", "eukaryotic", "nucleus"],
    ["mirusvirus", "nuclear"],
    ["mirusviruses", "nucleus"]
  ]
}

Step 2: Create A Run Directory

Create a directory for each prompt, for example:

mkdir -p runs/klosneuvirinae-hosts
printf '%s\n' "find papers that describe hosts of Klosneuvirinae" > runs/klosneuvirinae-hosts/prompt.txt
cp queries/klosneuvirus_hosts.json runs/klosneuvirinae-hosts/query.json

This is mandatory. Every run should preserve the input prompt, structured query, submitted payload, raw results, and a curated summary.

Step 3A: Search With Hosted API

Use this mode when POLARS_DOVMED_API_KEY is available or provided by the user.

This repository includes scripts/query_literature.py as a convenience wrapper for the hosted parquet-backed API.

Recommended API workflow:

  1. author query.json
  2. inspect the JSON
  3. run POST /api/scan_literature_advanced with mode="discovery"
  4. inspect top hits and collect candidate pmc_id values
  5. run POST /api/get_paper_details with pmc_ids
  6. if needed, run POST /api/scan_literature_advanced with mode="advanced" for final structured refinement

Use discovery mode first for candidate retrieval. Use advanced mode only for final structured refinement.

The query JSON is the source of truth for API mode.

  • In local mode, the JSON file is passed directly to dovmed scan.
  • In API mode, the agent should read the JSON file and serialize its contents into the API request body as primary_queries.
  • Do not bypass the structured-query authoring step and jump straight to improvised free-text queries unless the user explicitly asks for a quick exploratory search.
  • scripts/query_literature.py --query... is explicit opt-in only and requires --allow-flat-query.
  • Save the exact API payload to the run directory as a JSON file before submitting it.
  • Save the raw API response to the run directory as a JSON file after the request returns.
  • If discovery fallback is used, save it separately as payload_discovery.json and results_discovery.json.
  • The helper auto-loads ~/.config/polars-dovmed/.env, so a configured POLARS_DOVMED_API_KEY does not need manual source in typical agent runs.
  • The helper submits hosted search work through /api/jobs and polls for completion, instead of holding one long edge request open.
  • For structured discovery runs, the helper automatically fetches details for the top candidate PMC IDs and reranks them using grouped query evidence before summarizing results.

Example:

python skills/polars-dovmed/scripts/query_literature.py \
  --queries-file runs/klosneuvirinae-hosts/query.json \
  --mode discovery \
  --extract-matches none \
  --add-group-counts primary \
  --max-results 25 \
  --save-payload runs/klosneuvirinae-hosts/payload_discovery.json \
  --save-response runs/klosneuvirinae-hosts/results_discovery.json

python skills/polars-dovmed/scripts/query_literature.py \
  --details PMC6912108 PMC8490762 PMC5871332 \
  --save-payload runs/klosneuvirinae-hosts/payload_details.json \
  --save-response runs/klosneuvirinae-hosts/results_details.json

Step 3B: Search Locally With dovmed scan

Use this mode when no hosted API key is available.

dovmed scan \
  --parquet-pattern "data/pubmed_central/parquet_files/*/*.parquet" \
  --queries-file runs/klosneuvirinae-hosts/query.json \
  --extract-matches primary \
  --add-group-counts primary \
  --output-path results/klosneuvirus_hosts \
  --verbose

Search Semantics

  • Prefer structured JSON over ad hoc natural-language search strings.
  • For complex questions, prefer multiple concept groups instead of one long flat phrase.
  • If grouped concepts matter, preserve that grouping in both API payloads and local query JSON.

Retrieval Quality Playbook

  • Build searches around anchor concepts first.
  • Treat support concepts as refiners, not anchors.
  • Prefer explicit biological names over generic role words.
  • Put alternate names and spelling variants inside the same concept group.
  • Use disqualifying_terms for acronym collisions, wrong clades, and predictable false positives.

Hit Ranking Guidance

Rank hits in this order:

  1. exact anchor-name hit in the title
  2. exact anchor-name hit in the abstract
  3. anchor plus support co-occurrence in title or abstract
  4. multiple distinct relevant group matches
  5. full-text-only matches last

Down-rank or discard:

  • papers matching only generic support terms
  • papers with no anchor-name evidence in title or abstract
  • papers clearly centered on the wrong clade, host, or system
  • papers whose relevance depends only on a broad background mention

Recall-First Principle

  • When the key evidence may only appear in full text, prefer higher recall over early precision.
  • Use discovery mode first.
  • Fetch details for the best candidate PMC IDs.
  • Only tighten with advanced grouped refinement if needed.

Retrieval Loop

  1. author structured JSON
  2. run discovery mode
  3. review the first 5-10 titles
  4. fetch paper details for the most relevant PMC IDs
  5. refine the query JSON
  6. run advanced mode only if discovery plus details is not enough

"X Of Y" Query Construction

For requests shaped like:

  • "hosts of X"
  • "symbionts of Y"
  • "pathways in Z"
  • "genes involved in W"

do not represent the query as loose top-level concepts like:

  • X
  • host
  • symbiont
  • pathway

Instead:

  1. identify the entity anchor
  2. identify the relation or property term
  3. build OR-of-AND groups that combine them inside the same pattern group

Quick Smoke Test

Use this to verify that the API-backed discovery path, paper-details lookup, saved payloads, saved responses, and expected output shape are all working before a real run.

Run:

python skills/polars-dovmed/scripts/smoke_test.py

Default artifact directory:

skills/polars-dovmed/runs/smoke-test/

Expected success indicators in summary.json:

  • success: true
  • discovery result has:

- mode: "discovery" - strategy_used - elapsed_ms - at least one paper - per-paper ranking

  • details result has:

- found >= 1 - normalized_pmc_ids - empty missing_ids for the known test PMC

Quick Reference

TaskAction
Preferred first stepauthor query.json directly
Search artifactQuery JSON file
Preferred execution when key existsHosted API
Fallback executiondovmed scan on local parquet files
Execution-order ruleCheck API first, local fallback second
Local dataset requirementPMC OA parquet files
Helper wrapper in this reposkills/polars-dovmed/scripts/query_literature.py
Preferred candidate endpointPOST /api/scan_literature_advanced with mode="discovery"
Structured API endpointPOST /api/scan_literature_advanced
Flat exploratory endpointPOST /api/search_literature only with explicit opt-in
Automatic second passdiscovery -> paper details -> grouped rerank
Paper details endpointPOST /api/get_paper_details with pmc_ids
Required run artifactsprompt.txt, query.json, payload.json, results.json, optional summary
Quick skill verificationpython skills/polars-dovmed/scripts/smoke_test.py

Confirmed API Contract

Structured Advanced Search

Use:

{
  "primary_queries": {
    "concept_a": [["pattern1"], ["pattern2"]],
    "concept_b": [["pattern3"]]
  },
  "search_columns": ["title", "abstract_text", "full_text"],
  "extract_matches": "none",
  "add_group_counts": "primary",
  "max_results": 5
}

Send this to:

  • POST /api/scan_literature_advanced
  • header: X-API-Key:...

Structured Discovery Search

Use the same structured request body but set:

{
  "mode": "discovery"
}

Paper Details

Use:

{
  "pmc_ids": ["PMC1234567"]
}

Send this to:

  • POST /api/get_paper_details

Do not use paper_ids.

Output

  • curated paper lists with titles and identifiers
  • query JSON files used for the search
  • saved run artifacts for reproducibility
  • notes on noisy concepts, exclusions, and refinements
  • warnings about incomplete citation metadata or likely indexing gaps

Quality Gates

  • execution mode chosen correctly: API when key exists, local otherwise
  • API availability checked before local fallback assumptions
  • structured query file authored first or user-supplied
  • dedicated run directory created for the prompt
  • prompt.txt, query.json, payload.json, raw results, and summary saved
  • query JSON inspected before search
  • first 5-10 results reviewed before trusting the result set
  • noisy concept groups refined instead of widening free-text queries blindly
  • discovery mode used before paper-details lookup and advanced refinement
  • discovery fallback artifacts saved separately if used
  • missing citation metadata verified in PubMed or PMC when needed
  • final answer states whether results came from hosted API or local parquet scan

Troubleshooting

Issue: Hosted API key is missing Solution: Fall back to local dovmed scan if local parquet files exist.

Issue: Local parquet files are missing Solution: Use hosted API mode if a key is available, otherwise state that the local corpus must be prepared first.

Issue: Authored query JSON is noisy Solution: Tighten anchor terms, remove generic support groups, and add disqualifying_terms.

Issue: Search returns too many generic hits Solution: Refine the query JSON rather than broadening the free-text query.

Issue: Citation fields are incomplete Solution: Verify in PubMed or PMC before final output.

平台分布

Codex

37.59%
按下载量换算43

Claude

31.94%
按下载量换算37

Cursor

17.47%
按下载量换算20

Gemini CLI

10.43%
按下载量换算12

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills