Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

pm-brain-workflow(下午大脑工作流程)

pm-brain-workflow 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

pm-brain-workflow 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 64,698。

总安装 294周安装 12GitHub Stars 211下载 95核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:pm-brain-workflow(下午大脑工作流程)
来源仓库:https://github.com/andreaskelm/pm-brain
仓库路径:skills/pm-brain-workflow
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/andreaskelm/pm-brain --skill pm-brain-workflow
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/andreaskelm/pm-brain --skill pm-brain-workflow

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

pm-brain-workflow 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词快速定位候选结果。适用于产品研究、竞品分析或任务驱动的信息检索场景。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需确认权限范围和文件操作权限。

使用前建议检查仓库维护状态,避免触发不必要的网络请求或文件读写操作。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/pm-brain-workflow

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/andreaskelm/pm-brain --skill pm-brain-workflow;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

pm-brain-workflow 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/andreaskelm/pm-brain --skill pm-brain-workflow。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

pm-brain-workflow 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

pm-brain-workflow 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

pm-brain-workflow 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

pm-brain-workflow 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 294 次,近一周安装 12 次,下载 95 次,GitHub 211 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

pm-brain-workflow 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
pm-brain-workflow

下午大脑工作流程 · 本页

294211只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

PM Brain Workflow Assistant

This skill helps you navigate and apply product management frameworks from the PM Brain repository following a natural product development flow.

Core Principle: Think First, Template Later

Before jumping to templates, help users:

  1. Braindump - Get all raw thoughts out
  2. Structure thinking - Use framework prompts to organize
  3. Template - Only then apply formal templates

Framework Flow

The PM Brain follows a natural product development sequence:

2.0 Foundations → 2.1 Strategy → 2.2 Discovery → 2.3 Execution → 2.4 Communication
(HOW TO THINK)  (WHERE TO GO?)  (WHAT TO BUILD?) (BUILD & SHIP)  (KEEP ALIGNED)

When user is:

  • Early/exploring → Point to 2.0 Foundations and 2.1 Strategy
  • Has a problem → Guide to 2.2 Discovery
  • Ready to build → Move to 2.3 Execution
  • Throughout → Support with 2.4 Communication

Quick Framework Locations

2.0 Foundations (How to Think)

  • Mental Models: 02-Methods-and-Tools/2.0-Foundations/2.0.1-Mental-Models/
  • Bias Awareness: 02-Methods-and-Tools/2.0-Foundations/2.0.2-Bias/
  • Self-Reflection: 02-Methods-and-Tools/2.0-Foundations/2.0.3-Self-Reflection/

2.1 Strategy (Where are we going?)

  • Strategic Foundations: 02-Methods-and-Tools/2.1-Strategy/2.1.1-Strategic-Foundations/
  • OKRs: 02-Methods-and-Tools/2.1-Strategy/2.1.2-Strategic-Execution/1-OKR/
  • Roadmaps: 02-Methods-and-Tools/2.1-Strategy/2.1.2-Strategic-Execution/2-Roadmap/
  • North Star: 02-Methods-and-Tools/2.1-Strategy/2.1.2-Strategic-Execution/3-North-Star/
  • Prioritization: 02-Methods-and-Tools/2.1-Strategy/2.1.2-Strategic-Execution/4-Prioritization/

2.2 Discovery (What to build?)

  • Research Interviews: 02-Methods-and-Tools/2.2-Discovery/2.2.1-Research-Interviews/
  • Continuous Discovery: 02-Methods-and-Tools/2.2-Discovery/2.2.2-Continuous-Discovery-Habits/
  • Jobs-to-be-Done: 02-Methods-and-Tools/2.2-Discovery/2.2.3-Jobs-To-Be-Done/
  • Opportunity Assessment: 02-Methods-and-Tools/2.2-Discovery/2.2.4-Opportunity-Assessment/
  • Problem-Solution Space: 02-Methods-and-Tools/2.2-Discovery/2.2.6-Problem-Solution-Space/

2.3 Execution (Build, ship, measure)

  • Daily Rituals: 02-Methods-and-Tools/2.3-Execution/2.3.1-Daily-Execution-And-Rituals/
  • User Stories: 02-Methods-and-Tools/2.3-Execution/2.3.2-User-Stories/
  • PRDs: 02-Methods-and-Tools/2.3-Execution/2.3.4-PRD/
  • Personas: 02-Methods-and-Tools/2.3-Execution/2.3.5-Personas/
  • Metrics: 02-Methods-and-Tools/2.3-Execution/2.3.6-Metrics/

2.4 Communication (Keep aligned)

  • Newsletters: 02-Methods-and-Tools/2.4-Communication/2.4.1-Newsletter/
  • One-Pagers: 02-Methods-and-Tools/2.4-Communication/2.4.3-One-Pagers/
  • Stakeholder Management: 02-Methods-and-Tools/2.4-Communication/2.4.7-Stakeholder-Management/
  • Saying No: 02-Methods-and-Tools/2.4-Communication/2.4.6-Saying-No/
  • Politics & organization survival: use the politics-coach skill with 01-Company-Context/1.1-Stakeholder-Avatars/ (person-level avatars) and 01-Company-Context/1.2-Organization-Survival/ (system-level politics: power map, alliances, red flags) when stakeholder problems are clearly political, not just about message shape.

Typical File Patterns

Most framework folders follow this structure:

  • 1-*-framework.md - Guide explaining the framework
  • 2-*-template.md - Template to fill out
  • 3-*-evaluation.md - Assessment criteria

Braindumping Workflow

When a user wants to work on something or is thinking/braindumping (the agent is in product_sense): apply the golden rule from PRODUCT-SENSE-RULES.md (braindump before structure), including the "braindump sufficient" checklist. Use prompts from 02-Methods-and-Tools/2.0-Foundations/2.0.1-Mental-Models/6-Product-Sense-Development/2-product-sense-prompts.md for the relevant context (PRD, prioritization, strategy, research, stuck).

  1. Listen and probe

- Ask if the user has added (or should add) relevant context from 01-Company-Context/, 03-Research-Artifacts/, or 04-Initiatives/; having it in the conversation speeds up thinking. - What's the core problem or opportunity? - What stage are they at? (ideation, validation, building, shipping) - What constraints exist?

  1. Guide exploration (do not suggest templates yet)

- Use prompts from 2-product-sense-prompts.md to surface assumptions and blind spots - Ask clarifying questions from the relevant framework - Help organize scattered thoughts only after raw thinking is out

  1. Suggest framework (only after braindump / when leaving product_sense into execution_mode)

- Match their need to the right framework location - Show the framework guide first (1-*-framework.md) - Only then point to the template (2-*-template.md)

Modes & evals

  • product_sense → braindump, prompts, no framework until sufficient. execution_mode → structure + framework/template (or template-finder path). meta_reflection → after substantial conversations: suggest 00-Meta/ (log, forecast, learning), optionally Level 2 checklist (.cursor/evals/), and rule updates (.cursor/rules/thinking.mdc). Full routing and states: ORCHESTRATION.md.
  • Signal mode transitions in natural language when switching (per AGENTS.md and ORCHESTRATION.md); e.g. "We've got enough to structure this—here's the framework that fits…"
  • Evals are a separate workflow, not a conversation mode: Level 1 (artifact quality) lives in 02-Methods-and-Tools/ and the agent uses Quick Quality Checks per .cursor/rules/evaluation-orchestration.mdc when creating supported frameworks; Level 2 (agent behavior) lives in .cursor/evals/. See ORCHESTRATION.md → Eval Checkpoints. You may suggest the Level 2 checklist in meta_reflection; the user runs evals when they choose.

Common Scenarios

"I have an idea"

→ Start with Discovery (use discovery-research skill):

  • Problem-Solution Space to separate problem from solution
  • Jobs-to-be-Done to understand user needs
  • Opportunity Assessment to evaluate viability

"I need to prioritize features"

→ Go to Strategy (use strategy-planning skill):

  • Prioritization frameworks (RICE, Value/Effort, MoSCoW)
  • Strategic Foundations for alignment with goals

"I need to write a PRD"

→ Check in Execution:

  • Before touching templates, ask 2–3 lightweight preflight questions (why this/why now, know vs guess, who it’s for) and a context/memory check, for example:

- "Why this, why now?" - "What do you already know vs what are you guessing?" - "Who is this primarily for to read and approve?" - "Do you want to anchor this in any existing strategy/initiative/research, or keep this PRD self-contained for now?"

  • PRD templates and guides
  • User Stories for requirements
  • Metrics for success criteria

"How do I convince stakeholders?"

→ Look in Communication (use stakeholder-management skill; add politics-coach when dynamics are clearly political):

  • One-Pagers for executive summaries
  • Stakeholder Management strategies
  • Saying No frameworks for managing requests

"I'm stuck / not sure how to think about this"

→ Start with Foundations:

  • Mental Models for frameworks
  • Bias awareness for blind spots
  • Self-Reflection for clarity

"I'm overwhelmed with requests"

→ Treat this as an overwhelm / paralysis case:

  • First, acknowledge the feeling and keep cognitive load low.
  • Ask at most 1–2 gentle questions to narrow, for example: "What’s one thing that, if you made a bit of progress on it this week, would make you feel less stuck?"
  • Help the user choose a tiny, concrete next step (e.g. "open the first onboarding email and jot 3 bullets on what feels off") instead of introducing mini‑frameworks.
  • Make explicit that they choose: "You choose the smallest step that feels doable; I’ll help you shape it."

"Am I improving? / How do I track my judgment?"

→ Point to 00-Meta:

  • Product Judgment Test: 00-Meta/0.3-Product-Judgment-Test/ – log forecasts (prediction + confidence %) *before* shipping, resolve when data is in, track Weighted Brier Score for calibration
  • Learning log and growth portfolio: 00-Meta/0.1-Learning-Log/, 00-Meta/0.2-Growth-Portfolio/

Response Guidelines

  1. Always cite source paths - e.g., "From 02-Methods-and-Tools/2.3-Execution/2.3.4-PRD/2-prd-template.md"
  2. Read files before suggesting - Don't guess what's in a framework; read it first
  3. Think → Structure → Template - Never jump straight to templates
  4. Follow the flow - Respect the natural progression (Foundations → Strategy → Discovery → Execution → Communication)
  5. Cross-reference related frameworks - PMs benefit from connecting concepts
  6. Be actionable - Point to specific next steps, not just information

Storage Locations

  • Personal practice & evidence: 00-Meta/ (daily log, learning log, growth portfolio, Product Judgment Test)
  • Company context: 01-Company-Context/
  • Methods & frameworks: 02-Methods-and-Tools/
  • Research artifacts: 03-Research-Artifacts/
  • Active initiatives: 04-Initiatives/

Example Interactions

User: "I want to assess if we should build a new feature" Response:

  1. Ask: What problem does it solve? For whom?
  2. Guide to: 2.2-Discovery/2.2.4-Opportunity-Assessment/
  3. Read framework guide first, then suggest template
  4. Cross-reference: Problem-Solution Space, JTBD

User: "Help me write a PRD" Response:

  1. Before template, ask: What have you learned from discovery? What metrics matter?
  2. Point to: 2.3-Execution/2.3.4-PRD/
  3. Also reference: User Stories, Personas, Metrics

User: "I'm overwhelmed with requests" Response:

  1. Explore the situation
  2. Point to: 2.4-Communication/2.4.6-Saying-No/
  3. Cross-reference: Prioritization frameworks, Stakeholder Management

Notes

  • This repository is git-versioned - changes are tracked
  • Templates are starting points, not rigid requirements
  • Frameworks are tools for thinking, not bureaucracy
  • The best PMs adapt frameworks to their context

平台分布

Codex

35.36%
按下载量换算34

Claude

31.73%
按下载量换算30

Cursor

19.5%
按下载量换算19

Gemini CLI

10.17%
按下载量换算10

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills