Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

plot-release(剧情发布)

plot-release 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

plot-release 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 58,684。

总安装 408周安装 17GitHub Stars 2下载 136核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:plot-release(剧情发布)
来源仓库:https://github.com/eins78/skills
仓库路径:skills/plot-release
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/eins78/skills --skill plot-release
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/eins78/skills --skill plot-release

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

plot-release 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词或任务场景快速定位候选结果时使用。它适用于信息收集、线索整理和初步筛选等研究检索类任务,可帮助 Agent 快速缩小范围并生成候选列表。

通过关键词、来源仓库或任务上下文触发,返回结构化结果供进一步分析或人工复核。安装命令为 npx skills add https://github.com/eins78/skills --skill plot-release,需确认权限与网络访问能力。

使用前应检查维护状态,避免依赖过期或不可靠的外部数据源,确保操作符合最小权限原则。

来源仓库内路径:skills/plot-release

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/eins78/skills --skill plot-release;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

plot-release 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/eins78/skills --skill plot-release。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

plot-release 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

plot-release 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

plot-release 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

plot-release 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 408 次,近一周安装 17 次,下载 136 次,GitHub 2 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

plot-release 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
plot-release

剧情发布 · 本页

4082只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Plot: Cut a Release

Create a versioned release from delivered plans. This workflow can be run manually (using git and forge CLI), by an AI agent interpreting this skill, or via a workflow script (once available).

Input: $ARGUMENTS is optional. Can be:

  • rc — cut a release candidate tag and generate a verification checklist
  • A version number (e.g., 1.2.0) or bump type (major, minor, patch) — cut the final release

Examples: /plot-release rc, /plot-release minor, /plot-release 1.2.0

Setup

Add a ## Plot Config section to the adopting project's CLAUDE.md:

## Plot Config
- **Project board:** <your-project-name> (#<number>)  <!-- optional, for `gh pr edit --add-project` -->
- **Branch prefixes:** idea/, feature/, bug/, docs/, infra/
- **Plan directory:** docs/plans/
- **Active index:** docs/plans/active/
- **Delivered index:** docs/plans/delivered/

Model Guidance

StepsMin. TierNotes
1. Determine VersionMidHeuristic: plan types → bump suggestion
2A. RC PathSmallGit tag, template generation
2B. Release NotesMidDiscovery logic, changelog collection
3. Cross-check NotesFrontier (orchestrator) + Small (subagents)Orchestrator compares; small subagents can gather commit messages and plan changelogs in parallel
4-6. Next Steps through SummarySmallTemplate list, no-ops, formatting

1. Determine Version

Check for the latest git tag:

git tag --sort=-v:refname | head -1

If $ARGUMENTS is rc:

  • Determine the target version (same rules as below — check delivered plans, suggest bump type)
  • Check for existing RC tags for this version: git tag --list "v<version>-rc.*"
  • Next RC number: if no existing RCs, use rc.1; otherwise increment
  • Proceed to step 2A (RC path)

If $ARGUMENTS specifies a version (e.g., 1.2.0):

  • Use it directly (validate it's valid semver)
  • Proceed to step 2B (final release path)

If $ARGUMENTS specifies a bump type (major, minor, patch):

  • Calculate the new version from the latest tag
  • Proceed to step 2B (final release path)

If $ARGUMENTS is empty:

  • Check if there's an open RC checklist (docs/releases/v*-checklist.md) with all items checked
  • If yes: propose cutting the final release for that version
  • If no: look at delivered plans since the last release to suggest a bump type:

- Any features → suggest minor - Only bug fixes → suggest patch - Breaking changes noted in changelogs → suggest major

  • If unable to determine bump type from plan metadata, ask the user to specify the version directly
  • Propose the version and confirm with the user
Smaller models: Skip the automatic bump type suggestion. Instead, list the delivered plans with their types and ask the user: "What version should this release be? (major/minor/patch or exact version)" Let the human decide.

2A. RC Path — Cut Release Candidate

Tag the RC:

git tag -a v<version>-rc.<n> -m "Release candidate v<version>-rc.<n>"
git push origin v<version>-rc.<n>

Generate verification checklist:

Collect all delivered plans since the last release (via docs/plans/delivered/ — check the Delivered date in each plan's Status section against the last release tag date). For each delivered feature or bug plan, extract the ## Changelog section and create a checklist item. If a plan has a Sprint: <name> field, include the sprint name alongside the checklist item for context. Sprint completion is informational — it does not block the release.

mkdir -p docs/releases

Write docs/releases/v<version>-checklist.md:

# Release Checklist — v<version>

RC: v<version>-rc.<n> (YYYY-MM-DD)

## Verification

- [ ] <feature/bug slug> — <changelog summary>
- [ ] <feature/bug slug> — <changelog summary>

## Automated Tests

- [ ] CI passes on RC tag

## Sign-off

- [ ] All items verified by: ___
- [ ] Final release approved by: ___
git add docs/releases/v<version>-checklist.md
git commit -m "release: v<version>-rc.<n> checklist"
git push

Summary (RC):

  • RC tag: v<version>-rc.<n>
  • Checklist: docs/releases/v<version>-checklist.md
  • Plans included: list of slugs
  • Progress: [] Draft > [] Approved > [x] Delivered > [*] Released (RC)
  • Suggested next actions:

1. Test against the checklist items 2. If bugs found: fix via bug/ branches, merge, then /plot-release rc for next RC 3. When all items pass: /plot-release to cut the final release

2B. Final Release Path — Generate Release Notes

Check for project-specific release note tooling, then either run it or fall back to manual collection.

Discover tooling — check in this order:

  1. Changesets: Does .changeset/config.json exist? If so, the project uses @changesets/cli.
  2. Project rules: Read CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md for release note instructions (e.g., custom scripts, specific commands).
  3. Custom scripts: Check package.json for release-related scripts (e.g., release, version, changelog).

If tooling is found: remind the user to run it (e.g., pnpm exec changeset version for changesets). Do not run release tooling automatically — the user controls when and how versions are bumped. Then proceed to step 3 (cross-check).

If no tooling is found: collect changelog entries from delivered plans and present them to the user:

# Get the date of the last release tag (exclude RC tags)
LAST_TAG=$(git tag --sort=-v:refname | grep -v '\-rc\.' | head -1)
if [ -n "$LAST_TAG" ]; then
  LAST_RELEASE_DATE=$(git log -1 --format=%ai "$LAST_TAG" | cut -d' ' -f1)
else
  LAST_RELEASE_DATE="1970-01-01"
fi

# Find delivered plans newer than the last release
ls docs/plans/delivered/ 2>/dev/null

For each delivered plan since the last release:

  1. Read the ## Changelog section
  2. Read the ## Status section for the Type (feature/bug/docs/infra)
  3. Collect the changelog entries

Only include feature and bug plans in the release notes (docs/infra are live when merged — they don't need release).

Present the collected entries to the user and suggest they add them to CHANGELOG.md. Do not write to CHANGELOG.md directly.

3. Cross-check Release Notes

Model tiers for this step: - Frontier (e.g., Opus): Full cross-check — compare changelog entries against delivered plans and commit messages. Can delegate data gathering (reading plans, collecting commit messages) to small subagents. Flag significant gaps (missing features, phantom entries). Don't nitpick wording. - Mid (e.g., Sonnet): Compare changelog entry count against delivered plan count. Can delegate plan reading to small subagents. Flag obvious mismatches (plan with no corresponding entry, entry with no corresponding plan). Skip semantic content comparison. - Small (e.g., Haiku): Skip gap detection. Present the generated release notes and ask: "Do these release notes look complete?" Human review is the final gate.

Whether generated by tooling or manually constructed, compare the changelog against the actual work:

  1. Collect the list of delivered plans and commit messages since the last tag
  2. Compare against the generated changelog entries
  3. Only flag significant gaps or errors — e.g., a delivered feature completely missing from the changelog, or a changelog entry that doesn't match any actual work
  4. Don't nitpick wording or minor omissions — offer improvements only if there are clear, meaningful gaps
  5. If gaps are found, show them to the user and ask whether to fix before proceeding

This cross-check is the primary value of /plot-release — verifying that release notes accurately reflect delivered work.

4. Recommended Next Steps

Present a numbered list of actions for the user to confirm:

  1. Update CHANGELOG.md with the collected entries (if not already done by tooling)
  2. Bump version in package.json (if applicable): pnpm version <version> --no-git-tag-version
  3. Commit: git commit -am "release: v<version>"
  4. Tag: git tag -a v<version> -m "Release v<version>"
  5. Push: git push origin main && git push origin v<version>

Offer to execute these steps only if the user confirms. Do not run them automatically.

5. Clean Up RC Artifacts

If RC tags exist for this version, they remain in git history (don't delete them — they're part of the release record). The checklist file at docs/releases/v<version>-checklist.md stays committed as documentation of what was verified.

6. Summary

Print:

  • Version: v<version>
  • Plans included:

- <slug> — - <slug> —

  • Cross-check result: complete / gaps found
  • RC iterations: (if any)
  • Progress: [] Draft > [] Approved > [] Delivered > [x] Released
  • Status: what remains to be done (version bump, tag, push, etc.)
  • Suggested next actions:

1. If version bump/tag/push still needed: follow the steps from step 4 2. Run /plot to verify clean state 3. Start next cycle: /plot-idea or /plot-sprint

平台分布

Codex

36.84%
按下载量换算50

Claude

32.72%
按下载量换算44

Cursor

16.96%
按下载量换算23

Gemini CLI

8.83%
按下载量换算12

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills