Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 效率

plc-skill(PLC 技能)

plc-skill 用于补充效率相关能力,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要让 Agent 承接效率相关任务时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

plc-skill 是效率类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在效率类的 21,003 个 Skill 里排第 11,104。

总安装 4,774周安装 195GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,529核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:plc-skill(PLC 技能)
来源仓库:https://github.com/migo-ovo/plc-skill
安装命令:
openclaw skills install plc-skill
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install plc-skill

这个 Skill 是做什么的

效率类 Skill 把重复的整理、汇总、转换工作交给助手完成,减少手工复制粘贴。

提供 IEC 61131-3 标准的 PLC 开发、调试与故障排除支持。适用于工业自动化项目中代码审查、重构或参数优化。可解释梯形图、函数块等逻辑,辅助现场工程师快速定位问题。需确认目标 PLC 型号与固件版本兼容性。plc-skill 属于效率类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

建议在仿真环境中验证修改,避免影响实际产线运行。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install plc-skill;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

plc-skill 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install plc-skill。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

plc-skill 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

plc-skill 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

plc-skill 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

plc-skill 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 4,774 次,近一周安装 195 次,下载 1,529 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

plc-skill 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理效率类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

效率类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
github

GitHub 代码协作 · OpenClaw

7,632,918545需要联网MIT-0通过
nano-pdf

Nano PDF 文档 · OpenClaw

4,249,476231需要联网MIT-0通过
auto-updater

自动更新程序 · OpenClaw

2,964,063386操作浏览器MIT-0通过
video-frames

视频帧 · OpenClaw

2,621,304112需要联网MIT-0通过
gemini

Gemini 助手 · OpenClaw

2,547,39648需要联网MIT-0有提醒
plc-skill

PLC 技能 · 本页

4,774—需要联网MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
plc-skill
description
General PLC development, explanation, review, refactoring, debugging, and troubleshooting skill across IEC 61131-3 style industrial control work. Use when the request involves PLC logic, sequence control, state machines, alarms, interlocks, timers, counters, I/O mapping, Structured Text (ST), Ladder Diagram (LD), Function Block Diagram (FBD), Sequential Function Chart (SFC), program structure, code review, maintainability, or commissioning/debugging. Route through the common PLC layer first, then prefer the matching vendor path when the user mentions Mitsubishi, Siemens, Omron, Allen-Bradley/Rockwell, Schneider, Delta, Keyence, Panasonic, Beckhoff, or Codesys ecosystems, software, CPU families, device models, or vendor-specific terminology. Do not prefer this skill for generic electronics, pure wiring-only work without logic context, broad industrial networking without control-program context, or high-confidence safety conclusions without confirmed field conditions.
metadata

PLC Skill

Treat this as a general PLC skill with explicit vendor routing, not as a vague all-brands encyclopedia.

Work in two layers:

  1. Common PLC layer
  2. Vendor-specific layer when the platform is identifiable

Always keep these layers separate.

Operating model

First decide whether the request is actually a PLC/programming task.

Then classify it as one of:

  • common PLC question with no confirmed vendor
  • vendor-specific PLC question
  • mixed / ambiguous vendor question
  • out-of-scope non-PLC question

If the vendor is known, use the matching vendor references first for environment, terminology, program organization, instruction semantics, and tooling behavior.

If the vendor is unknown, answer from the common PLC layer first and explicitly mark which details depend on vendor, model, software, or language.

If the user mixes multiple vendor ecosystems or terms, point out the likely mismatch instead of silently merging them.

Core boundaries

This skill covers:

  • PLC logic design
  • sequence / state-machine / step control
  • alarms, latches, resets, interlocks
  • timers, counters, edge-triggered behavior
  • I/O mapping strategy
  • program organization and modularity
  • debugging and troubleshooting
  • code review and refactoring
  • IEC 61131-3 language-level reasoning
  • ST / LD / FBD / SFC common concepts
  • vendor-specific routing when the platform is known

This skill does not default to:

  • generic electronics or PCB work
  • pure wiring-only installation answers without control logic context
  • broad industrial networking coverage with no PLC-program relevance
  • SIL/PL/safety certification conclusions without confirmed field context
  • pretending that one vendor's terminology or syntax applies to all vendors

Read order

Start with:

  • references/skill-architecture.md
  • references/common/scope-and-trigger-rules.md
  • references/common/task-router.md
  • references/common/knowledge-priority.md
  • references/vendors/vendor-routing.md
  • templates/common/template-map.md

Then load only the narrowest files needed.

Common layer responsibilities

Use the common layer for:

  • IEC 61131-3 framing and language-level concepts
  • sequence, state, alarm, interlock, reset, ownership, and scan-cycle reasoning
  • engineering structure and maintainability guidance
  • generic debugging, review, and completeness handling
  • common templates, checklists, and response format

Read from references/common/ and templates/common/ first when the vendor is unknown.

Vendor layer responsibilities

Use a vendor layer for:

  • vendor software environment and engineering workflow
  • vendor terminology and model-family cues
  • vendor-specific instruction, device, memory, or tag conventions
  • project organization norms for that platform
  • debugging behavior and common platform pitfalls
  • official manual routing and evidence preference for that ecosystem

Current deepest vendor module:

  • Mitsubishi: mature and preferred when Mitsubishi / MELSEC / GX Works / FX / Q / iQ-F / iQ-R cues are present

Prepared expansion modules:

  • Siemens
  • Omron
  • Rockwell / Allen-Bradley
  • Schneider
  • Delta
  • Keyence
  • Panasonic
  • Beckhoff
  • Codesys

Evidence priority

Use evidence in this order:

  1. Bundled common references for PLC-generic engineering rules
  2. Bundled vendor references for the identified platform
  3. Vendor official manuals / official software docs
  4. IEC 61131-3 and PLCopen material
  5. Bundled templates and examples
  6. Community material as low-priority supplement

If the answer depends on vendor-specific behavior and the vendor is not confirmed, say so.

Response rules

Always:

  • separate confirmed facts from assumptions
  • say when implementation details depend on vendor/model/software
  • prefer modular, reviewable outputs over giant code dumps
  • use templates/checklists when inputs are incomplete
  • stay conservative in safety-relevant topics

Reference map

Common:

  • references/common/scope-and-trigger-rules.md
  • references/common/task-router.md
  • references/common/knowledge-priority.md
  • references/common/query-to-doc-routing.md
  • references/common/glossary.md
  • references/common/plcopen-and-iec-notes.md
  • references/common/st-style-guide.md
  • references/common/st-output-style.md
  • references/common/program-templates.md
  • references/common/alarm-and-interlock-patterns.md
  • references/common/scan-cycle-and-output-ownership.md
  • references/common/debugging-and-review.md
  • references/common/debugging-checklists.md
  • references/common/code-review-checklists.md
  • references/common/input-completeness-rules.md
  • references/common/response-fallback-rules.md
  • references/common/output-format.md
  • references/common/safety-boundaries.md
  • references/common/ide-integration-formats.md
  • references/common/hmi-interface-patterns.md
  • references/common/hardware-abstraction-mapping.md
  • references/common/vendor-pitfalls-and-pro-tips.md
  • references/common/version-control-and-code-review.md

Routing:

  • references/skill-architecture.md
  • references/vendors/vendor-routing.md
  • references/vendors/vendor-module-map.md
  • references/vendors/vendor-recognition-signals.md

Mitsubishi:

  • references/vendors/mitsubishi/mitsubishi-overview.md
  • references/vendors/mitsubishi/mitsubishi-fx3u-rules.md
  • references/vendors/mitsubishi/fx3u-focus.md
  • references/vendors/mitsubishi/fx3u-device-and-instruction-notes.md
  • references/vendors/mitsubishi/gxworks2-structured-project.md
  • references/vendors/mitsubishi/gxworks2-structured-project-deep-notes.md
  • references/vendors/mitsubishi/gxworks2-project-review-patterns.md
  • references/vendors/mitsubishi/official-doc-index.md

Mature vendor modules:

Siemens:

  • references/vendors/siemens/siemens-overview.md
  • references/vendors/siemens/siemens-s7-1200-1500-rules.md
  • references/vendors/siemens/siemens-st-programming-guide.md
  • references/vendors/siemens/official-doc-index.md

Rockwell / Allen-Bradley:

  • references/vendors/rockwell/rockwell-overview.md
  • references/vendors/rockwell/rockwell-logix-rules.md
  • references/vendors/rockwell/rockwell-st-programming-guide.md
  • references/vendors/rockwell/official-doc-index.md

Omron:

  • references/vendors/omron/omron-overview.md
  • references/vendors/omron/omron-nj-nx-rules.md
  • references/vendors/omron/official-doc-index.md

Schneider:

  • references/vendors/schneider/schneider-overview.md
  • references/vendors/schneider/schneider-modicon-rules.md
  • references/vendors/schneider/official-doc-index.md

Beckhoff:

  • references/vendors/beckhoff/beckhoff-overview.md
  • references/vendors/beckhoff/beckhoff-twincat-rules.md
  • references/vendors/beckhoff/official-doc-index.md

Codesys:

  • references/vendors/codesys/codesys-overview.md
  • references/vendors/codesys/codesys-v3-rules.md
  • references/vendors/codesys/official-doc-index.md

Delta:

  • references/vendors/delta/delta-overview.md
  • references/vendors/delta/delta-dvp-rules.md
  • references/vendors/delta/official-doc-index.md

Keyence:

  • references/vendors/keyence/keyence-overview.md
  • references/vendors/keyence/keyence-kv-rules.md
  • references/vendors/keyence/official-doc-index.md

Panasonic:

  • references/vendors/panasonic/panasonic-overview.md
  • references/vendors/panasonic/panasonic-fpwin-rules.md
  • references/vendors/panasonic/official-doc-index.md

平台分布

OpenClaw

86.96%
按下载量换算1,330

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills