Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

playwright-form-validation(Playwright form validation 搜索)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

playwright-form-validation 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 69,522。

总安装 218周安装 9GitHub Stars 1下载 71核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:playwright-form-validation(Playwright form validation 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/dawiddutoit/custom-claude
仓库路径:skills/playwright-form-validation
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/dawiddutoit/custom-claude --skill playwright-form-validation
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/dawiddutoit/custom-claude --skill playwright-form-validation

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。适合编写单元测试、端到端测试或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免误改逻辑。涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

playwright-form-validation 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/playwright-form-validation

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/dawiddutoit/custom-claude --skill playwright-f…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

playwright-form-validation 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/dawiddutoit/custom-claude --skill playwright-form-valida…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

playwright-form-validation 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

playwright-form-validation 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

playwright-form-validation 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

playwright-form-validation 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 218 次,近一周安装 9 次,下载 71 次,GitHub 1 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

playwright-form-validation 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
playwright-form-validation

Playwright form validation 搜索 · 本页

2181操作浏览器未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Playwright Form Validation Tester

Automates comprehensive form validation testing by systematically submitting invalid data, capturing validation messages, and generating detailed test reports.

Quick Start

Test a login form's validation:

# User asks: "Test the validation on the login form at example.com/login"

# Skill will:
# 1. Navigate to form
# 2. Test empty email field
# 3. Test invalid email format
# 4. Test empty password field
# 5. Test valid submission
# 6. Generate report with screenshots

Output: Validation report showing all error messages, missing validations, and screenshots of each error state.

Table of Contents

  1. When to Use This Skill
  2. What This Skill Does
  3. Instructions
  4. Supporting Files
  5. Expected Outcomes
  6. Integration Points
  7. Expected Benefits
  8. Success Metrics
  9. Requirements
  10. Red Flags to Avoid
  11. Notes

When to Use This Skill

Explicit Triggers

  • "Test form validation on [URL]"
  • "Check validation errors for this form"
  • "Test invalid inputs on the signup form"
  • "Verify error messages are displayed"
  • "Run validation tests on [form]"

Implicit Triggers

  • QA testing workflows requiring form validation checks
  • Accessibility audits checking error message clarity
  • Security testing for input sanitization
  • Regression testing after form changes
  • Documentation of validation behavior

Debugging Triggers

  • "Why isn't this form showing validation errors?"
  • "Are all required fields validated?"
  • "What validation messages does this form show?"
  • "Check if email validation is working"

What This Skill Does

This skill performs systematic form validation testing:

  1. Field Discovery - Identifies all form fields and their types
  2. Empty Value Testing - Submits form with each field empty
  3. Invalid Format Testing - Tests common invalid patterns (email, phone, etc.)
  4. Boundary Testing - Tests min/max lengths and values
  5. Valid Submission - Verifies successful submission with valid data
  6. Error Capture - Screenshots and catalogs all validation messages
  7. Report Generation - Creates comprehensive validation report

Instructions

Overview

The validation testing workflow has 7 main steps:

  1. Navigate to form and capture initial state
  2. Identify all form fields and their constraints
  3. Test empty field validation for required fields
  4. Test invalid format validation (email, phone, etc.)
  5. Test boundary values (min/max lengths and values)
  6. Test valid submission to verify success path
  7. Generate comprehensive validation report

Quick Workflow Example

// 1. Navigate and snapshot
await browser_navigate({ url: "https://example.com/login" });
await browser_snapshot({ filename: "initial.md" });

// 2. Test empty email
await browser_fill_form({
  fields: [{ name: "Email", type: "textbox", ref: "ref_1", value: "" }]
});
await browser_click({ element: "Submit", ref: "ref_submit" });
await browser_take_screenshot({ filename: "empty-email.png" });

// 3. Test invalid email format
await browser_navigate({ url: "https://example.com/login" }); // Reset
await browser_fill_form({
  fields: [{ name: "Email", type: "textbox", ref: "ref_1", value: "invalid" }]
});
await browser_click({ element: "Submit", ref: "ref_submit" });
await browser_take_screenshot({ filename: "invalid-email.png" });

// 4. Test valid submission
await browser_navigate({ url: "https://example.com/login" });
await browser_fill_form({
  fields: [
    { name: "Email", type: "textbox", ref: "ref_1", value: "test@example.com" },
    { name: "Password", type: "textbox", ref: "ref_2", value: "ValidPass123!" }
  ]
});
await browser_click({ element: "Submit", ref: "ref_submit" });
await browser_take_screenshot({ filename: "success.png" });

// 5. Generate report using template

Key Testing Patterns

Empty Fields - Test each required field with empty value Invalid Formats - Test email (invalid), phone (abc), URL (not-url) Boundaries - Test min/max length ("short", "a".repeat(101)) Cross-Field - Test password mismatch, invalid date ranges Valid Data - Verify success path works

Detailed Workflow

For complete step-by-step instructions with all code examples, see:

  • references/detailed-workflow.md - Full workflow with code samples
  • references/validation-patterns.md - Field type testing patterns
  • examples/examples.md - Complete form testing examples

Supporting Files

  • references/validation-patterns.md - Common validation patterns and test cases for different field types
  • examples/examples.md - Complete validation test examples for common forms (login, signup, checkout)
  • templates/validation-report-template.md - Markdown template for validation reports
  • scripts/parse_validation_errors.py - Helper to extract validation messages from snapshots

Expected Outcomes

Successful Validation Test

✅ Form Validation Test Complete

Form: Login Form (https://example.com/login)
Fields tested: 2 (email, password)
Validations found: 4
Missing validations: 0

Results by field:

Email Field:
✅ Empty value - "Email is required"
✅ Invalid format - "Please enter a valid email address"

Password Field:
✅ Empty value - "Password is required"
✅ Too short - "Password must be at least 8 characters"

Valid submission: ✅ Success (redirected to dashboard)

Screenshots saved: 5
Report: .claude/artifacts/2025-12-20/validation-report-login-form.md

Validation Issues Found

⚠️ Form Validation Issues Detected

Form: Signup Form (https://example.com/signup)
Fields tested: 5
Validations found: 3
Missing validations: 2

Issues:

❌ Phone field - No validation for invalid format
   Tested: "abc123", "12-34" → No error message shown

❌ Age field - No validation for negative values
   Tested: "-5" → Submission accepted

Recommendations:
1. Add phone number format validation
2. Add min value constraint to age field
3. Consider adding password strength indicator

Report: .claude/artifacts/2025-12-20/validation-report-signup-form.md

Integration Points

With Quality Gates

  • Run validation tests as part of QA workflow
  • Include in pre-release testing checklist
  • Automate regression testing for form changes

With Accessibility Testing

  • Verify error messages are clear and descriptive
  • Check that errors are associated with fields (aria-describedby)
  • Validate screen reader compatibility

With Security Testing

  • Verify input sanitization on client side
  • Check for XSS vulnerabilities in error messages
  • Test SQL injection patterns in text fields

With Documentation

  • Auto-generate validation documentation from reports
  • Create field reference guides with validation rules
  • Document error message copy for style guides

Expected Benefits

MetricBeforeAfterImprovement
Time to test form30 min (manual)2 min (automated)93% reduction
Test coverage40% (spot checks)100% (systematic)2.5x increase
Bugs found2-3 (missed edge cases)8-10 (comprehensive)3x increase
DocumentationNone → Screenshots + reportManual notes → Auto-generatedConsistent
Regression testingRarely doneAutomatedReliable

Success Metrics

A validation test is successful when:

✅ All form fields identified and cataloged ✅ Empty value validation tested for required fields ✅ Invalid format validation tested for typed fields (email, phone, etc.) ✅ Boundary values tested for constrained fields (min/max) ✅ Valid submission verified with success confirmation ✅ All validation messages captured and documented ✅ Screenshots saved for each error state ✅ Validation report generated with findings ✅ Missing validations identified and reported ✅ Recommendations provided for improvements

Requirements

Browser Automation:

  • Playwright MCP server configured
  • Browser installed via mcp__playwright__browser_install
  • Active browser session

Tools:

  • mcp__playwright__browser_navigate - Navigate to form URL
  • mcp__playwright__browser_snapshot - Capture form structure and errors
  • mcp__playwright__browser_fill_form - Fill field values
  • mcp__playwright__browser_click - Submit form
  • mcp__playwright__browser_wait_for - Wait for validation to appear
  • mcp__playwright__browser_take_screenshot - Capture error states
  • Write - Generate validation report
  • Read - Parse snapshots for validation messages

Knowledge:

  • Common validation patterns (email, phone, URL, etc.)
  • HTML form field types and attributes
  • Validation message extraction from snapshots
  • Markdown report formatting

Environment:

  • .claude/artifacts/{YYYY-MM-DD}/ directory for reports
  • Write permissions for screenshots

Red Flags to Avoid

Common mistakes when testing form validation:

  • Not waiting for validation - Click submit and immediately capture without waiting for messages
  • Testing only one field - Missing comprehensive coverage of all fields
  • Ignoring field types - Using same invalid pattern for all fields
  • Not testing boundaries - Missing min/max length and value constraints
  • Skipping valid submission - Not verifying success path works
  • Missing screenshots - Not capturing visual proof of error states
  • Incomplete report - Not documenting all findings systematically
  • Not clearing previous values - Leaving field values from previous tests
  • Ignoring client-side vs server-side - Not distinguishing validation types
  • Not checking accessibility - Missing aria-invalid, aria-describedby attributes

Notes

Best Practices:

  1. Test systematically - One field at a time, one validation at a time
  2. Clear between tests - Reset form to clean state before each test
  3. Wait appropriately - Give validation time to appear (1-2 seconds)
  4. Capture everything - Screenshot + snapshot for each error state
  5. Document clearly - Use descriptive filenames and report sections

Validation Types to Test:

  • Required field - Empty value submission
  • Format validation - Email, phone, URL, date patterns
  • Length constraints - Min/max character limits
  • Value constraints - Min/max numeric values
  • Pattern matching - Regex validation (password strength, username format)
  • Cross-field validation - Password confirmation, date ranges
  • Custom business rules - Age restrictions, allowed domains

Common Validation Messages:

  • "This field is required"
  • "Please enter a valid email address"
  • "Password must be at least 8 characters"
  • "Please enter a valid phone number"
  • "Value must be between X and Y"

Report Organization:

  • Save all artifacts to dated directory: .claude/artifacts/{YYYY-MM-DD}/
  • Use consistent naming: validation-{testname}-{fieldname}.png
  • Include all screenshots in report with relative paths
  • Provide actionable recommendations, not just findings

Progressive Disclosure:

  • For simple forms (2-3 fields), include full results inline
  • For complex forms (10+ fields), reference detailed results in report file
  • Always provide summary statistics up front
  • Link to screenshots rather than embedding them in conversation

平台分布

Codex

34.25%
按下载量换算24

Claude

28.76%
按下载量换算20

Cursor

18.95%
按下载量换算13

Gemini CLI

8.25%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills