Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

task-management(任务管理)

task-management 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

task-management 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 14,593。

总安装 682周安装 29GitHub Stars 1下载 239核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:task-management(任务管理)
来源仓库:https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents
仓库路径:skills/task-management
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents --skill task-management
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents --skill task-management

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

task-management 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合围绕仓库状态和代码变更进行整理。适用于任务管理和协作事项的处理,可结合代码变更事项使用。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需确认权限范围和维护状态。

安装前建议确认是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写等操作边界。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/task-management

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents --skill task-…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

task-management 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents --skill task-management。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

task-management 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

task-management 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

task-management 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

task-management 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 682 次,近一周安装 29 次,下载 239 次,GitHub 1 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

task-management 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
task-management

任务管理 · 本页

6821需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Task Management

Overview

Task management converts approved plans into bite-sized, trackable tasks and orchestrates their execution with progress reporting and checkpoint reviews. Each task is a single action that takes 2-5 minutes. The skill provides structured progress tracking, regular checkpoints, and integration with code review to maintain quality throughout execution.

Announce at start: "I'm using the task-management skill to break this plan into tracked tasks."

Trigger Conditions

  • An approved plan document needs to be converted into executable tasks
  • Multi-step implementation needs structured progress tracking
  • Work needs checkpoint reviews at regular intervals
  • /execute command used with a plan that needs task breakdown
  • Transition from planning skill with an approved plan

Phase 1: Plan Parsing

Goal: Extract all tasks from the approved plan with correct ordering and dependencies.

  1. Read the approved plan document from start to finish
  2. Extract every implementation step as a discrete task
  3. Identify dependencies between tasks (what must complete first)
  4. Order tasks by dependency — independent tasks first
  5. Confirm task list with the user before beginning execution

Task Granularity Rules

GranularityExampleVerdict
Single action, 2-5 min"Write the failing test for UserService.create"Correct
Single action, 2-5 min"Run the test to verify it fails"Correct
Single action, 2-5 min"Implement the minimal code to pass the test"Correct
Multiple actions, 30+ min"Implement the authentication system"Too large — decompose
Trivial, < 1 min"Add a blank line"Too small — merge with adjacent task

Task Specification Template

Task N: [Clear, specific description]
Files: [Exact paths to create/modify/test]
Depends on: [Task numbers that must complete first, or "none"]
Verification: [Exact command to confirm completion]

STOP — Do NOT proceed to Phase 2 until:

  • Every plan step has been converted to 2-5 minute tasks
  • Dependencies are mapped (no circular dependencies)
  • Every task has a verification command
  • Task list is confirmed with user

Phase 2: Task Execution

Goal: Execute tasks one at a time with verification after each.

Per-Task Workflow

  1. Announce — Report which task is starting: [N/Total] Starting: <description>
  2. Set status — Mark task as in_progress
  3. Execute — Perform the task (follow TDD if writing code)
  4. Verify — Run the verification command
  5. Read output — Confirm verification matches success criteria
  6. Report — Show completion: [N/Total] Completed: <description>
  7. Set status — Mark task as completed

Execution Rules

RuleRationale
One task at a timePrevents context switching errors
Verify before marking completeNo false completions
Read verification output fullyDo not assume success from partial output
Follow TDD for code tasksRED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle
Do not skip aheadDependencies may not be satisfied

Task Status Flow

pending → in_progress → completed
                     → blocked (needs user input)
                     → failed (invoke resilient-execution)

Status Decision Table

OutcomeNew StatusAction
Verification passescompletedProceed to next task
Verification fails, fixablein_progressFix and re-verify
Verification fails, unclear causefailedInvoke resilient-execution skill
Needs user decisionblockedReport blocker, pause task
Task depends on blocked taskpendingSkip to next non-blocked task

Do NOT proceed to next task until current task verification passes.


Phase 3: Checkpoint Review

Goal: Pause every 3 tasks to assess progress and quality.

Checkpoint Trigger Table

ConditionAction
3 tasks completed since last checkpointMandatory checkpoint
Logical batch complete (e.g., one component)Checkpoint recommended
Test failure encounteredImmediate checkpoint
User requests statusAd-hoc checkpoint

Checkpoint Steps

  1. Show progress summary
  2. Run full test suite (not just new tests)
  3. Run lint, type-check, build as applicable
  4. Dispatch code-review skill if significant code was written
  5. Ask user if direction is still correct

Progress Report Format

After each task:

[3/15] Task completed: Write failing test for UserService.create
       Files: tests/services/user.test.ts
       Verification: npm test -- --grep "UserService.create" — PASS

After each checkpoint:

── Checkpoint [6/15] ──
Completed: 6 | Remaining: 9 | Blocked: 0
Tests: 12 passing, 0 failing
Lint: clean | Build: passing
Next batch: Tasks 7-9 (API endpoint implementation)
Continue? [yes / adjust plan / stop here]

STOP — Do NOT proceed to next batch until:

  • Full test suite passes
  • Checkpoint report presented to user
  • User has confirmed to continue

Phase 4: Batch Review

Goal: After completing a logical group of tasks, perform quality review.

  1. Dispatch code-reviewer agent to review the batch
  2. Fix any Critical or Important issues before proceeding
  3. Commit the batch with a descriptive conventional commit message
  4. Update the plan document with completed status

Review Issue Handling

SeverityActionContinue?
CriticalMust fix immediatelyNo — fix first
ImportantShould fix before next batchConditional — user decides
SuggestionNote for futureYes — proceed

STOP — Do NOT start next batch until:

  • Review issues at Critical severity are resolved
  • Batch is committed
  • Plan document is updated

Phase 5: Completion

Goal: Verify all tasks are done and report final status.

  1. Confirm all tasks have completed status
  2. Run final full test suite
  3. Run all verification commands
  4. Present final summary to user
  5. Invoke verification-before-completion skill

Final Summary Format

── FINAL SUMMARY ──
Total tasks: 15 | Completed: 15 | Failed: 0
Tests: 42 passing, 0 failing
Build: passing | Lint: clean
Commits: 5 (conventional format)

All tasks from plan docs/plans/2026-03-15-feature.md are complete.
Verification-before-completion: PASS

Anti-Patterns / Common Mistakes

Anti-PatternWhy It FailsCorrect Approach
Marking complete without verificationFalse progress, bugs accumulateRun verification command, read output
Tasks larger than 5 minutesHard to track, prone to scope creepBreak into 2-5 minute tasks
Skipping checkpointsQuality degrades, direction driftsCheckpoint every 3 tasks
Running only new testsRegressions go undetectedFull test suite at checkpoints
Parallelizing dependent tasksRace conditions, merge conflictsOne task at a time unless truly independent
Proceeding past blocked tasks silentlyUser unaware of skipped workReport all blockers explicitly
Not committing at batch boundariesLarge, hard-to-review changesetsCommit after each logical batch
"It works, I'll verify later"Later never comesVerify NOW

Anti-Rationalization Guards

If you catch yourself thinking:

  • "The code looks right, I don't need to run it..." — Run it. Always.
  • "I'll batch the verifications..." — No. Verify each task individually.
  • "This task is trivial, it obviously works..." — Prove it with verification.

Integration Points

SkillRelationshipWhen
planningUpstream — provides approved planTask list source
executing-plansComplementary — handles plan execution flowCan be used together
test-driven-developmentPer-task — TDD cycle for code tasksEvery code task
verification-before-completionPer-task — verification gateBefore marking any task complete
resilient-executionOn failure — retry with alternativesWhen task verification fails
code-reviewAt checkpoints — batch quality reviewEvery 3 tasks or batch boundary
subagent-driven-developmentAlternative — parallel execution path (via Agent tool)For independent task batches
Agent toolDispatch mechanism for all subagent workWhen parallelizing independent tasks
circuit-breakerSafety net — detects stagnationWhen tasks repeatedly fail

Concrete Examples

Example: Task Extraction from Plan

Plan step: "Add user registration endpoint with validation"

Extracted tasks:

Task 1: Write failing test for POST /api/users input validation
  Files: tests/api/users.test.ts
  Depends on: none
  Verification: npm test -- --grep "POST /api/users validation" → FAIL (expected)

Task 2: Implement input validation schema
  Files: src/schemas/user.ts
  Depends on: Task 1
  Verification: npm test -- --grep "POST /api/users validation" → PASS

Task 3: Write failing test for POST /api/users success case
  Files: tests/api/users.test.ts
  Depends on: Task 2
  Verification: npm test -- --grep "POST /api/users creates user" → FAIL (expected)

Task 4: Implement registration endpoint handler
  Files: src/routes/users.ts
  Depends on: Task 3
  Verification: npm test -- --grep "POST /api/users" → ALL PASS

Task 5: Commit registration endpoint
  Files: none (git operation)
  Depends on: Task 4
  Verification: git log --oneline -1 → shows conventional commit

Example: Blocked Task Report

BLOCKED: Task 7 — Write integration test for payment webhook
Reason: Stripe test API key not configured in .env.test
Impact: Tasks 7-9 (payment flow) cannot proceed
Non-blocked tasks: Tasks 10-12 (profile page) can continue

Options:
A. User provides Stripe test key → unblocks Tasks 7-9
B. Skip payment tasks, continue with profile → revisit later
C. Mock Stripe entirely → reduces test fidelity

Awaiting direction.

Key Principles

  • One task at a time — Do not parallelize unless tasks are truly independent
  • Verify after each task — Run the verification command before marking complete
  • Checkpoint regularly — Every 3 tasks, pause and assess
  • Track everything — No task without a status
  • Small commits — Commit after each logical batch

Skill Type

RIGID — Follow this process exactly. Every task gets verified. Every 3 tasks get a checkpoint. No exceptions.

平台分布

Codex

38.47%
按下载量换算92

Claude

30.43%
按下载量换算73

Cursor

18.38%
按下载量换算44

Gemini CLI

10.47%
按下载量换算25

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills