Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

executing-plans(执行计划)

executing-plans 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

executing-plans 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 14,414。

总安装 706周安装 30GitHub Stars 1下载 247核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:executing-plans(执行计划)
来源仓库:https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents
仓库路径:skills/executing-plans
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents --skill executing-plans
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents --skill executing-plans

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

executing-plans 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合整理仓库状态和协作事项。适用于围绕代码变更、仓库状态或协作流程进行信息梳理的场景。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装并使用该技能。

安装前需确认权限范围和维护状态,注意可能触发联网或文件读写操作。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/executing-plans

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents --skill execu…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

executing-plans 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents --skill executing-plans。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

executing-plans 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

executing-plans 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

executing-plans 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

executing-plans 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 706 次,近一周安装 30 次,下载 247 次,GitHub 1 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

executing-plans 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
executing-plans

执行计划 · 本页

7061需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Executing Plans

Overview

This skill turns an approved plan document into working code through disciplined, batch-based execution. Each step is implemented with TDD, verified before proceeding, and reviewed at checkpoints. It provides the structural framework for moving from plan to production code with consistent quality gates.

Announce at start: "I'm using the executing-plans skill to implement the approved plan at [plan path]."

Trigger Conditions

  • An approved plan document exists and is ready for implementation
  • /execute command invoked with a plan reference
  • Resuming a partially completed plan execution
  • Transition from planning skill after plan approval

Phase 1: Read the Plan

Goal: Thoroughly understand the plan before writing any code.

  1. Read the entire plan document from start to finish
  2. Identify all implementation steps and count them
  3. Map dependencies between steps (what must be done first)
  4. Note any ambiguities or open questions
  5. Confirm understanding with the user before proceeding

Plan Comprehension Checklist

CheckQuestion
Goal clarityCan you explain the plan's goal in one sentence?
Step countHow many implementation steps are there?
DependenciesWhich steps depend on which?
AmbiguitiesAre there any unclear or underspecified steps?
VerificationDoes every step have a verification method?

STOP — Do NOT proceed to Phase 2 until:

  • You can explain the plan's goal in one sentence
  • You can list all implementation steps
  • Dependencies are mapped
  • Any ambiguities are noted and resolved with user
  • User has confirmed you may proceed

Phase 2: Create Task Batch

Goal: Break the plan into small, executable task batches.

Batch Size Decision Table

Task ComplexityBatch SizeExamples
Simple (config, boilerplate)Up to 5 tasksENV vars, imports, type definitions
Standard (features, logic)3 tasksEndpoints, services, components
Complex (integrations, security)2 tasksOAuth flows, payment processing
Critical (data migration, auth)1 taskDatabase migrations, credential handling

Task Requirements (STIC)

CriterionDescription
SpecificClear definition of what to implement
TestableCan be verified with automated tests
IndependentMinimal coupling to other tasks in the batch (where possible)
CompactCompletable in a focused session (2-5 minutes)

Task Template

Task: [concise description]
Plan Step: [reference to plan section]
Files to Create/Modify: [list of exact file paths]
Acceptance Criteria:
  - [specific, testable criterion 1]
  - [specific, testable criterion 2]
Dependencies: [other tasks that must be done first, or "none"]
Verification: [exact command to run]

STOP — Do NOT proceed to Phase 3 until:

  • Tasks created for the current batch
  • Each task has clear acceptance criteria
  • Dependencies are satisfied (previous tasks complete)
  • Tasks ordered by dependency (independent tasks first)

Phase 3: Execute Tasks

Goal: Execute each task one at a time using TDD.

Per-Task Workflow

1. ANNOUNCE which task you are starting
2. IMPLEMENT using test-driven-development skill:
   a. Write failing test (RED)
   b. Write minimal code to pass (GREEN)
   c. Refactor (REFACTOR)
   d. Repeat RED-GREEN-REFACTOR for each behavior
3. VERIFY using verification-before-completion skill:
   a. Run full test suite (not just new tests)
   b. Run lint, type-check, build as applicable
   c. Confirm all checks pass
4. MARK task as complete
5. PROCEED to next task

Execution Rules

RuleRationale
One task at a timeDo not start task 2 until task 1 is verified
Follow TDD strictlyNo production code without a failing test
Do not deviate from the planIf plan needs changes, stop and discuss with user
Do not skip verificationEvery task must pass verification before marking complete
Report progressAnnounce start and completion of each task

Task Outcome Decision Table

OutcomeActionNext Step
Verification passesMark completeNext task
Test failure, obvious fixFix and re-verifySame task
Test failure, unclear causeInvoke systematic-debuggingSame task after fix
Plan step is ambiguousStop and ask userWait for clarification
Plan step is not feasibleReport blockerWait for direction
Unexpected dependency foundReport and reorderAdjust batch

STOP — Do NOT proceed to next task until:

  • Current task's acceptance criteria are met
  • All tests pass (new and existing)
  • Verification-before-completion has been executed
  • Task marked as complete

Phase 4: Batch Checkpoint

Goal: After completing all tasks in a batch, perform a full checkpoint review.

Checkpoint Steps

  1. Run full test suite — all tests, not just those from the current batch
  2. Run all verification commands — lint, type-check, build, format
  3. Review what was implemented — summarize completed tasks and outcomes
  4. Assess progress against the plan — how far through are we?
  5. Identify any issues or risks that came up during execution
  6. Report to user and ask for direction

Checkpoint Report Template

BATCH CHECKPOINT
================
Batch: [N] of [estimated total]
Tasks Completed: [list]

Verification Results:
  Tests:      [X passed, Y failed, Z skipped]
  Build:      [pass/fail]
  Lint:       [pass/fail, N warnings]
  Type-check: [pass/fail]

Progress: [N of M plan steps complete] ([percentage]%)

Issues Encountered:
  - [issue 1 and how it was resolved]

Risks or Concerns:
  - [risk 1]

Next Batch Preview:
  - [task 1]
  - [task 2]
  - [task 3]

Awaiting direction: Continue with next batch / Adjust plan / Other?

STOP — Do NOT proceed to next batch until:

  • Full test suite passes
  • All verification commands pass
  • Checkpoint report presented to user
  • User has confirmed to continue

Phase 5: Continue, Adjust, or Complete

Goal: Act on user direction after each checkpoint.

Direction Decision Table

User DirectionActionNext Phase
"Continue"Create next batch of tasksPhase 2
"Adjust plan"Discuss changes, update plan documentPhase 2 (with updated plan)
"Stop here"Summarize progress, note remaining workCompletion
"Skip ahead to [step]"Verify dependencies are met, then jumpPhase 2 (at new step)
"Go back and redo [task]"Revert if needed, re-execute with correctionsPhase 3

Never proceed to the next batch without explicit user approval.


Critical Blocker Handling

When you encounter something that prevents task completion, do NOT work around it. Stop and escalate.

Blocker Classification

TypeExamplesAction
Ambiguous specPlan step could mean multiple thingsPresent interpretations, ask user
Missing dependencyRequired API or library unavailableReport with alternatives
ContradictionStep conflicts with another part of the planIdentify both sides, ask user
Security concernPlanned approach has vulnerabilityReport risk, propose safer alternative
FeasibilityStep cannot be implemented as describedExplain why, propose alternatives

Blocker Report Format

CRITICAL BLOCKER
================
Task: [which task is blocked]
Blocker: [clear description of the problem]
Impact: [what cannot proceed until this is resolved]
Options:
  A. [option with tradeoffs]
  B. [option with tradeoffs]
  C. [skip this step and continue]

Awaiting direction before proceeding.

Do NOT guess what the user intended. Do NOT implement a workaround without approval. Do NOT skip the blocked task silently. DO present options with clear tradeoffs. DO continue with non-blocked tasks if possible (but flag the skip).


Subagent Dispatch Option

For larger plans, individual tasks can be dispatched to subagents for parallel execution.

When to Suggest Subagent Dispatch

ConditionThreshold
Independent tasks in plan10+ tasks with few dependencies
Task specification qualityEach task has clear acceptance criteria
Speed requirementUser has indicated urgency
Task interdependencyLow coupling between tasks

When conditions are met, suggest switching to the subagent-driven-development skill for the remaining work.


Anti-Patterns / Common Mistakes

Anti-PatternWhy It FailsCorrect Approach
Implementing entire plan at onceNo checkpoints, no quality gatesBatch-based execution with checkpoints
Skipping TDD because "it's simple"Bugs accumulate, regressions appearEvery task uses TDD, no exceptions
Working around blockers silentlyUser unaware, wrong assumptions baked inStop and escalate blockers
Proceeding without approval after batchDirection may have changedAlways checkpoint and wait
Deviating from the planUnauthorized changes, scope creepDiscuss changes before implementing
Running only new testsRegressions go undetectedFull test suite at checkpoints
Marking tasks complete without verificationFalse progress, accumulated bugsVerification is mandatory
Batches larger than 5 tasksHard to review, too much risk per batchKeep batches small
Skipping checkpoint reportUser loses visibility into progressAlways present full checkpoint
Not committing at batch boundariesHuge diffs, hard to revertCommit after each batch

Anti-Rationalization Guards

If you catch yourself thinking:

  • "I know what comes next, I'll skip the checkpoint..." — No. Report and wait.
  • "This verification is redundant..." — Run it anyway. Fresh evidence only.
  • "The plan is close enough, I'll adjust as I go..." — Discuss adjustments first.

Subagent Dispatch Opportunities

Task PatternDispatch ToWhen
Independent plan steps with no shared stateParallel subagents via Agent toolWhen dependency analysis shows no blockers between steps
Code review of completed stepcode-reviewer agentAfter each major plan step completion
Test execution for completed featuresBackground Bash taskWhen tests can run independently of ongoing work

Follow the dispatching-parallel-agents skill protocol when dispatching.


Integration Points

SkillRelationshipWhen
planningUpstream — provides approved plan documentPlan is the input to this skill
test-driven-developmentPer-task — TDD cycle for every code taskPhase 3 execution
verification-before-completionPer-task — verification gateBefore marking any task complete
systematic-debuggingOn failure — investigate unexpected failuresWhen task encounters errors
code-reviewAt checkpoints — review code qualityPhase 4 batch review
subagent-driven-developmentAlternative — parallel execution pathFor large independent task sets
resilient-executionOn failure — retry with alternativesWhen task approaches fail
task-managementComplementary — provides task trackingCan be used together

Concrete Examples

Example: Batch Creation from Plan

Plan: "Add user authentication with JWT"

Batch 1 (3 tasks):
  Task 1: Write failing test for JWT token generation
    Files: tests/auth/jwt.test.ts
    Verification: npm test -- --grep "JWT generation" → FAIL (expected)

  Task 2: Implement JWT token generation
    Files: src/auth/jwt.ts
    Verification: npm test -- --grep "JWT generation" → PASS

  Task 3: Write failing test for auth middleware
    Files: tests/middleware/auth.test.ts
    Verification: npm test -- --grep "auth middleware" → FAIL (expected)

[CHECKPOINT after batch 1]

Batch 2 (3 tasks):
  Task 4: Implement auth middleware
  Task 5: Write failing test for login endpoint
  Task 6: Implement login endpoint

[CHECKPOINT after batch 2]

Completion Criteria

The plan execution is complete when:

  1. All plan steps have been implemented as tasks
  2. All tasks have passed verification
  3. Full test suite passes
  4. Final checkpoint report presented to user
  5. User confirms the plan is complete

Skill Type

RIGID — Follow this process exactly. Batches, checkpoints, and verification gates are non-negotiable. No task is complete without verification. No batch proceeds without user approval.

平台分布

Codex

37.81%
按下载量换算93

Claude

29.27%
按下载量换算72

Cursor

17.75%
按下载量换算44

Gemini CLI

10.04%
按下载量换算25

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills