Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

pipeline-review(管道审查)

pipeline-review 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

pipeline-review 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 7,132。

总安装 19,875周安装 804GitHub Stars 11,663下载 6,239核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:pipeline-review(管道审查)
来源仓库:https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins
仓库路径:skills/pipeline-review
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill pipeline-review
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill pipeline-review

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

pipeline-review 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位候选结果。适用于关键词搜索、任务场景匹配或来源线索梳理等研究检索场景。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装并使用。

安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态,注意是否涉及联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。建议结合原始 README 和仓库内容进一步核验具体功能和使用边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/pipeline-review

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill pipe…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

pipeline-review 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill pipeline-revie…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

pipeline-review 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

pipeline-review 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

pipeline-review 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

pipeline-review 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 19,875 次,近一周安装 804 次,下载 6,239 次,GitHub 11,663 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

pipeline-review 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 来源仓库有 11,663 星,维护活跃度相对可查。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
pipeline-review

管道审查 · 本页

19,87511,663只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

/pipeline-review

If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.

Analyze your pipeline health, prioritize deals, and get actionable recommendations for where to focus.

Usage

/pipeline-review [segment or rep]

Review pipeline for: $ARGUMENTS

If a file is referenced: @$1


How It Works

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                     PIPELINE REVIEW                              │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  STANDALONE (always works)                                       │
│  ✓ Upload CSV export from your CRM                              │
│  ✓ Or paste/describe your deals                                 │
│  ✓ Health check: flag stale, stuck, and at-risk deals          │
│  ✓ Prioritization: rank deals by impact and closability        │
│  ✓ Hygiene audit: missing data, bad close dates, single-thread │
│  ✓ Weekly action plan: what to focus on                        │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  SUPERCHARGED (when you connect your tools)                      │
│  + CRM: Pull pipeline automatically, update records             │
│  + Activity data for engagement scoring                         │
│  + Historical patterns for risk prediction                      │
│  + Calendar: See upcoming meetings per deal                     │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

What I Need From You

Option A: Upload a CSV Export your pipeline from your CRM (e.g. Salesforce, HubSpot). Helpful fields:

  • Deal/Opportunity name
  • Account name
  • Amount
  • Stage
  • Close date
  • Created date
  • Last activity date
  • Owner (if reviewing a team)
  • Primary contact

Option B: Paste your deals

Acme Corp - $50K - Negotiation - closes Jan 31 - last activity Jan 20
TechStart - $25K - Demo scheduled - closes Feb 15 - no activity in 3 weeks
BigCo - $100K - Discovery - closes Mar 30 - created last week

Option C: Describe your pipeline "I have 12 deals. Two big ones in negotiation that I'm confident about. Three stuck in discovery for over a month. The rest are mid-stage but I haven't talked to some of them in a while."


Output

# Pipeline Review: [Date]

**Data Source:** [CSV upload / Manual input / CRM]
**Deals Analyzed:** [X]
**Total Pipeline Value:** $[X]

---

## Pipeline Health Score: [X/100]

| Dimension | Score | Issue |
|-----------|-------|-------|
| **Stage Progression** | [X]/25 | [X] deals stuck in same stage 30+ days |
| **Activity Recency** | [X]/25 | [X] deals with no activity in 14+ days |
| **Close Date Accuracy** | [X]/25 | [X] deals with close date in past |
| **Contact Coverage** | [X]/25 | [X] deals single-threaded |

---

## Priority Actions This Week

### 1. [Highest Priority Deal]
**Why:** [Reason — large, closing soon, at risk, etc.]
**Action:** [Specific next step]
**Impact:** $[X] if you close it

### 2. [Second Priority]
**Why:** [Reason]
**Action:** [Next step]

### 3. [Third Priority]
**Why:** [Reason]
**Action:** [Next step]

---

## Deal Prioritization Matrix

### Close This Week (Focus Time Here)
| Deal | Amount | Stage | Close Date | Next Action |
|------|--------|-------|------------|-------------|
| [Deal] | $[X] | [Stage] | [Date] | [Action] |

### Close This Month (Keep Warm)
| Deal | Amount | Stage | Close Date | Status |
|------|--------|-------|------------|--------|
| [Deal] | $[X] | [Stage] | [Date] | [Status] |

### Nurture (Check-in Periodically)
| Deal | Amount | Stage | Close Date | Status |
|------|--------|-------|------------|--------|
| [Deal] | $[X] | [Stage] | [Date] | [Status] |

---

## Risk Flags

### Stale Deals (No Activity 14+ Days)
| Deal | Amount | Last Activity | Days Silent | Recommendation |
|------|--------|---------------|-------------|----------------|
| [Deal] | $[X] | [Date] | [X] | [Re-engage / Downgrade / Remove] |

### Stuck Deals (Same Stage 30+ Days)
| Deal | Amount | Stage | Days in Stage | Recommendation |
|------|--------|-------|---------------|----------------|
| [Deal] | $[X] | [Stage] | [X] | [Push / Multi-thread / Qualify out] |

### Past Close Date
| Deal | Amount | Close Date | Days Overdue | Recommendation |
|------|--------|------------|--------------|----------------|
| [Deal] | $[X] | [Date] | [X] | [Update date / Push to next quarter / Close lost] |

### Single-Threaded (Only One Contact)
| Deal | Amount | Contact | Risk | Recommendation |
|------|--------|---------|------|----------------|
| [Deal] | $[X] | [Name] | Champion leaves = deal dies | [Identify additional stakeholders] |

---

## Hygiene Issues

| Issue | Count | Deals | Action |
|-------|-------|-------|--------|
| Missing close date | [X] | [List] | Add realistic close dates |
| Missing amount | [X] | [List] | Estimate or qualify |
| Missing next step | [X] | [List] | Define next action |
| No primary contact | [X] | [List] | Assign contact |

---

## Pipeline Shape

### By Stage
| Stage | # Deals | Value | % of Pipeline |
|-------|---------|-------|---------------|
| [Stage] | [X] | $[X] | [X]% |

### By Close Month
| Month | # Deals | Value |
|-------|---------|-------|
| [Month] | [X] | $[X] |

### By Deal Size
| Size | # Deals | Value |
|------|---------|-------|
| $100K+ | [X] | $[X] |
| $50K-100K | [X] | $[X] |
| $25K-50K | [X] | $[X] |
| <$25K | [X] | $[X] |

---

## Recommendations

### This Week
1. [ ] [Specific action for priority deal 1]
2. [ ] [Action for at-risk deal]
3. [ ] [Hygiene task]

### This Month
1. [ ] [Strategic action]
2. [ ] [Pipeline building if needed]

---

## Deals to Consider Removing

These deals may be dead weight:

| Deal | Amount | Reason | Recommendation |
|------|--------|--------|----------------|
| [Deal] | $[X] | [No activity 60+ days, no response] | Mark closed-lost |
| [Deal] | $[X] | [Pushed 3+ times, no champion] | Qualify out |

Prioritization Framework

I'll rank your deals using this framework:

FactorWeightWhat I Look For
Close Date30%Deals closing soonest get priority
Deal Size25%Bigger deals = more focus
Stage20%Later stage = more focus
Activity15%Active deals get prioritized
Risk10%Lower risk = safer bet

You can tell me to weight differently: "Focus on big deals over soon deals" or "I need quick wins, prioritize close dates."


If CRM Connected

  • I'll pull your pipeline automatically
  • Update records with new close dates, stages, next steps
  • Create follow-up tasks
  • Track hygiene improvements over time

Tips

  1. Review weekly — Pipeline health decays fast. Weekly reviews catch issues early.
  2. Kill dead deals — Stale opportunities inflate your pipeline and distort forecasts. Be ruthless.
  3. Multi-thread everything — If one person goes dark, you need a backup contact.
  4. Close dates should mean something — A close date is when you expect signature, not when you hope for one.

平台分布

Codex

37.18%
按下载量换算2,320

Claude

31.51%
按下载量换算1,966

Cursor

19.03%
按下载量换算1,187

Gemini CLI

9.71%
按下载量换算606

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills