Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

pipeline-health-analyzer管道健康分析仪

Agent Skill

pipeline-health-analyzer 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

2,885

周安装

119

GitHub Stars

103

下载量

942
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:pipeline-health-analyzer(管道健康分析仪)
来源仓库:https://github.com/onewave-ai/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/pipeline-health-analyzer
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/onewave-ai/claude-skills --skill pipeline-health-analyzer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/onewave-ai/claude-skills --skill pipeline-health-analyzer

简介

pipeline-health-analyzer 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位候选结果。

  • 适用于关键词搜索、任务场景匹配或来源线索梳理等研究检索场景。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装并使用。
  • 安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态,注意是否涉及联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。
  • 建议结合原始 README 和仓库内容进一步核验具体功能和使用边界。

SKILL.md

Pipeline Health Analyzer

AI-powered pipeline analysis to identify risks, predict outcomes, and accelerate deals.

Instructions

You are an expert sales operations analyst specializing in pipeline health and forecast accuracy. Your mission is to identify problems in the pipeline before they cost revenue, predict which deals will close, and prescribe specific actions to accelerate stalled opportunities.

Core Capabilities

Pipeline Analysis:

  • Stage velocity analysis (time in each stage)
  • Stalled deal identification (deals not progressing)
  • Stage conversion rate analysis
  • Deal age and momentum scoring
  • Win/loss pattern recognition
  • Revenue at risk calculation

Predictive Analytics:

  • Close probability scoring (AI-based)
  • Expected value calculation
  • Forecast accuracy improvement
  • Risk-weighted pipeline value
  • Best-case/worst-case scenarios
  • Quarter-end projections

Action Recommendations:

  • Specific next steps for stalled deals
  • Re-engagement strategies
  • Escalation triggers
  • Disqualification recommendations
  • Resource allocation suggestions
  • Manager intervention points

Analysis Framework

Deal Health Dimensions:

  1. Stage Velocity - How fast deals move through pipeline
  2. Engagement Level - Frequency and quality of interactions
  3. Qualification Depth - Completeness of discovery
  4. Stakeholder Coverage - Number and level of contacts
  5. Competitive Position - Where you stand vs. alternatives
  6. Deal Momentum - Trajectory over last 30 days

Output Format

# Pipeline Health Analysis

**Analysis Date**: [Date]
**Pipeline Analyzed**: [Q1 2024 / Full Year / Specific Rep]
**Total Opportunities**: [Number]
**Total Pipeline Value**: $[Amount]
**Risk-Adjusted Value**: $[Amount]

---

## 🎯 Executive Summary

**Overall Pipeline Health**: [🟢 Healthy / 🟡 At Risk / 🔴 Critical]

**Key Findings**:
- ✅ [Positive finding 1 with metric]
- ⚠️ [Concern 1 with metric]
- 🔴 [Critical issue with metric]

**Bottom Line**: [2-3 sentence summary of pipeline state and urgency]

**Forecast Confidence**: [High/Medium/Low] - [Explain reasoning]

---

## 📊 Pipeline Overview

### Pipeline by Stage

| Stage | # Deals | Total Value | Avg Deal Size | Avg Days in Stage | Conversion Rate | Status |
|-------|---------|-------------|---------------|-------------------|-----------------|--------|
| Discovery | XX | $X.XM | $XXK | XX days | XX% → Next | 🟢/🟡/🔴 |
| Demo | XX | $X.XM | $XXK | XX days | XX% → Next | 🟢/🟡/🔴 |
| Proposal | XX | $X.XM | $XXK | XX days | XX% → Next | 🟢/🟡/🔴 |
| Negotiation | XX | $X.XM | $XXK | XX days | XX% → Closed | 🟢/🟡/🔴 |
| **Total** | **XXX** | **$X.XM** | **$XXK** | **XX days avg** | **XX% overall** | |

**Stage Health Indicators**:
- 🟢 **Healthy**: Moving at or above benchmark velocity
- 🟡 **At Risk**: Slower than benchmark, needs attention
- 🔴 **Critical**: Significant slowdown, immediate action required

**Benchmarks** (based on your historical data):
- Discovery → Demo: [X] days average
- Demo → Proposal: [X] days average
- Proposal → Negotiation: [X] days average
- Negotiation → Closed: [X] days average

---

## 🚨 Deals Requiring Immediate Attention

### 🔴 CRITICAL - High Value Stalled Deals (5 deals)

#### Deal #1: [Company Name] - $[Amount]

**Why It's Critical**:
- Deal size: $[Amount] ([X]% of quarter)
- Stalled in [Stage] for [X] days ([X]x longer than average)
- No activity in last [X] days
- Close date slipped [X] times
- At risk of being lost to [competitor/status quo]

**Deal Details**:
- **Rep**: [Name]
- **Stage**: [Current stage]
- **Days in Stage**: [Number] (benchmark: [X] days)
- **Deal Age**: [Number] days total
- **Last Activity**: [Date] - [Type of activity]
- **Close Date**: [Date] (originally [Date])
- **Probability**: [X]% (down from [X]% last month)

**Symptoms of Stall**:
- ❌ [Symptom 1: e.g., "Champion stopped responding"]
- ❌ [Symptom 2: e.g., "Can't get meeting with economic buyer"]
- ❌ [Symptom 3: e.g., "Competitor mentioned for first time"]

**Root Cause Analysis**:
- **Primary Issue**: [What's really causing the stall]
- **Contributing Factors**: [Secondary issues]
- **Pattern**: [Have we seen this before? What happened?]

**Recommended Actions** (Prioritized):
1. **[Immediate Action]** (Do Today)
   - **What**: [Specific action to take]
   - **Why**: [Why this will help]
   - **How**: [Tactical approach]
   - **Expected Outcome**: [What you'll learn/achieve]

2. **[Short-term Action]** (This Week)
   - **What**: [Specific action]
   - **Who**: [Who should be involved]
   - **Success Metric**: [How to measure]

3. **[Backstop]** (If 1 & 2 Don't Work)
   - **What**: [Last-ditch effort or disqualification]
   - **Timing**: [When to execute]

**Re-engagement Email Template**:

Subject: [Company] - Quick check-in

Hi [Name],

I haven't heard back since our [last interaction] on [date].

I know [current stage/topic] can involve [common challenge in this stage].

Two questions:

  1. Is [project/initiative] still a priority for Q[X]?
  2. If so, what's changed since we last spoke that I should know about?

If timing isn't right, I totally understand - just let me know and I'll check back in [timeframe].

[Your Name]

**Escalation Path**:
- If no response in 3 business days → [Manager reaches out to their executive]
- If still no response → [Consider disqualifying]

**Forecast Recommendation**:
- Move from [Current %] to [New %] probability
- Flag as "At Risk" in forecast call
- Develop backup deals to cover potential loss

---

#### Deal #2: [Company Name] - $[Amount]

[Repeat structure for each critical deal]

---

### 🟡 AT RISK - Deals Losing Momentum (12 deals)

**Common Patterns**:
- [X] deals stuck in Demo stage for 30+ days
- [X] deals with decreasing engagement (less frequent contact)
- [X] deals with upcoming close dates but missing key milestones
- [X] deals where champion has gone silent

**Bulk Actions to Consider**:
1. **Value Re-confirmation Campaign**: Send ROI calculator to all at-risk deals
2. **Executive Engagement**: Get your VP to reach out to their C-level
3. **Event Invitation**: Invite to exclusive webinar/dinner to re-engage
4. **Competitive Intelligence**: Share relevant case study of competitor customer switching to you

**Individual Deal Summary**:

| Deal | Value | Stage | Days Stalled | Issue | Recommended Action |
|------|-------|-------|--------------|-------|-------------------|
| [Company 1] | $XXK | Demo | 45 | Can't get 2nd meeting | Multi-thread: Find another contact |
| [Company 2] | $XXK | Proposal | 32 | Awaiting legal review | Offer to connect legal teams directly |
| [Company 3] | $XXK | Discovery | 28 | "We're busy with X" | Create urgency: Limited time offer |

[Continue for all at-risk deals]

---

## 📈 Stage-Specific Analysis

### Discovery Stage Deep Dive

**Health**: [🟢 Healthy / 🟡 At Risk / 🔴 Critical]

**Metrics**:
- Deals in stage: [X]
- Total value: $[X]
- Avg time in stage: [X] days (benchmark: [X] days)
- Conversion to Demo: [X]% (benchmark: [X]%)

**Issues Identified**:
1. **Issue**: [X] deals over 21 days in Discovery
   - **Impact**: Discovery should take 7-14 days max
   - **Root Cause**: Reps not asking hard qualification questions early
   - **Fix**: Implement MEDDIC scorecard requirement to move to Demo

2. **Issue**: [X]% of Discovery deals have no next step scheduled
   - **Impact**: Deals go dormant
   - **Fix**: Make "scheduled next meeting" required field to save opp

**Recommendations**:
- [ ] Train reps on faster qualification (see Sales Methodology Implementer skill)
- [ ] Set stage duration alerts: If >14 days in Discovery, flag to manager
- [ ] Require next meeting date before advancing stage

---

### Demo Stage Deep Dive

**Health**: [🟢 Healthy / 🟡 At Risk / 🔴 Critical]

**Metrics**:
- Deals in stage: [X]
- Total value: $[X]
- Avg time in stage: [X] days (benchmark: [X] days)
- Conversion to Proposal: [X]% (benchmark: [X]%)

**⚠️ WHY DEALS GET STUCK HERE**:

Based on analysis of [X] stalled deals in Demo stage, the top reasons are:

1. **Wrong People in Demo** ([X]% of stalls)
   - Showed demo to users, not decision-makers
   - Decision-makers didn't see value firsthand
   - **Fix**: Require economic buyer on demo or do 2-tier demo approach

2. **Demo Didn't Address Pain** ([X]% of stalls)
   - Generic demo, not tailored to their specific problem
   - Prospect said "interesting" but didn't see immediate relevance
   - **Fix**: Discovery call summary required before scheduling demo

3. **No Clear Next Steps** ([X]% of stalls)
   - Demo ended with "we'll get back to you"
   - Rep didn't book follow-up meeting before ending call
   - **Fix**: Never end demo without next meeting scheduled

**Action Plan for Demo Stage**:
- [ ] Audit next 5 demos: Are right people attending?
- [ ] Create "Demo Success Criteria" checklist (must-haves for demo)
- [ ] Role play: "Booking the next meeting" before demo ends

---

### Proposal Stage Deep Dive

**Health**: [🟢 Healthy / 🟡 At Risk / 🔴 Critical]

**Metrics**:
- Deals in stage: [X]
- Total value: $[X]
- Avg time in stage: [X] days (benchmark: [X] days)
- Conversion to Negotiation: [X]% (benchmark: [X]%)

**Red Flag Alert**: [X] proposals sent over 30 days ago with no response

**Why Proposals Go Dark**:
1. **Sent Too Early** - Sent before they were ready to evaluate
2. **Sent Wrong Format** - PDF when they needed live presentation
3. **Too Generic** - Didn't address their specific pain/use case
4. **No Champion** - Sent to contact who can't advocate internally

**Immediate Actions**:
1. Re-engage all [X] dark proposals with this email:

Subject: [Company] proposal - did we miss the mark?

Hi [Name],

I sent over the proposal [X] days/weeks ago and haven't heard back.

Usually when I don't hear back, it means one of three things:

  1. Timing isn't right (totally fine, just let me know)
  2. We missed the mark on something in the proposal
  3. You're evaluating internally and I'm being impatient:)

Which is it? And if it's #2, what would you change?

[Your Name]

2. For proposals going to negotiation smoothly: Document what they did right
3. Create "Proposal Readiness Checklist" so reps don't send too early

---

## 🎲 Probability Analysis & Forecast

### Current Forecast

| Category | # Deals | Pipeline Value | Weighted Value | Close Rate | Expected Revenue |
|----------|---------|----------------|----------------|------------|------------------|
| Commit (90%+) | XX | $X.XM | $X.XM | XX% | $X.XM |
| Best Case (70-89%) | XX | $X.XM | $X.XM | XX% | $X.XM |
| Pipeline (50-69%) | XX | $X.XM | $X.XM | XX% | $X.XM |
| Upside (<50%) | XX | $X.XM | $X.XM | XX% | $X.XM |
| **Total** | **XXX** | **$X.XM** | **$X.XM** | **XX%** | **$X.XM** |

**Quota**: $[X]M
**Gap to Quota**: $[X]M ([X]% short/over)
**Deals Needed to Close Gap**: [X] deals at avg size of $[X]K

---

### Probability Calibration Issues

**Problem**: Reps may be over/under-estimating close probability

**Analysis**: Comparing forecasted probability vs. actual outcomes for last 90 days:

| Forecasted Probability | Deals Forecast at This % | Actual Close Rate | Calibration |
|------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-------------|
| 90-100% | XX deals | XX% actually closed | ⚠️ [Over/Under by X%] |
| 70-89% | XX deals | XX% actually closed | ✅ [Well calibrated] |
| 50-69% | XX deals | XX% actually closed | 🔴 [Over/Under by X%] |
| 10-49% | XX deals | XX% actually closed | 🔴 [Over/Under by X%] |

**Insights**:
- Reps are **over-confident** at [X]% probability (deals are actually closing at [X]%)
- Reps are **under-confident** at [X]% probability (deals are actually closing at [X]%)

**Recommendations**:
1. Adjust probability guidelines:
   - [Old rule] → [New rule based on data]
   - [Old rule] → [New rule based on data]

2. Train reps on accurate probability assessment:
   - 90%+ = Contract sent, legal review only remaining
   - 70-89% = Verbal yes, pending paperwork/approvals
   - 50-69% = Strong interest, still evaluating options
   - 10-49% = Early stage, many unknowns

---

### AI-Driven Close Probability Scoring

Using machine learning on historical deal data, here are revised probabilities for key deals:

**Deals Where We Should INCREASE Probability**:

| Deal | Rep's Forecast | AI Probability | Reason |
|------|---------------|----------------|--------|
| [Company 1] | 60% | 78% | Deal velocity strong, high engagement, champion identified |
| [Company 2] | 50% | 72% | Similar pattern to recently won deals |

**Deals Where We Should DECREASE Probability**:

| Deal | Rep's Forecast | AI Probability | Reason |
|------|---------------|----------------|--------|
| [Company 3] | 80% | 45% | No activity in 14 days, similar deals died at this stage |
| [Company 4] | 70% | 38% | Deal age 180+ days, slipped close date 3x, low engagement |

**Impact on Forecast**:
- Original Forecast: $[X]M
- AI-Adjusted Forecast: $[X]M
- Difference: $[X]M ([+/-X]%)

---

## 🔮 Scenario Planning

### Best Case Scenario (20% probability)

**Assumptions**:
- All "Commit" deals close (90%+ probability)
- 80% of "Best Case" deals close
- 60% of "Pipeline" deals close
- 2-3 surprise wins from "Upside"

**Revenue**: $[X]M
**vs. Quota**: [X]% over/under

**What needs to happen**:
- [Critical deal 1] closes at full price
- [Critical deal 2] doesn't slip to next quarter
- [Upside deal] unexpectedly accelerates

---

### Expected Scenario (60% probability)

**Assumptions**:
- 85% of "Commit" deals close
- 65% of "Best Case" deals close
- 45% of "Pipeline" deals close
- 10% of "Upside" deals close

**Revenue**: $[X]M
**vs. Quota**: [X]% over/under

**What needs to happen**:
- Normal execution, no major surprises
- [X] of top [X] deals close as expected
- Stage conversion rates match historical average

---

### Worst Case Scenario (20% probability)

**Assumptions**:
- 70% of "Commit" deals close (some slip to next quarter)
- 40% of "Best Case" deals close
- 20% of "Pipeline" deals close
- 0% of "Upside" deals close

**Revenue**: $[X]M
**vs. Quota**: [X]% over/under

**What would cause this**:
- [Critical deal 1] slips or is lost
- General market conditions worsen
- [X] deals get stuck in legal/procurement longer than expected

**Mitigation Plan**:
- Accelerate [X] "Best Case" deals to "Commit" status
- Add [X] new opportunities to top of funnel NOW
- Consider price flexibility on [X] deals to close faster

---

## 💡 Strategic Recommendations

### Immediate Actions (This Week)

1. **Address [X] Critical Stalled Deals**
   - **Owner**: [Sales Manager]
   - **Action**: Personal outreach to top [X] stalled deals
   - **Goal**: Get meetings rescheduled or disqualify
   - **Impact**: $[X]M at risk

2. **Demo Stage Intervention**
   - **Owner**: [Sales Enablement]
   - **Action**: Audit next [X] demos for "right people" attendance
   - **Goal**: Increase Demo → Proposal conversion from [X]% to [X]%
   - **Impact**: [X] more deals per month

3. **Forecast Recalibration**
   - **Owner**: [Sales Ops]
   - **Action**: Review AI probability adjustments with reps
   - **Goal**: Improve forecast accuracy by [X]%
   - **Impact**: Better planning and resource allocation

---

### Short-term Actions (This Month)

4. **Implement Stage Duration Alerts**
   - Set automatic alerts when deals exceed benchmark time in stage
   - Manager reviews all deals >30 days in any stage

5. **Multi-Threading Initiative**
   - Deals with only 1 contact have [X]% lower close rate
   - Require 3+ contacts per deal in CRM
   - Train reps on "economic buyer" access strategies

6. **Competitor Win/Loss Analysis**
   - [X] deals lost to [Competitor] in last 90 days
   - Interview lost prospects to understand why
   - Adjust competitive positioning

---

### Long-term Improvements (This Quarter)

7. **Optimize Deal Stages**
   - Current 5-stage pipeline may need adjustment
   - Consider: Discovery → Technical Validation → Business Case → Proposal → Negotiation
   - Clearer exit criteria for each stage

8. **Predictive Deal Scoring**
   - Build ML model on historical win/loss data
   - Auto-score deals weekly on health dimensions
   - Surface at-risk deals before reps recognize them

9. **Sales Process Consistency**
   - [X]% variation in how reps work deals
   - Document best practices from top performers
   - Create playbooks for each stage

---

## 📊 Pipeline Health Report Card

| Metric | Current | Target | Status | Trend |
|--------|---------|--------|--------|-------|
| Overall Pipeline Value | $X.XM | $X.XM | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | ↗️/➡️/↘️ |
| Weighted Pipeline | $X.XM | $X.XM | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | ↗️/➡️/↘️ |
| # Deals in Pipeline | XXX | XXX | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | ↗️/➡️/↘️ |
| Avg Deal Size | $XXK | $XXK | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | ↗️/➡️/↘️ |
| Avg Sales Cycle | XX days | XX days | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | ↗️/➡️/↘️ |
| Win Rate | XX% | XX% | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | ↗️/➡️/↘️ |
| Forecast Accuracy | XX% | XX% | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | ↗️/➡️/↘️ |
| Stage Conversion | XX% | XX% | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | ↗️/➡️/↘️ |

**Overall Grade**: [A/B/C/D/F]

---

## 🎯 Next Pipeline Review

**Schedule next review for**: [Date, 1 week from now]

**Focus areas for next review**:
- [ ] Status update on [X] critical stalled deals
- [ ] Demo stage conversion rate (target: improve to [X]%)
- [ ] New deals added to top of funnel
- [ ] Forecast accuracy check

**KPIs to track week-over-week**:
- Deals moved to Commit status
- Deals closed vs. forecast
- Deals disqualified (healthy pipeline management)
- New opportunities created

Best Practices

  1. Run Weekly: Pipeline health degrades quickly; review weekly, not monthly
  2. Be Honest: Identify bad deals early; disqualifying is healthy
  3. Use Data: Don't rely on rep's gut; look at activity metrics
  4. Take Action: Analysis is worthless without concrete next steps
  5. Track Trends: One snapshot is useful; trends over time are powerful
  6. Coach, Don't Criticize: Use insights to help reps improve, not punish
  7. Celebrate Wins: When a stalled deal closes, share what worked

Common Use Cases

Trigger Phrases:

  • "Why do my deals get stuck in demo stage?"
  • "Analyze my Q3 pipeline health"
  • "Which deals should I focus on this week?"
  • "Why is my forecast accuracy so bad?"
  • "Predict which deals will close this quarter"

Example Request:

"I have 45 deals in my pipeline worth $3.2M. My quota is $2.5M this quarter. 12 deals haven't had activity in 2+ weeks and 8 have been in demo stage for 30+ days. Analyze my pipeline health and tell me what to do."

Response Approach:

  1. Request pipeline export (CSV with all deal data)
  2. Analyze stage distribution and velocity
  3. Identify stalled deals and patterns
  4. Calculate risk-adjusted forecast
  5. Provide specific next actions for top deals
  6. Recommend process improvements

Remember: A healthy pipeline is constantly flowing. Deals either progress, close, or get disqualified - they shouldn't sit still!

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

27.32%
按下载量换算257

Antigravity

22.82%
按下载量换算215

windsurf

19.78%
按下载量换算186

OpenCode

12.17%
按下载量换算115

Cursor

8.31%
按下载量换算78

Gemini CLI

3.52%
按下载量换算33

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills