Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ux-writing(用户体验写作)

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

ux-writing 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 70,604。

总安装 210周安装 9GitHub Stars 35下载 73核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ux-writing(用户体验写作)
来源仓库:https://github.com/petekp/claude-code-setup
仓库路径:skills/ux-writing
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/petekp/claude-code-setup --skill ux-writing
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/petekp/claude-code-setup --skill ux-writing

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

ux-writing 用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写,适合提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语。适用于研究检索类任务,特别适合用户体验相关的文案撰写和文档优化。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,支持多宿主环境集成。

使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论。ux-writing 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ux-writing

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/petekp/claude-code-setup --skill ux-writing;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

ux-writing 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/petekp/claude-code-setup --skill ux-writing。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ux-writing 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ux-writing 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

ux-writing 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ux-writing 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 210 次,近一周安装 9 次,下载 73 次,GitHub 35 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ux-writing 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ux-writing

用户体验写作 · 本页

21035需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

UX Writer

Words are interface. Every string is a design decision.

Output Contract

For copy audits, structure your analysis as:

## Copy Audit

### Voice Check
- Current voice: [description of detected voice/tone]
- Target voice: [if specified or inferred]
- Adjustments needed: [specific changes, or "None—voice is consistent"]

### Issues
| Location | Current Copy | Problem | Suggested Copy |
|----------|--------------|---------|----------------|
| [Button/label/message] | "..." | [Why it fails] | "..." |

### Patterns to Establish
- Buttons: [verb + object pattern]
- Errors: [structure: what happened → how to fix]
- Empty states: [structure used]
- Success: [tone and length]

### Quick Wins
- [Most impactful change]
- [Second priority]

For individual copy requests:

## Copy: [Element Type]

### Context
[Where this appears, user state, stakes]

### Recommendation
[The copy]

### Rationale
- [Why this wording]

### Variations
- [Alternative if needed]

Core Principles

Clarity Over Cleverness

  • Say what you mean
  • Mean what you say
  • If a user has to think about what you wrote, rewrite it
  • Puns and wordplay rarely survive translation or stress

Brevity With Purpose

  • Shorter is usually better
  • But not at the cost of clarity
  • Cut ruthlessly, then check if meaning survived
  • "Delete your account" not "Proceed with account deletion process"

User Over System

  • Speak the user's language, not the system's
  • "We couldn't find that page" not "404 Error: Resource not found"
  • "Your photo is uploading" not "Asset upload in progress"
  • The user doesn't care about your architecture

Consistency Is Kindness

  • Same action = same words everywhere
  • Pick "Save" or "Submit" and stick with it
  • Pick "Cancel" or "Discard" and stick with it
  • Inconsistency creates doubt

Voice and Tone

Voice (Who You Are)

Voice is constant—your product's personality:

  • Confident but not arrogant
  • Helpful but not patronizing
  • Professional but not cold
  • Clear but not dumbed-down

Define 3-4 voice attributes. Use them as a filter.

Tone (How You Adapt)

Tone shifts with context:

ContextTone
SuccessCelebratory, warm
ErrorCalm, helpful, humble
WaitingReassuring, patient
WarningSerious, clear
OnboardingEncouraging, guiding
Empty stateInviting, actionable

The same voice, different tones. You're still you when happy or apologizing.

Finding Your Voice

Ask:

  • If your product were a person, who would they be?
  • How would they explain something at a dinner party?
  • What would they never say?

Test:

  • Read it aloud. Does it sound like a human?
  • Would you say this to someone's face?
  • Does it match the rest of the product?

Microcopy Patterns

Buttons and Actions

Do:

  • Start with a verb
  • Be specific about what happens
  • "Save changes" not "Save"
  • "Send message" not "Submit"
  • "Delete project" not "Delete" (when stakes are high)

Avoid:

  • "Click here" (obviously they'll click)
  • "Submit" (submit what?)
  • "OK" (ok to what?)
  • "Yes/No" without context

Button pairs:

PrimarySecondary
SaveCancel
DeleteKeep
SendSave draft
ConfirmGo back
Create accountLog in instead

Labels and Placeholders

Labels:

  • Always visible (not just placeholders)
  • Noun or short phrase
  • "Email address" not "Enter your email address here"
  • Sentence case, not Title Case

Placeholders:

  • Example format, not instruction
  • "name@example.com" not "Enter email"
  • Disappear on focus—don't rely on them
  • Gray text, low contrast (they're hints, not content)

Helper text:

  • Explain why or give guidance
  • "We'll send a confirmation link"
  • "Must be at least 8 characters"
  • Below the field, not above

Error Messages

Structure:

  1. What happened (brief)
  2. Why it happened (if helpful)
  3. How to fix it (always)

Examples:

Bad: "Invalid input" Good: "Enter a valid email address, like name@example.com"

Bad: "Error 500" Good: "Something went wrong on our end. Please try again."

Bad: "Password must contain at least one uppercase letter, one lowercase letter, one number, and one special character and be between 8 and 64 characters" Good: "Password needs 8+ characters with a mix of letters, numbers, and symbols"

Principles:

  • Never blame the user
  • Be specific about what's wrong
  • Tell them exactly how to fix it
  • Don't use "please" excessively (once is enough)
  • "Oops" and "Uh oh" get old fast

Success Messages

  • Confirm what happened
  • Be brief—success shouldn't slow them down
  • Suggest next action if relevant
  • Match the magnitude of accomplishment

Examples:

  • "Saved" (small action)
  • "Message sent" (medium action)
  • "Your account is ready. Let's get started." (big moment)

Empty States

Structure:

  1. What belongs here
  2. Why it's empty (if not obvious)
  3. How to fill it (call to action)

Examples:

Bad: "No data"

Good:

No projects yet Create your first project to get started. [Create project]

Better:

Your projects will appear here Projects help you organize your work. Create one to begin. [Create your first project]

Loading and Progress

Brief waits (<5 seconds):

  • Spinner or skeleton is enough
  • "Loading..." if you must

Longer waits:

  • Set expectations: "This usually takes about a minute"
  • Show progress: "Uploading... 45%"
  • Explain what's happening: "Processing your images..."

Very long waits:

  • "We'll email you when it's ready"
  • Let them leave

Confirmations and Warnings

Confirmation dialogs:

  • State the action clearly
  • Explain consequences
  • Make the destructive option obviously destructive

Example:

Delete this project? This will permanently delete "Website Redesign" and all its files. This can't be undone. [Cancel] [Delete project]

Not:

Are you sure? [No] [Yes]

Warning patterns:

  • Yellow/orange for warnings (proceed with caution)
  • Red for destructive actions (data loss, irreversible)
  • Inline near the action, not just in a modal

Tooltips and Help Text

When to use tooltips:

  • Clarify icon-only buttons
  • Explain unfamiliar terms
  • Provide keyboard shortcuts
  • NOT for essential information

Writing tooltips:

  • One sentence max
  • No period at the end (unless multiple sentences)
  • Action-oriented for buttons: "Add a new project"
  • Explanatory for concepts: "Projects organize your work"

Onboarding Copy

Principles:

  • Show value before asking for effort
  • One concept per step
  • Praise progress
  • Let them skip (with grace)

Welcome screens:

  • Warm but brief
  • Set expectations
  • Single clear next step

Tooltips/Coaches:

  • Point to specific UI
  • Explain benefit, not just function
  • "Add teammates to collaborate in real-time" not "Click here to add users"

Progress:

  • "Step 2 of 4" (sets expectations)
  • "Almost there!" (encouragement)
  • "You're all set" (closure)

Writing Techniques

The Readback Test

Read it aloud. If you wouldn't say it to someone, don't write it.

The Screenshot Test

Cover everything but the text. Does it still make sense?

The Stress Test

Imagine the user is frustrated, in a hurry, or on their phone with one thumb. Does your copy still work?

The Translation Test

Will this make sense in other languages? Idioms, puns, and cultural references often don't.

The Truncation Test

What happens when this is cut off on a small screen? Put important words first.

Common Mistakes

Being Vague

  • "An error occurred" → What error?
  • "Invalid" → What's invalid? What's valid?
  • "Try again" → Try what again? Will it work this time?

Being Verbose

  • "In order to save your changes, please click the Save button below"
  • → "Save changes"

Being Robotic

  • "Your request has been processed successfully"
  • → "Done" or "Changes saved"

Being Cute When It Hurts

  • "Oopsie! Something went wrong:(" (when they lost data)
  • Save personality for low-stakes moments

Mixing Metaphors

  • Pick a conceptual model and stick with it
  • If it's a "library," use "shelves" not "folders"
  • If it's an "inbox," use "messages" not "items"

Assuming Knowledge

  • "Configure your SSH keys" (what's SSH?)
  • "Enable 2FA" (what's 2FA?)
  • Either explain or link to explanation

Capitalization and Punctuation

Capitalization

  • Sentence case for almost everything: "Create new project"
  • Title Case rarely: Proper nouns, app names
  • ALL CAPS never (except abbreviations)

Punctuation

  • No periods in buttons or labels
  • Periods in sentences (body copy, descriptions)
  • No exclamation marks in errors!!!
  • One exclamation mark maximum per screen (usually in success)

Contractions

  • Use them—they're human: "can't," "won't," "you'll"
  • Exception: Very formal or legal contexts
  • Exception: When meaning could be unclear

Writing for Accessibility

Screen Readers

  • Links: "Read our privacy policy" not "Click here"
  • Buttons: Describe the action, not the element
  • Images: Alt text that conveys meaning, not decoration

Cognitive Load

  • Simple words over complex
  • Short sentences over long
  • Active voice over passive
  • Lists over paragraphs

Reading Level

  • Aim for grade 8 reading level
  • Hemingway App is a useful check
  • Simple doesn't mean dumbed down

Content Strategy

Content Hierarchy

  1. What must they know? (essential)
  2. What should they know? (helpful)
  3. What could they know? (optional)

Put #1 in the UI. Put #2 in tooltips/help. Put #3 in documentation.

Writing Systems, Not Strings

  • Create patterns, not one-offs
  • "You have 1 notification" / "You have 2 notifications" (pluralization)
  • Build a component library for copy too
  • Document patterns in a style guide

Governance

  • Who approves copy?
  • Where does copy live? (code, CMS, spreadsheet?)
  • How do you maintain consistency across teams?
  • Who updates when the product changes?

The Craft

What Great UX Writing Feels Like

  • You don't notice it
  • Everything makes sense
  • You never feel lost or blamed
  • The product feels like it's on your side

The Real Job

  • Reduce friction
  • Prevent errors
  • Build trust
  • Guide without controlling
  • Disappear into usefulness

Remember

  • You're not writing for screens
  • You're writing for people
  • Tired people, busy people, frustrated people
  • One confused moment costs trust
  • Every word is a chance to help

平台分布

Codex

34.98%
按下载量换算26

Claude

30.71%
按下载量换算22

Cursor

21.37%
按下载量换算16

Gemini CLI

9.17%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills