Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

handoff(交接)

handoff 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

handoff 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 53,392。

总安装 535周安装 23GitHub Stars 35下载 188核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:handoff(交接)
来源仓库:https://github.com/petekp/claude-code-setup
仓库路径:skills/handoff
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/petekp/claude-code-setup --skill handoff
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/petekp/claude-code-setup --skill handoff

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。适合根据关键词或任务场景快速定位候选结果。可结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态。

handoff 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/handoff

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/petekp/claude-code-setup --skill handoff;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

handoff 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/petekp/claude-code-setup --skill handoff。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

handoff 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

handoff 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

handoff 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

handoff 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 535 次,近一周安装 23 次,下载 188 次,GitHub 35 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

handoff 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
handoff

交接 · 本页

53535只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Handoff

Create a handoff that lets a fresh agent act immediately instead of re-deriving context.

Workflow

1. Gather Hard-to-Rediscover Facts

Collect the details that are expensive to recover:

  • Original goal and current scope
  • Exact resume point: what was happening at the moment the handoff was requested
  • Files, commands, URLs, logs, and error signatures that matter
  • Decisions already made, plus the reason they were made
  • User preferences, repo rules, or operating constraints established during the session
  • Verification state: what passed, what failed, what was not run
  • Blockers, risks, and open questions

If the work lives in a git repo, run scripts/gather-git-state.sh and include the useful parts.

2. Separate Facts From Guesses

Keep these distinct:

  • Observed facts: commands run, files changed, errors seen, tests run
  • Current hypothesis: what the agent currently believes is likely true
  • Open questions: what still needs proof

Never imply certainty that the session did not earn. If tests were not run, say so explicitly.

3. Optimize for Resume Fidelity

Prioritize the information that makes the next session fast and safe:

  • Absolute paths over vague file references
  • Exact commands, failing checks, and specific error strings
  • The next concrete action, not a broad workstream
  • Constraints that would cause rework if forgotten
  • Dead ends only when they prevent repeated wasted effort

Omit routine chatter, standard explanations, and long file contents.

4. Use an Action-Oriented Prompt Shape

Start the handoff with the mission and the immediate next move. Make it obvious where to resume.

# Resume: [task]

## Mission
[1-2 sentences describing the goal and current scope]

## Resume Point
- Last meaningful action: [most recent command, edit, or observation]
- Next command or file to open: `[exact command]` or `/absolute/path/to/file:line`
- Success criterion for the next step: [what result should happen next]

## Current State
- [What is already done and working]
- [What is in progress]
- [What is blocked or uncertain]

## Repo State
- Working directory: `/absolute/path`
- Branch: `branch-name`
- Working tree: [clean/dirty + notable changes]
- Recent commits: `abc123 message`

## Key Artifacts
- `/absolute/path/to/file` - [why it matters]
- `command` - [what it proved or failed to prove]
- `error string / URL / log path` - [why it matters]

## Project Rules
- [Repo instruction, user preference, or workflow rule that must persist]

## Established Decisions
- [Decision + reason]

## Assumptions
- [Tentative belief that still needs verification]

## Verification State
- Passed: `command or check`
- Failed: `command or check`
- Not run: `command or check`

## Rejected Paths
- [Approach ruled out and why]

## Open Questions / Risks
- [Unknown, blocker, or edge case]

## Notes for the Next Agent
- [Shortcut, warning, or important context]

Omit empty sections. For non-repo work, skip Repo State.

5. Adapt to the Task Type

For coding or debugging work, emphasize:

  • Reproduction steps
  • Expected vs actual behavior
  • Exact failing command or test
  • Local changes that must not be overwritten

For planning, research, or review work, emphasize:

  • Decision rationale
  • Alternatives already ruled out
  • Evidence gathered
  • What still needs proof before implementation

Compression Rules

Scale depth to the task:

  • Simple task: 100-200 tokens
  • Medium task: 200-450 tokens
  • Complex task: 450-900 tokens

Compress aggressively:

  • Use bullets instead of prose
  • Include only the commands and files that matter
  • Summarize long traces to the decisive lines
  • Prefer established: or not yet verified: over long explanation

Output

Always do both:

  1. Display the full handoff prompt in a fenced code block
  2. Copy it to the clipboard

Prefer scripts/copy-to-clipboard.sh <file> after writing the prompt to a temporary file or an existing handoff artifact. If the repo already uses a handoff file such as HANDOFF.md or .claude/handoffs/..., update that artifact too. Do not invent a new persistent file unless the user asked for one or the project already has a convention.

Confirm clearly that the prompt was copied and, if relevant, where it was saved.

Example Output

# Resume: Add Google OAuth login

## Mission
Add Google OAuth login to the Express app. The strategy and routes exist; the next session should finish session serialization and verify the end-to-end flow.

## Resume Point
- Last meaningful action: hit the OAuth callback and reproduced `Failed to serialize user into session`
- Next command or file to open: `/Users/dev/acme/src/auth/google.ts`
- Success criterion for the next step: callback completes and the session stores the user successfully

## Current State
- Installed passport, passport-google-oauth20
- Created `/Users/dev/acme/src/auth/google.ts` with the strategy config
- Added `/auth/google` and `/auth/google/callback` routes
- Current blocker: callback returns `Failed to serialize user into session`

## Repo State
- Working directory: `/Users/dev/acme`
- Branch: `oauth/google-login`
- Working tree: dirty; local edits in auth setup and auth routes
- Recent commits: `91ab23f add google oauth routes`

## Key Artifacts
- `/Users/dev/acme/src/auth/google.ts` - strategy setup; missing serialization wiring
- `/Users/dev/acme/src/routes/auth.ts:45` - callback handler where the error surfaces
- `/Users/dev/acme/src/app.ts` - passport middleware initialized; session serialization still incomplete
- `npm test -- auth` - has not been run since the latest auth edits
- `Failed to serialize user into session` - decisive error signature

## Project Rules
- Do not add a persistent session store yet

## Established Decisions
- Keep `express-session` on the default memory store for now
- Use `.env` for `GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID` and `GOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRET`

## Assumptions
- Passport can serialize only the user ID without changing the current route contract

## Verification State
- Passed: strategy registration and auth route wiring
- Failed: OAuth callback request with session serialization error
- Not run: end-to-end OAuth success path after adding serialize/deserialize

## Rejected Paths
- Do not switch to a database-backed session store yet; it expands scope before the auth flow works

## Open Questions / Risks
- Decide whether to serialize the whole user record or just the user ID

平台分布

Codex

36.35%
按下载量换算68

Claude

25.53%
按下载量换算48

Cursor

19.19%
按下载量换算36

Gemini CLI

9%
按下载量换算17

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills