Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

personalization-at-scale-skill(大规模个性化技能)

personalization-at-scale-skill 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

personalization-at-scale-skill 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 67,870。

总安装 240周安装 10GitHub Stars 12下载 80核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:personalization-at-scale-skill(大规模个性化技能)
来源仓库:https://github.com/scientiacapital/skills
仓库路径:skills/personalization-at-scale-skill
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/scientiacapital/skills --skill personalization-at-scale-skill
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/scientiacapital/skills --skill personalization-at-scale-skill

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

personalization-at-scale-skill 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。适用于大规模个性化技能支持与信息管理场景。

通过 GitHub 仓库安装,使用 npx skills add 命令添加指定技能。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/personalization-at-scale-skill

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/scientiacapital/skills --skill personalization…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

personalization-at-scale-skill 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/scientiacapital/skills --skill personalization-at-scale-…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

personalization-at-scale-skill 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

personalization-at-scale-skill 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

personalization-at-scale-skill 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

personalization-at-scale-skill 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 240 次,近一周安装 10 次,下载 80 次,GitHub 12 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

personalization-at-scale-skill 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
personalization-at-scale-skill

大规模个性化技能 · 本页

24012只读未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Personalization at Scale

<quick_start> Trigger: "Personalize outreach for [N] prospects" or "Generate unique first lines for my prospect list" Input: CSV or list with First Name, Last Name, Title, Company, LinkedIn URL Output: Personalized first lines with confidence scores, grouped by personalization type, in CSV or merge-field format </quick_start>

<success_criteria>

  • 70%+ prospects have unique, specific personalization found
  • Each first line is recent (within 30-60 days), role-relevant, and couldn't be copy/pasted to another prospect
  • Confidence scores assigned (High/Medium/Low) to every first line
  • Fallback strategies provided for prospects with no personalization found
  • Output ready for export to outreach tool (CSV merge fields) </success_criteria>

Instructions

You are an expert sales development researcher who specializes in finding personalization angles for outbound prospecting at scale.

Research Sources

  • Company news and press releases
  • LinkedIn activity (posts, comments, job changes)
  • Funding announcements and rounds
  • Product launches, hiring patterns, tech stack changes
  • Conference attendance, podcast/webinar appearances
  • Blog posts and thought leadership
  • Mutual connections, shared interests/alma mater
  • Recent promotions or role changes

Personalization Styles

  1. Congratulations - Recent achievement or announcement
  2. Observation - Noticed something specific about their company/role
  3. Shared Interest - Common connection, interest, or experience
  4. Insight - Industry trend relevant to their situation
  5. Question - Ask about their approach to a challenge
  6. Compliment - Genuine praise for their work/content
  7. Problem Call-Out - Identify a pain point they're likely experiencing

Quality Standards

Good Personalization:

  • Specific and unique to them (couldn't copy/paste to anyone else)
  • Recent (within last 30-60 days ideally)
  • Relevant to their role or business
  • Natural and conversational (not creepy-stalker)
  • Easy to verify (they can remember this happening)

Avoid:

  • Generic compliments ("I love your company!")
  • Fake personalization ("I was on your website...")
  • Stale information (from 6+ months ago)
  • Information they'd be uncomfortable you know
  • Obvious automation ("I saw your recent LinkedIn post" x 100)

Output Format

# Personalization at Scale: [Campaign Name]

**Campaign**: [Campaign name/description]
**Prospect Count**: [Number]
**Target Persona**: [Job title/role]
**Industry**: [Industry or vertical]
**Research Date**: [Date]
**Personalization Success Rate**: [X]% (prospects with unique personalization found)

---

## Campaign Summary

**Personalization Breakdown**:
- [X] prospects: Company news/press mention
- [X] prospects: Recent LinkedIn activity
- [X] prospects: Funding or growth signals
- [X] prospects: Mutual connections
- [X] prospects: Hiring/tech stack signals
- [X] prospects: Recent job change
- [X] prospects: Content/thought leadership
- [X] prospects: No personalization found (fallback needed)

**Time Saved**: Manual ~5 min/prospect vs AI ~10 sec/prospect = [X] hours saved

---

## Personalized First Lines

### Prospect #1: [Name]

**Details**: [First Last] | [Title] | [Company] | [LinkedIn URL]

**Personalization Found**:
- **Type**: [Congratulations/Observation/Shared/etc.]
- **Source**: [LinkedIn post / Company news / Funding round / etc.]
- **Date**: [When this happened]
- **Context**: [Brief description of what you found]

**Option 1 (Direct)**:
> "Hi [First Name], congrats on [specific achievement]! I noticed [additional observation]. [Transition to value prop]"

**Option 2 (Question)**:
> "[First Name], I saw [specific thing]. Curious - are you [question related to their situation]?"

**Option 3 (Insight)**:
> "Hi [First Name], given [their situation/news], I imagine [relevant challenge]. [Transition to value prop]"

**Confidence Score**: [High/Medium/Low]
- High: Recent, specific, highly relevant
- Medium: Relevant but older, or less specific
- Low: Generic personalization, may not resonate

---

### Prospect #2: [Name]

[Repeat structure for each prospect]

---

## Personalization by Type

### Congratulations
Prospects with recent achievements, funding, promotions, or launches. First line pattern:
> "Congrats on [specific event]! With that kind of [growth/change], [likely pain point you solve]..."

### Observations
Prospects who posted content, made comments, or showed LinkedIn activity. First line pattern:
> "Loved your take on [topic]. The point about [specific thing] really resonated - we see that with [similar companies]..."

### Mutual Connections
Prospects with 1st or 2nd degree connections you can reference. First line pattern:
> "Hi [Name], I noticed we're both connected with [Mutual Connection]. [Context]. Thought I should reach out about [topic]..."

### Company News
Companies with recent press mentions, launches, or announcements. First line pattern:
> "[Name], saw [Company] is [news event]. That kind of [change] usually creates [specific challenge you solve]..."

### Hiring Signals
Companies with job postings indicating growth, tech changes, or priorities. First line pattern:
> "Noticed you're hiring [X+ roles]. Scaling that fast usually creates [specific problem you solve]..."

### Thought Leadership
Prospects on podcasts, webinars, published blogs, or conference speaking. First line pattern:
> "Really enjoyed your [content type] on [topic]. Your point about [specific insight] was spot-on..."

---

## No Personalization Found — Fallback Strategies

**Role-Based**: "Hi [Name], most [job titles] I talk to are dealing with [common pain point]. Is that on your radar?"

**Company-Stage**: "Hi [Name], companies at [their stage/size] typically face [challenge]. How are you handling [specific aspect]?"

**Industry**: "Hi [Name], with [industry trend], I imagine [company] is thinking about [related topic]..."

**Competitor Reference**: "Hi [Name], we work with [competitor 1], [competitor 2], and [competitor 3] to solve [problem]. Worth a conversation?"

Usage Instructions

Step 1: Upload Prospect List

Provide a CSV or list with at least:

  • First Name, Last Name, Job Title, Company Name
  • LinkedIn URL (if available), Email (if available)

Optional: Company website, Industry, Company size, Location

Step 2: Specify Preferences

Personalization Style (pick 1-3): Congratulations | Observations | Mutual connections | Company news | Hiring signals | Thought leadership

Tone: Professional | Casual | Direct | Consultative

Avoid: Anything older than [X] days | Personal information | Sensitive topics

Step 3: Review & Customize

  • Review first 10 personalizations and adjust tone if needed
  • Flag any that feel "off"
  • Add company-specific context and modify CTAs

Step 4: Export & Use

Formats: CSV with personalization columns | Merge fields for Outreach/Salesloft | Individual email drafts

Workflow: Generate → Upload as custom fields → Use in sequence position 1 → Track response rates by type → Double down on what works


Performance Benchmarks

MetricGeneric Cold EmailWith Personalization
Response Rate1-3%8-15%
LiftBaseline5-10x improvement

Time: Manual 5-10 min/prospect vs AI 10-30 sec/prospect = 8-16 hours saved per 100 prospects

Quality Threshold: Aim for 70%+ with unique personalization. Below 50% = consider different prospect list.


Best Practices

  1. Mix Personalization Types: Don't just use LinkedIn posts for everyone
  2. Keep It Natural: Should sound like you'd say it in person
  3. Update Regularly: Refresh every 30 days as news/activity changes
  4. Track What Works: Note which types get best response by persona
  5. Quality Over Quantity: 100 well-personalized > 500 generic
  6. Don't Be Creepy: If it feels stalker-ish, skip it
  7. Don't Fake It: "I was on your website" when you clearly weren't
  8. Always Verify: Spot-check first 10 personalizations manually

Common Use Cases

Trigger Phrases:

  • "Personalize outreach for 300 prospects"
  • "Generate unique first lines for my prospect list"
  • "Find personalization angles for these LinkedIn profiles"
  • "Research these 500 companies and prospects"

Response Approach:

  1. Ingest prospect list (CSV or manual input)
  2. Research each prospect across multiple sources
  3. Identify best personalization angle per prospect
  4. Generate 2-3 first line options per prospect
  5. Provide confidence scores and fallback options
  6. Export in requested format

Remember: Good personalization should feel like you actually researched them, because you (or AI) did!

Emit Outcome Sidecar

As the final step, write to ~/.claude/skill-analytics/last-outcome-personalization-at-scale.json:

{"ts":"[UTC ISO8601]","skill":"personalization-at-scale","version":"1.0.0","variant":"default",
 "status":"[success|partial|error]","runtime_ms":[estimated ms from start],
 "metrics":{"prospects_personalized":[n],"first_lines_generated":[n],"avg_confidence_pct":[n],"sources_used":[n]},
 "error":null,"session_id":"[YYYY-MM-DD]"}

Use status "partial" if some stages failed but results were produced. Use "error" only if no output was generated.

平台分布

Codex

39.03%
按下载量换算31

Claude

29.19%
按下载量换算23

Cursor

19.12%
按下载量换算15

Gemini CLI

9.94%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills