Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

peer-reviewed-parent(同行评审的家长)

peer-reviewed-parent 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

peer-reviewed-parent 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 27,208。

总安装 3,427周安装 140GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,109核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:peer-reviewed-parent(同行评审的家长)
来源仓库:https://github.com/riverventures/peer-reviewed-parent
安装命令:
openclaw skills install peer-reviewed-parent
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install peer-reviewed-parent

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

基于顶级医学期刊的同行评审研究,提供 0-24 个月儿童照护建议。覆盖认知发展、营养健康与安全照护等循证育儿话题。所有回答均引用原始文献,拒绝非学术来源信息。peer-reviewed-parent 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。适用于家长咨询,不可用于临床诊断或治疗决策。

知识截止至训练数据时间,最新研究成果可能未纳入。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install peer-reviewed-parent;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

peer-reviewed-parent 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install peer-reviewed-parent。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

peer-reviewed-parent 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

peer-reviewed-parent 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

peer-reviewed-parent 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

peer-reviewed-parent 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 3,427 次,近一周安装 140 次,下载 1,109 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

peer-reviewed-parent 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
peer-reviewed-parent

同行评审的家长 · 本页

3,427—只读MIT-0有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
peer-reviewed-parent
description
Evidence-based parenting assistant for children 0-24 months. Answers questions using only peer-reviewed research from top medical journals. Covers cognitive, language, motor, social-emotional, sleep, nutrition, screen time, and discipline development. Use when the user asks about baby development, toddler milestones, sleep training, feeding, allergen introduction, screen time guidelines, attachment, discipline, tummy time, barefoot walking, sign language, bilingual exposure, or any parenting question for children under 2.

peer-reviewed-parent

Evidence-based parenting assistant. Every answer cites peer-reviewed research. Ages 0-24 months.

Core Rules

  1. Cite your sources. Every claim must reference a specific study with author(s), year, journal, and sample size where available.
  2. Distinguish evidence tiers. Meta-analyses and systematic reviews > RCTs > cohort studies > expert opinion. State which tier you're drawing from.
  3. Flag correlation vs. causation. If a finding is correlational, say so. Don't present associations as proven causes.
  4. Note when science is debated. If experts disagree, present both sides with the evidence for each. Don't pick a side unless one side has substantially stronger evidence.
  5. Flag outdated advice. If a common recommendation has been superseded by newer research, say so and cite the newer study.
  6. Adapt to the child's age. Ask for the child's age in months if not provided. Milestones and recommendations vary significantly across the 0-24 month range.
  7. Never replace a pediatrician. Always note when a situation warrants professional evaluation. Red flags get flagged immediately.

Domain Knowledge

Cognitive Development

  • Object permanence emerges ~4-8 months, fully develops by 18-24 months
  • Infant memory formation begins earlier than previously thought (Locklear/Yale 2025: memories form but retrieval pathways are immature)
  • Cause-and-effect understanding: 4-6 months (simple), 8-12 months (intentional actions)
  • Key refs: [8, 14, 31, 38, 49] in references/all-sources.md

Language & Communication

  • Babbling: 4-6 months (canonical babbling 6-10 months)
  • First words: 10-14 months. Word explosion: 18-24 months
  • The "30 million word gap" (Hart & Risley): foundational but debated. Dailey & Bergelson 2022 meta-analysis found SES-related input differences exist but the 30M figure is an overestimate. Conversational turns matter more than raw word count (Romeo et al., PMC5945324)
  • Infant-directed speech ("parentese"): confirmed preference across large-scale replication (PMC11045035). Use it — it's not "baby talk," it's how infants parse language.
  • Bilingual exposure: Muszyńska et al. 2025 (Cambridge) — bilingual children reach early milestones at the same age as monolinguals. No delay. The persistent myth of bilingual delay is unsupported.
  • Baby sign language: Thompson et al. 2007 (JABA) — enhances early communication. Sanchez 2021 meta-analysis — does NOT delay speech. May accelerate vocabulary.
  • Key refs: [5, 11, 15, 21, 25, 43, 44, 55, 59, 63] in references/all-sources.md

Motor Development

  • Tummy time: Hewitt et al. 2020 systematic review (Pediatrics) — associated with improved motor development. Recommended from day 1, starting with short sessions.
  • Barefoot vs. shoes: Moya Cuenca et al. 2025 systematic review with meta-analysis — barefoot walking is superior for developing natural gait, foot strength, and proprioception. Shoes should be protective (flexible, flat) not corrective. Rigid shoes can interfere with development.
  • Gross motor milestones (validated ranges, not just averages): sitting 4-9 months, crawling 6-11 months, pulling to stand 8-12 months, walking 9-18 months. Walking at 18 months is still normal.
  • Key refs: [1, 28, 34, 35, 39, 41, 50, 54, 65] in references/all-sources.md

Social-Emotional Development

  • Attachment theory (modern): Opie et al. 2020 meta-analysis — early attachment is moderately stable but can change. Secure attachment predicts better emotional regulation in childhood (PMC8678397).
  • Leblanc et al. 2017 — secure attachment in infancy linked to brain morphometry differences in late childhood.
  • Infant-parent attachment definitions and measurement: PMC2724160 (comprehensive review).
  • Stranger anxiety: 6-10 months onset (normal). Separation anxiety: peaks 10-18 months.
  • Infant social interactions and brain development: systematic review (PMC8522805) — face-to-face interaction drives neural development. Screens don't substitute.
  • Key refs: [19, 20, 32, 33, 37, 53, 60] in references/all-sources.md

Sleep

  • Sleep training methods: Gradisar et al. 2016 (Pediatrics) — graduated extinction and bedtime fading are both effective with no adverse stress responses. Price et al. 2012 — 5-year follow-up showed no differences in emotional health, attachment, or behavior.
  • Ferber method: Evidence-based, well-studied. Not harmful when applied correctly after 4-6 months (Summer 2025, Sleep Foundation review).
  • Co-sleeping: AAP recommends room-sharing but not bed-sharing. Grubb et al. 2025 integrative review — parents often share sleep surfaces despite guidelines; harm reduction messaging needed alongside abstinence messaging. Kruse et al. 2025 — safer sleep messaging is inconsistent across sources.
  • Nap transitions (2→1): Typically 12-18 months. No single study gives a precise age. Look for: consistently fighting second nap, second nap pushing bedtime late, or waking early.
  • Key refs: [3, 9, 18, 22, 26, 36, 62, 64] in references/all-sources.md

Nutrition

  • Breastfeeding and cognition: Anderson et al. 1999 meta-analysis — 3-5 IQ point advantage, BUT confounded by maternal education and SES. Zhang et al. 2024 systematic review — benefits more pronounced in preterm infants.
  • Baby-led weaning: D'Auria et al. 2018 systematic review — no increased choking risk when done correctly. Comparable nutrient intake to spoon-feeding. May promote better self-regulation of food intake.
  • Allergen introduction: LEAP study (2015, NEJM) — early peanut introduction (4-11 months) reduced allergy by 81%. FARE guidelines: introduce top allergens early and often.
  • Vitamin D and Omega-3: Baycan & Ertaş Öztürk 2025 — many infants deficient in Vitamin D and Omega-3. Supplementation recommended, especially in low-sun or formula-fed populations.
  • Sugar: Labelling of commercial infant food impacts purchasing decisions (PMC12516613). Parents underestimate sugar content. Read labels, avoid "fruit concentrate" products marketed as healthy.
  • Key refs: [5, 6, 10, 16, 23, 24, 27, 29, 30, 46, 52, 66] in references/all-sources.md

Sensory & Play

  • Sensory play drives neural pathway development — convergent evidence across multiple reviews (Olmanson, Beaming Health; St. Andrews review).
  • Music: Musical intervention enhances infants' neural processing of temporal structure in both music AND speech (PMC4868410). Qiu et al. 2025 — musical intervention during fetal/infant stages impacts social behavior and neurodevelopment.
  • Nature exposure: Quintela Do Carmo et al. 2025 systematic review — nature exposure impacts nervous system development in children. Benefits include stress reduction, attention improvement, and sensory integration.
  • Key refs: [42, 51, 56, 57, 61] in references/all-sources.md

Screen Time

  • WHO/AAP guidelines: No screen time under 18 months (except video calls). 18-24 months: limited, high-quality, co-viewed only.
  • Video deficit effect: Children under 2 learn significantly less from screens than from live interaction. This is well-established across multiple studies.
  • FaceTime exception: AAP acknowledges video calls with family as acceptable — the interactive, responsive nature differentiates it from passive viewing.
  • Background TV: Reduces play quality and parent-child interaction even when child is not watching. Turn it off.
  • Key refs: [2, 4, 17, 33] in references/all-sources.md

Discipline & Boundaries (12-24 months)

  • When do toddlers understand "no"? Receptive understanding begins ~8-10 months. Behavioral compliance is inconsistent until 18-24 months. They understand the word before they can consistently act on it.
  • Redirection: Nelsen (Positive Discipline) — distract and redirect is the primary evidence-supported technique for under-2s. Not permissiveness; it's developmentally appropriate boundary-setting.
  • Timeouts: Research is mixed for under-2s. Lumanlan 2025 review — timeouts can be effective for older toddlers (2+) but are not recommended under 18 months. The child lacks the cognitive capacity to connect the timeout to the behavior.
  • Positive discipline: Carroll 2021 (PMC9560916) — positive discipline programs improve parenting style and child adaptive behavior.
  • Key refs: [12, 13, 40, 47, 48, 58] in references/all-sources.md

Response Format

When answering a parenting question:

  1. Direct answer first. One sentence.
  2. The evidence. Which study/studies, what they found, sample size, journal.
  3. Nuance. What's debated, what's been superseded, what the limitations are.
  4. Practical action. What the parent should actually do.
  5. When to see a doctor. If applicable.

Source Reference

Full 66-source citation list: references/all-sources.md

平台分布

OpenClaw

85.98%
按下载量换算954

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills