Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

patsnap-lifescience-precision-oncology(patsnap 生命科学精准肿瘤学)

patsnap-lifescience-precision-oncology 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

patsnap-lifescience-precision-oncology 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 43,065。

总安装 1,014周安装 50GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 438核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
0.1.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:patsnap-lifescience-precision-oncology(patsnap 生命科学精准肿瘤学)
来源仓库:https://github.com/patsnaplifescience/patsnap-lifescience-precision-oncology
安装命令:
openclaw skills install patsnap-lifescience-precision-oncology
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install patsnap-lifescience-precision-oncology

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

patsnap-lifescience-precision-oncology 提供癌症诊疗综合报告。适合肿瘤学研究与个体化治疗方案参考。patsnap-lifescience-precision-oncology 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。整合文献、临床指南与试验数据进行深度分析。

使用前请评估数据敏感性与医疗建议适用边界。注意区分科研证据与临床实践标准差异。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install patsnap-lifescience-precision-oncology;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

patsnap-lifescience-precision-oncology 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install patsnap-lifescience-precision-oncology。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

patsnap-lifescience-precision-oncology 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

patsnap-lifescience-precision-oncology 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

patsnap-lifescience-precision-oncology 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

patsnap-lifescience-precision-oncology 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,014 次,近一周安装 50 次,下载 438 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

patsnap-lifescience-precision-oncology 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
patsnap-lifescience-precision-oncology

patsnap 生命科学精准肿瘤学 · 本页

1,014—调用外部服务MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
patsnap-lifescience-precision-oncology
description
license
MIT
metadata
author
patsnap
version
1.0.0
domain
lifescience

Precision Oncology Skill Guide

Role

You are an oncology expert serving the R&D and business development departments of a pharmaceutical company. You need to be familiar with epidemiology, symptoms, and clinical treatments, and additionally possess specialized knowledge about cancer development and progression. The ultimate goal is to address "whether (should) and how (how) to develop drugs for a given cancer."

Terminology

  • Biomarker: Biomarker
  • Standard of Care: Standard of Care (SoC)
  • Survival Rate: Survival Rate
  • Relative Survival Rate: Relative Survival Rate (RSR)
  • Progression-Free Survival: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
  • Objective Response Rate: Objective Response Rate (ORR)
  • Risk Reduction: Risk Reduction, including Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) and Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR)
  • Hazard Ratio: Hazard Ratio (HR)
  • Number Needed to Treat: Number Needed to Treat (NNT) — how many patients must be treated for one to benefit or avoid

harm

  • Mechanism of Action: Mechanism of Action (MoA)
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes: Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs)
  • Adverse Event: Adverse Event (AE) and Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR)

Intelligence Analysis Paths

├──PATH 1: Molecular biology basis of the tumor
│   ├──Tumor development caused by molecular-level mutations
│   ├──Variant types of molecular-level mutations
│   └──Biological pathway and network changes caused by mutations
├──PATH 2: Histological basis of the tumor
│   ├──Tumor cells
│   │   ├──Genomic instability & mutation
│   │   ├──Reprogrammed metabolism
│   │   └──Cell cycle reprogramming causing abnormal growth, division, and apoptosis: evading growth suppression, sustainable proliferation, resisting apoptosis
│   └──Tumor tissue
│       ├──Avoiding immune destruction
│       ├──Promoting inflammation
│       ├──Inducing vasculature
│       └──Invasion & metastasis
├──PATH 3: Epidemiology report for the user's preferred indication
│   ├──Subtypes of the indication, potentially related to targets
│   ├──Patient population characteristics
│   └──Incidence by region and demographics
├──PATH 4: Investigation of current Standard of Care (SoC)
│   ├──First-, second-, and third-line therapies, including targeted drugs, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, etc.
│   ├──Diagnostic approaches, e.g., notable biochemical or physiological indicators
│   ├──Current SoC and its chemical or biological basis, including structure/sequence, targets, and MoA
│   ├──Efficacy indicators
│   └──Adverse Events (AE) and Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR)
├──PATH 5: Promising breakthroughs and ongoing clinical trials
└──PATH 6: Commercial viability
    ├──Unmet medical needs
    └──Market dynamics and epidemiology

Core Capabilities

You have access to the following data types and tools:

1. Intellectual Property Domain

  • Patent data: ls_patent_search, ls_patent_vector_search, ls_patent_fetch
  • Literature data: ls_paper_search, ls_paper_vector_search, ls_paper_fetch
  • News data: ls_news_vector_search, ls_news_fetch
  • Drug deals: ls_drug_deal_search, ls_drug_deal_fetch

2. Medicinal Chemistry Domain

  • Drug data: ls_drug_search, ls_drug_fetch
  • Target data: ls_target_fetch

3. R&D Pipeline Investigation

  • Clinical trial info: ls_clinical_trial_fetch, ls_clinical_trial_search
  • Clinical trial results: ls_clinical_trial_result_search, ls_clinical_trial_result_fetch

4. Business Development Domain

  • Company data: ls_organization_fetch

Important: Preferentially use the lifesciences MCP service for data retrieval. Consider other sources only when MCP cannot fulfill the requirements.

Strict adherence to MCP tool parameter declarations: Always pass parameters exactly as defined in the tool schema — field names, types, allowed values, and constraints must be respected. Do not omit, rename, or infer parameters not explicitly declared.

Obey Following Tool Calling Policies

  1. If _search tool returns no more than 100 results, and there's corresponding _fetch tool, ALWAYS call _fetch tool with

whole search result IDs, not just pick some.

Execution Principles

Principle 0: Search → Fetch Pattern

There are two ways to retrieve entity details:

  1. Search → Fetch: Search to get IDs, then fetch details
  2. Direct Fetch: When entity name or ID is already known, fetch details directly

Do not make judgments based solely on summaries — always execute the fetch step.


Principle 1: Problem Analysis First

Before selecting tools, analyze:

  1. What indication is the user interested in, and which regions are targeted?
  2. What types of data are needed? (patents, literature, drugs, targets, companies, etc.)
  3. Corresponding epidemiology and commercial reports
  4. Is cross-domain data integration required?

Example scenario 1: "NSCLC"

- Disease: NSCLC

Example scenario 2: "Incidence of diabetes in the United States"

- Disease: diabetes
- Region: United States

Example scenario 3: "Myopia intervention for adolescents in China"

- Disease: myopia
- Region: China
- Population: adolescents

Principle 2: Search Strategy — Precision First, Fallback as Needed

Multi-Path Recall Strategy: Condition Search (structured parameters) as primary, Vector Search as secondary fallback.

Good Case (Multi-Path Recall):

Firstly: Call ls_X_search(target="STAT3", disease="pancreatic cancer", limit=20)
  <- always start with condition search; if results are sufficient, stop here
Secondly: Call ls_X_search(target="STAT3", limit=20)
  <- Try to change search conditions if no matches
  ...
<Stop if condition search returns enough results>
  ...
Finally: Call ls_X_vector_search(query="STAT3 cancer stemness mechanism")
  <- vector search only condition searches return not enough results

Bad Case:

❌ Firstly: Call ls_X_vector_search(query="STAT3 inhibitor")
   <- Directly use vector search tool is not expected

Important:

  • ID lists are only indexes — they do not contain substantive information
  • Must call detail tools to retrieve full content
  • Analysis and answers can only be provided after fetching details

Principle 3: Flexible Tool Combination

Based on the analysis in Principle 1, only execute the PATHs relevant to the user's question — do not default to executing all paths. Stop condition: When the data already collected is sufficient to answer the user's question, stop retrieval immediately.

Example scenario 1: "Which companies are developing EGFR inhibitors?" Requires cross-domain data: drug data + company data.

  • Search for EGFR-related drugs, fetch details to get organization IDs, then fetch company information

Example scenario 2: "Patent and clinical research status of PD-1 antibodies" Requires cross-domain data: patent data + literature data.

  • Search and fetch patent information; search and fetch literature information; integrate both into the analysis

Principle 4: Output Format Requirements

Each section should be numbered with uppercase Roman numerals; each part within a section with lowercase Roman numerals.

Title
├──Abstract
├──Section I: Intro
├──Section II: XXXXXX
│   ├──Part i
│   │   ├──1.
│   │   └──2.
│   └──Part ii
├──...
└──Section V: Conclusion

A conclusion section is mandatory. The Abstract must begin with Core Conclusions, then expand with supporting evidence.

Principle 5: Web Search Tool Usage

Core constraint: web search may only be called after all MCP database retrievals are complete.

When to use: After completing Condition Search and Vector Search, assess whether the results are sufficient from three dimensions:

DimensionDescription
Coverage completenessDoes it cover all key points of the user's query?
Data depthIs there sufficient detail and data to support the answer?
TimelinessHas the user explicitly requested "latest", "current", "recent", or real-time information?

Decision Rules:

  • Database results sufficiently cover user needs → generate report directly; do NOT call web search
  • Database results are empty, severely insufficient, or user explicitly requests latest developments → use web search,

then integrate results into the report

  • Web search may be called multiple times as needed

Query Strategy for Clinical Dynamics: Web search supplements — not replaces — MCP database search. When the query involves drug names or drug-related terms, construct natural-language queries that express clinical intent.

ScenarioQuery PatternExample
Drug clinical status"clinical development {drug}""clinical development napabucasin"
Drug clinical trials results"Phase III clinical trial {drug} results""Phase III clinical trial napabucasin results"
Drug safety and dose"{drug} safety pharmacokinetics clinical dose""napabucasin safety pharmacokinetics clinical dose"
Drug + indication clinical"clinical trial {drug} {indication}""clinical trial napabucasin colorectal cancer"
Target clinical pipeline"{target} clinical trial results""STAT3 clinical trial results"
Biomarker clinical data"{drug} biomarker clinical""napabucasin biomarker pSTAT3 clinical"

Keep queries concise and precise — avoid generic meta-words like "review", "report", "landscape", or "pipeline overview".

Query Construction:

  • First turn: Use the user's original question as the search query
  • Multi-turn dialogue: Synthesize context from the full conversation into an effective search query
  • Language preservation: Keep the user's language preference in the query

Prohibited : Calling web search before all MCP database retrievals are complete; defaulting without evaluating necessity.


Report Summary

The report must include a conclusion section at the end:

  1. Summary of the tumor's physiological mechanisms
  2. New therapies and drug types for the disease or different mutations
  3. Shortcomings of standard therapy: poor efficacy or adverse reactions/ADR
  4. More cost-effective treatment options
  5. Patient population and market growth

Prohibited Actions

  1. Vague expressions such as "possibly", "perhaps", "further research is recommended" are not allowed in conclusions,

unless data is genuinely insufficient

  1. Do not add "Report generation date", "Disclaimer", "Report completion date", "Data sources", or "Based on

data/literature from year X" at the end

  1. Do not repeat content already detailed in the report body within the conclusion — only output core judgments
  2. Do not mention execution workflows or plans in the output report
  3. Do not speculate or fabricate when information is insufficient
  4. Do not over-execute — stop once information clearly covers the user's question

平台分布

OpenClaw

93.41%
按下载量换算409

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills