Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

patent-application-creator专利申请创建者

Agent Skill

patent-application-creator 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

8,683

周安装

373

GitHub Stars

96

下载量

3,044
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:patent-application-creator(专利申请创建者)
来源仓库:https://github.com/robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator
仓库路径:skills/patent-application-creator
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator --skill patent-application-creator
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator --skill patent-application-creator

简介

自动生成完整专利申请文档,含权利要求书和技术说明。

  • 适用于发明人快速起草高质量专利文件。
  • 覆盖现有技术检索、图表生成和格式校验全流程。
  • 需人工复核确保技术描述准确无误。patent-application-creator 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 注意 USPTO 格式要求,避免因手续问题被驳回。

SKILL.md

Patent Application Creator Skill

Complete end-to-end patent application creation from invention disclosure to USPTO-ready filing.

When to Use

Invoke this skill when users ask to:

  • Create a complete patent application
  • Draft a provisional patent application
  • Prepare a utility patent application
  • Write patent claims and specification
  • Generate a full patent filing package

What This Skill Does

Orchestrates the complete patent creation workflow:

  1. Prior Art Search → Identify existing patents
  2. Claims Drafting → Write independent and dependent claims
  3. Specification Writing → Create detailed description
  4. Diagram Generation → Produce technical figures
  5. Abstract Creation → Write concise summary
  6. Compliance Checking → Validate USPTO requirements
  7. IDS Preparation → List prior art for disclosure

Complete Workflow

Phase 1: Discovery & Research (15-30 min)

  1. Invention Interview:

- Get detailed invention description from user - Extract key features and novel aspects - Identify problem being solved - List all components/steps

  1. Prior Art Search:

- Use Prior Art Search skill (7-step methodology) - Find 10-20 most relevant patents - Document key differences - Assess patentability

  1. Technology Landscape:

- Identify CPC classifications - Review competing approaches - Find terminology used in field

Output: Research summary with prior art analysis


Phase 2: Claims Drafting (20-40 min)

  1. Claim Strategy:

- Define claim scope based on prior art - Identify distinguishing features - Plan independent/dependent structure - Choose claim types (system, method, etc.)

  1. Independent Claims:

- Draft 1-3 broad independent claims - Use preamble-transition-body structure - Include all essential elements - Distinguish from prior art

  1. Dependent Claims:

- Add 10-20 dependent claims - Cover specific implementations - Add fall-back positions - Include preferred embodiments

  1. Claim Review:

- Use Patent Claims Analyzer skill - Check antecedent basis - Fix definiteness issues - Validate dependencies

Output: Complete claims section (20-25 claims)


Phase 3: Specification Writing (40-90 min)

  1. Title:

- Clear, descriptive (< 500 characters) - Matches invention scope - Includes key technology terms

  1. Field of the Invention:

- 1-2 paragraphs - Describe technical field - Reference relevant classifications

  1. Background:

- Problem statement (2-3 paragraphs) - Limitations of existing solutions - Need for invention - Cite prior art from search

  1. Summary:

- High-level description (3-5 paragraphs) - Main features and advantages - How it solves the problem - Independent claims in prose

  1. Brief Description of Drawings:

- List each figure - One sentence per figure - Reference numbers introduced

  1. Detailed Description:

- Complete description of all embodiments - Multiple embodiments (preferred + variations) - Step-by-step for methods - Component-by-component for systems - Reference numbers throughout - Support ALL claim elements (35 USC 112(a))

  1. Examples/Embodiments:

- Specific implementations - Working examples - Alternative designs

  1. Advantages/Benefits:

- List key advantages - Explain improvements over prior art

  1. Specification Review:

- Use Patent Claims Analyzer skill (specification mode) - Verify all claims are supported - Check enablement - Validate completeness

Output: Complete specification (20-50 pages)


Phase 4: Diagrams & Figures (15-30 min)

  1. Identify Figures Needed:

- System block diagrams - Method flowcharts - Component details - Alternative embodiments

  1. Generate Diagrams:

- Use Patent Diagram Generator skill - Create all required figures - Add reference numbers (10, 20, 30...) - Ensure clarity

  1. Figure Descriptions:

- Write detailed figure descriptions - Explain all reference numbers - Describe relationships between components

Output: 3-10 patent figures (SVG/PNG/PDF)


Phase 5: Abstract & Front Matter (10-15 min)

  1. Abstract:

- 50-150 words (USPTO requirement) - Single paragraph - No claim limitations - Broad technical description

  1. Title Page Info:

- Inventors - Assignee - Correspondence address - Prior applications (if any)

  1. Cross-References:

- Related applications - Priority claims - Provisional references

Output: Complete front matter


Phase 6: Compliance & Validation (15-20 min)

  1. Formalities Check:

- Use Patent Claims Analyzer skill (formalities mode) - Abstract length: 50-150 words - Title length: < 500 characters - Required sections present - Drawing references valid

  1. Claims Compliance:

- 35 USC 112(b) definiteness - Antecedent basis correct - No indefinite terms - Proper dependencies

  1. Specification Compliance:

- 35 USC 112(a) written description - Enablement complete - Best mode disclosed - All claims supported

  1. MPEP Guidance:

- Use MPEP Search skill - Verify format requirements - Check section 608 compliance - Review any special requirements

Output: Compliance report with fixes


Phase 7: Final Assembly (10-15 min)

  1. Document Assembly:

- Title page - Abstract - Drawings (brief description) - Specification - Claims - Abstract (at end)

  1. IDS Preparation:

- List all prior art from search - Include publication numbers - Add filing/grant dates - Note relevance

  1. Filing Package:

- Specification document - Claims document - Figures (separate files) - IDS form data - Assignment (if applicable)

Output: USPTO-ready filing package


Document Templates

Specification Structure

[TITLE]

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

[Technical field description]

BACKGROUND

[Problem statement and prior art]

SUMMARY

[High-level invention description]

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates...
FIG. 2 shows...
FIG. 3 depicts...

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[Comprehensive description with reference numbers]

First Embodiment

[Detailed description of main embodiment]

Second Embodiment

[Alternative embodiment]

Examples

[Working examples]

ADVANTAGES

[Key benefits and improvements]

CONCLUSION

[Broad scope statement]

CLAIMS

[Claims section]

Claims Structure

What is claimed is:

1. A [system/method/apparatus] for [purpose], comprising:
    a [first element];
    a [second element]; and
    wherein [novel relationship/function].

2. The [system/method/apparatus] of claim 1, wherein [additional limitation].

3. The [system/method/apparatus] of claim 1, wherein [alternative limitation].

...

[Continue through all claims]

Quality Checklist

Before finalizing, verify:

  • Prior art search completed (Top 10 documented)
  • Claims drafted (1-3 independent, 10-20 dependent)
  • Specification written (20+ pages)
  • All claim elements supported in specification
  • Diagrams created (3+ figures with reference numbers)
  • Abstract written (50-150 words)
  • Title created (< 500 characters)
  • Antecedent basis checked (no critical issues)
  • Definiteness verified (no indefinite terms)
  • Enablement complete (sufficient detail)
  • Formalities compliant (MPEP 608)
  • IDS list prepared (all prior art included)
  • Figures match description
  • Reference numbers consistent
  • USPTO format requirements met

File Organization

patent-application/
├── 01-research/
│   ├── prior-art-search.md
│   ├── top-10-patents.md
│   └── patentability-assessment.md
├── 02-claims/
│   ├── claims-draft-v1.md
│   ├── claims-final.md
│   └── claims-analysis-report.md
├── 03-specification/
│   ├── specification-outline.md
│   ├── specification-full.md
│   └── specification-review.md
├── 04-diagrams/
│   ├── fig1-system-diagram.svg
│   ├── fig2-method-flowchart.svg
│   ├── fig3-component-detail.svg
│   └── figures-list.md
├── 05-front-matter/
│   ├── abstract.md
│   ├── title.md
│   └── bibliographic-data.md
├── 06-compliance/
│   ├── formalities-check.md
│   ├── claims-compliance.md
│   └── spec-compliance.md
└── 07-filing-package/
    ├── complete-specification.pdf
    ├── claims.pdf
    ├── drawings.pdf
    └── ids-list.md

Integration with Other Skills

This workflow orchestrates:

  • Prior Art Search skill (Phase 1)
  • Patent Claims Analyzer skill (Phase 2, 6)
  • Patent Diagram Generator skill (Phase 4)
  • MPEP Search skill (Phase 6)
  • BigQuery Patent Search skill (Phase 1)

Estimated Timeline

Provisional Application (Lighter requirements):

  • Research: 15 min
  • Claims: 20 min
  • Specification: 40 min
  • Diagrams: 15 min
  • Total: ~90 minutes

Utility Application (Full formal requirements):

  • Research: 30 min
  • Claims: 40 min
  • Specification: 90 min
  • Diagrams: 30 min
  • Compliance: 20 min
  • Total: ~3.5 hours

User Interaction Points

Throughout the workflow, pause to:

  1. After Research: Present patentability assessment, ask if should proceed
  2. After Claims: Show draft claims, get feedback on scope
  3. After Specification Outline: Review structure before full writing
  4. After Diagrams: Confirm figures match invention description
  5. After Compliance: Show any issues found, make fixes
  6. Before Final: Present complete package for review

Tools Available

  • Bash: Run Python tools for search, analysis
  • Write: Save all documents and sections
  • Read: Load user invention descriptions, prior art
  • Grep: Search through generated content

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

28.3%
按下载量换算861

OpenCode

20.6%
按下载量换算627

Gemini CLI

18.05%
按下载量换算549

Antigravity

13.27%
按下载量换算404

trae

8.24%
按下载量换算251

windsurf

3.21%
按下载量换算98

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills