Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

parse-dont-validate(解析不验证)

parse-dont-validate 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

parse-dont-validate 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 43,703。

总安装 964周安装 25GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 29核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:parse-dont-validate(解析不验证)
来源仓库:https://github.com/caidanw/skills
仓库路径:skills/parse-dont-validate
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/caidanw/skills --skill parse-dont-validate
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/caidanw/skills --skill parse-dont-validate

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

parse-dont-validate 专注于解析数据而不进行验证,适用于需要快速提取信息的场景。它帮助用户在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中高效处理原始内容。通过 GitHub 仓库安装后可直接集成到工作流中使用。使用前应检查其是否涉及敏感操作如网络请求或文件系统访问。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/parse-dont-validate

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/caidanw/skills --skill parse-dont-validate;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

parse-dont-validate 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/caidanw/skills --skill parse-dont-validate。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

parse-dont-validate 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

parse-dont-validate 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

parse-dont-validate 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

parse-dont-validate 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 964 次,近一周安装 25 次,下载 29 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

parse-dont-validate 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
parse-dont-validate

解析不验证 · 本页

964—需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Parse, Don't Validate

Based on Alexis King's article: https://lexi-lambda.github.io/blog/2019/11/05/parse-don-t-validate/

A parser is a function that consumes less-structured input and produces more-structured output. Validation checks a property and throws it away. Parsing checks a property and *preserves it in the type system*. Always prefer parsing.

The Core Idea

// VALIDATION: checks a property, returns nothing useful
function validateNonEmpty(list: string[]): void {
  if (list.length === 0) throw new Error("list cannot be empty");
}

// PARSING: checks the same property, returns proof in the type
function parseNonEmpty<T>(list: T[]): [T, ...T[]] {
  if (list.length === 0) throw new Error("list cannot be empty");
  return list as [T, ...T[]];
}

Both check the same thing. But parseNonEmpty gives the caller access to what it learned. validateNonEmpty throws the knowledge away, forcing every downstream function to either re-check or hope for the best.

The Two Strategies

When a function is partial (not defined for all inputs), there are exactly two ways to make it total:

1. Weaken the output (add Maybe/null)

function head<T>(list: T[]): T | undefined {
  return list[0];
}

Easy to implement, annoying to use. Every caller must handle undefined even if they already know the list is non-empty. Leads to redundant checks and // should never happen comments.

2. Strengthen the input (narrow the type) -- PREFER THIS

function head<T>(list: [T, ...T[]]): T {
  return list[0];
}

The check happens once, at the boundary, when the data enters the system. After that, the type carries the proof. No redundant checks. No impossible branches. If the validation logic changes, the compiler catches every affected call site.

Always try strategy 2 first. Fall back to strategy 1 only when 2 is impractical.

Practical Rules

1. Make illegal states unrepresentable

Use the most precise data structure you reasonably can. Don't model things you shouldn't allow.

// BAD: allows duplicate keys, order might matter or might not
type Config = Array<[string, string]>;

// GOOD: duplicates impossible by construction
type Config = Map<string, string>;

// or even better if keys are known:
type Config = { host: string; port: number; debug: boolean };

2. Push parsing to the boundary

Parse data into precise types as soon as it enters your system. The boundary between your program and the outside world is where parsing belongs.

// BAD: raw data flows deep into the system, validated ad-hoc
function processUser(data: unknown) {
  // 50 lines later...
  if (typeof data.email !== "string") throw new Error("invalid email");
}

// GOOD: parse at the boundary, use precise types everywhere else
interface User { name: string; email: string; age: number; }

function parseUser(data: unknown): User {
  // validate and parse here, once
}

function processUser(user: User) {
  // no validation needed -- the type guarantees it
}

3. Treat void-returning validators with deep suspicion

A function whose primary purpose is checking a property but returns void is almost always a missed opportunity. It should return a more precise type instead.

// SUSPICIOUS: checks something, returns nothing
function validateAge(age: number): void {
  if (age < 0 || age > 150) throw new Error("invalid age");
}

// BETTER: returns proof of validity as a branded type
type ValidAge = number & { readonly __brand: "ValidAge" };
function parseAge(age: number): ValidAge {
  if (age < 0 || age > 150) throw new Error("invalid age");
  return age as ValidAge;
}

4. Use branded/opaque types as "fake parsers"

When making an illegal state truly unrepresentable is impractical (e.g., "integer in range 1-100"), use branded types with smart constructors to fake it:

type EmailAddress = string & { readonly __brand: "EmailAddress" };

function parseEmail(input: string): EmailAddress {
  if (!input.includes("@")) throw new Error("invalid email");
  return input as EmailAddress;
}

// Now functions can demand EmailAddress instead of string
function sendEmail(to: EmailAddress, body: string): void { /* ... */ }

The type system won't let you pass a raw string where EmailAddress is expected. You must go through parseEmail first.

5. Let types inform code, not vice versa

Don't stick a boolean in a record because your current function needs it. Design the types first, then write functions that transform between them.

// BAD: boolean flag controlling behavior
interface Request { url: string; isAuthenticated: boolean; token?: string; }

// GOOD: discriminated union makes invalid state impossible
type Request =
  | { kind: "anonymous"; url: string }
  | { kind: "authenticated"; url: string; token: string };

6. Avoid denormalized data

Duplicating the same information in multiple places creates a trivially representable illegal state: the copies getting out of sync. Strive for a single source of truth.

If denormalization is necessary for performance, hide it behind an abstraction boundary where a small, trusted module keeps representations in sync.

7. Parse in multiple passes if needed

Avoiding shotgun parsing means don't *act on* data before it's fully parsed. It doesn't mean you can't use some input data to decide how to parse other input data.

// Fine: first parse the header to determine the format, then parse the body
const header = parseHeader(raw);
const body = parseBody(raw, header.format);

Shotgun Parsing -- The Anti-Pattern

Shotgun parsing is when validation code is mixed with and spread across processing code. Checks are scattered everywhere, hoping to catch all bad cases without systematic justification.

The danger: if a late-discovered error means some invalid input was already partially processed, you may need to roll back state changes. This is fragile and error-prone.

Parsing avoids this by stratifying the program into two phases:

  1. Parsing phase -- failure due to invalid input can only happen here
  2. Execution phase -- input is known-good, failure modes are minimal

Code Review Checklist

When reviewing code, watch for these smells:

  • Function accepts string where a more specific type exists (URL, email, ID)
  • Validation function returns void instead of a refined type
  • Same property checked in multiple places (redundant validation)
  • // should never happen or // impossible comments
  • Raw unknown/any/object flowing past the system boundary into business logic
  • Boolean fields that could be discriminated unions
  • Optional fields that are actually always present after a certain point
  • Arrays where non-empty arrays are required
  • null checks deep in business logic for data validated at entry

平台分布

Codex

35%
按下载量换算10

Claude

28.17%
按下载量换算8

Cursor

19.16%
按下载量换算6

Gemini CLI

10.53%
按下载量换算3

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills