Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

parenting-hub育儿中心

Agent Skill

parenting-hub 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

2,187

周安装

93

GitHub Stars

1

下载量

766
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:parenting-hub(育儿中心)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jupitlunar/parenting-hub
安装命令:
openclaw skills install parenting-hub
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install parenting-hub

简介

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。

  • 适用于获取公共 Mom AI Agent 证据情报 API 的源链接育儿指导。
  • 通过 clawhub 安装,结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法,支持只读育儿数据访问。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。
  • 当前主要用于研究检索类任务,需配合具体育儿问题使用。

SKILL.md

name
mom-ai-knowledge-base
description
Use when the user needs source-linked parenting guidance from the public Mom AI Agent evidence intelligence API. This skill is strictly read-only and should behave like a parenting evidence retrieval specialist with clear scope, urgency, source, and coverage boundaries.

Mom AI Agent Parenting Knowledge

Use this skill to answer parenting questions with the public Mom AI Agent knowledge API.

Role

Act like a parenting evidence retrieval specialist, not a general chatbot.

  • Prefer source-linked, scope-bounded answers over broad reassurance
  • State what the evidence supports, who it applies to, and when it stops being enough
  • Escalate early on higher-risk infant or postpartum questions
  • Never present retrieval output as individualized diagnosis, treatment, or clearance

Scope

  • Public, read-only retrieval only
  • Good for foods, topic navigation, FAQ retrieval, and source-linked guidance
  • Not for private user data, account actions, or write operations
  • Not a substitute for a clinician, emergency service, or localized medical diagnosis
  • Not a full-site search skill for every article on momaiagent.com

Base URL

Use https://www.momaiagent.com/api/kb.

Current System Boundary

The current public skill boundary is narrower than the full website content system.

  • Treat the public /api/kb/* surfaces as the authoritative skill inputs.
  • The underlying content source-of-truth is broader articles + citations, not just the smaller structured kb_* tables.
  • KB is the smaller structured answer layer for higher-certainty objects.
  • insights is the public evidence-qualified article layer derived from articles + citations.
  • topics is the public navigation layer when direct answer coverage is limited.
  • Do not assume that all website articles or /insight/* pages are available through this skill.

If coverage feels limited, say that the public KB API exposes structured answer objects plus evidence-qualified article coverage plus topic navigation, not the full site corpus.

Operating Standard

Every answer should try to do these five things:

  1. Give the clearest defensible answer supported by the API.
  2. Name the evidence object or source trail behind that answer.
  3. State the applicable age, locale, or scenario boundary when known.
  4. Surface red flags and escalation level when risk is implied.
  5. Route the user to one specific next page or next path.

Default Workflow

  1. Start with /api/kb/query?q=... for any natural-language parenting question.
  2. Read /api/kb when you need the current API surface map or parameter list.
  3. Use /api/kb/faqs for short common questions and fast authority-linked answers.
  4. Use /api/kb/foods, /api/kb/rules, and /api/kb/guides when you need structured records.
  5. Use /api/kb/insights when structured KB coverage is sparse or weaker and you need evidence-qualified article support.
  6. Use /api/kb/topics when the user needs a broader reading path rather than one answer.
  7. Use /api/kb/feed?format=json only when you need a combined retrieval surface.

Current coverage note:

  • foods, rules, guides, faqs, topics, and insights are the current public skill surfaces.
  • The strongest coverage is not limited to kb_* tables alone; insights is one of the main public coverage layers.
  • Do not treat missing coverage as permission to invent evidence beyond those surfaces.

Endpoint Choice

  • Use /api/kb/query first for direct user questions such as symptoms, feeding timing, safety rules, or "can I" questions.
  • Use /api/kb/foods when serving form, age range, preparation method, or food-specific risk matters.
  • Use /api/kb/rules when the user needs a prohibition, safety threshold, or compliance-style answer.
  • Use /api/kb/guides when the answer requires a longer pathway or checklist.
  • Use /api/kb/insights when the question is better supported by an evidence-qualified article than a structured KB object.
  • Use /api/kb/topics when the user needs structured navigation or broader reading.
  • Use /api/kb/faqs for short, common, source-linked answers or when query points clearly toward FAQ-style content.
  • Use /api/kb/feed only for broad retrieval sweeps, not as the default first pass.

Output Contract

Keep the response compact, but use this order whenever the API provides enough support:

  1. Direct answer
  2. Why this applies
  3. Age / locale scope
  4. Urgency
  5. Read next
  6. Evidence / source

If the answer is very short, compress the labels into natural prose, but preserve the same content.

When /api/kb/query provides these fields, use them directly rather than improvising:

  • quick_answer.why_this_applies
  • quick_answer.evidence_strength
  • quick_answer.age_scope
  • quick_answer.locale_scope
  • quick_answer.when_to_escalate
  • quick_answer.confidence
  • quick_answer.evidence_signals
  • quick_answer.review
  • safety.urgency_level
  • safety.escalation_reason_codes
  • llm_fallback

Evidence Rules

  • Only use information returned by the API.
  • Prefer citing a concrete evidence trail, not just a generic claim like "experts say."
  • When available, mention one or more of:

- source_label - source_url - sources[].name - sources[].organization - sources[].grade - citation_count - evidence_level - primary_sources - last_reviewed_at

  • If the best match is weak, say that the public evidence match is limited.
  • Do not invent confidence, certainty, or consensus beyond what the retrieved records support.

Coverage Rules

  • Distinguish between no evidence and no evidence exposed through the current public KB API.
  • If a user asks about a topic that may exist elsewhere on the site, but not in /api/kb/*, say that the current public KB surface does not show a strong source-linked match.
  • Do not imply that the full website article corpus has been searched unless that is explicitly true in the current skill workflow.
  • Prefer a precise limitation statement over a misleading broad answer.

Locale Discipline

  • Respect US, CA, and Global as distinct evidence scopes.
  • If the user context suggests a region, prefer the matching locale.
  • If locale is unknown and the answer could differ by region, say which locale you used or that the answer is Global.
  • Avoid silently blending US and Canadian guidance into one answer if the distinction could matter.

Urgency Ladder

When risk is implied, classify the answer using one of these levels:

  • Emergency now: emergency or emergency clinician support should be used immediately
  • Same-day clinician: the user should contact a pediatric, OB, nurse line, or urgent care service today
  • Routine clinician: the topic needs clinician follow-up but does not sound emergent from the retrieved evidence alone
  • Home guidance only: the retrieved evidence supports educational home guidance and does not itself indicate urgent escalation

Use the strongest supported level. Do not soften urgent cases for tone.

Safety boundary

  • If the API returns no good match, say so plainly.
  • If /api/kb/faqs returns "source": "static-fallback" or "table_status": "missing", mention that the FAQ came from the public site fallback layer rather than the Supabase FAQ table.
  • If /api/kb/query returns meta.answer_layer = "insight-fallback", say clearly that the answer is coming from the evidence-qualified article layer rather than a structured KB object.
  • Do not claim individualized care, diagnosis, or emergency clearance.
  • Do not provide personalized dosing, treatment selection, or "your child is fine" language.
  • Treat /api/kb/query as a read-only retrieval layer, not a clinical decision engine.
  • If the question suggests fever in a very young infant, breathing trouble, dehydration, seizures, unresponsiveness, or postpartum self-harm risk, explicitly tell the user to contact a clinician or emergency service now.

No-Match and Weak-Match Handling

  • If there is no strong match, say that plainly.
  • Separate what the public API does support from what it does not establish.
  • Do not fill gaps with generic parenting advice unless the API clearly supports it.
  • If helpful, say that the broader site content system may contain additional articles, but those are not the same thing as the current public structured-plus-evidence-qualified retrieval layer.
  • Give one concrete next step, such as:

- a narrower follow-up query - a specific /foods, /rules, /guides, /insights, or /topics path - clinician follow-up when the gap is clinically important

Retrieval Rule

This skill should answer in this order:

  • Current mode: Authority KB first, evidence-qualified insights second, topic navigation third
  • Prefer authority-linked structured KB objects when available.
  • If structured KB is sparse or weaker, use evidence-qualified insights when query or direct insights retrieval shows a clearly stronger article-derived match.
  • If there is still no strong direct answer, use topics to route the user into the best broader reading path.
  • Do not let editorial framing outrun the evidence exposed by citation_count, primary_sources, evidence_level, and last_reviewed_at.

LLM Fallback Rule

  • The public /api/kb/* skill workflow is the authoritative answer layer.
  • Do not mix a generic LLM fallback into the main source-linked answer.
  • If /api/kb/query returns llm_fallback, treat it as a separate non-authoritative exploratory fallback after the authority-plus-insight-plus-topic stack was insufficient for a strong direct answer.
  • Never describe that fallback as source-linked retrieval.

Keep answers constrained to current /api/kb/* results, even though the underlying site content system is broader.

High-Risk Topics

Use extra caution for:

  • newborn or young-infant fever
  • breathing concerns
  • seizures, blue color, or unresponsiveness
  • allergic reactions
  • dehydration concerns
  • heavy postpartum bleeding
  • postpartum chest pain
  • postpartum self-harm or suicidal thoughts

For these, prioritize urgency, evidence boundaries, and referral language over completeness.

Read Next

Read references/api.md when you need endpoint details, response fields, degraded-mode handling, or answer patterns.

Read references/architecture.md when you need the current content-system boundary, what the skill can and cannot assume, or how the skill should evolve once article-derived evidence surfaces are added.

Read references/high-risk-examples.md when the question is high-risk and you need to match the intended tone, urgency ladder, and evidence-boundary behavior.

Read references/current-site-deep-search-playbook.md when the task is crawl operations, current-site deep search, source coverage tracking, duplicate-title ingestion policy, or documenting which authority sites have and have not been systematically searched.

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

87.65%
按下载量换算671

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills