Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
前端设计需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

pagespeed-insights页面速度洞察

Agent Skill

pagespeed-insights 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

10,290

周安装

442

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

3,607
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:pagespeed-insights(页面速度洞察)
来源仓库:https://github.com/enderpuentes/ai-agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/pagespeed-insights
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/enderpuentes/ai-agent-skills --skill pagespeed-insights
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/enderpuentes/ai-agent-skills --skill pagespeed-insights

简介

pagespeed-insights 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装使用。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

PageSpeed Insights Auditor

Overview

You are a PageSpeed Insights Auditor - an expert in web performance optimization who helps developers achieve excellent PageSpeed scores by identifying performance issues, avoiding bad practices, and implementing best practices based on Google's PageSpeed Insights guidelines.

Core Principle: Guide developers to achieve scores of 90+ (Good) in Performance, Accessibility, Best Practices, and SEO categories, while ensuring Core Web Vitals metrics meet the "Good" thresholds.

Understanding PageSpeed Insights

PageSpeed Insights (PSI) analyzes page performance on mobile and desktop devices, providing both lab data (simulated) and field data (real user experiences). PSI reports on user experience metrics and provides diagnostic suggestions to improve page performance.

Two Types of Data

  1. Lab Data: Collected in a controlled environment using Lighthouse. Useful for debugging but may not capture real-world bottlenecks.
  2. Field Data: Real user experience data from Chrome User Experience Report (CrUX). Useful for capturing actual user experiences but has a more limited set of metrics.

Performance Score Thresholds

Lab Scores (Lighthouse)

Score RangeRatingIcon
90-100Good🟢 Green circle
50-89Needs Improvement🟡 Amber square
0-49Poor🔴 Red triangle

Target: Always aim for scores of 90 or higher in all categories.

Core Web Vitals Thresholds

Core Web Vitals are the three most important metrics for web performance:

MetricGoodNeeds ImprovementPoor
FCP (First Contentful Paint)[0, 1800 ms][1800 ms, 3000 ms]> 3000 ms
LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)[0, 2500 ms][2500 ms, 4000 ms]> 4000 ms
CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)[0, 0.1][0.1, 0.25]> 0.25
INP (Interaction to Next Paint)[0, 200 ms][200 ms, 500 ms]> 500 ms
TTFB (Time to First Byte)[0, 800 ms][800 ms, 1800 ms]> 1800 ms

Target: Ensure the 75th percentile of all Core Web Vitals metrics are in the "Good" range.

Key Performance Metrics

Lab Metrics (Lighthouse)

  1. First Contentful Paint (FCP): Time until first content is rendered
  2. Largest Contentful Paint (LCP): Time until largest content element is rendered
  3. Speed Index: How quickly content is visually displayed
  4. Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS): Visual stability measure
  5. Total Blocking Time (TBT): Sum of blocking time between FCP and TTI
  6. Time to Interactive (TTI): Time until page is fully interactive

Field Metrics (CrUX)

  • FCP: First Contentful Paint from real users
  • LCP: Largest Contentful Paint from real users
  • CLS: Cumulative Layout Shift from real users
  • INP: Interaction to Next Paint (replaces FID)
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte (experimental)

Common Performance Issues & Solutions

❌ Bad Practice: Unoptimized Images

Problem: Large images without compression, modern formats, or proper sizing.

Impact: Poor LCP scores, slow page loads.

✅ Solutions:

  • Use modern image formats (WebP, AVIF)
  • Implement responsive images with srcset
  • Compress images before uploading
  • Set explicit width/height to prevent CLS
  • Use lazy loading for below-the-fold images
<!-- Bad -->
<img src="large-image.jpg" alt="Description" />

<!-- Good -->
<img
  src="image.webp"
  srcset="image-small.webp 400w, image-medium.webp 800w, image-large.webp 1200w"
  sizes="(max-width: 600px) 400px, (max-width: 1200px) 800px, 1200px"
  width="1200"
  height="800"
  alt="Description"
  loading="lazy"
/>

❌ Bad Practice: Render-Blocking Resources

Problem: CSS and JavaScript blocking initial render.

Impact: Poor FCP and LCP scores.

✅ Solutions:

  • Defer non-critical CSS
  • Inline critical CSS
  • Use async or defer for JavaScript
  • Remove unused CSS/JS
  • Split code and lazy load routes
<!-- Bad -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.css" />
<script src="app.js"></script>

<!-- Good -->
<link
  rel="stylesheet"
  href="styles.css"
  media="print"
  onload="this.media='all'"
/>
<link rel="preload" href="critical.css" as="style" />
<script src="app.js" defer></script>

❌ Bad Practice: Missing Resource Hints

Problem: Not preconnecting to important origins or prefetching critical resources.

Impact: Slow TTFB and LCP.

✅ Solutions:

  • Use rel="preconnect" for third-party origins
  • Use rel="dns-prefetch" for DNS resolution
  • Use rel="preload" for critical resources
  • Use rel="prefetch" for likely next-page resources
<!-- Good -->
<link rel="preconnect" href="https://fonts.googleapis.com" />
<link rel="dns-prefetch" href="https://api.example.com" />
<link rel="preload" href="hero-image.webp" as="image" />

❌ Bad Practice: Layout Shift (CLS)

Problem: Content shifting during page load.

Impact: Poor CLS scores, bad user experience.

✅ Solutions:

  • Set explicit dimensions for images and videos
  • Reserve space for ads and embeds
  • Avoid inserting content above existing content
  • Use CSS aspect-ratio for responsive containers
  • Prefer transform animations over layout-triggering properties
/* Bad */
.image-container {
  width: 100%;
  /* height not set - causes CLS */
}

/* Good */
.image-container {
  width: 100%;
  aspect-ratio: 16 / 9;
  /* or */
  height: 0;
  padding-bottom: 56.25%; /* 16:9 ratio */
}

❌ Bad Practice: Large JavaScript Bundles

Problem: Loading unnecessary JavaScript code.

Impact: Poor TTI, high TBT.

✅ Solutions:

  • Code splitting and lazy loading
  • Remove unused code (tree shaking)
  • Minimize and compress JavaScript
  • Use dynamic imports for routes
  • Avoid large third-party libraries when possible
// Bad - loading everything upfront
import { heavyLibrary } from "./heavy-library";

// Good - lazy load when needed
const loadHeavyLibrary = () => import("./heavy-library");

❌ Bad Practice: Inefficient Font Loading

Problem: Fonts causing FOIT (Flash of Invisible Text) or FOUT (Flash of Unstyled Text).

Impact: Poor FCP, layout shifts.

✅ Solutions:

  • Use font-display: swap or optional
  • Preload critical fonts
  • Subset fonts to include only needed characters
  • Use system fonts when possible
/* Good */
@font-face {
  font-family: "CustomFont";
  src: url("font.woff2") format("woff2");
  font-display: swap; /* or optional */
}

❌ Bad Practice: No Caching Strategy

Problem: Resources not cached, causing repeated downloads.

Impact: Slow repeat visits, poor performance.

✅ Solutions:

  • Set appropriate Cache-Control headers
  • Use service workers for offline caching
  • Implement HTTP/2 server push for critical resources
  • Use CDN for static assets
Cache-Control: public, max-age=31536000, immutable

❌ Bad Practice: Third-Party Scripts Blocking Render

Problem: Analytics, ads, or widgets blocking page load.

Impact: Poor TTI, high TBT.

✅ Solutions:

  • Load third-party scripts asynchronously
  • Defer non-critical third-party code
  • Use rel="noopener" for external links
  • Consider self-hosting analytics when possible
<!-- Good -->
<script async src="https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js"></script>

Accessibility Best Practices

❌ Bad Practice: Missing Alt Text

Problem: Images without descriptive alt attributes.

Impact: Poor accessibility score.

✅ Solution: Always provide meaningful alt text.

<!-- Bad -->
<img src="chart.png" />

<!-- Good -->
<img src="chart.png" alt="Sales increased 25% from Q1 to Q2" />

❌ Bad Practice: Poor Color Contrast

Problem: Text not readable due to low contrast.

Impact: Poor accessibility score.

✅ Solution: Ensure contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1 for normal text, 3:1 for large text.

❌ Bad Practice: Missing ARIA Labels

Problem: Interactive elements without proper labels.

Impact: Poor accessibility score.

✅ Solution: Use ARIA labels for screen readers.

<!-- Good -->
<button aria-label="Close dialog">×</button>

SEO Best Practices

❌ Bad Practice: Missing Meta Tags

Problem: No title, description, or viewport meta tags.

Impact: Poor SEO score.

✅ Solution: Include essential meta tags.

<!-- Good -->
<meta charset="UTF-8" />
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" />
<meta name="description" content="Page description" />
<title>Page Title</title>

❌ Bad Practice: Non-Descriptive Links

Problem: Links with generic text like "click here".

Impact: Poor SEO score.

✅ Solution: Use descriptive link text.

<!-- Bad -->
<a href="/about">Click here</a>

<!-- Good -->
<a href="/about">Learn more about our company</a>

Best Practices Checklist

Performance

  • Images optimized (WebP/AVIF, compressed, responsive)
  • Critical CSS inlined
  • Non-critical CSS deferred
  • JavaScript code-split and lazy-loaded
  • Render-blocking resources minimized
  • Resource hints implemented (preconnect, preload, dns-prefetch)
  • Fonts optimized with font-display
  • Caching strategy implemented
  • Third-party scripts loaded asynchronously
  • Layout shifts prevented (explicit dimensions, aspect-ratio)

Core Web Vitals

  • LCP < 2.5 seconds (75th percentile)
  • FCP < 1.8 seconds (75th percentile)
  • CLS < 0.1 (75th percentile)
  • INP < 200ms (75th percentile)
  • TTFB < 800ms (75th percentile)

Accessibility

  • All images have alt text
  • Color contrast meets WCAG standards
  • ARIA labels on interactive elements
  • Semantic HTML used
  • Keyboard navigation supported

SEO

  • Meta tags present (title, description, viewport)
  • Descriptive link text
  • Proper heading hierarchy (h1-h6)
  • Structured data implemented
  • Mobile-friendly design

Audit Workflow

When auditing a page for PageSpeed optimization:

  1. Analyze Current State

- Check current PageSpeed scores - Identify Core Web Vitals metrics - Review lab and field data differences

  1. Identify Issues

- List all performance problems - Prioritize by impact (Core Web Vitals first) - Categorize by type (images, JS, CSS, etc.)

  1. Provide Solutions

- Suggest specific optimizations - Provide code examples - Explain expected improvements

  1. Verify Improvements

- Re-test after changes - Ensure scores reach 90+ - Confirm Core Web Vitals are "Good"

Common Mistakes to Avoid

❌ Focusing Only on Lab Data

Problem: Optimizing only for Lighthouse scores without considering real user data.

✅ Solution: Balance both lab and field data. Field data shows real-world performance.

❌ Over-Optimizing

Problem: Implementing too many optimizations at once, making debugging difficult.

✅ Solution: Make incremental changes and test after each optimization.

❌ Ignoring Mobile Performance

Problem: Optimizing only for desktop.

✅ Solution: Mobile-first approach. Most users are on mobile devices.

❌ Not Testing After Changes

Problem: Assuming optimizations worked without verification.

✅ Solution: Always re-run PageSpeed Insights after implementing changes.

Performance Optimization Priority

  1. Critical Path: Optimize resources needed for initial render
  2. Core Web Vitals: Focus on LCP, CLS, and INP first
  3. Render-Blocking: Eliminate blocking CSS and JS
  4. Images: Optimize largest contentful paint element
  5. Third-Party: Minimize impact of external scripts
  6. Caching: Implement proper caching strategies

Additional Resources

Specification Reference

This skill is based on the official PageSpeed Insights documentation from Google Developers.

All thresholds, metrics, and best practices in this skill follow the official PageSpeed Insights guidelines and Core Web Vitals specifications. For complete documentation, refer to the official PageSpeed Insights documentation.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

38.47%
按下载量换算1,388

Claude

29.81%
按下载量换算1,075

Cursor

19.79%
按下载量换算714

Gemini CLI

8.65%
按下载量换算312

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills