Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 前端设计

frontend-testing(前端测试)

用于辅助前端页面、组件、样式和交互逻辑的开发与维护。它适合让 Agent 生成或审查 React、Next.js、Vue、Tailwind、CSS 等相关代码,整理组件结构,或定位布局和性能问题。使用时需要结合项目现有设计系统、路由和构建方式,避免只生成孤立片段;涉及页面改动时,应配合本地预览和构建检查确认视觉效果。

frontend-testing 是前端设计类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在前端设计类的 10,216 个 Skill 里排第 6,674。

总安装 470周安装 20GitHub Stars 209下载 165核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:frontend-testing(前端测试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/pageai-pro/ralph-loop
仓库路径:skills/frontend-testing
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/pageai-pro/ralph-loop --skill frontend-testing
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/pageai-pro/ralph-loop --skill frontend-testing

这个 Skill 是做什么的

前端设计类 Skill 关注页面结构、视觉规范和组件写法,输出通常是可运行的界面代码。

frontend-testing 用于辅助前端页面、组件、样式和交互逻辑的开发与维护。它适合让 Agent 生成或审查 React、Next.js、Vue、 Tailwind、CSS 等相关代码,整理组件结构,或定位布局和性能问题。

使用时需要结合项目现有设计系统、路由和构建方式,避免只生成孤立片段; 涉及页面改动时,应配合本地预览和构建检查确认视觉效果。

来源仓库内路径:skills/frontend-testing

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/pageai-pro/ralph-loop --skill frontend-testing;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

frontend-testing 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/pageai-pro/ralph-loop --skill frontend-testing。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

frontend-testing 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

frontend-testing 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

frontend-testing 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

frontend-testing 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 470 次,近一周安装 20 次,下载 165 次,GitHub 209 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

frontend-testing 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理前端设计类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

前端设计类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
frontend-design

前端设计 · Codex、Claude

8,823,360126,072只读MIT通过
vercel-composition-patterns

Vercel 组合模式 · Codex、Claude

3,858,81625,893需要联网MIT通过
vercel-react-native-skills

Vercel React native skills 前端 · Codex、Claude

2,468,66425,878只读MIT通过
adapt

adapt 搜索 · Codex、Claude

2,027,04023,125操作浏览器未明确通过
bolder

bolder 分析 · Codex、Claude

2,004,28823,130只读未明确通过
frontend-testing

前端测试 · 本页

470209操作浏览器未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

This skill enables Claude to generate high-quality, comprehensive frontend tests following established conventions and best practices.

When to Apply This Skill

Apply this skill when the user:

  • Asks to write tests for a component, hook, or utility
  • Asks to review existing tests for completeness
  • Mentions Vitest, React Testing Library, RTL, or spec files
  • Requests test coverage improvement
  • Mentions testing, unit tests, or integration tests for frontend code
  • Wants to understand testing patterns in the frontend codebase

Do NOT apply when:

  • User is asking about E2E tests (Playwright)
  • User is only asking conceptual questions without code context

Quick Reference

Tech Stack

ToolVersionPurpose
Vitest4+Test runner
React Testing Library16+Component testing
jsdom-Test environment
TypeScript5+Type safety

Note: keep this list up to date with the project's dependencies.

Key Commands

Always prefer running specific tests over the entire suite for faster feedback:

# Run ALL tests (avoid during development)
npx vitest run

# ✅ PREFERRED: Run specific file
npx vitest run src/components/Button.spec.tsx

# ✅ PREFERRED: Run tests matching a pattern
npx vitest run --grep "Button"
npx vitest run -t "should render"

# ✅ PREFERRED: Run specific describe block
npx vitest run --grep "Button > Rendering"

# ✅ Run tests in a directory
npx vitest run src/components/

# ✅ Run single test by name
npx vitest run -t "should disable button when loading"

Watch Mode (Background Testing)

Use watch mode for efficient iterative development:

# ✅ Watch mode - reruns on file changes
npx vitest

# ✅ Watch specific file
npx vitest src/components/Button.spec.tsx

# ✅ Watch tests matching pattern
npx vitest --grep "Button"

File Naming

  • Test files: ComponentName.spec.tsx (same directory as component)

Test Structure Template

import { render, screen, fireEvent, waitFor } from '@testing-library/react'
import Component from './index'

// ✅ Import real project components (DO NOT mock these)
// import Loading from '@/app/components/base/loading'
// import { ChildComponent } from './child-component'

// ✅ Mock external dependencies only
vi.mock('@/service/api')
vi.mock('next/navigation', () => ({
  useRouter: () => ({ push: vi.fn() }),
  usePathname: () => '/test',
}))

// Shared state for mocks (if needed)
let mockSharedState = false

describe('ComponentName', () => {
  beforeEach(() => {
    vi.clearAllMocks()  // ✅ Reset mocks BEFORE each test
    mockSharedState = false  // ✅ Reset shared state
  })

  // Rendering tests (REQUIRED)
  describe('Rendering', () => {
    it('should render without crashing', () => {
      // Arrange
      const props = { title: 'Test' }

      // Act
      render(<Component {...props} />)

      // Assert
      expect(screen.getByText('Test')).toBeInTheDocument()
    })
  })

  // Props tests (REQUIRED)
  describe('Props', () => {
    it('should apply custom className', () => {
      render(<Component className="custom" />)
      expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toHaveClass('custom')
    })
  })

  // User Interactions
  describe('User Interactions', () => {
    it('should handle click events', () => {
      const handleClick = vi.fn()
      render(<Component onClick={handleClick} />)

      fireEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button'))

      expect(handleClick).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
    })
  })

  // Edge Cases (REQUIRED)
  describe('Edge Cases', () => {
    it('should handle null data', () => {
      render(<Component data={null} />)
      expect(screen.getByText(/no data/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
    })

    it('should handle empty array', () => {
      render(<Component items={[]} />)
      expect(screen.getByText(/empty/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
    })
  })
})

Testing Workflow (CRITICAL)

⚠️ Incremental Approach Required

NEVER generate all test files at once. For complex components or multi-file directories:

  1. Analyze & Plan: List all files, order by complexity (simple → complex)
  2. Process ONE at a time: Write test → Run test → Fix if needed → Next
  3. Verify before proceeding: Do NOT continue to next file until current passes
For each file:
  ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
  │ 1. Write test                                  │
  │ 2. Run: npm run test-unit <file>.spec.tsx      │
  │ 3. PASS? → Mark complete, next file            │
  │    FAIL? → Fix first, then continue            │
  └────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Complexity-Based Order

Process in this order for multi-file testing:

  1. 🟢 Utility functions (simplest)
  2. 🟢 Custom hooks
  3. 🟡 Simple components (presentational)
  4. 🟡 Medium components (state, effects)
  5. 🔴 Complex components (API, routing)
  6. 🔴 Integration tests (index files - last)

When to Refactor First

  • Medium Complexity: Break into smaller pieces before testing
  • 500+ lines: Consider splitting before testing
  • Many dependencies: Extract logic into hooks first

Testing Strategy

Path-Level Testing (Directory Testing)

When assigned to test a directory/path, test ALL content within that path:

  • Test all components, hooks, utilities in the directory (not just index file)
  • Use incremental approach: one file at a time, verify each before proceeding
  • Goal: 100% coverage of ALL files in the directory

Integration Testing First

Prefer integration testing when writing tests for a directory:

  • ✅ Import real project components directly (including base components and siblings)
  • ✅ Only mock: API services (@/service/*), next/navigation, complex context providers
  • ❌ DO NOT mock base components (@/app/components/base/*)
  • ❌ DO NOT mock sibling/child components in the same directory

Core Principles

1. AAA Pattern (Arrange-Act-Assert)

Every test should clearly separate:

  • Arrange: Setup test data and render component
  • Act: Perform user actions
  • Assert: Verify expected outcomes

2. Black-Box Testing

  • Test observable behavior, not implementation details
  • Use semantic queries (getByRole, getByLabelText)
  • Avoid testing internal state directly
  • Prefer pattern matching over hardcoded strings in assertions:
// ❌ Avoid: hardcoded text assertions
expect(screen.getByText('Loading...')).toBeInTheDocument()

// ✅ Better: role-based queries
expect(screen.getByRole('status')).toBeInTheDocument()

// ✅ Better: pattern matching
expect(screen.getByText(/loading/i)).toBeInTheDocument()

3. Single Behavior Per Test

Each test verifies ONE user-observable behavior:

// ✅ Good: One behavior
it('should disable button when loading', () => {
  render(<Button loading />)
  expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toBeDisabled()
})

// ❌ Bad: Multiple behaviors
it('should handle loading state', () => {
  render(<Button loading />)
  expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toBeDisabled()
  expect(screen.getByText('Loading...')).toBeInTheDocument()
  expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toHaveClass('loading')
})

4. Semantic Naming

Use should <behavior> when <condition>:

it('should show error message when validation fails')
it('should call onSubmit when form is valid')
it('should disable input when isReadOnly is true')

Required Test Scenarios

Always Required (All Components)

  1. Rendering: Component renders without crashing
  2. Props: Required props, optional props, default values
  3. Edge Cases: null, undefined, empty values, boundary conditions

Conditional (When Present)

FeatureTest Focus
useStateInitial state, transitions, cleanup
useEffectExecution, dependencies, cleanup
Event handlersAll onClick, onChange, onSubmit, keyboard
API callsLoading, success, error states
RoutingNavigation, params, query strings
useCallback/useMemoReferential equality
ContextProvider values, consumer behavior
FormsValidation, submission, error display

Coverage Goals (Per File)

For each test file generated, aim for:

  • ✅ 100% function coverage
  • ✅ 100% statement coverage
  • ✅ >95% branch coverage
  • ✅ >95% line coverage
Note: For multi-file directories, process one file at a time with full coverage each. See references/workflow.md.

Detailed Guides

For more detailed information, refer to:

  • references/workflow.md - Incremental testing workflow (MUST READ for multi-file testing)
  • references/mocking.md - Mock patterns and best practices
  • references/async-testing.md - Async operations and API calls
  • references/common-patterns.md - Frequently used testing patterns
  • references/checklist.md - Test generation checklist and validation steps

Project Configuration

  • vitest.config.ts - Vitest configuration
  • vitest.setup.ts - Test environment setup
  • Modules are not mocked automatically. Global mocks live in vitest.setup.ts (for example react-i18next, next/image); mock other modules like ky or mime locally in test files.

平台分布

Claude

34.03%
按下载量换算56

Codex

33.5%
按下载量换算55

Cursor

17.47%
按下载量换算29

Gemini CLI

8.89%
按下载量换算15

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills