Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

owasp(owasp 搜索)

owasp 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

owasp 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 68,166。

总安装 235周安装 10GitHub Stars 9下载 82核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:owasp(owasp 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/florianbuetow/claude-code
仓库路径:skills/owasp
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/florianbuetow/claude-code --skill owasp
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/florianbuetow/claude-code --skill owasp

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

owasp 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装,需结合原始 README 核验具体用法。

安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。owasp 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/owasp

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/florianbuetow/claude-code --skill owasp;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

owasp 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/florianbuetow/claude-code --skill owasp。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

owasp 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

owasp 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

owasp 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

owasp 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 235 次,近一周安装 10 次,下载 82 次,GitHub 9 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

owasp 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
owasp

owasp 搜索 · 本页

2359接触敏感数据未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

OWASP Top 10 Dispatcher

Dispatch parallel subagents covering all 10 categories of the OWASP Top 10 (2021). Each category runs as an independent subagent with its own context window, analyzing the scoped code for that specific class of vulnerability. Results are consolidated, deduplicated, and ranked by severity.

Supported Flags

Read ../../shared/schemas/flags.md for the full flag specification. This dispatcher supports all cross-cutting flags.

FlagDispatcher-Specific Behavior
--scopePropagated to all subagents. Default changed.
--depthPropagated to all subagents. Default standard.
--severityApplied during consolidation to filter the merged output.
--formatApplied to final consolidated output.
--only A01,A03Run only the listed categories. Accepts comma-separated category codes (e.g., A01, A03, A07). Unlisted categories are skipped entirely.
--fixPropagated to subagents; each produces fix suggestions inline.
--quietPropagated to subagents; suppress explanations.
--explainPropagated to subagents; add learning material per finding.

Framework Reference

Read ../../shared/frameworks/owasp-top10-2021.md for the full OWASP Top 10 specification including vulnerability descriptions, prevention guidance, and STRIDE cross-mappings for each category.

Pre-flight Relevance Check

Before dispatching subagents, scan the scoped file list to determine which categories are relevant. Skip categories that have no plausible attack surface in the codebase. This avoids wasting subagent context windows on irrelevant analysis.

CategorySkillSkip When
A01 Broken Access Controlaccess-controlNo route handlers, no auth middleware, no API endpoints
A02 Cryptographic FailurescryptoNo crypto imports, no hashing, no TLS config, no secret storage
A03 InjectioninjectionNo database queries, no shell commands, no template rendering, no user input handling
A04 Insecure Designinsecure-designAlways relevant (design-level analysis applies to any code)
A05 Security MisconfigurationmisconfigNo configuration files, no deployment manifests, no environment variables
A06 Outdated Componentsoutdated-depsNo package manifest (package.json, requirements.txt, go.mod, Gemfile, pom.xml, Cargo.toml)
A07 Auth FailuresauthNo login, registration, session, or token handling code
A08 Integrity FailuresintegrityNo CI/CD config, no deserialization, no package install scripts, no auto-update logic
A09 Logging FailuresloggingNo log statements, no audit trail, no monitoring config
A10 SSRFssrfNo HTTP client calls, no URL fetching, no webhook handling, no image/document fetching from URLs

How to check: Use Glob and Grep on the scoped files to detect relevant patterns. For example, check for fetch(, axios, requests.get, http.Get to determine A10 relevance. Check for package.json, requirements.txt, go.mod to determine A06 relevance.

If --only is specified, skip the relevance check and dispatch only the listed categories.

Dispatch Category Subagents

CRITICAL: All Task tool calls MUST appear in the SAME response message. This is what triggers parallel execution. If you emit them across separate messages, they run sequentially and waste time.

Dispatch Table

CategorySubagent SkillFinding PrefixDescription
A01skills/access-control/SKILL.mdACBroken access control, IDOR, CORS, missing deny-by-default
A02skills/crypto/SKILL.mdCRYPTWeak crypto, cleartext transmission, poor key management
A03skills/injection/SKILL.mdINJSQL/NoSQL/OS/LDAP injection, template injection
A04skills/insecure-design/SKILL.mdDESGNMissing threat modeling, insecure patterns, business logic flaws
A05skills/misconfig/SKILL.mdMSCFGDefault configs, unnecessary features, verbose errors
A06skills/outdated-deps/SKILL.mdDEPKnown CVEs in dependencies, unmaintained packages
A07skills/auth/SKILL.mdAUTHCredential stuffing, weak passwords, session management
A08skills/integrity/SKILL.mdINTEGInsecure deserialization, CI/CD integrity, unsigned updates
A09skills/logging/SKILL.mdLOGMissing audit logs, insufficient monitoring, log injection
A10skills/ssrf/SKILL.mdSSRFUnvalidated URL fetching, internal network access

Subagent Prompt Template

Each subagent Task call must include a FULLY self-contained prompt. Subagents get their own isolated context window and cannot see the main conversation.

Each subagent prompt must contain:

  1. The concrete file list to analyze (resolved from scope).
  2. The absolute path to the category SKILL.md to read and follow.
  3. The flags to apply (--scope, --depth, --severity, --format, etc.).
  4. The findings schema path (shared/schemas/findings.md) for output format.
  5. An instruction to return findings only -- no summary, no cross-category commentary. The dispatcher handles consolidation.
Analyze the following files for OWASP {CATEGORY_CODE} ({CATEGORY_NAME}) vulnerabilities:

FILES:
{FILE_LIST}

STEP 1: Read the skill definition at:
{ABSOLUTE_PATH_TO_PLUGIN}/skills/{SKILL_NAME}/SKILL.md

STEP 2: Follow the workflow defined in that skill to analyze the listed files.

STEP 3: Read the findings schema at:
{ABSOLUTE_PATH_TO_PLUGIN}/shared/schemas/findings.md

STEP 4: Output findings in the schema format. Set metadata.framework to "owasp"
and metadata.category to "{CATEGORY_CODE}".

FLAGS: --scope {SCOPE} --depth {DEPTH} --severity {SEVERITY}

IMPORTANT: Return ONLY the findings list. Do NOT produce a summary or
cross-category analysis. The dispatcher handles consolidation.

Launching

Emit one Task tool call per relevant category, ALL in a single response:

  • subagent_type: "general-purpose"
  • description: "OWASP {CATEGORY_CODE} - {CATEGORY_NAME}"
  • prompt: The fully self-contained prompt above, filled in for this category.

Do NOT emit Task calls one at a time. Do NOT wait between dispatches.

Consolidation

After ALL subagents return their results:

1. Merge Findings

Collect all findings from all subagent responses into a single list.

2. Deduplicate

Two findings are duplicates if they share the same location.file AND location.line (or overlapping line ranges). When duplicates exist:

  • Keep the finding with the higher severity.
  • Merge cross-references (a finding tagged A03 and A01 keeps both).
  • Note the duplicate in the retained finding's description.

3. Cross-Reference

For each finding, populate cross-framework references where known:

  • references.cwe: Map to CWE identifier.
  • references.stride: Map to STRIDE category letter(s).
  • references.mitre_attck: Map to ATT&CK technique ID.
  • references.sans_cwe25: Map to SANS/CWE Top 25 rank if applicable.

4. Rank by Severity

Sort findings: critical > high > medium > low. Within the same severity, sort by confidence (high > medium > low).

5. Produce Aggregate Output

Wrap the consolidated findings in the aggregate output format from shared/schemas/findings.md, including categories_checked, categories_skipped, skip_reason, total_findings, and by_severity.

6. Present Results

Output the consolidated report in the requested --format. Include:

  • Summary table: categories checked, categories skipped (with reasons).
  • Severity breakdown: count by critical/high/medium/low.
  • Findings list in severity order.
  • Cross-category patterns (e.g., "injection findings in A03 also indicate broken access control in A01").

Expert Mode

If --depth expert is set, after consolidation, launch red team subagents to simulate exploitation of the findings. Each red team agent receives the consolidated findings and attempts to construct multi-step attack chains.

Read ../../shared/frameworks/dread.md for DREAD scoring criteria. Each finding receives a DREAD score in expert mode.

Launch red team agents as parallel Task calls (same single-response rule). Pass the full findings list to each persona. Red team output is appended to findings with prefix RT and metadata.tool set to "red-team".

平台分布

Codex

32.56%
按下载量换算27

Claude

29.21%
按下载量换算24

Cursor

20.03%
按下载量换算16

Gemini CLI

8.86%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills