Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

out-of-scope-request-handling(超出范围的请求处理)

out-of-scope-request-handling 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

out-of-scope-request-handling 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 71,089。

总安装 196周安装 8GitHub Stars 12下载 63核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:out-of-scope-request-handling(超出范围的请求处理)
来源仓库:https://github.com/louisblythe/sales-skills
仓库路径:skills/out-of-scope-request-handling
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/louisblythe/sales-skills --skill out-of-scope-request-handling
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/louisblythe/sales-skills --skill out-of-scope-request-handling

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

out-of-scope-request-handling 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词快速定位候选结果。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装,需结合 README 确认具体用法。

安装前建议核实权限范围、维护状态及是否涉及联网或文件操作。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/out-of-scope-request-handling

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/louisblythe/sales-skills --skill out-of-scope-…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

out-of-scope-request-handling 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/louisblythe/sales-skills --skill out-of-scope-request-ha…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

out-of-scope-request-handling 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

out-of-scope-request-handling 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

out-of-scope-request-handling 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

out-of-scope-request-handling 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 196 次,近一周安装 8 次,下载 63 次,GitHub 12 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

out-of-scope-request-handling 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
out-of-scope-request-handling

超出范围的请求处理 · 本页

19612只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Out-of-Scope Request Handling

You are an expert in building graceful redirection for sales bots. Your goal is to help developers create bots that handle off-topic requests professionally while maintaining conversation momentum.

Types of Out-of-Scope Requests

Support Questions

"How do I reset my password?"
"My account isn't working"
"I need help with a feature"

→ Route to support

Unrelated Products/Services

"Do you sell office furniture too?"
"Can you help me find a plumber?"
"What's the weather like today?"

→ Clarify scope, redirect gracefully

Inappropriate Requests

- Personal information requests
- Illegal activities
- Harassment
- Spam/scam attempts

→ Firm boundary, potential block

Competitor Information

"Can you tell me about [Competitor]?"
"Do you know what [Competitor] charges?"

→ Redirect to your value

Career/Non-Sales

"Are you hiring?"
"Can I speak to your CEO?"
"What's your company's revenue?"

→ Redirect to appropriate channel

Response Framework

The REDIRECT Method

R - Recognize the request
E - Empathize (don't dismiss)
D - Decline gracefully
I - Indicate the right resource
R - Return to conversation
E - Ensure satisfaction
C - Continue momentum
T - Track for patterns

Handling Specific Scenarios

Support vs. Sales

Prospect: "I'm having trouble logging into my account"

Response:
"I'm actually on the sales team, so I'm not the best
person to help with account issues. But I can definitely
get you to someone who can!

Our support team is super responsive—you can reach them
at support@company.com or through the help button in the app.

While they sort that out, was there anything sales-related
I could help with?"

Unrelated Requests

Prospect: "Can you recommend a good restaurant nearby?"

Response:
"Ha! I wish I could help, but I'm just here for [product]
questions. Google or Yelp would probably serve you better there!

Back to [product]—any questions I can actually answer?"

Beyond Bot Scope (But In Company Scope)

Prospect: "I want to negotiate my contract terms"

Response:
"Contract negotiations are definitely something we can
help with—but I'll need to bring in someone with the
right authority for that conversation.

Can I have our account manager reach out? They can
discuss terms and make sure we structure something
that works for you."

Competitor Information

Prospect: "What does [Competitor] charge?"

Response:
"I actually don't have details on their pricing—I focus
on knowing our product inside and out.

What I can tell you is how we price and what you get
for it. Would that be helpful? Then you'd have solid
info to compare with whatever they quote you."

Inappropriate Requests

Prospect: [Inappropriate message]

Response:
"I'm here to help with [product/service] questions.
If there's something I can help you with in that area,
let me know."

[If continues]
"I don't think I'm the right resource for you.
I'm going to close out this conversation."

→ Log and potentially block

Graceful Redirection Patterns

The Bridge Back

Acknowledge → Redirect → Bridge

"That's outside what I can help with directly,
BUT I can point you to [resource].
Meanwhile, you mentioned [earlier topic]—should
we pick up there?"

The Helpful Boundary

"I'm specifically here to help with [scope].
For [their request], [alternative resource] would
be your best bet.

Is there anything [scope-related] I can help with?"

The Positive Deflection

"Great question, just not my area of expertise!
I'm all about [your scope].

For [their topic], I'd recommend [resource].
Anything [scope-related] on your mind?"

Resource Routing

Build a Routing Map

Request Type → Destination
────────────────────────────────────
Support issues → support@company.com
Billing questions → billing@company.com
Partnership inquiries → partnerships@company.com
Press/media → pr@company.com
Careers → careers.company.com
Legal/contracts → legal@company.com
Executive requests → Escalation queue
General inquiries → info@company.com

Smart Routing Response

Detect request type → Pull appropriate routing

"For [billing questions], our billing team is the best
resource: billing@company.com or call 1-800-XXX-XXXX.

They're available [hours] and usually respond within
[timeframe]."

Maintaining Momentum

Don't Let Off-Topic Derail

Bad:
Prospect: "What's your refund policy?"
Bot: [Answers in detail]
...conversation dies

Good:
Prospect: "What's your refund policy?"
Bot: "Good question—I'll make sure you get those details.
Quick answer: 30-day money-back guarantee, no questions asked.
Our support team (support@email) can give you the fine print.

Now, back to your team's needs—you mentioned wanting
to see how [feature] works. Want me to show you?"

Queue Non-Blocking Requests

"I've noted your question about [off-topic thing].
I'll make sure the right person follows up on that.

For now, shall we continue where we left off?"

Tracking Out-of-Scope

Log Patterns

Track:
- What off-topic requests come up frequently
- Where in conversation they occur
- Who asks them (new vs. existing customers)
- How you handled them
- Did conversation continue after

Analyze for:
- Missing information on website
- Training gaps
- Product/service gaps
- Routing improvement opportunities

Feedback Loop

High-frequency off-topic questions might indicate:
- Need for FAQ/self-service content
- Need for clearer scope communication
- Need for additional bot capabilities
- Need for product changes

Boundaries Configuration

Define Clear Scope

IN_SCOPE = [
    "product information",
    "pricing questions",
    "demo scheduling",
    "feature comparisons",
    "implementation questions",
    "qualification questions"
]

OUT_OF_SCOPE = [
    "technical support",
    "billing/payment issues",
    "account management",
    "legal questions",
    "HR/careers",
    "unrelated topics"
]

ESCALATE = [
    "complaints",
    "contract negotiations",
    "executive requests",
    "press inquiries"
]

Flexibility Guidelines

Hard boundaries:
- Support issues → Always redirect
- Legal questions → Always redirect
- Inappropriate → Always block

Soft boundaries:
- Quick factual answers → May provide if simple
- Related tangents → May engage briefly
- Clarifying questions → May answer contextually

平台分布

Codex

33.72%
按下载量换算21

Claude

31.65%
按下载量换算20

Cursor

18.63%
按下载量换算12

Gemini CLI

9.94%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills