Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

orchestration-qa(编排质量保证)

orchestration-qa 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

orchestration-qa 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 7,581。

总安装 18,588周安装 661GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 3,920核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:orchestration-qa(编排质量保证)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jpicklyk/task-orchestrator
仓库路径:skills/orchestration-qa
安装命令:
npx skills add jpicklyk/task-orchestrator --skill "orchestration-qa"
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

AgentSkills.tonpx skills
npx skills add jpicklyk/task-orchestrator --skill "orchestration-qa"

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。适用于研究检索类任务,支持多宿主环境集成,可结合来源仓库进一步核验具体用法。

通过 npx skills add jpicklyk/task-orchestrator --skill "orchestration-qa" 命令安装。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/orchestration-qa

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add jpicklyk/task-orchestrator --skill "orchestration-qa";命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

orchestration-qa 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add jpicklyk/task-orchestrator --skill "orchestration-qa"。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

orchestration-qa 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

orchestration-qa 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

orchestration-qa 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

orchestration-qa 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 18,588 次,近一周安装 661 次,下载 3,920 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

orchestration-qa 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
orchestration-qa

编排质量保证 · 本页

18,588—只读MIT未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
Orchestration QA
description
Quality assurance for orchestration workflows - validates Skills and Subagents follow documented patterns, tracks deviations, suggests improvements

Orchestration QA Skill

Overview

This skill provides quality assurance for Task Orchestrator workflows by validating that Skills and Subagents follow their documented patterns, detecting deviations, and suggesting continuous improvements.

Key Capabilities:

  • Interactive configuration - User chooses which analyses to enable (token efficiency)
  • Pre-execution validation - Context capture, checkpoint setting
  • Post-execution review - Workflow adherence, output validation
  • Specialized quality analysis - Execution graphs, tag coverage, information density
  • Efficiency analysis - Token optimization, tool selection, parallelization
  • Deviation reporting - Structured findings with severity (ALERT/WARN/INFO)
  • Pattern tracking - Continuous improvement suggestions

Philosophy:

  • ✅ User-driven configuration - Pay token costs only for analyses you want
  • ✅ Observe and validate - Never blocks execution
  • ✅ Report transparently - Clear severity levels (ALERT/WARN/INFO)
  • ✅ Learn from patterns - Track issues, suggest improvements
  • ✅ Progressive loading - Load only analysis needed for context
  • ❌ Not a blocker - Warns about issues, doesn't stop workflows
  • ❌ Not auto-fix - Asks user for decisions on deviations

When to Use This Skill

Interactive Configuration (FIRST TIME)

Trigger: First time using orchestration-qa in a session, or when user wants to change settings Action: Ask user which analysis categories to enable (multiselect interface) Output: Configuration stored in session, used for all subsequent reviews User Value: Only pay token costs for analyses you actually want

Session Initialization

Trigger: After configuration, at start of orchestration session Action: Load knowledge bases (Skills, Subagents, routing config) based on enabled categories Output: Initialization status with active configuration, ready signal

Pre-Execution Validation

Triggers:

  • "Create feature for X" (before Feature Orchestration Skill or Feature Architect)
  • "Execute tasks" (before Task Orchestration Skill)
  • "Mark complete" (before Status Progression Skill)
  • Before launching any Skill or Subagent

Action: Capture context, set validation checkpoints Output: Stored context for post-execution comparison

Post-Execution Review

Triggers:

  • After any Skill completes
  • After any Subagent returns
  • User asks: "Review quality", "Show QA results", "Any issues?"

Action: Validate workflow adherence, analyze quality, detect deviations Output: Structured quality report with findings and recommendations

Parameters

{
  phase: "init" | "pre" | "post" | "configure",

  // For pre/post phases
  entityType?: "feature-orchestration" | "task-orchestration" |
               "status-progression" | "dependency-analysis" |
               "feature-architect" | "planning-specialist" |
               "backend-engineer" | "frontend-developer" |
               "database-engineer" | "test-engineer" |
               "technical-writer" | "bug-triage-specialist",

  // For pre phase
  userInput?: string,          // Original user request

  // For post phase
  entityOutput?: string,       // Output from Skill/Subagent
  entityId?: string,           // Feature/Task/Project ID (if applicable)

  // Optional
  verboseReporting?: boolean           // Default: false (brief reports)
}

Workflow

Phase: configure (Interactive Configuration) - ALWAYS RUN FIRST

Purpose: Let user choose which analysis categories to enable for the session

When: Before init phase, or when user wants to change settings mid-session

Interactive Prompts:

Use AskUserQuestion to present configuration options:

AskUserQuestion({
  questions: [
    {
      question: "Which quality analysis categories would you like to enable for this session?",
      header: "QA Categories",
      multiSelect: true,
      options: [
        {
          label: "Information Density",
          description: "Analyze task content quality, detect wasteful patterns, measure information-to-token ratio (Specialists only)"
        },
        {
          label: "Execution Graphs",
          description: "Validate dependency graphs and parallel execution opportunities (Planning Specialist only)"
        },
        {
          label: "Tag Coverage",
          description: "Check tag consistency and agent-mapping coverage (Planning Specialist & Feature Architect)"
        },
        {
          label: "Token Optimization",
          description: "Identify token waste patterns (verbose output, unnecessary loading, redundant operations)"
        },
        {
          label: "Tool Selection",
          description: "Verify optimal tool usage (overview vs get, search vs filtered query, bulk operations)"
        },
        {
          label: "Routing Validation",
          description: "Detect Skills bypass violations (CRITICAL - status changes, feature creation, task execution)"
        },
        {
          label: "Parallel Detection",
          description: "Find missed parallelization opportunities (independent tasks, batch operations)"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      question: "How detailed should QA reports be?",
      header: "Report Style",
      multiSelect: false,
      options: [
        {
          label: "Brief",
          description: "Only show critical issues (ALERT level) - minimal token usage"
        },
        {
          label: "Standard",
          description: "Show ALERT and WARN level issues with brief explanations"
        },
        {
          label: "Detailed",
          description: "Show all issues (ALERT/WARN/INFO) with full analysis and recommendations"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
})

Default Configuration (if user skips configuration):

  • ✅ Routing Validation (CRITICAL - always enabled)
  • ✅ Information Density (for specialists)
  • ❌ All other categories disabled
  • Report style: Standard

Configuration Storage: Store user preferences in session state:

session.qaConfig = {
  enabled: {
    informationDensity: true/false,
    executionGraphs: true/false,
    tagCoverage: true/false,
    tokenOptimization: true/false,
    toolSelection: true/false,
    routingValidation: true,  // Always true (CRITICAL)
    parallelDetection: true/false
  },
  reportStyle: "brief" | "standard" | "detailed"
}

Token Cost: ~200-300 tokens (one-time configuration)

Phase: init (Session Initialization)

Purpose: Load knowledge bases for validation throughout session

Steps:

  1. If not configured: Run configure phase first (interactive)
  2. Read initialization.md for setup workflow
  3. Glob .claude/skills/*/SKILL.md → extract Skills knowledge

- Parse skill name, triggers, workflows, tools, token ranges

  1. Glob .claude/agents/task-orchestrator/*.md → extract Subagents knowledge

- Parse agent name, steps, critical patterns, output validation

  1. Read agent-mapping.yaml → extract routing configuration
  2. Initialize tracking state (deviations, patterns, improvements)
  3. Report initialization status with active configuration

Output:

{
  initialized: true,
  knowledgeBase: {
    skillsCount: 5,
    subagentsCount: 8,
    routingLoaded: true
  },
  configuration: {
    enabled: ["Information Density", "Routing Validation"],
    disabled: ["Execution Graphs", "Tag Coverage", "Token Optimization", "Tool Selection", "Parallel Detection"],
    reportStyle: "standard"
  },
  tracking: {
    sessionStart: timestamp,
    deviations: [],
    patterns: []
  }
}

Token Cost: ~800-1000 tokens (loads once per session)

Phase: pre (Pre-Execution Validation)

Purpose: Capture context and set validation checkpoints before launching

Steps:

  1. Read pre-execution.md for validation checklist
  2. Identify entity type (Skill vs Subagent)
  3. Capture original user input context
  4. Set entity-specific validation checkpoints based on type:

- Skills: Expected workflow steps, tool usage, token range - Subagents: Expected steps (8-9 steps), critical patterns, output format

  1. Store context for post-execution comparison
  2. Return ready signal

Context Captured:

  • User's original request (full text)
  • Expected mode (PRD/Interactive/Quick for Feature Architect)
  • Entity type and anticipated complexity
  • Validation checkpoints to verify after execution

Output:

{
  ready: true,
  contextCaptured: true,
  checkpoints: [
    "Verify Skill assessed complexity correctly",
    "Verify templates discovered and applied",
    // ... entity-specific checkpoints
  ]
}

Token Cost: ~400-600 tokens

Phase: post (Post-Execution Review)

Purpose: Validate workflow adherence, analyze quality, detect deviations

Steps:

1. Load Post-Execution Workflow

Read post-execution.md for review process

2. Determine Required Analyses

Based on entity type AND user configuration:

Planning Specialist:

  • Always: post-execution.md → core workflow validation
  • If routingValidation enabled: routing-validation.md → Skills usage check
  • If executionGraphs enabled: graph-quality.md → execution graph validation
  • If tagCoverage enabled: tag-quality.md → tag coverage analysis

Feature Architect:

  • Always: post-execution.md → PRD extraction validation
  • Always: Compare output vs original user input
  • If routingValidation enabled: routing-validation.md → agent-mapping check
  • If tagCoverage enabled: tag-quality.md → tag consistency check

Implementation Specialists (Backend, Frontend, Database, Test, Technical Writer):

  • Always: post-execution.md → lifecycle steps verification
  • If routingValidation enabled: routing-validation.md → Status Progression Skill usage
  • If informationDensity enabled: task-content-quality.md → content quality analysis
  • Always: Verify summary (300-500 chars), Files Changed section, test results

All Skills:

  • Always: Read skill definition from knowledge base
  • Always: Verify expected workflow steps followed
  • Always: Check tool usage matches expected patterns
  • Always: Validate token range
3. Conditional Efficiency Analysis

Based on user configuration:

  • If tokenOptimization enabled: Read token-optimization.md → identify token waste
  • If toolSelection enabled: Read tool-selection.md → verify optimal tool usage
  • If parallelDetection enabled: Read parallel-detection.md → find missed parallelization
4. Deviation Detection

Compare actual execution against expected patterns:

  • ALERT: Critical violations (status bypass, cross-domain tasks, missing requirements)
  • WARN: Process issues (verbose output, skipped steps, suboptimal dependencies)
  • INFO: Observations (efficiency opportunities, quality patterns)
5. Reporting

If deviations found:

  • Read deviation-templates.md → format report
  • Add to TodoWrite with appropriate severity
  • If ALERT: Report immediately to user with decision prompt
  • If WARN: Log for end-of-session summary
  • If INFO: Track for pattern analysis
6. Pattern Tracking

Read pattern-tracking.md → continuous improvement:

  • Check for recurring issues (count >= 2 in session)
  • Suggest definition improvements if patterns detected
  • Track for session summary

Output:

{
  workflowAdherence: "8/8 steps followed (100%)",
  expectedOutputs: "7/7 present",
  deviations: [
    {
      severity: "ALERT",
      issue: "Cross-domain task detected",
      details: "Task mixes backend + frontend",
      recommendation: "Split into domain-isolated tasks"
    }
  ],
  analyses: {
    graphQuality: "95%",
    tagCoverage: "100%",
    tokenEfficiency: "85%"
  },
  recommendations: [
    "Update planning-specialist.md to enforce domain isolation",
    "Add validation checklist for cross-domain detection"
  ]
}

Token Cost:

  • Basic validation: ~600-800 tokens
  • With specialized analysis (Planning Specialist): ~1500-2000 tokens
  • With efficiency analysis: +800-1200 tokens

Progressive Loading Strategy

Optimization: Load only the analysis docs needed based on entity type AND user configuration

Configuration-Driven Loading

Core Loading (always loaded regardless of config):

  • post-execution.md → base workflow validation
  • Skill/Subagent definition from knowledge base
  • Entity-specific mandatory checks (summary, files changed, etc.)

Conditional Loading (based on user configuration):

// Planning Specialist
if (config.routingValidation) → Read routing-validation.md
if (config.executionGraphs) → Read graph-quality.md
if (config.tagCoverage) → Read tag-quality.md

// Feature Architect
if (config.routingValidation) → Read routing-validation.md
if (config.tagCoverage) → Read tag-quality.md

// Implementation Specialists (Backend, Frontend, Database, Test, Technical Writer)
if (config.routingValidation) → Read routing-validation.md
if (config.informationDensity) → Read task-content-quality.md

// All Entities
if (config.tokenOptimization) → Read token-optimization.md
if (config.toolSelection) → Read tool-selection.md
if (config.parallelDetection) → Read parallel-detection.md

// Reporting
if (deviations.length > 0) → Read deviation-templates.md
if (session.deviations.count >= 2) → Read pattern-tracking.md

Token Savings Examples

Example 1: User only wants Information Density feedback

  • Configuration: Only "Information Density" enabled
  • Loaded for Backend Engineer: post-execution.md + task-content-quality.md = ~1,200 tokens
  • Skipped: routing-validation.md, token-optimization.md, tool-selection.md, parallel-detection.md = ~2,400 tokens saved
  • Savings: 67% reduction

Example 2: User wants minimal CRITICAL validation only

  • Configuration: Only "Routing Validation" enabled
  • Loaded: post-execution.md + routing-validation.md = ~1,000 tokens
  • Skipped: All other analysis docs = ~3,500 tokens saved
  • Savings: 78% reduction

Example 3: User wants comprehensive Planning Specialist review

  • Configuration: All categories enabled
  • Loaded: post-execution.md + graph-quality.md + tag-quality.md + routing-validation.md + efficiency docs = ~3,500 tokens
  • Skipped: None (comprehensive mode)
  • Savings: 0% (full analysis)

Special Cases

Task Orchestration Skill:

  • parallel-detection.md always loaded if enabled in config (core to this skill's purpose)

Status Progression Skill:

  • routing-validation.md always loaded if enabled in config (CRITICAL - status bypass detection)

Output Format

Success (No Deviations)

✅ **QA Review**: [Entity Name]

Workflow adherence: 100%
All quality checks passed.

[If efficiency analysis enabled:]
Token efficiency: 85% (identified 2 optimization opportunities)

Issues Found

## QA Review: [Entity Name]

**Workflow Adherence:** X/Y steps (Z%)

### ✅ Successes
- [Success 1]
- [Success 2]

### ⚠️ Issues Detected

**🚨 ALERT**: [Critical issue]
- Impact: [What this affects]
- Found: [What was observed]
- Expected: [What should have happened]
- Recommendation: [How to fix]

**⚠️ WARN**: [Process issue]
- Found: [What was observed]
- Expected: [What should have happened]

### 📋 Added to TodoWrite
- Review [Entity]: [Issue description]
- Improvement: [Suggestion]

### 🎯 Recommendations
1. [Most critical action]
2. [Secondary action]

### 💭 Decision Required
[If user decision needed, present options]

Integration with Orchestrator

Recommended Pattern:

// 1. FIRST TIME: Interactive configuration
Use orchestration-qa skill (phase="configure")
// Agent asks user which analysis categories to enable
// User selects: "Information Density" + "Routing Validation"
// Configuration stored in session

// 2. Session initialization
Use orchestration-qa skill (phase="init")
// Returns: Initialized with [2] analysis categories enabled

// 3. Before launching Feature Architect
Use orchestration-qa skill (
  phase="pre",
  entityType="feature-architect",
  userInput="[user's original request]"
)

// 4. Launch Feature Architect
Task(subagent_type="Feature Architect", prompt="...")

// 5. After Feature Architect returns
Use orchestration-qa skill (
  phase="post",
  entityType="feature-architect",
  entityOutput="[subagent's response]",
  entityId="feature-uuid"
)
// Only loads: post-execution.md + routing-validation.md (user config)
// Skips: graph-quality.md, tag-quality.md, token-optimization.md (not enabled)

// 6. Review QA findings, take action if needed

Mid-Session Reconfiguration:

// User: "I want to also track token optimization now"
Use orchestration-qa skill (phase="configure")
// Agent asks again, pre-selects current config
// User adds "Token Optimization" to enabled categories
// New config stored, affects all subsequent post-execution reviews

Supporting Documentation

This skill uses progressive loading to minimize token usage. Supporting docs are read as needed:

  • initialization.md - Session setup workflow
  • pre-execution.md - Context capture and checkpoint setting
  • post-execution.md - Core review workflow for all entities
  • graph-quality.md - Planning Specialist: execution graph analysis
  • tag-quality.md - Planning Specialist: tag coverage validation
  • task-content-quality.md - Implementation Specialists: information density and wasteful pattern detection
  • token-optimization.md - Efficiency: identify token waste patterns
  • tool-selection.md - Efficiency: verify optimal tool usage
  • parallel-detection.md - Efficiency: find missed parallelization
  • routing-validation.md - Critical: Skills vs Direct tool violations
  • deviation-templates.md - User report formatting by severity
  • pattern-tracking.md - Continuous improvement tracking

Token Efficiency

Current Trainer (monolithic): ~20k-30k tokens always loaded

Orchestration QA Skill (configuration-driven progressive loading):

  • Configure phase: ~200-300 tokens (one-time, interactive)
  • Init phase: ~1000 tokens (one-time per session)
  • Pre-execution: ~600 tokens (per entity)
  • Post-execution (varies by configuration):

- Minimal (routing only): ~800-1000 tokens - Standard (info density + routing): ~1200-1500 tokens - Planning Specialist (graphs + tags + routing): ~2000-2500 tokens - Comprehensive (all categories): ~3500-4000 tokens

Configuration Impact Examples:

User ConfigurationToken Costvs Monolithicvs Default
Information Density only~1,200 tokens94% savings67% savings
Routing Validation only~1,000 tokens95% savings78% savings
Default (Info + Routing)~1,500 tokens93% savingsbaseline
Comprehensive (all enabled)~4,000 tokens80% savings-167%

Smart Defaults: Most users only need Information Density + Routing Validation, achieving 93% token reduction while catching critical issues and wasteful content.

Quality Metrics

Track these metrics across sessions:

  • Workflow adherence percentage
  • Deviation count by severity (ALERT/WARN/INFO)
  • Pattern recurrence (same issue multiple times)
  • Definition improvement suggestions generated
  • Token efficiency of analyzed workflows

Examples

See examples.md for detailed usage scenarios including:

  • Interactive configuration - Choosing analysis categories
  • Session initialization - Loading knowledge bases with config
  • Feature Architect validation - PRD mode with selective analysis
  • Planning Specialist review - Graph + tag analysis (when enabled)
  • Implementation Specialist review - Information density tracking
  • Status Progression enforcement - Critical routing violations
  • Mid-session reconfiguration - Changing enabled categories
  • Token efficiency comparisons - Different configuration impacts

平台分布

windsurf

27.53%
按下载量换算1,079

OpenCode

26.48%
按下载量换算1,038

Codex

18.27%
按下载量换算716

Claude Code

13.7%
按下载量换算537

Antigravity

9.05%
按下载量换算355

Gemini CLI

3.88%
按下载量换算152

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills