Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

optimizing-sql-queriesoptimizing SQL queries 搜索

Agent Skill

用于辅助数据库表结构、查询语句、迁移脚本和数据维护任务。它适合让 Agent 分析 schema、编写 SQL、排查查询问题、整理索引或生成迁移建议。使用时需要明确数据库类型、连接环境和目标表,区分只读分析与写入变更;涉及删除、更新、迁移和批量导入时,应优先 dry-run、备份或事务保护,避免误操作。

总安装

710

周安装

29

GitHub Stars

2,119

下载量

227
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:optimizing-sql-queries(optimizing SQL queries 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills
仓库路径:skills/optimizing-sql-queries
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill optimizing-sql-queries
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill optimizing-sql-queries

简介

专门用于 SQL 查询性能诊断与执行计划可视化。

  • 可识别全表扫描、临时表滥用等常见低效模式。
  • 提供重写建议包括 JOIN 顺序调整、子查询物化等技巧。
  • 使用前需确认数据库类型(MySQL/PostgreSQL/SQL Server 等)以适配语法。
  • optimizing-sql-queries 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

SQL Query Optimizer

Overview

Rewrite SQL queries for maximum performance by eliminating anti-patterns, restructuring JOINs, leveraging window functions, and applying database-specific optimizations for PostgreSQL and MySQL. This skill takes a slow query and its execution plan as input and produces an optimized version with measurable improvement, along with any supporting index changes needed.

Prerequisites

  • The slow SQL query text and its current execution time
  • EXPLAIN ANALYZE output (PostgreSQL) or EXPLAIN FORMAT=JSON output (MySQL) for the query
  • Table row counts and approximate data distribution for involved tables
  • psql or mysql CLI for testing rewrites
  • Knowledge of the application's acceptable result ordering and NULL handling requirements

Instructions

  1. Examine the original query structure and identify common anti-patterns:

- SELECT * instead of specific columns (forces unnecessary I/O) - WHERE column IN (SELECT...) that can be rewritten as JOIN or EXISTS - DISTINCT used to mask duplicate rows from incorrect JOINs - Functions applied to indexed columns in WHERE clauses (WHERE UPPER(name) = 'FOO') - OR conditions that prevent index usage - NOT IN with nullable columns (produces wrong results and poor plans)

  1. Analyze the execution plan to identify the most expensive operation nodes. Focus optimization effort on the node consuming the most time or processing the most rows.
  2. Rewrite subqueries as JOINs where possible. Convert correlated subqueries to lateral joins (PostgreSQL) or derived tables. Replace IN (SELECT...) with EXISTS (SELECT 1...) for existence checks since EXISTS short-circuits after the first match.
  3. Optimize JOIN ordering for the query planner: place the most selective table (fewest matching rows after WHERE filters) as the driving table. Use JOIN hints only as a last resort since the optimizer usually picks the correct order with accurate statistics.
  4. Replace multiple OR conditions on the same column with IN (...): change WHERE status = 'active' OR status = 'pending' to WHERE status IN ('active', 'pending'). For OR across different columns, consider UNION ALL of two simpler queries.
  5. Apply window functions to replace self-joins or correlated subqueries. Use ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY... ORDER BY...) for top-N-per-group queries instead of GROUP BY with subqueries.
  6. Leverage CTEs (Common Table Expressions) for readability but be aware that PostgreSQL versions before 12 materialize all CTEs. For performance-critical queries on older PostgreSQL, inline the CTE as a subquery.
  7. Optimize aggregation queries by filtering before grouping (WHERE is more efficient than HAVING for non-aggregate conditions), using partial indexes for filtered aggregates, and considering materialized views for expensive recurring aggregations.
  8. Test the rewritten query with EXPLAIN ANALYZE and compare execution time, row estimates vs. actuals, and buffer usage against the original. The optimized version should show fewer rows processed, index scans replacing sequential scans, and lower total execution time.
  9. Document each change made, the reason for the change, and the measured impact so the development team understands and can apply similar patterns to future queries.

Output

  • Optimized SQL query with comments explaining each structural change
  • Before/after execution plans showing performance improvement
  • Index recommendations (CREATE INDEX statements) needed to support the optimized query
  • Anti-pattern report listing issues found in the original query with explanations
  • Performance metrics comparison (execution time, rows scanned, buffer hits)

Error Handling

ErrorCauseSolution
Rewritten query returns different resultsJOIN type change (INNER vs LEFT) or NULL handling differenceVerify result sets match with EXCEPT query; preserve original JOIN types; handle NULLs explicitly with COALESCE
Optimized query slower than originalStatistics outdated causing planner to choose wrong planRun ANALYZE on involved tables; compare estimated rows vs actual rows in EXPLAIN; consider SET enable_seqscan = off to test alternative plans
CTE materialization hurting performancePostgreSQL <12 materializes CTEs preventing predicate pushdownInline the CTE as a subquery; upgrade PostgreSQL; add AS NOT MATERIALIZED hint in PostgreSQL 12+
Window function query uses excessive memoryLarge partition sizes with ORDER BY in window specificationAdd LIMIT to outer query; use index matching the PARTITION BY and ORDER BY columns; increase work_mem for the session
UNION ALL produces duplicatesOverlapping conditions in constituent queriesAdd mutually exclusive WHERE conditions to each branch; or use UNION (with dedup cost) if overlap is unavoidable

Examples

Converting correlated subquery to JOIN: Original: SELECT * FROM orders WHERE customer_id IN (SELECT id FROM customers WHERE region = 'US') taking 8 seconds with sequential scan on orders. Rewrite: SELECT o.* FROM orders o JOIN customers c ON o.customer_id = c.id WHERE c.region = 'US' using index on orders.customer_id reduces to 120ms.

Top-N per group with window function: Original uses self-join to find the 3 most recent orders per customer (15 seconds). Rewrite: SELECT * FROM (SELECT *, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY customer_id ORDER BY created_at DESC) AS rn FROM orders) sub WHERE rn <= 3 with index on (customer_id, created_at DESC) completes in 400ms.

Eliminating DISTINCT from incorrect JOIN: SELECT DISTINCT o.* FROM orders o JOIN line_items li ON o.id = li.order_id WHERE li.amount > 100 scans all line items. Rewrite: SELECT o.* FROM orders o WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM line_items li WHERE li.order_id = o.id AND li.amount > 100) eliminates the deduplication step and halves execution time.

Resources

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

38%
按下载量换算86

Claude

26.23%
按下载量换算60

Cursor

17.08%
按下载量换算39

Gemini CLI

9.73%
按下载量换算22

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills