Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

optimizing-sql-queries(optimizing SQL queries 搜索)

用于辅助数据库表结构、查询语句、迁移脚本和数据维护任务。它适合让 Agent 分析 schema、编写 SQL、排查查询问题、整理索引或生成迁移建议。使用时需要明确数据库类型、连接环境和目标表,区分只读分析与写入变更;涉及删除、更新、迁移和批量导入时,应优先 dry-run、备份或事务保护,避免误操作。

optimizing-sql-queries 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 47,935。

总安装 710周安装 29GitHub Stars 2,119下载 227核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:optimizing-sql-queries(optimizing SQL queries 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills
仓库路径:skills/optimizing-sql-queries
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill optimizing-sql-queries
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill optimizing-sql-queries

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

专门用于 SQL 查询性能诊断与执行计划可视化。可识别全表扫描、临时表滥用等常见低效模式。提供重写建议包括 JOIN 顺序调整、子查询物化等技巧。使用前需确认数据库类型(MySQL/PostgreSQL/SQL Server 等)以适配语法。

optimizing-sql-queries 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/optimizing-sql-queries

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skill…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

optimizing-sql-queries 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

optimizing-sql-queries 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

optimizing-sql-queries 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

optimizing-sql-queries 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

optimizing-sql-queries 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 710 次,近一周安装 29 次,下载 227 次,GitHub 2,119 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

optimizing-sql-queries 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 来源仓库有 2,119 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
optimizing-sql-queries

optimizing SQL queries 搜索 · 本页

7102,119需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

SQL Query Optimizer

Overview

Rewrite SQL queries for maximum performance by eliminating anti-patterns, restructuring JOINs, leveraging window functions, and applying database-specific optimizations for PostgreSQL and MySQL. This skill takes a slow query and its execution plan as input and produces an optimized version with measurable improvement, along with any supporting index changes needed.

Prerequisites

  • The slow SQL query text and its current execution time
  • EXPLAIN ANALYZE output (PostgreSQL) or EXPLAIN FORMAT=JSON output (MySQL) for the query
  • Table row counts and approximate data distribution for involved tables
  • psql or mysql CLI for testing rewrites
  • Knowledge of the application's acceptable result ordering and NULL handling requirements

Instructions

  1. Examine the original query structure and identify common anti-patterns:

- SELECT * instead of specific columns (forces unnecessary I/O) - WHERE column IN (SELECT...) that can be rewritten as JOIN or EXISTS - DISTINCT used to mask duplicate rows from incorrect JOINs - Functions applied to indexed columns in WHERE clauses (WHERE UPPER(name) = 'FOO') - OR conditions that prevent index usage - NOT IN with nullable columns (produces wrong results and poor plans)

  1. Analyze the execution plan to identify the most expensive operation nodes. Focus optimization effort on the node consuming the most time or processing the most rows.
  2. Rewrite subqueries as JOINs where possible. Convert correlated subqueries to lateral joins (PostgreSQL) or derived tables. Replace IN (SELECT...) with EXISTS (SELECT 1...) for existence checks since EXISTS short-circuits after the first match.
  3. Optimize JOIN ordering for the query planner: place the most selective table (fewest matching rows after WHERE filters) as the driving table. Use JOIN hints only as a last resort since the optimizer usually picks the correct order with accurate statistics.
  4. Replace multiple OR conditions on the same column with IN (...): change WHERE status = 'active' OR status = 'pending' to WHERE status IN ('active', 'pending'). For OR across different columns, consider UNION ALL of two simpler queries.
  5. Apply window functions to replace self-joins or correlated subqueries. Use ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY... ORDER BY...) for top-N-per-group queries instead of GROUP BY with subqueries.
  6. Leverage CTEs (Common Table Expressions) for readability but be aware that PostgreSQL versions before 12 materialize all CTEs. For performance-critical queries on older PostgreSQL, inline the CTE as a subquery.
  7. Optimize aggregation queries by filtering before grouping (WHERE is more efficient than HAVING for non-aggregate conditions), using partial indexes for filtered aggregates, and considering materialized views for expensive recurring aggregations.
  8. Test the rewritten query with EXPLAIN ANALYZE and compare execution time, row estimates vs. actuals, and buffer usage against the original. The optimized version should show fewer rows processed, index scans replacing sequential scans, and lower total execution time.
  9. Document each change made, the reason for the change, and the measured impact so the development team understands and can apply similar patterns to future queries.

Output

  • Optimized SQL query with comments explaining each structural change
  • Before/after execution plans showing performance improvement
  • Index recommendations (CREATE INDEX statements) needed to support the optimized query
  • Anti-pattern report listing issues found in the original query with explanations
  • Performance metrics comparison (execution time, rows scanned, buffer hits)

Error Handling

ErrorCauseSolution
Rewritten query returns different resultsJOIN type change (INNER vs LEFT) or NULL handling differenceVerify result sets match with EXCEPT query; preserve original JOIN types; handle NULLs explicitly with COALESCE
Optimized query slower than originalStatistics outdated causing planner to choose wrong planRun ANALYZE on involved tables; compare estimated rows vs actual rows in EXPLAIN; consider SET enable_seqscan = off to test alternative plans
CTE materialization hurting performancePostgreSQL <12 materializes CTEs preventing predicate pushdownInline the CTE as a subquery; upgrade PostgreSQL; add AS NOT MATERIALIZED hint in PostgreSQL 12+
Window function query uses excessive memoryLarge partition sizes with ORDER BY in window specificationAdd LIMIT to outer query; use index matching the PARTITION BY and ORDER BY columns; increase work_mem for the session
UNION ALL produces duplicatesOverlapping conditions in constituent queriesAdd mutually exclusive WHERE conditions to each branch; or use UNION (with dedup cost) if overlap is unavoidable

Examples

Converting correlated subquery to JOIN: Original: SELECT * FROM orders WHERE customer_id IN (SELECT id FROM customers WHERE region = 'US') taking 8 seconds with sequential scan on orders. Rewrite: SELECT o.* FROM orders o JOIN customers c ON o.customer_id = c.id WHERE c.region = 'US' using index on orders.customer_id reduces to 120ms.

Top-N per group with window function: Original uses self-join to find the 3 most recent orders per customer (15 seconds). Rewrite: SELECT * FROM (SELECT *, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY customer_id ORDER BY created_at DESC) AS rn FROM orders) sub WHERE rn <= 3 with index on (customer_id, created_at DESC) completes in 400ms.

Eliminating DISTINCT from incorrect JOIN: SELECT DISTINCT o.* FROM orders o JOIN line_items li ON o.id = li.order_id WHERE li.amount > 100 scans all line items. Rewrite: SELECT o.* FROM orders o WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM line_items li WHERE li.order_id = o.id AND li.amount > 100) eliminates the deduplication step and halves execution time.

Resources

平台分布

Codex

38%
按下载量换算86

Claude

26.23%
按下载量换算60

Cursor

17.08%
按下载量换算39

Gemini CLI

9.73%
按下载量换算22

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills