Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

optimize-for-ai(针对 AI 进行优化)

optimize-for-ai 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

optimize-for-ai 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 1,019。

总安装 129,744周安装 5,337GitHub Stars 7下载 41,976核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:optimize-for-ai(针对 AI 进行优化)
来源仓库:https://github.com/calm-north/seojuice-skills
仓库路径:skills/optimize-for-ai
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/calm-north/seojuice-skills --skill optimize-for-ai
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/calm-north/seojuice-skills --skill optimize-for-ai

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

通过引文架构、E-E-A-T 信号和实体构建优化 AI 搜索引擎的内容。

指导 ChatGPT、Perplexity、Claude、Gemini 和 Google AI 概述中 AI 引用的内容结构 - 重点关注可提取性、可引用性、权威性、新鲜度和实体清晰度 提供 AI 引文评分框架(5 个维度,20 多个清单项目)以及展示如何将薄弱内容转化为可引用陈述的前后示例 涵盖每个引擎的优化差异、引用差距分析以及跨平台的品牌实体构建(维基百科、维基数据、LinkedIn、Crunchbase) 包括技术要求(robots.txt 配置、语义 HTML、结构化数据)和随着时间的推移跟踪 AI 可见性的监控策略

来源仓库内路径:skills/optimize-for-ai

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/calm-north/seojuice-skills --skill optimize-fo…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

optimize-for-ai 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/calm-north/seojuice-skills --skill optimize-for-ai。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

optimize-for-ai 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

optimize-for-ai 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

optimize-for-ai 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

optimize-for-ai 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 129,744 次,近一周安装 5,337 次,下载 41,976 次,GitHub 7 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

optimize-for-ai 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
optimize-for-ai

针对 AI 进行优化 · 本页

129,7447只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Optimize for AI

Optimize for AI search engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Google AI Overviews) using citation architecture, E-E-A-T signals, and brand entity building.

The Shift: Ranked vs Cited

Traditional SEO gets you ranked in a list of results. AI SEO gets you cited as a source in AI-generated answers. The difference matters:

  • AI systems select sources based on content quality, structure, and authority — not just ranking position
  • AI Overviews appear in a growing share of Google searches and can significantly reduce website clicks
  • Well-structured, authoritative content gets cited far more often than unstructured content
  • Being cited by AI builds brand trust in a way traditional rankings cannot

Content That Gets Cited

What AI Systems Look For

AI systems extract information from content. The easier it is to extract, the more likely it gets cited:

Definitions and clear statements

  • "X is Y" format — unambiguous, extractable
  • Place definitions early in the content, right after the heading
  • Avoid burying answers in lengthy introductions

Structured data

  • Comparison tables — among the most commonly cited content formats
  • Step-by-step lists
  • Statistical claims with sources
  • Pro/con lists

Original insights

  • Original research and data — unique data earns disproportionate citations
  • Expert quotes with credentials
  • First-hand experience descriptions
  • Counterintuitive findings backed by evidence

Comprehensive coverage

  • Definitive guides that cover a topic end-to-end
  • FAQ sections with direct answers
  • Content that answers follow-up questions proactively

Content Formats That Win (ranked by citation frequency)

FormatWhy It Works
Comparison articlesAI frequently answers "X vs Y" and "best X" queries — structured comparisons are easy to extract
Definitive guidesComprehensive coverage signals authority to AI systems
Original researchUnique data that no one else has — AI systems prefer primary sources
How-to tutorialsStep-by-step structure maps directly to AI response format
Expert roundupsMultiple expert voices increase perceived authority

Content-Type Optimization

Different content types get cited differently. Optimize based on what you're writing:

Comparison / "Best X" Content

  • Lead with a clear verdict or winner in the first 100 words
  • Include a summary comparison table near the top (AI systems extract tables directly)
  • Structure each option with consistent subheadings (Pros, Cons, Pricing, Best For)
  • State the recommendation explicitly: "The best X for Y is Z because..."

Research / Data Content

  • Add a "Key Findings" callout box with the single most notable statistic
  • Present data in HTML tables, not inline prose
  • State methodology explicitly (sample size, timeframe, data source)
  • Lead each section with the conclusion, then the supporting data

How-To / Tutorial Content

  • Present the complete step list before any explanatory prose
  • Use ordered lists with concise step descriptions
  • Include estimated time and difficulty level upfront
  • End with a concrete result statement: "After completing these steps, you will have..."

Definition / Explainer Content

  • Put the definition in the first sentence — not after context-setting
  • Use the "X is Y" format: unambiguous, standalone, extractable
  • Follow with a concrete example in the second paragraph
  • Structure the rest as progressive detail (what → why → how → examples)

AI Citation Scoring

Score each page across 5 dimensions. For each item: Pass (meets criteria fully), Partial (partly meets), or Fail (does not meet).

1. Extractability

Can AI systems pull a useful answer from this content?

ItemPassFail
Core answer in first 150 words after the headingAnswer appears immediatelyAnswer buried in background
Self-contained statements (make sense without context)Key claims stand aloneClaims require surrounding text
Structured data (tables, lists) for comparisons/dataData in tables or listsData in prose paragraphs
TL;DR or summary box at the topPresentMissing

2. Quotability

Does the content contain statements worth citing?

ItemPassFail
Specific claims with numbers and units"Response time improved 40% (from 500ms to 300ms)""Response time improved significantly"
Named sources on all statisticsSource and date citedUnsourced numbers
Clear definitions using "X is Y" structurePresent for key termsKey terms undefined or vague

3. Authority

Does the content signal expertise?

ItemPassFail
Author identified with relevant credentialsName, title, experience visibleAnonymous or no bio
Expert quotes with named sourcesAt least 1 named expert quotedNo external voices
References to primary sources (not just other blogs)Links to research, docs, official dataOnly cites other blog posts

4. Freshness

Is the content current?

ItemPassFail
Published or updated date visible on pageDate present and within 18 monthsNo date or older than 18 months
Data and examples are currentStatistics from last 2 yearsOutdated numbers or deprecated tools

5. Entity Clarity

Can AI systems identify what entity this content is about?

ItemPassFail
Subject entity named in full in opening paragraph"SEOJuice is an SEO intelligence platform..."Pronoun or abbreviated reference
Organization schema with sameAs linksJSON-LD presentMissing
Consistent brand name across platformsSame name on site, GBP, LinkedIn, etc.Variations or inconsistencies

Veto: If AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot) are blocked in robots.txt, the AI visibility score is 0 regardless of content quality. Check this first.

Scoring

Score each dimension: Pass = 10, Partial = 5, Fail = 0. Average items per dimension.

DimensionScoreAssessment
Extractability[x]/10...
Quotability[x]/10...
Authority[x]/10...
Freshness[x]/10...
Entity Clarity[x]/10...
AI Citation Score[avg]/10...

Making Content Quotable

AI systems cite content they can extract cleanly. Here are before/after examples showing how to transform weak content into citable content:

Definition Block

Before (score: 1/10): "SEO is really important and there are many things to consider."

After (score: 9/10): "Search engine optimization (SEO) is the practice of improving a website's visibility in organic search results through technical configuration, content relevance, and link authority. According to BrightEdge, 53% of all website traffic originates from organic search."

Fix: Name the term, classify it, list its components, add a sourced statistic.

Statistical Claim

Before (score: 2/10): "Email marketing is pretty effective for most businesses."

After (score: 9/10): "Email marketing generates an average return of $42 for every $1 spent (Litmus, 2023), making it the highest-ROI digital marketing channel — outperforming social media (average $5.20 per $1) and paid search (average $8 per $1)."

Fix: Replace adjectives with numbers, name the source, add comparison context.

Process / How-To

Before (score: 2/10): "Think about your keywords and try to optimize your content."

After (score: 8/10): "To optimize a page for a target keyword: (1) place the keyword in the title tag and H1, (2) use it in the first 100 words, (3) add 2-3 semantic variations in H2 subheadings, (4) maintain 0.5-2.5% keyword density, and (5) include it in the meta description. Use tools like Google Search Console to verify indexing within 48 hours."

Fix: Number the steps, make each action specific, add tool and time reference.

Quotability Test

Score each content section against these 10 questions (8+ = highly quotable, 5-7 = needs work, <5 = major rewrite):

  1. Can AI quote this without needing surrounding context?
  2. Does it include specific numbers or measurements?
  3. Is the source of any claim clearly identified?
  4. Is the language precise and unambiguous?
  5. Would a subject-matter expert approve this statement?
  6. Is it scannable (uses lists, tables, or short paragraphs)?
  7. Is the information current (data from last 2 years)?
  8. Can the claims be independently verified?
  9. Is it specific to a defined use case or audience?
  10. Does it answer a complete question without requiring follow-up?

Citation Gap Analysis

Check who AI systems currently cite for your target topics:

  1. Search your primary keywords on ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews
  2. Note which domains are cited in the responses
  3. For each competitor citation, assess: what does their content have that yours doesn't?
  4. Common gaps: more specific data, clearer structure, better-known author, fresher content

Optimization Framework

1. Structure for Extraction

  • Use clear H2/H3 headings that match questions people ask
  • Put the answer in the first sentence after the heading
  • Use HTML tables for comparisons and data
  • Use ordered lists for processes and rankings
  • Include a TL;DR or summary box at the top of long content

2. Build Authority Signals

  • Statistics with sources: Content with cited statistics is significantly more likely to be referenced
  • Expert quotes: Named experts with credentials increase citation likelihood substantially
  • Dates and freshness: AI systems prefer recent, dated content
  • Consistent brand voice: Be recognizable as an authority in your niche
  • Cross-platform presence: Appear on Wikipedia, Reddit, industry sites — AI systems cross-reference

3. Entity Building

AI systems understand brands as entities. To strengthen your brand entity:

  • Maintain consistent brand information across the web (name, description, expertise areas)
  • Appear on platforms AI systems index: Wikipedia, Wikidata, Crunchbase, LinkedIn, industry directories
  • Get mentioned (not just linked) on authoritative sites
  • Create a robust About page and author bios with credentials
  • Use Organization schema markup with sameAs links to all official profiles

4. Entity Identity Checklist

AI systems recognize brands as entities. Use this prioritized checklist to strengthen your entity:

Priority 1 — Foundation (must-have):

  • Organization schema on homepage with name, url, logo, description
  • sameAs property links to all authoritative profiles (LinkedIn, Wikipedia, Wikidata, social)
  • About page with entity-rich content (founding date, key people, mission)
  • Consistent brand name, address, and contact info across all directories
  • Branded search returns your site as #1 result

Priority 2 — Authority (should-have):

  • Google Knowledge Panel present with correct information
  • Wikipedia article or 3+ independent reliable source mentions
  • Wikidata entry with 10+ properties and references
  • 3+ authoritative media mentions in recognized publications
  • Author pages with credentials and Person schema

Priority 3 — AI-Specific (must-have for AI visibility):

  • ChatGPT recognizes your entity correctly when asked
  • Perplexity returns accurate information about your brand
  • Entity definition is quotable in the first paragraph of your About page
  • Entity name used identically across all platforms (no abbreviations or variations)
  • Key pages updated within the last 6 months
Current StateFocus AreaTimeline
Most Priority 1 missingPriority 1 only2-4 weeks
Priority 1 done, Priority 2 mixedPriority 2 authority1-2 months
Priority 1-2 donePriority 3 AI-specific2-3 months
All tiers doneMaintenance + quarterly re-auditOngoing

5. Technical Requirements

  • Don't block AI crawlers. Check robots.txt for blocks on GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended
  • Keep content accessible. Content behind login walls, paywalls, or heavy JS rendering may not be crawled
  • Use semantic HTML. Proper heading hierarchy, tables, lists — not divs styled to look like these
  • Implement structured data. Article, FAQ, HowTo, Organization schema help AI systems understand content type

AI Visibility Audit Checklist

  • robots.txt does not block AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot)
  • Key pages render without JavaScript (or use SSR/SSG)
  • Content uses clear definitional structure ("X is Y")
  • Comparison tables exist for relevant topics
  • Statistics include named sources and dates
  • Author bios include credentials and expertise signals
  • Organization schema is present with sameAs links
  • Brand appears on major platforms (Wikipedia, Crunchbase, LinkedIn)
  • Content is dated and regularly updated
  • FAQ sections use direct, concise answers

How Each AI Engine Cites Differently

Different AI systems have distinct citation behaviors. Optimize for all, but understand the differences:

FactorGoogle AI OverviewsChatGPTPerplexityClaude
Freshness biasHighMediumVery HighN/A (training data)
Authority weightVery HighHighHighHigh
Structure importanceHighMediumVery HighMedium
Typical citations per answer3-81-65-10N/A
Domain trust weightVery HighHighMediumHigh
Factual density preferenceHighHighVery HighVery High

Per-Engine Notes

  • Google AI Overviews — Favors E-E-A-T signals, recent publication dates, structured content (short paragraphs, bullet points, tables). Cites 3-8 sources per overview.
  • ChatGPT (with browsing) — Uses inline citations [1], [2]. Favors.edu/.gov/.org domains and recognized brands. Pulls exact quotes when information is distinctive.
  • Perplexity — Strongest freshness bias. Shows domain and publish date alongside citations. Prefers quotable standalone statements with high factual density. Most sources per answer (5-10).
  • Claude — Relies on training data, not live browsing. Values clear authoritative definitions, well-established methodologies, and consensus information. Optimize for training data inclusion via authoritative publishing.

Monitoring AI Visibility

Track your AI presence across platforms:

  1. Search your brand on ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Gemini
  2. Search your primary topics and check if your content is cited
  3. Track mentions over time — are you being cited more or less frequently?
  4. Monitor sentiment — how do AI systems describe your brand?
  5. Check competitors — who gets cited for your key topics?

Common Mistakes

  • Treating AI SEO as separate from traditional SEO. Strong traditional SEO is the foundation — AI systems largely index the same content Google does.
  • Keyword stuffing. Actively reduces AI citation likelihood. Write naturally.
  • Gating content. Paywalled or login-gated content can't be cited.
  • Ignoring freshness. Outdated content gets deprioritized quickly.
  • Blocking AI crawlers. Some sites block AI bots out of principle — this guarantees invisibility.

Output Format

AI Visibility Strategy: [domain]

Current AI Presence

  • Brand recognized by AI systems: [yes/partially/no]
  • Topics where cited: [list]
  • Citation sentiment: [positive/neutral/mixed]
  • AI crawler access: [allowed/blocked/partially blocked]

Optimization Priorities

PriorityActionPages AffectedExpected Impact
1.........

Content Optimization Plan For each key page/topic:

  • Current state (extractable? structured? authoritative?)
  • Specific changes needed
  • Schema to add

Brand Entity Checklist

  • Consistent brand presence across platforms
  • Organization schema with sameAs links
  • Author bios with credentials
  • Appearances on AI-indexed platforms

Pro Tip: Try the free AI Visibility Checker to see how your brand appears in AI search results, the AI Crawler Inspector to verify bot access, and the GEO Content Analyzer to score content for AI citation readiness. SEOJuice MCP users can run /seojuice:aiso-report for AISO scores across visibility, sentiment, position, and coverage — with monthly trends.

平台分布

Codex

36.78%
按下载量换算15,439

Claude

28.51%
按下载量换算11,967

Cursor

17.49%
按下载量换算7,342

Gemini CLI

10.51%
按下载量换算4,412

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills