Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

optimization-catalog(优化目录)

optimization-catalog 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

optimization-catalog 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 52,216。

总安装 563周安装 23GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 182核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:optimization-catalog(优化目录)
来源仓库:https://github.com/pepperu96/hyper-mla
仓库路径:skills/optimization-catalog
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/pepperu96/hyper-mla --skill optimization-catalog
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/pepperu96/hyper-mla --skill optimization-catalog

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

optimization-catalog 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。适用于参数空间探索、超参组合管理与实验结果归档等 ML 工程场景。支持多维指标对比与帕累托前沿可视化建议。

安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/pepperu96/hyper-mla --skill optimization-catalog;需定义清晰优化目标函数。搜索结果依赖初始种子质量,建议多样化采样起点。

来源仓库内路径:skills/optimization-catalog

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/pepperu96/hyper-mla --skill optimization-catal…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

optimization-catalog 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/pepperu96/hyper-mla --skill optimization-catalog。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

optimization-catalog 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

optimization-catalog 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

optimization-catalog 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

optimization-catalog 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 563 次,近一周安装 23 次,下载 182 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

optimization-catalog 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
optimization-catalog

优化目录 · 本页

563—需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Optimization Catalog Router

Use this skill as a dispatcher. The shared root knowledge base remains the canonical location for algorithmic patterns that transfer across implementation languages. Language-specific overlays capture implementation details tied to a specific DSL or programming model.

Load Order

  1. Read the shared root knowledge under docs/knowledge/optimizations/ and docs/knowledge/anti-patterns/ when the pattern is algorithmic.
  2. Load the language-specific optimization catalog skill for the chosen implementation language.
  3. Read language overlays in docs/knowledge/languages/<language>/... only when the implementation details depend on that surface.

Language-Specific Catalog Skills

Language keyLoad this skillLanguage-specific knowledge root
cutile-dsl/optimization-catalog-cutile-dsldocs/knowledge/languages/cutile-dsl/
cute-dsl/optimization-catalog-cute-dsldocs/knowledge/languages/cute-dsl/

Classification Rule

  • Shared root catalogs are for algorithmic patterns, workload-shape rules, and anti-patterns that transfer across DSLs.
  • Language overlays are for implementation details that depend on a specific API, compiler behavior, code-generation surface, or scheduling model.
  • When in doubt, keep the reusable mechanism in the shared root and add a language-specific overlay only for the implementation surface.

Current Migration State

  • The shared root catalogs in docs/knowledge/optimizations/ and docs/knowledge/anti-patterns/ remain the compatibility-preserving baseline.
  • New language-specific overlays are being added under docs/knowledge/languages/.
  • Existing references to the legacy root paths continue to work during the migration.

Knowledge Base Principles

The goal of this catalog is to build reusable cuTile kernel design knowledge, not to accumulate device folklore.

Every entry must therefore be written as:

  • a pattern or anti-pattern that can transfer across kernels,
  • with a clear context describing when it applies,
  • with explicit performance metrics affected,
  • with evidence separated into local validation, and generalized takeaway when relevant.

Device and architecture facts are encouraged when they sharpen the rule:

  • architecture families such as Blackwell or Hopper,
  • architecture capabilities such as Tensor Cores, TMA, thread block clusters, scheduler behavior, or shared-memory limits,
  • device-level specs such as peak FP16/BF16 TFLOP/s, peak memory bandwidth, ridge point, SM count, registers/SM, or SMEM capacity.

But those facts must be converted into reusable guidance. Entries should avoid collapsing into "kernel X on device Y liked config Z" unless that observation is only being used as evidence for a broader pattern.

How This Catalog Works

  1. Index below maps trigger conditions → optimization → detail file
  2. Orchestrator reads index to pick optimizations based on profiling results
  3. Kernel designer reads detail files to implement specific optimizations
  4. New optimizations: create detail file in docs/knowledge/optimizations/ + add row to index
  5. Failed optimizations: create anti-pattern in docs/knowledge/anti-patterns/ + add row below

Optimization Index

IDOptimizationTrigger ConditionsEst. ImpactPitfallsDetail File
O1Split-KV proportional block allocationDual-path kernel has strongly unbalanced latent vs decompressed work; equal block split leaves one path starvedVery HighRequires a reduction kernel and intermediate tensorsdocs/knowledge/optimizations/split-kv.md
O2Head grouping for shared-operand reuseSame operand is reused across heads (for example latent Z) and Bh=1 produces skinny per-head MMAs or near-zero TC utilizationVery HighRaises register pressure; not appropriate for per-head-only operands like decompressed K/Vdocs/knowledge/optimizations/head-grouping.md
O3Independent path schedulingAfter Split-KV, the latent and decompressed paths still want different streaming granularities or load schedulingLow-MedGains are modest if register pressure and occupancy do not improvedocs/knowledge/optimizations/independent-tiles.md
O4Swizzle schedulingTiled kernel reuses one operand across neighboring CTAs and block order measurably affects L2 localityLowCompute-bound kernels may see only marginal benefit; 1D remap adds index overheaddocs/knowledge/optimizations/swizzle.md
O5Latency hintsLoad/compute overlap tuning is needed after the kernel structure is already sound, and the per-path DRAM pressure differs enough that compiler guidance may help schedulingLowDifficult to isolate; hints are suggestions rather than guaranteesdocs/knowledge/optimizations/latency-hints.md
O6CGA thread block clustersHopper+ kernel has genuine cross-CTA data sharing opportunity or needs to reason correctly about num_ctas semantics and cluster launch behaviorMediumHardware-specific and easy to misuse when there is no real sharing benefitdocs/knowledge/optimizations/cga.md
O7Fast math for online softmaxOnline-softmax loop is heavy on exp2/division, larger tiles collapse compute throughput, and reduced-precision inference math is acceptableHighNot a substitute for sane tiling; gains shrink if spills or bandwidth dominatedocs/knowledge/optimizations/fast-math-online-softmax.md
O8Causal K-loop splitCausal attention has many fully unmasked K-tiles, only diagonal/tail tiles need mask logic, and future tiles can be skippedMedium-HighCan be neutral or negative if masking is no longer material on the target bottleneckdocs/knowledge/optimizations/causal-k-loop-split.md
O9Causal ProgramId remapTriangular work causes wave-tail imbalance across CTAs and a simple launch-order reversal is availableLow-MedSmall gain if work distribution is already uniform or the grid is tinydocs/knowledge/optimizations/causal-program-id-remap.md
O10Adaptive tile and occupancy autotuningBest tile/occupancy point changes with sequence length or device envelope; fixed manual choice underfills short shapes or overcommits long onesHighSearch space can explode if not curated; cannot rescue a structurally broken kerneldocs/knowledge/optimizations/adaptive-tile-autotuning.md
O11Pipeline-driven low-occupancy schedulingLarge unavoidable per-CTA state forces one CTA/SM or very low occupancy, and the kernel must win via overlap and scheduling rather than more resident warpsHighRequires architecture/DSL support for fine-grained scheduling; cannot be faked with a monolithic CTAdocs/knowledge/optimizations/pipeline-driven-low-occupancy.md

Anti-Pattern Index

IDAnti-PatternFailure ModeSourceDetail File
A1Equal block split across heterogeneous paths50/50 block allocation for unequal latent vs decompressed work produces sequential bottlenecks instead of overlapMLA-var6+ V0docs/knowledge/anti-patterns/equal-block-split.md
A2TILE_M=1 combine/decompressionSingle-row combine GEMMs disable Tensor Cores and leave a persistent tail at small sMLA-var6+ V0/V2/V3docs/knowledge/anti-patterns/tile-m-one-combine.md
A3Underfilled persistent concurrencyResident block budgets below the SM count leave the GPU idle and make overlap ineffectiveMLA-var6+ V4docs/knowledge/anti-patterns/underfilled-persistent.md
A4Register-ceiling persistent stagePersistent kernel lands at the register ceiling (255 regs/thread), collapses occupancy, and becomes latency-boundMLA-var6+ V4docs/knowledge/anti-patterns/spill-heavy-persistent.md
A5Blind large-tile portCopying a tile shape from another device without revalidating registers, SMEM, local-memory traffic, and grid size crosses a resource cliffFlashAttention learning chaindocs/knowledge/anti-patterns/blind-large-tile-port.md
A6Uniform causal maskingPaying full causal-mask logic on every K-tile wastes work even though most tiles are fully valid or fully skippedFlashAttention learning chaindocs/knowledge/anti-patterns/uniform-causal-masking.md
A7Sub-16 MMA dimensionShrinking any effective MMA dimension (M, N, or K) below 16 usually breaks Tensor Core coverage and explodes latency instead of fixing occupancyFlashMLA V1 manual probes + Tensor Core shape constraintsdocs/knowledge/anti-patterns/sub-16-mma-dimension.md
A8Blind dataflow flipRewriting a resource-sensitive Tensor Core kernel into an algebraically equivalent operand orientation changes codegen enough to reintroduce spills or worsen SMEM behaviorFlashMLA V1 → V2docs/knowledge/anti-patterns/blind-dataflow-flip.md

Cross-Referencing: Metrics → Optimizations

Profiling Metric StateLikely Optimizations
Equal-duration kernels with obviously unequal workO1 (Split-KV proportional block allocation)
Bh=1 or per-head skinny MMAs on a shared operandO2 (Head grouping)
Dual-path kernel plateaus near the ridge point after Split-KVO3 (Independent path scheduling)
L2 hit < 90% and neighboring CTAs reload the same operand tilesO4 (Swizzle scheduling)
Same kernel structure but different path-level memory pressure suggests compiler scheduling changes may matterO5 (Latency hints)
Cross-CTA data sharing on Hopper+ or confusion about what num_ctas actually controlsO6 (CGA thread block clusters)
Tensor Core/MMA structure is sound, but online-softmax special functions dominate the hot loopO7 (Fast math for online softmax)
Causal kernel still spends meaningful time in mask/control flow because many K-tiles are fully valid and future tiles are fully skippedO8 (Causal K-loop split)
Causal/triangular workload shows tail imbalance across CTAs or waves finish unevenlyO9 (Causal ProgramId remap)
Short shapes underfill the GPU while long shapes prefer different tiles or occupancy hintsO10 (Adaptive tile and occupancy autotuning)
Registers/SMEM force one CTA/SM, eligible warps stay very low, and the kernel is compute-bound but still under-utilizes Tensor CoresO11 (Pipeline-driven low-occupancy scheduling)
Combine stage has TILE_M=1 and TC Util = 0%A2 (TILE_M=1 combine/decompression)
Persistent resident blocks < SM count or waves/SM < 1A3 (Underfilled persistent concurrency)
Persistent stage at 255 regs/thread with single-digit occupancyA4 (Register-ceiling persistent stage)
Imported large tile causes register/SMEM cliffs, local-memory traffic, or abrupt grid shrinkage on the target deviceA5 (Blind large-tile port)
Causal masking logic is paid uniformly across all K-tiles despite obvious fully-valid and fully-skipped regionsA6 (Uniform causal masking)
Candidate tile drives any effective MMA dimension below 16, or Tensor Core FLOPs collapse far below algorithmic FLOPs after a "smaller tile" changeA7 (Sub-16 MMA dimension)
Proposed optimization is only an algebraic operand/dataflow flip, especially near a register or SMEM cliffA8 (Blind dataflow flip)

Knowledge Base Update Protocol

For the full update protocol, detail file template, and step-by-step instructions, load the /orchestration-workflow skill.

平台分布

Codex

35.15%
按下载量换算64

Claude

32.25%
按下载量换算59

Cursor

18.49%
按下载量换算34

Gemini CLI

9.18%
按下载量换算17

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills