Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ops-contract-review(运营合同审查)

ops-contract-review 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

ops-contract-review 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 56,510。

总安装 449周安装 18GitHub Stars 125下载 145核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ops-contract-review(运营合同审查)
来源仓库:https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills
仓库路径:skills/ops-contract-review
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill ops-contract-review
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill ops-contract-review

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

ops-contract-review 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。适用于法务文档查询、合同条款比对和合规性审查等场景。支持按关键词、法律领域或时间范围进行定向检索。

安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill ops-contract-review;需验证数据来源可靠性。涉及敏感信息时应限制输出范围,避免泄露机密条款。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ops-contract-review

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill ops-contract…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

ops-contract-review 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill ops-contract-review。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ops-contract-review 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ops-contract-review 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

ops-contract-review 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ops-contract-review 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 449 次,近一周安装 18 次,下载 145 次,GitHub 125 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ops-contract-review 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ops-contract-review

运营合同审查 · 本页

449125只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Business Contract Review

Framework

IRON LAW: Read the Entire Contract, Not Just the Commercial Terms

Price and scope are negotiated carefully. Liability, indemnification,
termination, and IP ownership are often accepted on autopilot.
These "back-of-contract" clauses are where the real risk lives.

A great price with unlimited liability is a terrible deal.

Contract Review Checklist (Business Focus)

1. Parties & Authority

  • Correct legal entity names (not a subsidiary you didn't intend to contract with)
  • Signer has authority to bind the organization

2. Scope & Deliverables

  • Clearly defined: what is included AND what is excluded
  • Acceptance criteria: how do you determine delivery is satisfactory?
  • Change order process: how are scope changes handled and priced?

3. Payment Terms

  • Payment schedule: milestones, monthly, upon delivery
  • Payment terms: net 30, net 60, upon receipt
  • Late payment consequences
  • Currency and exchange rate risk (for international contracts)

4. Term & Termination

  • Contract duration: fixed term vs auto-renewal
  • Termination for convenience: can either party exit? With what notice?
  • Termination for cause: what constitutes a breach?
  • Wind-down obligations: what happens after termination? Data return? Transition assistance?

5. Liability & Indemnification

  • Liability cap: is there one? What's the amount? (ideally = contract value)
  • Indemnification: who indemnifies whom? For what? Is it mutual or one-sided?
  • Exclusions: consequential damages, lost profits — are they excluded?
  • Insurance requirements: does either party need to carry insurance?

6. Intellectual Property

  • Who owns work product created during the contract?
  • Pre-existing IP: remains with original owner (ensure this is stated)
  • License grants: what rights does each party get to use the other's IP?

7. Confidentiality

  • Definition of confidential information (not too broad, not too narrow)
  • Duration: how long after termination?
  • Exceptions: publicly available info, independently developed, legally compelled

8. Dispute Resolution

  • Governing law: which jurisdiction?
  • Arbitration vs litigation: arbitration is faster and private, litigation is cheaper for small claims
  • Venue: where are disputes heard?

Risk Rating

Risk LevelCharacteristicsAction
🟢 LowMarket-standard terms, balanced obligationsSign
🟡 MediumSome one-sided clauses, manageable riskNegotiate specific clauses
🔴 HighUnlimited liability, no exit, one-sided IPDon't sign without major revisions

Output Format

# Contract Review: {Agreement Type} with {Counterparty}

## Overview
- Type: {service/vendor/partnership/license}
- Value: {$X}
- Term: {duration}

## Risk Assessment
| Area | Risk | Issue | Recommendation |
|------|------|-------|---------------|
| Scope | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | {finding} | {action} |
| Payment | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | {finding} | {action} |
| Termination | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | {finding} | {action} |
| Liability | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | {finding} | {action} |
| IP | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | {finding} | {action} |
| Confidentiality | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | {finding} | {action} |

## Red Flags
1. {specific clause + why it's risky}

## Negotiation Priorities
1. {most important change to request}
2. {second priority}
3. {third priority}

## Overall Risk: 🟢/🟡/🔴
{Summary recommendation: sign / negotiate / reject}

Gotchas

  • Auto-renewal without notice deadline: Many contracts auto-renew unless you give 30-90 days' notice. Calendar the notice deadline immediately upon signing.
  • "Standard" contracts are NOT neutral: The drafter's "standard" template protects the drafter. Everything is negotiable.
  • Verbal agreements are risky: "They said they'd cover that" means nothing if it's not in the contract. If it's important, it must be written.
  • Force majeure scope: Post-COVID, check what's included. Pandemic? Supply chain disruption? Government orders? Too narrow = no protection when you need it.
  • This is a business review, not legal advice: For contracts with significant financial or legal exposure, have a licensed attorney review the final version.

References

  • For contract law fundamentals, see the law-contract skill
  • For negotiation tactics, see the ops-negotiation skill

平台分布

Codex

33.76%
按下载量换算49

Claude

28.66%
按下载量换算42

Cursor

20.75%
按下载量换算30

Gemini CLI

9.91%
按下载量换算14

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills