Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

openspec-bulk-archive-change(openspec 批量存档更改)

openspec-bulk-archive-change 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

openspec-bulk-archive-change 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 49,632。

总安装 643周安装 26GitHub Stars 5,867下载 202核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:openspec-bulk-archive-change(openspec 批量存档更改)
来源仓库:https://github.com/pbh-btn/peerbanhelper
仓库路径:skills/openspec-bulk-archive-change
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/pbh-btn/peerbanhelper --skill openspec-bulk-archive-change
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/pbh-btn/peerbanhelper --skill openspec-bulk-archive-change

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

openspec-bulk-archive-change 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词或任务场景快速定位候选结果。通过 npx skills add 命令从 peerbanhelper 仓库安装该技能。

安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网或文件操作。建议结合原始 README 继续核验具体搜索逻辑和使用方式。

来源仓库内路径:skills/openspec-bulk-archive-change

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/pbh-btn/peerbanhelper --skill openspec-bulk-ar…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

openspec-bulk-archive-change 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/pbh-btn/peerbanhelper --skill openspec-bulk-archive-chan…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

openspec-bulk-archive-change 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

openspec-bulk-archive-change 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

openspec-bulk-archive-change 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

openspec-bulk-archive-change 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 643 次,近一周安装 26 次,下载 202 次,GitHub 5,867 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

openspec-bulk-archive-change 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 来源仓库有 5,867 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
openspec-bulk-archive-change

openspec 批量存档更改 · 本页

6435,867接触敏感数据未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Archive multiple completed changes in a single operation.

This skill allows you to batch-archive changes, handling spec conflicts intelligently by checking the codebase to determine what's actually implemented.

Input: None required (prompts for selection)

Steps

  1. Get active changes Run openspec list --json to get all active changes. If no active changes exist, inform user and stop.
  2. Prompt for change selection Use AskUserQuestion tool with multi-select to let user choose changes: IMPORTANT: Do NOT auto-select. Always let the user choose.

- Show each change with its schema - Include an option for "All changes" - Allow any number of selections (1+ works, 2+ is the typical use case)

  1. Batch validation - gather status for all selected changes For each selected change, collect: a. Artifact status - Run openspec status --change "<name>" --json b. Task completion - Read openspec/changes/<name>/tasks.md c. Delta specs - Check openspec/changes/<name>/specs/ directory

- Parse schemaName and artifacts list - Note which artifacts are done vs other states - Count - [] (incomplete) vs - [x] (complete) - If no tasks file exists, note as "No tasks" - List which capability specs exist - For each, extract requirement names (lines matching ### Requirement: <name>)

  1. Detect spec conflicts Build a map of capability -> [changes that touch it]: auth -> [change-a, change-b] <- CONFLICT (2+ changes) api -> [change-c] <- OK (only 1 change) A conflict exists when 2+ selected changes have delta specs for the same capability.
  2. Resolve conflicts agentically For each conflict, investigate the codebase: a. Read the delta specs from each conflicting change to understand what each claims to add/modify b. Search the codebase for implementation evidence: c. Determine resolution: d. Record resolution for each conflict:

- Look for code implementing requirements from each delta spec - Check for related files, functions, or tests - If only one change is actually implemented -> sync that one's specs - If both implemented -> apply in chronological order (older first, newer overwrites) - If neither implemented -> skip spec sync, warn user - Which change's specs to apply - In what order (if both) - Rationale (what was found in codebase)

  1. Show consolidated status table Display a table summarizing all changes: | Change | Artifacts | Tasks | Specs | Conflicts | Status | |---------------------|-----------|-------|---------|-----------|--------| | schema-management | Done | 5/5 | 2 delta | None | Ready | | project-config | Done | 3/3 | 1 delta | None | Ready | | add-oauth | Done | 4/4 | 1 delta | auth (!) | Ready* | | add-verify-skill | 1 left | 2/5 | None | None | Warn | For conflicts, show the resolution: * Conflict resolution: - auth spec: Will apply add-oauth then add-jwt (both implemented, chronological order) For incomplete changes, show warnings: Warnings: - add-verify-skill: 1 incomplete artifact, 3 incomplete tasks
  2. Confirm batch operation Use AskUserQuestion tool with a single confirmation: If there are incomplete changes, make clear they'll be archived with warnings.

- "Archive N changes?" with options based on status - Options might include: - "Archive all N changes" - "Archive only N ready changes (skip incomplete)" - "Cancel"

  1. Execute archive for each confirmed change Process changes in the determined order (respecting conflict resolution): a. Sync specs if delta specs exist: b. Perform the archive: mkdir -p openspec/changes/archive mv openspec/changes/<name> openspec/changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<name> c. Track outcome for each change:

- Use the openspec-sync-specs approach (agent-driven intelligent merge) - For conflicts, apply in resolved order - Track if sync was done - Success: archived successfully - Failed: error during archive (record error) - Skipped: user chose not to archive (if applicable)

  1. Display summary Show final results: ## Bulk Archive Complete Archived 3 changes: - schema-management-cli -> archive/2026-01-19-schema-management-cli/ - project-config -> archive/2026-01-19-project-config/ - add-oauth -> archive/2026-01-19-add-oauth/ Skipped 1 change: - add-verify-skill (user chose not to archive incomplete) Spec sync summary: - 4 delta specs synced to main specs - 1 conflict resolved (auth: applied both in chronological order) If any failures: Failed 1 change: - some-change: Archive directory already exists

Conflict Resolution Examples

Example 1: Only one implemented

Conflict: specs/auth/spec.md touched by [add-oauth, add-jwt]

Checking add-oauth:
- Delta adds "OAuth Provider Integration" requirement
- Searching codebase... found src/auth/oauth.ts implementing OAuth flow

Checking add-jwt:
- Delta adds "JWT Token Handling" requirement
- Searching codebase... no JWT implementation found

Resolution: Only add-oauth is implemented. Will sync add-oauth specs only.

Example 2: Both implemented

Conflict: specs/api/spec.md touched by [add-rest-api, add-graphql]

Checking add-rest-api (created 2026-01-10):
- Delta adds "REST Endpoints" requirement
- Searching codebase... found src/api/rest.ts

Checking add-graphql (created 2026-01-15):
- Delta adds "GraphQL Schema" requirement
- Searching codebase... found src/api/graphql.ts

Resolution: Both implemented. Will apply add-rest-api specs first,
then add-graphql specs (chronological order, newer takes precedence).

Output On Success

## Bulk Archive Complete

Archived N changes:
- <change-1> -> archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<change-1>/
- <change-2> -> archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<change-2>/

Spec sync summary:
- N delta specs synced to main specs
- No conflicts (or: M conflicts resolved)

Output On Partial Success

## Bulk Archive Complete (partial)

Archived N changes:
- <change-1> -> archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<change-1>/

Skipped M changes:
- <change-2> (user chose not to archive incomplete)

Failed K changes:
- <change-3>: Archive directory already exists

Output When No Changes

## No Changes to Archive

No active changes found. Use `/opsx:new` to create a new change.

Guardrails

  • Allow any number of changes (1+ is fine, 2+ is the typical use case)
  • Always prompt for selection, never auto-select
  • Detect spec conflicts early and resolve by checking codebase
  • When both changes are implemented, apply specs in chronological order
  • Skip spec sync only when implementation is missing (warn user)
  • Show clear per-change status before confirming
  • Use single confirmation for entire batch
  • Track and report all outcomes (success/skip/fail)
  • Preserve.openspec.yaml when moving to archive
  • Archive directory target uses current date: YYYY-MM-DD-
  • If archive target exists, fail that change but continue with others

平台分布

Codex

35.37%
按下载量换算71

Claude

29.47%
按下载量换算60

Cursor

16.83%
按下载量换算34

Gemini CLI

8.97%
按下载量换算18

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

可疑

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills