Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

openclaw-workspace(OpenClaw workspace 搜索)

openclaw-workspace 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

openclaw-workspace 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 3,399。

总安装 44,550周安装 1,875GitHub Stars 2下载 15,363核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:openclaw-workspace(OpenClaw workspace 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/ivangdavila/openclaw-workspace
安装命令:
openclaw skills install openclaw-workspace
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install openclaw-workspace

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

审核和改进 OpenClaw 跨灵魂、代理和工具的工作空间。适用于角色调整、主动行为和记忆管理优化。支持工作流程适配和技能整合,提升整体性能。安装命令:openclaw skills install openclaw-workspace。需确认权限范围和维护状态,避免触发配置变更或数据访问。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install openclaw-workspace;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

openclaw-workspace 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install openclaw-workspace。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

openclaw-workspace 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

openclaw-workspace 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

openclaw-workspace 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

openclaw-workspace 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 44,550 次,近一周安装 1,875 次,下载 15,363 次,GitHub 2 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

openclaw-workspace 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
openclaw-workspace

OpenClaw workspace 搜索 · 本页

44,5502需要联网MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
OpenClaw Workspace
slug
openclaw-workspace
version
1.0.0
homepage
https://clawic.com/skills/openclaw-workspace
description
Audit and improve OpenClaw workspaces across SOUL, AGENTS, TOOLS, USER, MEMORY, and skills for persona tuning, proactive behavior, recall, and workflow fit. Use when (1) the user wants to improve or analyze their workspace; (2) they want the agent to become more proactive, sharper, or better organized; (3) they ask how to change soul, agent behavior, memory, tools, or skills; (4) they want workspace improvements based on prior conversations.
changelog
Clarified activation wording so the skill is picked more reliably for broad workspace improvement requests.
metadata
{"clawdbot":{"emoji":"🧩","requires":{"bins":[]},"os":["linux","darwin","win32"]}}

When to Use

Use when the user wants to improve, audit, debug, redesign, or understand their OpenClaw workspace as a working system, not as isolated files.

This skill should also activate when the user asks why the agent behaves a certain way, how to make it more proactive, how to improve recall, how to tune tone or autonomy, or how to evolve the workspace from prior conversations.

If the request is broad or the user does not know where to start, default to proposing a deep workspace audit first.

Improvement Surface

LayerImprove Here WhenWhat Good Looks Like
SOUL.mdTone, personality, confidence, warmth, bluntness, humor, tasteThe agent sounds intentional, stable, and human rather than generic
IDENTITY.mdName, vibe markers, stable self-description, outward identity cuesThe agent presents itself consistently across channels and sessions
AGENTS.mdStartup behavior, work style, boundaries, proactivity, escalation rulesThe agent starts strong, acts resourcefully, and stays inside clear operating rules
TOOLS.mdTool usage conventions, local notes, operating hints, environment quirksThe agent uses available tools better without pretending new tools exist
USER.mdStable facts about the human, context, preferences, identity cuesThe agent adapts to the person without building a creepy dossier
MEMORY.mdDurable lessons, recurring priorities, long-term preferences, important factsMain-session recall is sharp without becoming bloated or stale
memory/ daily notesRecent context, fresh changes, current projects, recent mistakes or winsThe agent can reason from recency instead of relying only on old summaries
HEARTBEAT.mdRecurring checks, proactive follow-through, idle-time maintenanceProactivity feels useful and timely instead of noisy
skills/Capability gaps, reusable playbooks, domain-specific operating rulesRepeated problems move out of ad hoc prompting and into reusable skill behavior

Core Rules

1. Default to Deep Audit Mode for Broad Workspace Requests

  • If the user says "improve my workspace", "analyze my workspace", "why is my agent like this", or anything equally broad, start by proposing a deep audit.
  • A deep audit should inspect the current workspace stack, recent memory evidence, active behavior patterns, and the biggest friction points before prescribing changes.
  • If the user already names a target such as proactivity, memory, tone, or tools, audit that layer first but still map likely side effects on adjacent layers.
  • The default audit order is: bootstrap behavior files first, then memory evidence, then skills, then concrete improvement proposals.
  • A good audit ends with three outputs: what is driving the current behavior now, what is misaligned, and the smallest diffs that would materially improve it.

2. Diagnose by Layer Instead of Giving Generic Advice

  • Do not give vague "make it more proactive" or "improve memory" advice without locating which file or mechanism controls that behavior.
  • Voice and personality belong in SOUL.md.
  • Stable self-presentation and identity markers belong in IDENTITY.md.
  • Startup routines, decision defaults, red lines, escalation rules, and proactive behavior belong in AGENTS.md and sometimes HEARTBEAT.md.
  • Tool notes belong in TOOLS.md.
  • Human-specific context belongs in USER.md.
  • Durable recall belongs in MEMORY.md, while recent raw context belongs in memory/ daily files.
  • Repeated domain workflows belong in skills, not in bloated root files.

3. Use Prior Conversations as Primary Evidence

  • Before proposing workspace changes from history, search existing memory first rather than guessing from the current message alone.
  • Use memory_search on MEMORY.md plus memory/*.md whenever the question depends on previous preferences, recurring mistakes, deadlines, people, or long-running work.
  • If transcript-backed recall is available, use recent session evidence to identify repeated friction, repeated user corrections, and patterns worth turning into workspace rules.
  • If transcript recall is not available, say so plainly and propose the smallest safe upgrade path for conversation-based improvement instead of pretending the evidence exists.

4. Keep Bootstrap Files High-Leverage and Compact

  • AGENTS.md, SOUL.md, and TOOLS.md are bootstrap context, so every line should earn its place.
  • Keep identity, startup, boundaries, and execution defaults in root files; move heavy procedures, niche runbooks, and long examples into skills or narrower supporting files.
  • If behavior is inconsistent, first check for prompt bloat, duplicate rules, contradictory instructions, and stale sections before adding more text.
  • Prefer one sharp rule in the right file over five overlapping paragraphs across the workspace.

5. Make the Smallest Change That Fixes the Behavior

  • Tune the specific layer that owns the problem instead of rewriting the whole workspace.
  • Personality issues should not trigger a memory rewrite.
  • Identity presentation issues should not trigger an AGENTS rewrite if IDENTITY.md is the real owner.
  • Memory drift should not trigger a SOUL rewrite.
  • Missing capability should not be patched into AGENTS.md if it belongs in a skill.
  • When proposing improvements, show concrete diffs or exact replacement blocks and explain the expected behavioral change, not just the file destination.

6. Tune Proactivity With Boundaries, Not With Vibes

  • "Be more proactive" is not enough; define what the agent should notice, when it should act, and when it must ask first.
  • Use AGENTS.md for general proactive stance and HEARTBEAT.md for recurring checks, follow-through, and quiet-time behavior.
  • Separate internal initiative from external action: reading, organizing, checking, and drafting can often be proactive; messaging, spending, deleting, scheduling, or publishing usually still need approval.
  • If a workspace feels passive, look for missing startup rules, no heartbeat loop, weak next-step behavior, and missing recovery patterns before adding louder wording.

7. Respect Privacy, Session Boundaries, and Real Platform Behavior

  • MEMORY.md is high-trust personal context and should be treated more carefully than general workspace notes.
  • Do not recommend copying private long-term memory into shared-context behavior files unless the user explicitly wants that tradeoff.
  • TOOLS.md does not grant new tool access; it only improves how the agent uses tools that already exist.
  • Conversation-driven upgrades must respect storage, privacy, and operational cost tradeoffs when enabling broader recall.
  • Never recommend hidden workspace rewrites; improvements should be explicit, reviewable, and tied to a concrete reason.

Common Traps

TrapWhy It FailsBetter Move
Stuffing everything into AGENTS.mdBootstrap context becomes noisy, contradictory, or truncatedKeep AGENTS.md lean and move specialized behavior into skills or tighter files
Treating SOUL.md as an execution manualPersonality and execution policy get mixed into one unstable blobKeep SOUL.md about identity and tone; keep operating rules in AGENTS.md
Ignoring IDENTITY.mdName, vibe, and self-presentation drift across contextsKeep stable identity markers in IDENTITY.md instead of scattering them
Using TOOLS.md to "enable" toolsThe agent still only has the tools granted by runtime policyUse TOOLS.md for usage hints, local conventions, and caveats only
Putting durable preferences into daily notesImportant context gets buried in recency noisePromote stable patterns into MEMORY.md or USER.md
Putting current project churn into MEMORY.mdLong-term memory becomes stale, bloated, and low-signalKeep fresh work in memory/ daily files and periodically distill it
Making proactivity broader without boundariesThe agent becomes noisy, interruptive, or riskyDefine trigger conditions, quiet hours, and approval boundaries explicitly
Auditing without conversation evidenceRecommendations sound generic and miss repeated user painSearch memory first, then propose changes backed by actual patterns
Enabling wider recall without explaining tradeoffsUsers get surprise storage, privacy, or cost consequencesExplain exactly what gets indexed, why, and what the user gains

Default Audit Output

When running the default deep audit, produce a compact improvement packet:

  1. Current behavior map:

which files are actually driving tone, startup, memory, proactivity, and capabilities right now

  1. Evidence:

repeated user requests, recurring frictions, stale rules, duplication, or missing layers

  1. Recommended changes:

low-risk, medium-risk, and structural improvements with exact target files

  1. Suggested next move:

review diffs, apply one layer only, or run a full workspace cleanup

Do not end with generic advice alone. The user should leave with a real plan tied to specific workspace files.

Related Skills

Install with clawhub install <slug> if user confirms:

  • analysis - Run workspace and system audits with prioritized findings and remediation
  • proactivity - Tune initiative, follow-through, and heartbeat behavior
  • memory - Design deeper storage systems when built-in memory is not enough
  • self-improving - Turn repeated corrections into durable operating improvements

Feedback

  • If useful: clawhub star openclaw-workspace
  • Stay updated: clawhub sync

平台分布

OpenClaw

85.17%
按下载量换算13,085

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills