openai-reusable-prompts（OpenAI reusable prompts 搜索）

OpenAI Reusable Prompts

Summary

This skill focuses only on writing high-quality prompts and formatting them for clarity, consistency, and better model steerability.

It helps define prompt structure, wording quality, examples, and formatting patterns for reliable outputs.

When to use

• You want better-written prompts with clear instruction hierarchy.
• You need consistent prompt formatting across tasks or teams.
• You want reusable prompt templates with strong examples and constraints.
• You need to improve ambiguous prompts that produce inconsistent output.
• You are standardizing a stable, repeatable procedure that multiple agents or teams should share.
• You want reusable behavior that can be versioned and improved independently over time.

When not to use

• You are asking for API integration code, deployment, or version rollout strategy.
• You need runtime implementation details instead of prompt writing guidance.
• The request is truly one-off and does not need reusable structure.
• The procedure changes daily and has not stabilized yet.
• The task primarily requires live external state or side effects; use tools or APIs for that.

Required inputs

Provide or infer:

• Outcome: what the prompt must produce.
• Audience or task type: who uses the output and for what.
• Output contract: free text, markdown, JSON, or schema-constrained output.
• Constraints: style, tone, safety limits, and forbidden behavior.

If relevant, also capture example inputs and expected outputs.

If details are missing, ask only the minimum needed to author a usable v1 template.

Routing guidance and edge cases

• Prefer triggering this skill for reusable procedures, stable writing standards, or organization-wide prompt conventions.
• Avoid triggering this skill when the user asks for ad hoc brainstorming that does not require strict structure.
• Include both positive and negative examples in your authored prompt package to improve routing accuracy.
• If routing is inconsistent, iterate on frontmatter name, description, and examples before changing scripts or runtime code.

Procedure

1. Define the target behavior.

• Write a one-sentence objective for the prompt.
• Define success as observable output criteria.

1. Set instruction hierarchy.

• Put high-priority behavior first.
• Separate required rules from preferences.
• State what the model must do and must not do.

1. Draft the prompt with consistent formatting.

• Use clear section headers in this order when useful: Identity, Instructions, Examples, Context.
• Keep instructions explicit and testable.
• Use placeholders for dynamic values, for example {{customer_name}}.

1. Strengthen formatting discipline.

• Use bullet lists for constraints and output rules.
• Use XML-style delimiters for example I/O blocks when helpful.
• Avoid long paragraphs that hide requirements.

1. Add examples that teach behavior.

• Include at least 2 examples when output format is strict.
• Cover common and edge inputs.
• Keep examples consistent with stated rules.

1. Add output contract checks.

• Specify exact format expectations (fields, ordering, allowed labels).
• Add explicit negative constraints to reduce drift.

1. Revise for clarity and brevity.

• Remove redundant instructions.
• Replace vague wording with measurable requirements.
• Keep only context that changes model decisions.

1. Add operational readiness notes when the prompt will be used as a skill artifact.

• Include when to use, how to run, expected outputs, and gotchas.
• Add explicit verification steps and output checks for brittle multi-step workflows.

Branching logic

• If output must follow strict schema: Use explicit field-level formatting rules and schema-like examples.
• If behavior differs by customer or locale: Keep global rules stable and isolate locale-specific rules in dedicated context blocks.
• If the prompt is long and complex: Split sections clearly and remove non-essential context.
• If task is reasoning-heavy and under-specified: Start with goal + constraints, then tighten with examples after observing failures.
• If task is deterministic and format-sensitive: Use strict format instructions and highly specific examples.

Quality criteria

A skill run is complete when all are true:

• Prompt objective and output contract are explicit.
• Instruction hierarchy is clear (must vs should).
• Formatting is consistent across sections.
• Examples reinforce the required behavior and format.
• Ambiguous wording has been removed.
• Negative trigger examples are present for routing precision.
• Verification steps and output checks are defined when workflow execution is multi-step.

Operational best practices (skills in API)

Apply these when the prompt template is packaged in a skill context.

1. Keep skills discoverable.

• Use clear frontmatter name and description.
• Keep explicit "Use when" and "Do not use when" guidance.
• Include negative examples with positive examples.

1. Keep system prompts lean.

• Put stable, reusable procedures in skills.
• Keep global policies and always-on behavior in system prompts.
• Do not duplicate full skill procedures in system prompts.

1. Design script-backed skills like tiny CLIs.

• Ensure commands run from the command line.
• Require deterministic stdout for key status and results.
• Fail loudly with clear usage or validation errors.
• Write outputs to known, documented file paths.

1. Include worked examples in skill assets.

• Provide inputs, commands, and expected outputs.
• Cover normal cases and at least one edge case.

1. Add explicit verification gates.

• Validate output format and required fields.
• Confirm artifacts exist at expected paths.
• Add checks that catch partial completion.

1. Be cautious with network access.

• Prefer no-network execution when possible.
• If network access is required, use strict allowlists and explicit data-egress constraints.

1. Use a model that can reliably complete multi-step workflows.

• If execution is brittle, simplify the workflow and strengthen verification guidance.

Reproducibility and versioning

• Prefer zip bundles for portability, reliability, and easier version management.
• Pin explicit skill versions in production when reproducibility matters.
• Use floating latest only when intentional and monitored.
• If version is omitted, behavior follows the platform default version pointer.
• Pin model version and skill version together for stable cross-deployment behavior.

Deliverables

Produce:

1. Reusable prompt template text (dashboard-ready; Procedure steps 1-4)
2. Prompt formatting checklist (Procedure step 6)
3. Improved example set (good and edge cases; Procedure step 5)
4. Prompt rewrite notes explaining key clarity changes (Procedure step 7)
5. Operational readiness notes (how to run, expected outputs, gotchas, verification checks; Procedure step 8)

Dashboard authoring template

Use this as a starting point for the reusable prompt body in the OpenAI Dashboard.

# Identity
You are an assistant that {role-purpose}.

# Instructions
- Primary objective: {objective}
- Required constraints: {constraints}
- Output requirements: {format-rules}
- Never do: {prohibited-behaviors}

# Examples
<input id="example-1">
{example-input-1}
</input>
<output id="example-1">
{example-output-1}
</output>

# Context
{stable-reference-context}

Skill authoring add-on template (for runnable skill workflows)

Use this companion template when the prompt package will be executed as a skill with scripts or assets.

# When to use
- {positive-trigger-1}
- {positive-trigger-2}

# Do not use when
- {negative-trigger-1}
- {negative-trigger-2}

# Inputs
- {input-contract}

# How to run
- {install-command}
- {run-command}

# Expected outputs
- {path-1}: {artifact-description}
- {path-2}: {artifact-description}

# Gotchas
- {failure-mode-1}
- {failure-mode-2}

# Verification checks
- {check-1}
- {check-2}

# Worked examples
<input id="example-1">
{example-input-1}
</input>
<run id="example-1">
{example-command-1}
</run>
<output id="example-1">
{example-output-1}
</output>

Prompt formatting checklist

Use this checklist for every prompt revision.

- [ ] Objective is one sentence and testable
- [ ] Required behavior is listed before optional preferences
- [ ] Output format is explicit and easy to verify
- [ ] At least 2 examples are present for strict formats
- [ ] Negative constraints are included
- [ ] Context is minimal and relevant
- [ ] No contradictory instructions
- [ ] "Use when" and "Do not use when" routing guidance is explicit
- [ ] At least one negative trigger example is included
- [ ] Reproducibility notes are present (versioning and packaging intent)
- [ ] Verification steps and output checks are defined for multi-step workflows

Prompt starter patterns

• "Rewrite this prompt using Identity, Instructions, Examples, Context sections while preserving intent: {prompt}."
• "Tighten this prompt to eliminate ambiguity and enforce this format: {format-rules}."
• "Add high-quality examples to teach this behavior: {objective}."
• "Convert this long paragraph prompt into a concise, structured prompt with explicit constraints."

Guardrails

• Do not include secrets or private data in prompt text.
• Do not mix conflicting instructions in multiple sections.
• Do not leave output format implied when precision is required.
• Do not overfit to one example; use diverse examples.
• Do not duplicate full skill procedures inside system prompts.
• Do not rely on open network access without strict allowlists and explicit data-egress rules.
• Do not leave output paths undefined for script-backed workflows.