Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

clarify(文案澄清)

clarify 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

clarify 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 54,235。

总安装 514周安装 21GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 166核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:clarify(文案澄清)
来源仓库:https://github.com/open-horizon-labs/impeccable
仓库路径:skills/clarify
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/open-horizon-labs/impeccable --skill clarify
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/open-horizon-labs/impeccable --skill clarify

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

clarify 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在各类 Agent 中快速定位候选结果。它支持基于关键词、任务场景或来源线索进行信息检索与筛选。使用时需结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态,避免触发联网或文件读写。

clarify 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/clarify

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/open-horizon-labs/impeccable --skill clarify;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

clarify 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/open-horizon-labs/impeccable --skill clarify。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

clarify 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

clarify 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

clarify 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

clarify 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 514 次,近一周安装 21 次,下载 166 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

clarify 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
clarify

文案澄清 · 本页

514—只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Identify and improve unclear, confusing, or poorly written interface text to make the product easier to understand and use.

Assess Current Copy

Identify what makes the text unclear or ineffective:

  1. Find clarity problems:

- Jargon: Technical terms users won't understand - Ambiguity: Multiple interpretations possible - Passive voice: "Your file has been uploaded" vs "We uploaded your file" - Length: Too wordy or too terse - Assumptions: Assuming user knowledge they don't have - Missing context: Users don't know what to do or why - Tone mismatch: Too formal, too casual, or inappropriate for situation

  1. Understand the context:

- Who's the audience? (Technical? General? First-time users?) - What's the user's mental state? (Stressed during error? Confident during success?) - What's the action? (What do we want users to do?) - What's the constraint? (Character limits? Space limitations?)

CRITICAL: Clear copy helps users succeed. Unclear copy creates frustration, errors, and support tickets.

Plan Copy Improvements

Create a strategy for clearer communication:

  • Primary message: What's the ONE thing users need to know?
  • Action needed: What should users do next (if anything)?
  • Tone: How should this feel? (Helpful? Apologetic? Encouraging?)
  • Constraints: Length limits, brand voice, localization considerations

IMPORTANT: Good UX writing is invisible. Users should understand immediately without noticing the words.

Improve Copy Systematically

Refine text across these common areas:

Error Messages

Bad: "Error 403: Forbidden" Good: "You don't have permission to view this page. Contact your admin for access."

Bad: "Invalid input" Good: "Email addresses need an @ symbol. Try: name@example.com"

Principles:

  • Explain what went wrong in plain language
  • Suggest how to fix it
  • Don't blame the user
  • Include examples when helpful
  • Link to help/support if applicable

Form Labels & Instructions

Bad: "DOB (MM/DD/YYYY)" Good: "Date of birth" (with placeholder showing format)

Bad: "Enter value here" Good: "Your email address" or "Company name"

Principles:

  • Use clear, specific labels (not generic placeholders)
  • Show format expectations with examples
  • Explain why you're asking (when not obvious)
  • Put instructions before the field, not after
  • Keep required field indicators clear

Button & CTA Text

Bad: "Click here" | "Submit" | "OK" Good: "Create account" | "Save changes" | "Got it, thanks"

Principles:

  • Describe the action specifically
  • Use active voice (verb + noun)
  • Match user's mental model
  • Be specific ("Save" is better than "OK")

Help Text & Tooltips

Bad: "This is the username field" Good: "Choose a username. You can change this later in Settings."

Principles:

  • Add value (don't just repeat the label)
  • Answer the implicit question ("What is this?" or "Why do you need this?")
  • Keep it brief but complete
  • Link to detailed docs if needed

Empty States

Bad: "No items" Good: "No projects yet. Create your first project to get started."

Principles:

  • Explain why it's empty (if not obvious)
  • Show next action clearly
  • Make it welcoming, not dead-end

Success Messages

Bad: "Success" Good: "Settings saved! Your changes will take effect immediately."

Principles:

  • Confirm what happened
  • Explain what happens next (if relevant)
  • Be brief but complete
  • Match the user's emotional moment (celebrate big wins)

Loading States

Bad: "Loading..." (for 30+ seconds) Good: "Analyzing your data... this usually takes 30-60 seconds"

Principles:

  • Set expectations (how long?)
  • Explain what's happening (when it's not obvious)
  • Show progress when possible
  • Offer escape hatch if appropriate ("Cancel")

Confirmation Dialogs

Bad: "Are you sure?" Good: "Delete 'Project Alpha'? This can't be undone."

Principles:

  • State the specific action
  • Explain consequences (especially for destructive actions)
  • Use clear button labels ("Delete project" not "Yes")
  • Don't overuse confirmations (only for risky actions)

Navigation & Wayfinding

Bad: Generic labels like "Items" | "Things" | "Stuff" Good: Specific labels like "Your projects" | "Team members" | "Settings"

Principles:

  • Be specific and descriptive
  • Use language users understand (not internal jargon)
  • Make hierarchy clear
  • Consider information scent (breadcrumbs, current location)

Apply Clarity Principles

Every piece of copy should follow these rules:

  1. Be specific: "Enter email" not "Enter value"
  2. Be concise: Cut unnecessary words (but don't sacrifice clarity)
  3. Be active: "Save changes" not "Changes will be saved"
  4. Be human: "Oops, something went wrong" not "System error encountered"
  5. Be helpful: Tell users what to do, not just what happened
  6. Be consistent: Use same terms throughout (don't vary for variety)

NEVER:

  • Use jargon without explanation
  • Blame users ("You made an error" → "This field is required")
  • Be vague ("Something went wrong" without explanation)
  • Use passive voice unnecessarily
  • Write overly long explanations (be concise)
  • Use humor for errors (be empathetic instead)
  • Assume technical knowledge
  • Vary terminology (pick one term and stick with it)
  • Repeat information (headers restating intros, redundant explanations)
  • Use placeholders as the only labels (they disappear when users type)

Verify Improvements

Test that copy improvements work:

  • Comprehension: Can users understand without context?
  • Actionability: Do users know what to do next?
  • Brevity: Is it as short as possible while remaining clear?
  • Consistency: Does it match terminology elsewhere?
  • Tone: Is it appropriate for the situation?

Remember: You're a clarity expert with excellent communication skills. Write like you're explaining to a smart friend who's unfamiliar with the product. Be clear, be helpful, be human.

平台分布

Codex

38.73%
按下载量换算64

Claude

28.21%
按下载量换算47

Cursor

20.13%
按下载量换算33

Gemini CLI

10.39%
按下载量换算17

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills