Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

unit-test-philosophy(单元测试哲学)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

unit-test-philosophy 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 16,756。

总安装 470周安装 20GitHub Stars 30下载 165核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:unit-test-philosophy(单元测试哲学)
来源仓库:https://github.com/open-agreements/open-agreements
仓库路径:skills/unit-test-philosophy
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/open-agreements/open-agreements --skill unit-test-philosophy
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/open-agreements/open-agreements --skill unit-test-philosophy

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

单元测试哲学用于辅助测试设计和用例编写。适合生成单元测试或端到端测试。unit-test-philosophy 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。使用时需确认项目测试框架和运行命令。避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。涉及浏览器时应区分本地模拟和环境。

来源仓库内路径:skills/unit-test-philosophy

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/open-agreements/open-agreements --skill unit-t…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

unit-test-philosophy 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/open-agreements/open-agreements --skill unit-test-philos…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

unit-test-philosophy 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

unit-test-philosophy 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

unit-test-philosophy 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

unit-test-philosophy 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 470 次,近一周安装 20 次,下载 165 次,GitHub 30 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

unit-test-philosophy 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
unit-test-philosophy

单元测试哲学 · 本页

47030调用外部服务未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Unit Test Philosophy (Open Agreements)

Security model

  • This skill is guidance only — it does not execute tests or modify code directly.
  • All test commands are provided for the user or agent to run in their local environment.
  • No network access, credentials, or external services are required.

Use this skill when

  • A request asks to add tests, improve coverage, or harden regressions.
  • A change touches src/, integration-tests/, packages/contracts-workspace, or packages/contracts-workspace-mcp.
  • You need readable Allure behavior specs and OpenSpec traceability.

Core philosophy

  1. Test highest-risk behavior first. Focus first on mutating flows, parser/validator boundaries, and policy/safety checks.
  2. Optimize for regression prevention, not just line coverage. Prioritize branches where failures could produce wrong legal output or unsafe automation behavior.
  3. Treat Allure as test style, not test type. Use normal unit/integration tests with Allure labels, steps, and attachments in the same files.
  4. Keep spec and test effectively coextensive. If behavior is important enough to test, map it to canonical OpenSpec scenarios or active change-package scenarios.
  5. Keep assertions behavior-oriented. Verify user-observable outputs, diagnostics, and mutation outcomes before internals.
  6. Make failures easy to debug. Attach structured context for inputs, normalized outputs, and error payloads.

Repo standards

Test structure

  • Use Given/When/Then/And wording in Allure step titles.
  • Keep scenario steps as top-level test steps; avoid wrapping the full test body in synthetic container steps like Execute test body.
  • Prefer one assertion per step where practical.
  • Multiple assertions in one step are acceptable when they validate one cohesive invariant.
  • Keep tests deterministic (fixed fixtures, explicit env flags, no timing assumptions).

Allure API

  • Prefer repo helpers over direct raw Allure calls:

- integration-tests/helpers/allure-test.ts - Common helpers: itAllure, testAllure, allureStep, allureJsonAttachment, allurePrettyJsonAttachment, allureWordLikeTextAttachment, allureParameter, allureSeverity

  • Do not import from allure-vitest in tests.
  • Keep helper usage consistent across src/**/*.test.ts and integration-tests/**/*.test.ts.
  • For complex fixtures/stateful flows, attach:

- a pretty JSON artifact for request/result payloads - a human-readable “Word-like” artifact for document/checklist state before and after mutation when relevant

  • Rendering note: HTML preview attachments rely on the report post-process sanitizer allowlist patch (scripts/patch_allure_html_sanitizer.mjs, invoked by npm run report:allure). Do not bypass this pipeline when generating reports for review.

File naming and placement

  • Use collocated test files like src/<module>.test.ts.
  • Add Allure style inside these tests; do not split by "allure-only" test types by default.
  • Keep one test file focused on one module or capability.
  • Migration policy: gradually rename legacy *.allure.test.ts files to *.test.ts; do not introduce new *.allure.test.ts files.

OpenSpec traceability

  • Use .openspec('OA-###') whenever a matching scenario ID exists for the behavior.
  • Scenario IDs may come from either canonical specs (openspec/specs/open-agreements/spec.md) or active change-package specs (openspec/changes/<change-id>/specs/open-agreements/spec.md).
  • Pre-canonical IDs from active change packages are valid during implementation and should remain stable when promoted into canonical specs.
  • For new important behavior, add scenario IDs in the active change package first, map tests immediately, then promote those IDs into canonical specs when archiving.

Coverage expansion workflow

  1. Read coverage summaries and identify branch-heavy modules in src/core/** and integration flows.
  2. Rank by blast radius and mutation risk.
  3. Add tests in this order:

- Validation and error branches - Strict vs permissive behavior - No-partial-mutation / transactional guarantees - Invariants (deterministic outputs, schema safety, idempotency)

  1. Run targeted tests first, then full suite and coverage.

Severity recommendation rubric

  • critical: mutation correctness, legal-output integrity, data-loss risk, security/policy guardrails.
  • normal: standard behavior and compatibility scenarios.
  • minor: narrow edge cases with low production impact.
  • Apply severity based on failure impact, not module ownership.

Command checklist

npm run test:run
npm run test:coverage
npm run check:spec-coverage
npm run check:allure-labels

Minimal test template (TypeScript)

import { describe, expect } from 'vitest';
import { itAllure as it, allureStep, allureJsonAttachment } from '../../../integration-tests/helpers/allure-test.js';

describe('checklist patch behavior', () => {
  it('applies replacement deterministically', async () => {
    let result: { ok: boolean };

    await allureStep('Given a valid patch payload', async () => {
      await allureJsonAttachment('patch-input.json', {
        patch_id: 'patch_001',
        operations: [{ op: 'replace', path: '/issues/0/status', value: 'CLOSED' }],
      });
    });

    await allureStep('When patch validation runs', async () => {
      result = { ok: true };
    });

    await allureStep('Then validation succeeds', async () => {
      expect(result!.ok).toBe(true);
    });
  });
});

Extended reference

  • See references/allure-test-spec-writing-guide.md for full Allure step-writing guidance.

平台分布

Codex

38.9%
按下载量换算64

Claude

31.94%
按下载量换算53

Cursor

17.22%
按下载量换算28

Gemini CLI

8.3%
按下载量换算14

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills