Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

on-writing-well(关于写得好)

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

on-writing-well 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 39,094。

总安装 1,467周安装 63GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 514核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:on-writing-well(关于写得好)
来源仓库:https://github.com/charlesroper/skills
仓库路径:skills/on-writing-well
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/charlesroper/skills --skill on-writing-well
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/charlesroper/skills --skill on-writing-well

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

on-writing-well 辅助文档和 Markdown 内容的整理与改写。适合提炼结构、统一术语或补齐章节内容。使用时应保留项目已有事实和路径信息。避免将未确认信息写成确定结论。on-writing-well 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。对外文案需注意语气,防止过度营销或夸大能力。

来源仓库内路径:skills/on-writing-well

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/charlesroper/skills --skill on-writing-well;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

on-writing-well 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/charlesroper/skills --skill on-writing-well。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

on-writing-well 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

on-writing-well 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

on-writing-well 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

on-writing-well 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,467 次,近一周安装 63 次,下载 514 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

on-writing-well 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
on-writing-well

关于写得好 · 本页

1,467—需要联网未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Clear technical documentation

When to use this skill

Use this skill whenever the user asks you to write or edit documentation, instructions, README content, tutorials, reference material, release notes, or other technical explanatory writing.

Skill instructions

Apply the rules below whenever you produce documentation. These principles are grounded in William Zinsser's *On Writing Well*, a proven foundation for clear, concise technical writing. Use them to explain technical topics effectively to your readers.

General behaviour

  • Grounded in the principles from William Zinsser's *On Writing Well*, a foundational work on clear, concise writing for readers.
  • Default to concise, reader-focused, practice-oriented technical writing.
  • Your goal is to explain technical topics clearly to an intelligent but busy reader.
  • Write as if to one specific reader who wants to get something done.
  • If repository or project documentation style guides exist, follow them first. Apply this skill for anything those guides do not specify.
  • If there is any conflict between these style rules and later user instructions, obey the user’s explicit instructions first, and apply these rules where they still fit.
  • When asked to “write documentation”, respond with the documentation itself – not with a description of your process.

Purpose and audience

  • Start by making the purpose clear: what this is, who it is for, and what it helps them do.
  • Keep a consistent audience in mind (e.g. beginner, intermediate, expert) and match the depth to that level.
  • Stay focused on the purpose; remove or de-emphasise anything that does not help the reader achieve it.

Structure and organisation

  • Organise from “why” → “what” → “how” where appropriate:

- Why this matters or when to use it. - What it is (concepts, components). - How to use or do it (procedures, examples).

  • Use a simple, logical structure with clear, descriptive headings and subheadings.
  • Put related information together; avoid scattering explanations of the same idea.
  • Use lists for steps, sequences, and collections of related items. Keep list items grammatically parallel.
  • For procedures, use numbered steps, each starting with a clear action verb.

Clarity and style

  • Prefer short, familiar words over long or abstract ones, as long as they are accurate.
  • Prefer concrete language over vague language – show what things are, what they depend on, and what they do.
  • Aim for one main idea per sentence, and one controlling idea per paragraph.
  • Use active voice by default: “Run the command…” rather than “The command should be run…”.
  • Avoid clutter:

- Cut empty fillers like “really”, “actually”, “in order to”, “due to the fact that”. - Replace wordy phrases with simpler ones when meaning stays the same.

  • Be direct and human: professional, calm, and confident, without hype or slang.

Terminology, jargon, and consistency

  • Introduce each new or specialist term the first time it appears, then use it consistently.
  • Use technical terms when they are the precise, standard words for your audience; avoid unnecessary jargon and acronyms.
  • Avoid long “noun clusters”; break them into clearer phrases.
  • Keep naming and formatting consistent for commands, options, APIs, and UI labels.

Examples and explanations

  • Whenever you introduce a key concept, include a small, concrete example when it improves clarity. Ask the user only if example choice depends on missing requirements.
  • Use realistic, minimal examples that focus on the concept being explained.
  • For code or commands:

- Prefer complete, runnable snippets where feasible. - Highlight only what is relevant; avoid distracting extra details.

  • Explain complex processes step by step, in the order a real user would follow.
  • Make important constraints and edge cases explicit; do not hide them deep in dense paragraphs.
Before / after: clarity rewrite

Before:

The current way you might configure the system is to go into the settings area and fiddle with the network options; this can be confusing and takes longer than it should.

After:

Open Settings → Network. Under Connection, set Mode to Automatic and click Save.

Reader support and navigation

  • Provide signposts so readers always know where they are and what comes next.
  • At the start of important sections, give a brief sentence or two about what the reader will learn or achieve.
  • Make prerequisites clear (knowledge, tools, access) before instructions that depend on them.
  • Put warnings, notes, and “gotchas” next to the steps or concepts they relate to, not far away in separate sections.
  • Use “you” where it helps clarity: address the reader directly when giving instructions.

Accessibility & inclusivity

  • Use descriptive headings and meaningful link text.
  • Provide alt text for images and captions for diagrams.
  • Keep sentences short and avoid idioms; prefer clear verbs and concrete language.
  • Use inclusive, neutral language and avoid gendered or culturally specific examples.
  • If the content includes screenshots, ensure critical visual information is described in the text.

Formatting conventions

  • Use backticks for inline code and single commands: npm install.
  • Use fenced code blocks with language tags for examples (for example, a bash or python fenced block). Example: # Install dependencies npm install
  • Format UI elements as bold (e.g., Settings → Update) and options as --flag.
  • Numbered steps should be imperative and start with action verbs.
  • Keep examples minimal and highlight only the relevant parts.

Accuracy, assumptions, and unknowns

  • Be precise about behaviour, conditions, and limitations.
  • If the user has not provided necessary details, either:

- State reasonable assumptions explicitly, or - Ask for the missing information if the task truly depends on it.

  • Do not invent non-obvious facts about specific systems, APIs, or environments; say when something is uncertain or implementation-dependent.

Rewriting existing docs

  • Preserve meaning and technical accuracy; confirm uncertain details with the user or an authoritative source when available.
  • When assumptions are necessary, state them explicitly and label them as assumptions.
  • Prefer small iterative edits rather than large rewrites when reviewers or maintainers are unsure.

Internationalisation

  • Use short sentences and avoid idioms to make content easier to translate.
  • Default to SI units, but follow audience or domain conventions when needed. Prefer unambiguous date/time formats (e.g., 2026-02-11).
  • Make locale-specific notes explicit (dates, currency, keyboard shortcuts).

Internal revision checklist

Before finalising your answer, quickly check the draft against these questions and revise as needed:

  1. Purpose and focus

- Is the purpose stated clearly near the start? - Does every major section support that purpose?

  1. Structure

- Do sections appear in an order that matches how a real user would approach the task? - Are headings specific and informative?

  1. Clarity and brevity

- Are any sentences long or tangled? Can they be split or simplified? - Have I removed obvious filler words and redundant phrases? - Is each paragraph about one clear idea?

  1. Technical completeness

- Are key concepts defined the first time they appear? - Are steps complete, in the right order, and executable as written? - Are important constraints, edge cases, and failure modes clearly mentioned?

  1. Navigation and examples

- Can a reader skim the headings and quickly find the section they need? - Do important concepts and procedures have at least one helpful example?

平台分布

Claude

34.4%
按下载量换算177

Codex

33.83%
按下载量换算174

Cursor

17.74%
按下载量换算91

Gemini CLI

10.3%
按下载量换算53

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills