Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 待分类

running-effective-1-1s(运行有效 1 1s)

running-effective-1-1s 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

running-effective-1-1s 是待分类类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在待分类类的 11,209 个 Skill 里排第 3,325。

总安装 1,056周安装 44GitHub Stars 3下载 352核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:running-effective-1-1s(运行有效 1 1s)
来源仓库:https://github.com/oldwinter/skills
仓库路径:skills/running-effective-1-1s
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill running-effective-1-1s
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill running-effective-1-1s

这个 Skill 是做什么的

这个 Skill 的分类还没最终确定,用法以来源仓库的说明为准。

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue 和 Pull Request 协作信息。适合围绕代码变更和仓库状态进行整理与分析。可结合来源仓库 README 核验具体用法和权限范围。安装前建议确认是否会触发命令执行或文件读写操作。

running-effective-1-1s 属于待分类类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/running-effective-1-1s

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill running-effective-1-1…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

running-effective-1-1s 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill running-effective-1-1s。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

running-effective-1-1s 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

running-effective-1-1s 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

running-effective-1-1s 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

running-effective-1-1s 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,056 次,近一周安装 44 次,下载 352 次,GitHub 3 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

running-effective-1-1s 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理待分类类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

待分类类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
infsh-cli

infsh CLI · Codex、Claude

4,374,576382权限未标注未明确未收录
ai-video-generation

AI 视频生成 · Codex、Claude

4,313,376382调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lark-openapi-explorer

云雀 OpenAPI 浏览器 · Codex、Claude

2,064,1209,011需要联网未明确有提醒
lark-workflow-standup-report

Lark 工作流程站立报告 · Codex、Claude

2,041,6328,978需要联网未明确通过
use-my-browser

使用我的浏览器 · Codex、Claude

1,848,49140操作浏览器未明确未通过
running-effective-1-1s

运行有效 1 1s · 本页

1,0563只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Running Effective 1:1s

Scope

Covers

  • Designing a lightweight 1:1 operating system (purpose, cadence, meeting types, shared docs)
  • Running 1:1s as coaching conversations (not just status updates)
  • Holding career development conversations (life story → future dreams → action plan)
  • Doing basic wellbeing/recovery check-ins (joy/energy) without crossing into therapy/medical advice
  • Running skip-levels and special sessions (e.g., post-crisis “make them feel heard” 1:1s)

When to use

  • “My 1:1s are turning into status updates—help me redesign them.”
  • “Create a 1:1 agenda + shared doc template for me and my direct reports.”
  • “I’m a new manager—set up my 1:1 cadence and question bank.”
  • “Help me run better career conversations in 1:1s.”
  • “Plan a skip-level program and templates.”

When NOT to use

  • You need HR/legal guidance, an investigation, or a performance improvement plan (involve HR/legal; use your company process)
  • You need a project status meeting cadence (use team/ops rituals; 1:1s should not be the primary status channel)
  • The situation involves immediate safety/mental health crisis (seek professional help and follow company policy)

Inputs

Minimum required

  • Your role and context (manager level, org type, function, time zones)
  • Who the 1:1s are for (directs, skip-levels) and relationship stage (new, stable, strained)
  • Current 1:1 cadence and what’s not working (2–5 concrete examples)
  • What you want to change (coaching, feedback, career growth, wellbeing, alignment, retention)
  • Constraints: meeting load, confidentiality/PII rules, any HR policies, time box/deadline

Missing-info strategy

  • Ask up to 5 questions from references/INTAKE.md (3–5 at a time).
  • If key details are missing, proceed with a default 1:1 operating system and clearly label assumptions.
  • Do not request secrets or sensitive personal data; use anonymized summaries.

Outputs (deliverables)

Produce a 1:1 Operating System Pack in Markdown (in-chat; or as files if requested):

  1. Context + goals (what 1:1s are for in this team; what they are not for)
  2. Cadence + meeting types plan (weekly/biweekly + barbell approach + skip-level cadence)
  3. Shared 1:1 doc templates (agenda, notes, action items, topics backlog)
  4. Coaching toolkit (conversation rules + question bank + “coach vs advisor” prompts)
  5. Career development conversation plan (life story → dreams → action plan, with templates)
  6. Wellbeing/recovery check-in pattern (joy/energy prompts + boundaries + escalation guidance)
  7. Special-situation playbooks (post-crisis listening session; urgent topical meeting; skip-level template)
  8. Risks / Open questions / Next steps (always included)

Templates: references/TEMPLATES.md Expanded guidance: references/WORKFLOW.md

Workflow (8 steps)

1) Intake + boundaries + safety

  • Inputs: user context; references/INTAKE.md.
  • Actions: Confirm goals for 1:1s, current failure modes, constraints, and any HR/safety boundaries. Decide which deliverables are needed (full pack vs just templates).
  • Outputs: Context snapshot + assumptions/unknowns list.
  • Checks: The purpose of 1:1s is explicit and does not conflict with HR/legal policy.

2) Define the 1:1 purpose and “what goes where”

  • Inputs: goals + failure modes.
  • Actions: Separate topics into channels: team status rituals vs 1:1 coaching, career, feedback, and blockers. Define what the 1:1 should consistently cover (and what it should not).
  • Outputs: “What goes where” map + 1:1 purpose statement.
  • Checks: Status updates have a non-1:1 home (async or team ritual).

3) Choose cadence + meeting types (barbell design)

  • Inputs: roster, seniority, relationship needs, time budget.
  • Actions: Propose a cadence plan: standing 1:1s where they add value, plus a barbell approach (high-quality relationship catch-ups + urgent topical meetings). Add a skip-level cadence if needed.
  • Outputs: Cadence + meeting types plan.
  • Checks: The plan reduces meeting bloat while improving timeliness and relationship quality.

4) Create the shared 1:1 documentation system

  • Inputs: tools available (doc, notes, tracker), privacy constraints.
  • Actions: Define a shared doc per report (or per relationship) with: agenda, running topics backlog, notes, decisions, and action items. Include a pre-work expectation for both sides.
  • Outputs: Shared 1:1 doc template + action item tracker conventions.
  • Checks: Every meeting ends with written next steps and owners; sensitive content is handled appropriately.

5) Shift from “advisor” to “coach” (conversation rules)

  • Inputs: common problem types brought to 1:1s.
  • Actions: Write a coaching toolkit: default questions, how to avoid jumping to answers, and how to help the report reason through tradeoffs. Include a “when to be directive” exception list (risk, safety, time-critical).
  • Outputs: Coaching rules + question bank.
  • Checks: The toolkit trains independent problem solving rather than escalating everything to the manager.

6) Build a career development sequence (3 conversations)

  • Inputs: role expectations, growth paths, aspirations (if known).
  • Actions: Create a career plan that schedules three deeper conversations: Life Story, Future Dreams, Career Action Plan. Define how tactical 1:1s connect to growth over time.
  • Outputs: Career conversation plan + templates.
  • Checks: The plan results in 1–3 concrete growth bets and follow-up checkpoints.

7) Add wellbeing/recovery + special situations

  • Inputs: team stress level, recent change events, relationship health.
  • Actions: Add a lightweight joy/energy check-in pattern and a “behavioral activations” list. Add special playbooks: post-crisis listening session (feel heard), urgent topical meeting, and skip-level structure.
  • Outputs: Wellbeing pattern + special-situation playbooks + templates.
  • Checks: Boundaries are clear (not therapy); escalation paths are documented.

8) Quality gate + rollout plan

  • Inputs: full draft pack.
  • Actions: Run references/CHECKLISTS.md and score with references/RUBRIC.md. Add Risks / Open questions / Next steps. Propose a 2–4 week pilot with review prompts.
  • Outputs: Final 1:1 Operating System Pack.
  • Checks: Pack is immediately usable; responsibilities and follow-ups are explicit.

Quality gate (required)

Examples

Example 1 (new manager): “I’m a new product lead with 6 direct reports across time zones. Design my 1:1 cadence, a shared 1:1 doc template, and a coaching question bank. Include a career conversation plan and a 4-week pilot.” Expected: cadence plan + templates + coaching toolkit + career sequence + quality gates.

Example 2 (meeting bloat): “My calendar is overloaded with weekly 1:1s. I still want strong relationships and fast escalation on urgent topics. Propose a barbell approach, updated agendas, and a skip-level cadence.” Expected: reduced standing roster with explicit alternatives; relationship catch-ups + urgent topical meetings; skip-level template.

Boundary example: “I need to document poor performance and start a PIP.” Response: recommend HR/performance management process; offer to help create a feedback conversation plan and expectations doc, but not to run an HR process via 1:1 templates.

平台分布

Codex

35.91%
按下载量换算126

Claude

31.51%
按下载量换算111

Cursor

16.93%
按下载量换算60

Gemini CLI

9.25%
按下载量换算33

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills