Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

prioritizing-roadmap(优先路线图)

prioritizing-roadmap 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

prioritizing-roadmap 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 46,976。

总安装 753周安装 32GitHub Stars 3下载 264核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:prioritizing-roadmap(优先路线图)
来源仓库:https://github.com/oldwinter/skills
仓库路径:skills/prioritizing-roadmap
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill prioritizing-roadmap
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill prioritizing-roadmap

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,支持关键词和任务场景定位。适合在 Codex、Claude 等宿主中快速获取候选结果。可结合来源仓库 README 核验具体用法和权限范围。安装前建议确认是否会触发联网或文件读写操作。prioritizing-roadmap 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/prioritizing-roadmap

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill prioritizing-roadmap;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

prioritizing-roadmap 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill prioritizing-roadmap。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

prioritizing-roadmap 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

prioritizing-roadmap 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

prioritizing-roadmap 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

prioritizing-roadmap 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 753 次,近一周安装 32 次,下载 264 次,GitHub 3 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

prioritizing-roadmap 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
prioritizing-roadmap

优先路线图 · 本页

7533只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Prioritizing Roadmap

Scope

Covers

  • Turning messy roadmap inputs into a ranked opportunity list + coherent roadmap
  • Defining a planning “season” (macro context) and success criteria
  • Using a common-currency scoring model (ICE + assumptions) to compare across teams
  • Producing an alignment-ready Roadmap Prioritization Pack

When to use

  • “What should we build next?”
  • “We need a Q2/Q3 roadmap.”
  • “We have too many requests and no way to compare them.”
  • “We need to prioritize across multiple teams/pods.”

When NOT to use

  • You don’t have any agreed goal / North Star / strategic intent (do product vision / goals first)
  • You need sprint planning or story-level estimation
  • You’re only choosing a single experiment within an already-fixed roadmap
  • You need a full customer discovery plan from scratch

Inputs

Minimum required

  • Product + primary customer segment
  • Planning horizon + cadence (e.g., next 6 weeks, next quarter, rolling 12–24 months)
  • Success criteria (North Star / business goal) + 2–5 guardrails
  • Candidate opportunities (or current roadmap/backlog) with rough size/effort
  • Constraints: capacity, commitments, dependencies, deadlines, risk tolerance

Missing-info strategy

  • Ask up to 5 questions from references/INTAKE.md.
  • If still missing, proceed with clearly labeled assumptions and provide 2–3 roadmap options.

Outputs (deliverables)

Produce a Roadmap Prioritization Pack in Markdown (in-chat; or as files if requested):

  1. Context snapshot (goal, horizon, constraints, stakeholders)
  2. Season framing (what changed, key bets, explicit non-goals)
  3. Opportunity inventory with conviction level (known vs hypothesis) and evidence
  4. Prioritization model (common currency + ICE scoring + assumptions)
  5. Ranked opportunity list (top 10–20) + “parking lot”
  6. Roadmap draft (Now/Next/Later or quarterly themes) + update cadence (rolling plan)
  7. Decision narrative (why these, why now) + “Think Bigger” ideas
  8. Risks / Open questions / Next steps (always included)

Templates: references/TEMPLATES.md

Workflow (8 steps)

1) Intake + decision framing

  • Inputs: User context; references/INTAKE.md.
  • Actions: Confirm the decision (backlog vs quarterly roadmap vs annual planning), horizon, stakeholders, constraints, and “must-do” commitments.
  • Outputs: Context snapshot.
  • Checks: Everyone agrees what decision will be made and by when.

2) Define the “season” + success criteria

  • Inputs: Context snapshot.
  • Actions: Name the current season (macro context), define 3–5 season bets, and set success criteria (North Star + guardrails).
  • Outputs: Season framing section.
  • Checks: A stakeholder can restate “why now” and “what we’re optimizing for”.

3) Build the opportunity inventory (separate truth vs hypotheses)

  • Inputs: Candidate inputs (requests, ideas, problems).
  • Actions: Normalize each item into a problem/outcome statement; tag conviction level (Known / Belief / Hypothesis) and evidence; split discovery vs delivery.
  • Outputs: Opportunity inventory table.
  • Checks: Every item has an intended outcome metric and a confidence/evidence note.

4) Define the common-currency scoring model (ICE + assumptions)

  • Inputs: Inventory + success criteria.
  • Actions: Choose a primary “common currency” (e.g., North Star units, revenue, cost, risk reduction) and define ICE scales; estimate impact ranges and confidence based on evidence.
  • Outputs: Scoring model + filled scoring table.
  • Checks: Two people using the same scales would produce similar relative rankings.

5) Stress-test the ranking (scenarios + constraints)

  • Inputs: Scored list + constraints.
  • Actions: Apply constraints (capacity, dependencies, deadlines); run 2–3 scenarios (base / aggressive / conservative); ensure a balanced portfolio (core, growth, quality, big bets).
  • Outputs: Shortlist (top set) + parking lot + key tradeoffs.
  • Checks: Tradeoffs and “no’s” are explicit; nothing critical is missing.

6) Draft the roadmap (sequencing + cadence)

  • Inputs: Shortlist + scenario choice.
  • Actions: Convert priorities into a roadmap (Now/Next/Later or quarterly themes), sequencing by dependencies and learning; define a rolling plan cadence (e.g., rolling 12–24 months, refreshed every 6 months).
  • Outputs: Roadmap draft + update cadence.
  • Checks: The roadmap is coherent, feasible, and resilient to new inputs.

7) Write the decision narrative + alignment plan

  • Inputs: Roadmap draft + rationale.
  • Actions: Write “why these, why now”; include a “Think Bigger” section; define how the roadmap will be communicated and updated.
  • Outputs: Decision narrative + comms/rollout plan.
  • Checks: A cross-functional partner can explain the roadmap without you in the room.

8) Quality gate + finalize the pack

  • Inputs: Full draft pack.
  • Actions: Run references/CHECKLISTS.md and score with references/RUBRIC.md. Add Risks/Open questions/Next steps.
  • Outputs: Final Roadmap Prioritization Pack.
  • Checks: Pack is shareable as-is; assumptions, owners, and cadence are explicit.

Quality gate (required)

Examples

Example 1 (B2B SaaS): “Prioritize our next-quarter roadmap for a collaboration product across Growth + Core.” Expected: season framing, scored opportunity inventory, a Now/Next/Later roadmap, and a clear decision narrative with explicit non-goals.

Example 2 (Marketplace): “Prioritize 6 months of roadmap across supply, demand, and trust & safety.” Expected: a common-currency model that makes cross-team tradeoffs comparable and a rolling plan refreshed on a fixed cadence.

Boundary example: “Give me a 2-year roadmap, we don’t have goals or constraints.” Response: ask for goals/constraints; if unavailable, produce options + assumptions and recommend doing product vision + North Star first.

平台分布

Codex

38.3%
按下载量换算101

Claude

28.9%
按下载量换算76

Cursor

20.89%
按下载量换算55

Gemini CLI

9.11%
按下载量换算24

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills