Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

defining-product-vision(定义产品愿景)

defining-product-vision 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

defining-product-vision 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 49,707。

总安装 642周安装 27GitHub Stars 3下载 225核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:defining-product-vision(定义产品愿景)
来源仓库:https://github.com/oldwinter/skills
仓库路径:skills/defining-product-vision
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill defining-product-vision
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill defining-product-vision

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

defining-product-vision 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词快速定位候选结果。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装并使用。使用前需确认权限范围、维护状态,避免触发联网或文件读写操作。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/defining-product-vision

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill defining-product-visi…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

defining-product-vision 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill defining-product-vision。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

defining-product-vision 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

defining-product-vision 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

defining-product-vision 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

defining-product-vision 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 642 次,近一周安装 27 次,下载 225 次,GitHub 3 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

defining-product-vision 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
defining-product-vision

定义产品愿景 · 本页

6423只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Defining Product Vision

Scope

Covers

  • Defining or refreshing a product vision (5–10 year future state)
  • Writing a vision statement + short vision narrative (concrete, not a tagline)
  • Translating vision into pillars and strategic choices (what we will/won’t do)
  • Packaging a “Product Vision Pack” leaders and teams can use as a decision tie-breaker

When to use

  • “We need a real product vision (not a slogan).”
  • “Leadership isn’t aligned on where the product is going.”
  • “Write a vision statement + one-pager for the next 5–10 years.”
  • “Bridge our mission to strategy and planning.”
  • “We have a big technology vision—what’s the user-friendly product form factor?”

When NOT to use

  • You only need a marketing tagline or positioning copy (do marketing/copywriting instead).
  • You need a detailed product strategy doc, roadmap, or OKRs *after* vision is already aligned (use those downstream skills).
  • You don’t have even a rough target customer/problem hypothesis (do discovery/research first).
  • You’re choosing metrics/measurement before agreeing on the future state (do vision first, then North Star metrics).

Inputs

Minimum required

  • Product (what it is today) + target customer segment(s)
  • The potent user problem / job-to-be-done the vision is grounded in
  • Time horizon (default: 5–10 years)
  • Mission / higher-level purpose (or executive intent)
  • Constraints (what must remain true: trust, safety, margin, compliance, etc.)
  • Stakeholders who must align (roles/names)

Missing-info strategy

  • Ask up to 5 questions from references/INTAKE.md.
  • If answers aren’t available, proceed with clearly labeled assumptions and provide 2–3 vision options.

Outputs (deliverables)

Produce a Product Vision Pack in Markdown (in-chat; or as files if requested):

  1. Context snapshot (bullets)
  2. Problem anchor (target customer + potent user problem)
  3. Vision statement (1 sentence)
  4. Vision narrative (concrete 5–10 year future state; tech-agnostic; aspirational but attainable)
  5. Vision pillars (3–5) + optional experience principles
  6. Strategy bridge (3–5 explicit choices + non-goals + “near-term wedge/form factor”)
  7. Rollout & alignment plan (workshop + comms + cadence)
  8. Risks / Open questions / Next steps (always included)

Templates: references/TEMPLATES.md

Workflow (8 steps)

1) Intake + constraints

  • Inputs: User context; use references/INTAKE.md.
  • Actions: Confirm product, target customer, horizon, mission, constraints, stakeholders, and why-now.
  • Outputs: 8–12 bullet Context snapshot.
  • Checks: You can restate “who we serve + what problem we solve” in 1–2 sentences.

2) Define the problem anchor (potent user problem)

  • Inputs: Context snapshot.
  • Actions: Write the target customer + problem as a crisp, user-centered statement; identify what “success” means for them.
  • Outputs: Problem anchor section (template in references/TEMPLATES.md).
  • Checks: Problem is specific, important, and not framed as “our feature idea”.

3) Draft 2–3 future states (vision options)

  • Inputs: Problem anchor + horizon.
  • Actions: Generate 2–3 distinct future-state options that are:

- Lofty and realistic - Tech-agnostic (not limited by today’s implementation) - Grounded in the user problem

  • Outputs: 2–3 Vision options (short narratives).
  • Checks: Each option passes the 4-point vision test in references/CHECKLISTS.md.

4) Write the vision statement + narrative (not a tagline)

  • Inputs: Chosen vision option.
  • Actions: Draft a 1-sentence vision statement and a short narrative (5–10 year future). Run the “what does that mean?” elaboration test.
  • Outputs: Vision statement + Vision narrative.
  • Checks: A stakeholder can ask “what does that mean?” and you can answer concretely (future customers, value difference, what’s changed).

5) Define pillars + principles (make it decision-useful)

  • Inputs: Vision narrative.
  • Actions: Create 3–5 pillars that imply product choices; add experience principles that help users act on the core value.
  • Outputs: Vision pillars (+ optional experience principles).
  • Checks: Each pillar can be translated into “we will invest in X / say no to Y”.

6) Build the strategy bridge (choices + non-goals + wedge)

  • Inputs: Vision pillars + constraints.
  • Actions: Translate the vision into 3–5 strategic choices and explicit non-goals. Propose a near-term wedge/form factor that delivers immediate utility while progressing the long-term vision.
  • Outputs: Strategy bridge section.
  • Checks: Strategy forces choice (scarce resources); includes at least 3 non-goals; names a plausible wedge.

7) Align stakeholders + iterate

  • Inputs: Draft pack.
  • Actions: Create a lightweight review plan (who, how, cadence). Anticipate objections and add an FAQ if needed.
  • Outputs: Rollout & alignment plan.
  • Checks: Key stakeholders can paraphrase the vision and disagree on specifics (not on meanings).

8) Quality gate + finalize pack

  • Inputs: All drafts.
  • Actions: Run references/CHECKLISTS.md and score with references/RUBRIC.md. Add Risks / Open questions / Next steps.
  • Outputs: Final Product Vision Pack.
  • Checks: Pack is shareable as-is; choices, non-goals, and caveats are explicit.

Quality gate (required)

Examples

Example 1 (B2B SaaS): “Define a product vision for a workflow automation platform for IT teams.” Expected: a Product Vision Pack with a concrete future state, pillars, and a strategy bridge (choices + non-goals + wedge).

Example 2 (Consumer): “Refresh product vision for a personal finance app expanding into a full ‘financial operating system’.” Expected: a vision that is lofty but attainable, tech-agnostic, grounded in a potent user problem, and packaged in a familiar form factor.

Boundary example: “Write a tagline for our website.” Response: clarify this skill produces product vision artifacts (not marketing copy). Offer to first produce a vision pack, then hand off a distilled tagline/positioning to a marketing/copy skill.

平台分布

Codex

35.09%
按下载量换算79

Claude

29.35%
按下载量换算66

Cursor

18.94%
按下载量换算43

Gemini CLI

10.05%
按下载量换算23

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills