Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

building-sales-team(建立销售团队)

building-sales-team 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

building-sales-team 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 48,934。

总安装 672周安装 28GitHub Stars 3下载 224核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:building-sales-team(建立销售团队)
来源仓库:https://github.com/oldwinter/skills
仓库路径:skills/building-sales-team
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill building-sales-team
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill building-sales-team

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,快速定位候选结果。适合在关键词搜索、任务场景或来源线索不明确时使用。可结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网或文件读写。

安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill building-sales-team

来源仓库内路径:skills/building-sales-team

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill building-sales-team;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

building-sales-team 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill building-sales-team。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

building-sales-team 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

building-sales-team 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

building-sales-team 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

building-sales-team 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 672 次,近一周安装 28 次,下载 224 次,GitHub 3 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

building-sales-team 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
building-sales-team

建立销售团队 · 本页

6723只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Building Sales Team

Scope

Covers

  • Deciding when to hire sales vs continue founder-led selling
  • Designing the first sales team (pilot AE/SDR/hybrid) and hiring sequence
  • Hiring for repeatability (avoid “one heroic rep” dependency)
  • Setting a minimal operating cadence (ramp plan, metrics, coaching loop)
  • Technical / product-heavy selling: “sales that can pass for PMs”

When to use

  • “We’re ready to hire our first AE / SDR—help me design the plan.”
  • “Should we hire sales now or wait until the motion is repeatable?”
  • “Create role scorecards + an interview loop for early sales hires.”
  • “We’re starting product-led sales—how do we run a small pilot team?”
  • “Build an onboarding + 30/60/90 ramp plan for the first reps.”

When NOT to use

  • You need to get first customers / validate ICP from scratch (use founder-sales first)
  • You’re scaling a mature sales org (territories, forecasting, multi-layer management)
  • You need legal/HR advice, compensation plan legal review, or employment compliance guidance
  • You want generic hiring advice without a defined sales motion and measurable readiness gates

Inputs

Minimum required

  • Company stage (pre-seed/seed/Series A+) and current GTM motion (PLG, outbound, enterprise, inbound)
  • Current funnel baseline: last ~50–100 “at-bats” if available (first meetings → closed-won), win rate, typical ACV, cycle length
  • ICP + product complexity (how technical is the sell; who must be convinced)
  • Current resources: founder time, CS/support involvement, marketing demand, budget/headcount constraints
  • Timeline + success definition (e.g., “2 reps ramped to $X pipeline/month in 90 days”)

Missing-info strategy

  • Ask up to 5 questions from references/INTAKE.md.
  • If data is missing, proceed with explicit assumptions and deliver two options: (A) “Hire now (pilot)” vs (B) “Wait + founder-led milestones to hit first”.

Outputs (deliverables)

Produce a Sales Team Build Pack in Markdown (in-chat; or as files if requested):

  1. Context snapshot (stage, motion, ICP, constraints, targets)
  2. Readiness gate (hire-now vs wait) with measurable criteria
  3. Team design + hiring sequence (who to hire first/second; when; why)
  4. Role scorecards (AE/SDR/hybrid) + evaluation criteria (incl. product depth bar)
  5. Interview loop + practical exercises + scoring sheet
  6. Onboarding + 30/60/90 ramp plan + coaching/metrics cadence
  7. Risks / Open questions / Next steps (always included)

Templates: references/TEMPLATES.md

Workflow (7 steps)

1) Intake + stage gating (should we hire now?)

  • Inputs: User context; references/INTAKE.md; any funnel history.
  • Actions: Identify the GTM motion and whether the founder has achieved a repeatable baseline. Look for: (a) organic demand/hand-raisers (if PLG), and/or (b) a repeatable win rate from first meeting → close (target range often ~15–25% over ~50–100 at-bats). Decide: Hire now vs Wait.
  • Outputs: Context snapshot + readiness gate decision + assumptions/unknowns.
  • Checks: The decision is tied to measurable evidence (or clearly labeled assumptions).

2) Define the “repeatable motion” you’re hiring into

  • Inputs: ICP, use case, pricing/packaging, current discovery/demo flow.
  • Actions: Write a 1-page “sales motion spec”: qualification, first meeting agenda, demo/pilot criteria, pricing guardrails, common objections, and what counts as an “at-bat”. Clarify founder vs rep responsibilities for the next 60–90 days.
  • Outputs: Sales motion spec + handoff boundaries.
  • Checks: A new rep could run the next 10 deals with this spec without inventing the process.

3) Choose the initial team topology (pilot-first) + sequence hires

  • Inputs: Motion spec; readiness decision; budget; pipeline sources.
  • Actions: Select the simplest starting shape:

- PLG/hand-raisers: attach yourself to a pilot AE and/or SDR and run it as a learning pod (not quota theater). - Outbound: consider an SDR+AE sequence (or a hybrid rep) depending on deal complexity. - In very early stages: use founder/CS/support to close a subset of deals until the motion is proven. Build a hiring sequence that enables A/B testing: if feasible, hire two reps close together to avoid “one data point” dependence.

  • Outputs: Team design + hiring plan table (roles, timing, success criteria, risks).
  • Checks: The plan creates comparability (two reps or comparable cohorts) and protects learning time.

4) Write role scorecards (hire for product depth + learning ability)

  • Inputs: Motion spec; team design; customer/technical context.
  • Actions: Draft scorecards for each role (AE/SDR/hybrid). For technical products, set a “PM-like” bar: reps should demonstrate product intuition, curiosity, and the ability to earn engineer trust. Translate insights into “must-have signals” + “red flags”.
  • Outputs: Role scorecards + evaluation rubric.
  • Checks: Scorecards are specific enough that two interviewers would rate candidates similarly.

5) Build an interview loop with practical tests

  • Inputs: Scorecards; references/TEMPLATES.md (interview kit).
  • Actions: Define stages, interviewers, and exercises (e.g., mock discovery, objection handling, written follow-up email, product deep-dive, “explain to 10 engineers” test). Add structured scoring and a debrief protocol to reduce gut-feel hiring.
  • Outputs: Interview plan + question bank + score sheet.
  • Checks: Every interview maps to a scorecard signal; pass/fail criteria are explicit.

6) Create onboarding + ramp plan (and a simple management system)

  • Inputs: Motion spec; expected pipeline sources; enablement assets (or create minimal ones).
  • Actions: Build a 30/60/90 plan: training, shadowing, call reviews, pipeline targets, activity guardrails, and demo/pilot readiness. Define weekly cadence (pipeline review, call coaching, experiment review). Preserve the “A/B test humans” approach by tracking rep-to-rep differences and diagnosing process vs person.
  • Outputs: Onboarding plan + ramp targets + coaching cadence + metrics list.
  • Checks: Ramp targets are measurable; coaching loop is scheduled; “definition of done” exists for each phase.

7) Quality gate + finalize

  • Inputs: Draft pack.
  • Actions: Run references/CHECKLISTS.md and score with references/RUBRIC.md. Add Risks / Open questions / Next steps and identify what would change the hire/wait decision.
  • Outputs: Final Sales Team Build Pack.
  • Checks: A stakeholder can approve the plan and start hiring this week (or confidently defer with clear milestones).

Quality gate (required)

Examples

Example 1 (first AE hires): “Use building-sales-team. We’re seed-stage B2B SaaS. Founder has closed 12 customers; last 60 first meetings → 14 closed-won (~23%). ACV $12k. We want to hire our first AEs. Output: a Sales Team Build Pack with readiness gate, hire-two plan, role scorecards, and interview loop.”

Example 2 (PLG → PLS pilot): “Use building-sales-team. We have steady inbound hand-raisers from our product. We want a pilot AE/SDR pod to close mid-market upgrades. Output: team topology, hiring sequence, and a 30/60/90 ramp with coaching cadence.”

Boundary example: “We have no repeatable sales motion or ICP yet—hire a VP Sales to ‘figure it out’.” Response: recommend founder-led discovery/validation first (use founder-sales), define readiness milestones, and return to this skill once a motion can be written down and measured.

平台分布

Codex

36.2%
按下载量换算81

Claude

31.07%
按下载量换算70

Cursor

20.2%
按下载量换算45

Gemini CLI

10.47%
按下载量换算23

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills