Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 待分类

building-a-promotion-case(建立促销案例)

building-a-promotion-case 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

building-a-promotion-case 是待分类类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在待分类类的 11,209 个 Skill 里排第 3,864。

总安装 874周安装 35GitHub Stars 3下载 283核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:building-a-promotion-case(建立促销案例)
来源仓库:https://github.com/oldwinter/skills
仓库路径:skills/building-a-promotion-case
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill building-a-promotion-case
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill building-a-promotion-case

这个 Skill 是做什么的

这个 Skill 的分类还没最终确定,用法以来源仓库的说明为准。

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。适合围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。可结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网或文件读写。

安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill building-a-promotion-case

来源仓库内路径:skills/building-a-promotion-case

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill building-a-promotion-…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

building-a-promotion-case 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill building-a-promotion-case。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

building-a-promotion-case 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

building-a-promotion-case 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

building-a-promotion-case 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

building-a-promotion-case 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 874 次,近一周安装 35 次,下载 283 次,GitHub 3 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

building-a-promotion-case 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理待分类类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

待分类类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
infsh-cli

infsh CLI · Codex、Claude

4,374,576382权限未标注未明确未收录
ai-video-generation

AI 视频生成 · Codex、Claude

4,313,376382调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lark-openapi-explorer

云雀 OpenAPI 浏览器 · Codex、Claude

2,064,1209,011需要联网未明确有提醒
lark-workflow-standup-report

Lark 工作流程站立报告 · Codex、Claude

2,041,6328,978需要联网未明确通过
use-my-browser

使用我的浏览器 · Codex、Claude

1,848,49140操作浏览器未明确未通过
building-a-promotion-case

建立促销案例 · 本页

8743需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Building a Promotion Case

Scope

Covers

  • Turning “I want a promotion” into a concrete promotion thesis tied to company priorities
  • Mapping your work to the next-level expectations (career ladder / competency model)
  • Building an evidence-backed impact log (metrics + artifacts + stakeholder proof)
  • Creating a submission-ready promotion doc (one-pager + appendix) that makes the decision easy
  • Aligning with your manager using a partnership loop (a.k.a. “Magic Loop”) and planning the next 4–12 weeks
  • Building a lightweight sponsor/visibility plan (political capital without being sleazy)

When to use

  • “Help me write a promotion packet / promotion doc.”
  • “I need a promotion case that maps to our career ladder.”
  • “I want to get promoted this cycle—what should I do and how do I prove it?”
  • “My manager says ‘keep doing what you’re doing’—I need crisp promotion criteria and a plan.”
  • “I want to level up, but I’m not sure what evidence counts.”

When NOT to use

  • You need compensation negotiation tactics for a new offer (this pack is about *internal promotion readiness*, not external offers)
  • You are in an HR/performance escalation (PIP, investigation, termination risk) — involve HR/manager process first
  • You don’t want to involve your manager at all (promotion decisions are manager- and org-mediated; this pack assumes partnership)
  • You only need a resume/LinkedIn rewrite (use a resume-focused workflow instead)

Inputs

Minimum required

  • Your role + scope today (team, product area, what you own)
  • Target level/role and timing (desired promo cycle/date)
  • Your company’s leveling rubric / ladder (or a description of expectations if you can’t share the doc)
  • 3–8 work examples from the last 6–12 months (projects, launches, decisions, cross-functional leadership)
  • Evidence signals (metrics, customer outcomes, reliability, revenue/cost, quality, speed, adoption)
  • Stakeholders involved (manager, partners, potential sponsors, promo committee style if known)

Missing-info strategy

  • Ask up to 5 questions from references/INTAKE.md (3–5 at a time).
  • If the ladder/process is unclear, proceed with a generic ladder mapping and label assumptions for the user to correct.
  • Don’t request confidential/PII; use anonymized numbers and redacted descriptions.

Outputs (deliverables)

Produce a Promotion Case Pack (Markdown in-chat; or as files if requested) in this order:

  1. Promotion thesis + target role/timeline (what you’re asking for, why now)
  2. Next-level expectations map (ladder/competencies → what “good” looks like)
  3. Evidence log (impact table with metrics + artifacts + stakeholders)
  4. Competency mapping (claims → evidence; gaps → plan)
  5. Impact narrative (1-page story + “company problem solved” framing)
  6. Manager alignment plan (“Magic Loop”) (asks, commitments, check-ins, decision criteria)
  7. Sponsor/visibility map (who needs to believe what; how you’ll socialize)
  8. Risks / Open questions / Next steps (always)

Templates: references/TEMPLATES.md Expanded guidance: references/WORKFLOW.md

Workflow (8 steps)

1) Intake + promotion process snapshot

  • Inputs: user context; references/INTAKE.md.
  • Actions: Confirm the goal (promotion vs broader career planning). Capture timing, process, and decision-makers. Identify constraints (confidentiality, limited metrics, org politics).
  • Outputs: Promotion context snapshot + assumptions/unknowns list.
  • Checks: Target level and promo window are explicit; boundaries are respected.

2) Define the promotion thesis (make the decision easy)

  • Inputs: company priorities; your work themes; target level expectations.
  • Actions: Draft a 1–2 sentence thesis: *“Promote me to X because I already operate at X by doing Y which solves Z.”* Tie to a concrete company problem.
  • Outputs: Promotion thesis + 3–5 proof points (bullets).
  • Checks: Thesis is falsifiable and specific (not “I worked hard”).

3) Map next-level expectations (promotion ≠ career, but they should align)

  • Inputs: ladder/rubric (or proxy); target role definition.
  • Actions: Translate the ladder into a small set of competencies and “next-level signals.” Separate: (a) table stakes, (b) differentiators, (c) visibility/scope expectations.
  • Outputs: Expectations map + initial gap list.
  • Checks: Each competency has observable behaviors; gaps are concrete.

4) Build an evidence log (receipts, not vibes)

  • Inputs: 3–8 work examples; available metrics; artifacts.
  • Actions: Create an evidence table that captures: problem, your role, scope, decisions, outcomes, metrics/proxies, and partners. Identify where you need stakeholder quotes.
  • Outputs: Evidence log + “evidence missing” list.
  • Checks: Each major claim has at least 2 evidence types (metric/proxy + artifact/partner proof).

5) Convert evidence into a promotion doc draft (one-pager + appendix)

  • Inputs: thesis, expectations map, evidence log.
  • Actions: Draft the promo doc using the template. Write in exec-friendly language: impact, scope, leadership, leverage, and why you’re low-risk at the next level.
  • Outputs: Promotion doc draft + appendix (evidence snippets).
  • Checks: The doc is skimmable in 3 minutes; every claim has a pointer to evidence.

6) Manager alignment loop (“Magic Loop”) + criteria agreement

  • Inputs: draft doc; manager context; promo process.
  • Actions: Create a plan to align with your manager: ask what would make them confident, commit to what they ask, and schedule check-ins. Draft your “ask” script and the next 4–12 week plan.
  • Outputs: Manager alignment plan + 1:1 agenda/script.
  • Checks: Manager expectations are explicit; next check-in date is scheduled; you’ve made it easy to sponsor you.

7) Sponsor/visibility plan (politics as logistics)

  • Inputs: stakeholder map; known promo committee dynamics.
  • Actions: Identify 3–8 people whose belief matters. Plan how you will: (a) increase visibility of outcomes, (b) request feedback/endorsements, (c) avoid surprises.
  • Outputs: Sponsor/visibility map + outreach templates.
  • Checks: Every key stakeholder has a specific next action and a low-friction ask.

8) Quality gate + finalize

  • Inputs: full pack draft.
  • Actions: Run references/CHECKLISTS.md and score with references/RUBRIC.md. Tighten weak sections. Add Risks / Open questions / Next steps. Produce a submission-ready doc and a short “manager email” version.
  • Outputs: Final Promotion Case Pack.
  • Checks: Pack is evidence-based, ladder-aligned, and process-ready; risks and unknowns are explicit.

Quality gate (required)

Examples

Example 1 (typical): “I’m a Senior PM and want to get promoted to Staff PM in the next cycle (May). Here’s our ladder excerpt and 5 projects I led. Build a promotion case doc + evidence log + manager alignment plan.” Expected: Promotion Case Pack with a ladder-mapped narrative and concrete manager check-ins.

Example 2 (limited metrics): “I’m a PM on an internal platform team. My impact is hard to measure. Help me build a promotion case using proxy metrics, stakeholder evidence, and artifacts.” Expected: Evidence log with proxies (cycle time, reliability, adoption, internal NPS) and explicit proof pointers.

Boundary example: “My manager refuses to discuss promotions and HR is involved in a performance process.” Response: recommend following HR/manager process first; offer to help later with evidence capture, role expectations, and a future readiness plan.

平台分布

Codex

37.9%
按下载量换算107

Claude

29.34%
按下载量换算83

Cursor

19.8%
按下载量换算56

Gemini CLI

8.76%
按下载量换算25

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills