Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ai-product-strategy(AI 产品策略)

ai-product-strategy 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

ai-product-strategy 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,674 个 Skill 里排第 45,550。

总安装 840周安装 35GitHub Stars 3下载 280核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ai-product-strategy(AI 产品策略)
来源仓库:https://github.com/oldwinter/skills
仓库路径:skills/ai-product-strategy
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill ai-product-strategy
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill ai-product-strategy

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,快速定位候选结果。适合在关键词搜索、任务场景或来源线索不明确时使用。可结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网或文件读写。

安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill ai-product-strategy

来源仓库内路径:skills/ai-product-strategy

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill ai-product-strategy;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

ai-product-strategy 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill ai-product-strategy。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ai-product-strategy 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ai-product-strategy 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

ai-product-strategy 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ai-product-strategy 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 840 次,近一周安装 35 次,下载 280 次,GitHub 3 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ai-product-strategy 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ai-product-strategy

AI 产品策略 · 本页

8403只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

AI Product Strategy

Scope

Covers

  • Defining an executable product strategy for an AI/LLM/agent product or AI feature portfolio
  • Translating AI uncertainty (non-determinism, emergent risks) into an empirical plan with evals + instrumentation
  • Choosing product form factor (assistant vs copilot vs agent), autonomy boundaries, and a safety/security posture
  • Producing a strategy pack leaders and teams can use to align and execute

When to use

  • “Define our AI product strategy / LLM strategy / agent strategy.”
  • “Prioritize AI use cases and turn them into an AI roadmap.”
  • “We’re adding AI to an existing product—what should we build and how do we measure it?”
  • “We want to ship an agent; define autonomy, security, and rollout.”

When NOT to use

  • You need a long-term product/company vision (use defining-product-vision first).
  • You need deep competitor research, battlecards, or win/loss (use competitive-analysis).
  • You need a feature-level PRD/spec/design doc (use writing-prds / writing-specs-designs after strategy).
  • You’re doing model architecture research, training, or infra-level technical design (delegate to ML/eng).
  • You don’t yet have a clear problem/ICP hypothesis (use problem-definition / conducting-user-interviews).

Inputs

Minimum required

  • Product context (what exists today) + target customer/user + their job/pain
  • Strategy horizon (default: 3–12 months) + constraints (budget, latency, policy/legal, data access, platform)
  • Intended AI surface and scope: assistant / copilot / agent; where it lives in the workflow
  • Success metrics (1–3) and guardrails (2–5), including safety/trust, cost, and latency

Missing-info strategy

  • Ask up to 5 questions from references/INTAKE.md (3–5 at a time).
  • If details remain missing, proceed with clearly labeled assumptions and provide 2–3 options (use-case focus, autonomy level, build/buy).

Outputs (deliverables)

Produce an AI Product Strategy Pack in Markdown (in-chat; or as files if requested), in this order:

  1. Context snapshot (decision, users, constraints, why now)
  2. Strategy thesis (value prop, why-now, differentiation, non-goals)
  3. Use-case portfolio (prioritized opportunities with feasibility + risk)
  4. Autonomy policy (assistant→copilot→agent boundaries + human control points)
  5. System plan (build/buy, data plan, eval plan, cost/latency budgets)
  6. Empirical learning plan (experiments, instrumentation, iteration cadence)
  7. Roadmap (phases, milestones, exit criteria, owners)
  8. Risks / Open questions / Next steps (always included)

Templates: references/TEMPLATES.md

Workflow (8 steps)

1) Frame the decision and boundaries

  • Inputs: User request + constraints.
  • Actions: Define the decision to make, strategy horizon, and audience. Decide whether this is for a single feature, a product line, or a platform capability. Write 3–5 explicit non-goals.
  • Outputs: Draft Context snapshot + scope boundaries.
  • Checks: You can state “We are deciding X by date Y for audience Z,” and list what’s explicitly out of scope.

2) Map the user workflow and role shift

  • Inputs: Target user + current workflow.
  • Actions: Map the workflow steps where AI changes the user’s job. Note “human control points” (where a user must review/approve). Identify failure modes that matter (hallucination, privacy, action mistakes).
  • Outputs: Workflow notes + role-shift bullets (in thesis or appendix).
  • Checks: Value is tied to a real workflow step (not generic “AI magic”).

3) Build a use-case portfolio and prioritize bets

  • Inputs: Workflow map + constraints + risk appetite.
  • Actions: List 6–12 candidate use cases. Score value vs feasibility vs risk. Select the top 1–3 bets and 1 “explore later” bet.
  • Outputs: Use-case portfolio table + recommendation.
  • Checks: Each selected bet has a clear user, measurable outcome, and known “must-not-do” constraints.

4) Define differentiation + “why us / why now”

  • Inputs: Top bets + assets + market context.
  • Actions: Draft the strategy thesis: value prop, why-now, and defensible differentiation (data, distribution, workflow integration, UX, trust). Write key assumptions and how you’ll test them.
  • Outputs: Strategy thesis (copy/paste from template).
  • Checks: Differentiation is not “we use AI”; it names compounding advantages or unique assets.

5) Choose form factor and autonomy policy (assistant → copilot → agent)

  • Inputs: Bets + constraints + safety requirements.
  • Actions: Decide the minimal autonomy needed for utility. Specify what the system can do, what it can suggest, and what it must never do. Define permission prompts, approvals, logging, and rollback for any action-taking behavior.
  • Outputs: Autonomy policy table.
  • Checks: Every action capability has explicit permissions + auditability + rollback.

6) Draft the system plan (build/buy, data, evals, budgets)

  • Inputs: Autonomy policy + constraints + data access.
  • Actions: Choose a strategy-level technical approach (e.g., RAG, tool use, fine-tuning) and a data plan. Define eval strategy (offline + online), quality targets, and cost/latency budgets.
  • Outputs: System plan.
  • Checks: There’s a plausible path to meet quality + safety + cost + latency with measurable evals.

7) Make it empirical (experiments + instrumentation + iteration)

  • Inputs: Thesis + system plan + assumptions.
  • Actions: Design experiments/prototypes and a “watch/listen” plan post-launch. Define instrumentation (events/logs), review cadence, and an iteration loop for both utility and risk.
  • Outputs: Empirical learning plan.
  • Checks: Every major assumption has a test + metric + owner + timebox.

8) Roadmap + quality gate + finalize

  • Inputs: Full draft pack.
  • Actions: Create a phased roadmap with milestones, exit criteria, and owners. Run references/CHECKLISTS.md and score with references/RUBRIC.md. Always add Risks / Open questions / Next steps.
  • Outputs: Final AI Product Strategy Pack.
  • Checks: A stakeholder can act on the pack without a meeting; trade-offs and unknowns are explicit.

Quality gate (required)

Examples

Example 1 (AI-first product): “Use ai-product-strategy to define strategy for an AI coding assistant for mid-market engineering teams. Constraints: ship a beta in 8 weeks; must not leak proprietary code; budget capped at $X/month.” Expected: strategy thesis + prioritized use cases + autonomy policy + system/eval plan + roadmap.

Example 2 (AI feature portfolio): “Use ai-product-strategy to prioritize AI opportunities for a customer support platform. Decide copilot vs agent, include safety posture, and propose a 2-quarter roadmap.” Expected: use-case portfolio with 1–3 bets, a clear agency-control policy, empirical plan, and phased roadmap with exit criteria.

Boundary example: “Pick the best LLM provider.” Response: treat “provider choice” as an input to the system plan; ask for constraints (data, cost, latency, privacy, regions). If the broader product decision is unclear, run this full strategy workflow first.

平台分布

Codex

34.92%
按下载量换算98

Claude

33.25%
按下载量换算93

Cursor

19.31%
按下载量换算54

Gemini CLI

9.72%
按下载量换算27

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills