Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

ai-product-strategyAI 产品策略

Agent Skill

ai-product-strategy 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

840

周安装

35

GitHub Stars

3

下载量

280
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ai-product-strategy(AI 产品策略)
来源仓库:https://github.com/oldwinter/skills
仓库路径:skills/ai-product-strategy
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill ai-product-strategy
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill ai-product-strategy

简介

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,快速定位候选结果。

  • 适合在关键词搜索、任务场景或来源线索不明确时使用。
  • 可结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网或文件读写。
  • 安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill ai-product-strategy

SKILL.md

AI Product Strategy

Scope

Covers

  • Defining an executable product strategy for an AI/LLM/agent product or AI feature portfolio
  • Translating AI uncertainty (non-determinism, emergent risks) into an empirical plan with evals + instrumentation
  • Choosing product form factor (assistant vs copilot vs agent), autonomy boundaries, and a safety/security posture
  • Producing a strategy pack leaders and teams can use to align and execute

When to use

  • “Define our AI product strategy / LLM strategy / agent strategy.”
  • “Prioritize AI use cases and turn them into an AI roadmap.”
  • “We’re adding AI to an existing product—what should we build and how do we measure it?”
  • “We want to ship an agent; define autonomy, security, and rollout.”

When NOT to use

  • You need a long-term product/company vision (use defining-product-vision first).
  • You need deep competitor research, battlecards, or win/loss (use competitive-analysis).
  • You need a feature-level PRD/spec/design doc (use writing-prds / writing-specs-designs after strategy).
  • You’re doing model architecture research, training, or infra-level technical design (delegate to ML/eng).
  • You don’t yet have a clear problem/ICP hypothesis (use problem-definition / conducting-user-interviews).

Inputs

Minimum required

  • Product context (what exists today) + target customer/user + their job/pain
  • Strategy horizon (default: 3–12 months) + constraints (budget, latency, policy/legal, data access, platform)
  • Intended AI surface and scope: assistant / copilot / agent; where it lives in the workflow
  • Success metrics (1–3) and guardrails (2–5), including safety/trust, cost, and latency

Missing-info strategy

  • Ask up to 5 questions from references/INTAKE.md (3–5 at a time).
  • If details remain missing, proceed with clearly labeled assumptions and provide 2–3 options (use-case focus, autonomy level, build/buy).

Outputs (deliverables)

Produce an AI Product Strategy Pack in Markdown (in-chat; or as files if requested), in this order:

  1. Context snapshot (decision, users, constraints, why now)
  2. Strategy thesis (value prop, why-now, differentiation, non-goals)
  3. Use-case portfolio (prioritized opportunities with feasibility + risk)
  4. Autonomy policy (assistant→copilot→agent boundaries + human control points)
  5. System plan (build/buy, data plan, eval plan, cost/latency budgets)
  6. Empirical learning plan (experiments, instrumentation, iteration cadence)
  7. Roadmap (phases, milestones, exit criteria, owners)
  8. Risks / Open questions / Next steps (always included)

Templates: references/TEMPLATES.md

Workflow (8 steps)

1) Frame the decision and boundaries

  • Inputs: User request + constraints.
  • Actions: Define the decision to make, strategy horizon, and audience. Decide whether this is for a single feature, a product line, or a platform capability. Write 3–5 explicit non-goals.
  • Outputs: Draft Context snapshot + scope boundaries.
  • Checks: You can state “We are deciding X by date Y for audience Z,” and list what’s explicitly out of scope.

2) Map the user workflow and role shift

  • Inputs: Target user + current workflow.
  • Actions: Map the workflow steps where AI changes the user’s job. Note “human control points” (where a user must review/approve). Identify failure modes that matter (hallucination, privacy, action mistakes).
  • Outputs: Workflow notes + role-shift bullets (in thesis or appendix).
  • Checks: Value is tied to a real workflow step (not generic “AI magic”).

3) Build a use-case portfolio and prioritize bets

  • Inputs: Workflow map + constraints + risk appetite.
  • Actions: List 6–12 candidate use cases. Score value vs feasibility vs risk. Select the top 1–3 bets and 1 “explore later” bet.
  • Outputs: Use-case portfolio table + recommendation.
  • Checks: Each selected bet has a clear user, measurable outcome, and known “must-not-do” constraints.

4) Define differentiation + “why us / why now”

  • Inputs: Top bets + assets + market context.
  • Actions: Draft the strategy thesis: value prop, why-now, and defensible differentiation (data, distribution, workflow integration, UX, trust). Write key assumptions and how you’ll test them.
  • Outputs: Strategy thesis (copy/paste from template).
  • Checks: Differentiation is not “we use AI”; it names compounding advantages or unique assets.

5) Choose form factor and autonomy policy (assistant → copilot → agent)

  • Inputs: Bets + constraints + safety requirements.
  • Actions: Decide the minimal autonomy needed for utility. Specify what the system can do, what it can suggest, and what it must never do. Define permission prompts, approvals, logging, and rollback for any action-taking behavior.
  • Outputs: Autonomy policy table.
  • Checks: Every action capability has explicit permissions + auditability + rollback.

6) Draft the system plan (build/buy, data, evals, budgets)

  • Inputs: Autonomy policy + constraints + data access.
  • Actions: Choose a strategy-level technical approach (e.g., RAG, tool use, fine-tuning) and a data plan. Define eval strategy (offline + online), quality targets, and cost/latency budgets.
  • Outputs: System plan.
  • Checks: There’s a plausible path to meet quality + safety + cost + latency with measurable evals.

7) Make it empirical (experiments + instrumentation + iteration)

  • Inputs: Thesis + system plan + assumptions.
  • Actions: Design experiments/prototypes and a “watch/listen” plan post-launch. Define instrumentation (events/logs), review cadence, and an iteration loop for both utility and risk.
  • Outputs: Empirical learning plan.
  • Checks: Every major assumption has a test + metric + owner + timebox.

8) Roadmap + quality gate + finalize

  • Inputs: Full draft pack.
  • Actions: Create a phased roadmap with milestones, exit criteria, and owners. Run references/CHECKLISTS.md and score with references/RUBRIC.md. Always add Risks / Open questions / Next steps.
  • Outputs: Final AI Product Strategy Pack.
  • Checks: A stakeholder can act on the pack without a meeting; trade-offs and unknowns are explicit.

Quality gate (required)

Examples

Example 1 (AI-first product): “Use ai-product-strategy to define strategy for an AI coding assistant for mid-market engineering teams. Constraints: ship a beta in 8 weeks; must not leak proprietary code; budget capped at $X/month.” Expected: strategy thesis + prioritized use cases + autonomy policy + system/eval plan + roadmap.

Example 2 (AI feature portfolio): “Use ai-product-strategy to prioritize AI opportunities for a customer support platform. Decide copilot vs agent, include safety posture, and propose a 2-quarter roadmap.” Expected: use-case portfolio with 1–3 bets, a clear agency-control policy, empirical plan, and phased roadmap with exit criteria.

Boundary example: “Pick the best LLM provider.” Response: treat “provider choice” as an input to the system plan; ask for constraints (data, cost, latency, privacy, regions). If the broader product decision is unclear, run this full strategy workflow first.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.92%
按下载量换算98

Claude

33.25%
按下载量换算93

Cursor

19.31%
按下载量换算54

Gemini CLI

9.72%
按下载量换算27

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills