Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

sharp-edges(锋利的边缘)

sharp-edges 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

sharp-edges 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为权限未标注;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 49,774。

总安装 636周安装 26GitHub Stars 25下载 204核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:sharp-edges(锋利的边缘)
来源仓库:https://github.com/oimiragieo/agent-studio
仓库路径:skills/sharp-edges
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/oimiragieo/agent-studio --skill sharp-edges
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/oimiragieo/agent-studio --skill sharp-edges

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

sharp-edges 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位候选结果。适用于特定边缘案例、异常场景或复杂逻辑处理任务。通过 npx skills add 命令从 GitHub 仓库安装并使用。

安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网或文件操作。建议结合原始 README 核验具体用法和功能边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/sharp-edges

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/oimiragieo/agent-studio --skill sharp-edges;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    权限没有明确标注,第一次使用时只给一个无关紧要的任务,观察它到底读了哪些文件和网络。

常见问题

6 条

sharp-edges 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/oimiragieo/agent-studio --skill sharp-edges。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

sharp-edges 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

sharp-edges 需要什么权限?

权限级别没有明确标注。第一次使用时建议只给无关紧要的任务,观察它实际读写了哪些内容。

sharp-edges 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

sharp-edges 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 636 次,近一周安装 26 次,下载 204 次,GitHub 25 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

sharp-edges 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
sharp-edges

锋利的边缘 · 本页

63625权限未标注未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Sharp Edges

Living catalogue of confirmed hazard patterns in agent-studio. Each entry documents a real bug we've shipped. Invoke this skill during debugging and code review to check against known failure modes.

SE-01: Windows Backslash Paths

Symptom: Glob patterns match correctly in CI (Linux) but silently fail on developer machines (Windows).

Root cause: path.relative() returns backslash-separated paths on Windows (node_modules\foo), but glob patterns use forward slashes. [^/]* in regex won't block \.

Fix:

// ALWAYS normalize before regex matching
const rel = path.relative(root, filePath).replace(/\\/g, '/');

Test assertion:

assert(normalizePath('a\\b\\c') === 'a/b/c');
assert(!normalizePath('a\\b').includes('\\'));

Files affected: .claude/lib/utils/path-constants.cjs, any glob-based exclusion logic.


SE-02: Prototype Pollution via JSON.parse

Symptom: Object.prototype gains unexpected properties after parsing malformed JSON from hook input or agent memory.

Root cause: JSON.parse('{"__proto__":{"isAdmin":true}}') silently mutates Object.prototype in older Node.js versions or when objects are created via Object.create(null) checks are missed.

Fix:

// Use safeParseJSON — strips __proto__, constructor, prototype keys
const { safeParseJSON } = require('.claude/lib/utils/safe-json.cjs');
const { success, data } = safeParseJSON(rawInput, {});

Test assertion:

const before = Object.getPrototypeOf({});
safeParseJSON('{"__proto__":{"evil":true}}', {});
assert(!{}.evil);

Files affected: Any hook that calls JSON.parse() on stdin input.


SE-03: Hook Exit Code Protocol

Symptom: Hook appears to "block" when it should allow, or silently "allows" when it should block.

Root cause: Hooks use exit codes 0 (allow) and 2 (block). Using process.exit(1) or process.exit(true) does not block — it produces unexpected behavior.

Fix:

// CORRECT
if (shouldBlock) process.exit(2); // Block tool execution
process.exit(0); // Allow tool execution

// WRONG
if (shouldBlock) process.exit(1); // Not a valid block code
process.exit(false); // Not valid

Test assertion:

// Mock hook execution and verify exit code
const result = execHook(input);
assert(result.exitCode === 0 || result.exitCode === 2);

Files affected: All hooks in .claude/hooks/.


SE-04: Async Exception Swallowing in Promise.all

Symptom: One failing async operation silently causes all results to be lost; agent believes all tasks succeeded.

Root cause: Promise.all([...]) rejects on the first failure and discards all other results. When wrapped in try/catch that returns [], the caller sees empty results with no error.

Fix:

// Use Promise.allSettled to get partial results
const results = await Promise.allSettled(tasks);
const succeeded = results.filter(r => r.status === 'fulfilled').map(r => r.value);
const failed = results.filter(r => r.status === 'rejected').map(r => r.reason);
return { succeeded, failed, partial: failed.length > 0 };

Test assertion:

const tasks = [resolvesWith('ok'), rejectsWith('error'), resolvesWith('ok2')];
const result = await safeAllSettled(tasks);
assert(result.succeeded.length === 2);
assert(result.failed.length === 1);

SE-05: ReDoS in Glob-to-Regex

Symptom: Glob pattern matching hangs or takes exponential time on long path strings.

Root cause: Naive glob-to-regex conversion produces patterns with nested quantifiers like (.*)* or (.+)+ which backtrack exponentially on non-matching strings.

Fix:

// Use anchored, non-backtracking patterns
// BAD: (.*)* -> exponential backtracking
// GOOD: [^/]* -> linear, no backtracking
function globToRegex(glob) {
  const escaped = glob.replace(/[.+^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\$&');
  return escaped
    .replace(/\*\*/g, '___DOUBLE___')
    .replace(/\*/g, '[^/]*') // Single * -> no path separators
    .replace(/___DOUBLE___/g, '.*'); // ** -> any path
}

Test assertion:

const regex = globToRegex('**/*.js');
const longString = 'a'.repeat(10000) + '.ts';
const start = Date.now();
regex.test(longString);
assert(Date.now() - start < 100); // Must complete in <100ms

SE-06: DST Arithmetic Bugs

Symptom: Date calculations are off by 1 hour for events that cross daylight saving time boundaries.

Root cause: Adding 24 *60* 60 * 1000ms to a timestamp does not always equal "tomorrow" — DST transitions can make a day 23 or 25 hours long.

Fix:

// WRONG: assumes 24h = 1 day
const tomorrow = new Date(date.getTime() + 86400000);

// CORRECT: use date arithmetic, not ms arithmetic
const tomorrow = new Date(date);
tomorrow.setDate(tomorrow.getDate() + 1);

Test assertion:

// Test across a known DST boundary (e.g., March DST change)
const dst = new Date('2026-03-08T01:00:00'); // Day before US spring forward
const nextDay = addDays(dst, 1);
assert(nextDay.getDate() === 9);
assert(nextDay.getHours() === 1); // Same time, next day

SE-07: Array Mutation During forEach Iteration

Symptom: Items are skipped or processed twice; behavior is non-deterministic.

Root cause: Mutating an array (push, splice, shift) while iterating with forEach or for...of causes the iterator to skip or re-visit elements.

Fix:

// WRONG: mutates during iteration
arr.forEach(item => {
  if (condition) arr.push(newItem); // Skips items
});

// CORRECT: collect mutations, apply after
const toAdd = [];
arr.forEach(item => {
  if (condition) toAdd.push(newItem);
});
arr.push(...toAdd);

// OR: work on a copy
[...arr].forEach(item => { ... });

Test assertion:

const arr = [1, 2, 3];
const result = safeForEach(arr, item => item * 2);
assert(result.length === 3); // Original not mutated, all items processed

Usage

Invoke at the START of any debugging session:

Skill({ skill: 'sharp-edges' });

Then match your symptom against SE-01 through SE-07. If your bug is new and reproducible, add it to this catalogue.

Adding New Entries

Pattern for new entries:

## SE-0N: [Short Title]
**Symptom:** [What you observe]
**Root cause:** [Why it happens]
**Fix:** [Code fix with before/after]
**Test assertion:** [Minimal test that would catch it]
**Files affected:** [Where in agent-studio this applies]

Memory Protocol

After invoking: if you find a new sharp edge, append it here via technical-writer agent.

Memory Protocol (MANDATORY)

Before starting: Read .claude/context/memory/learnings.md

After completing:

  • New pattern -> .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
  • Issue found -> .claude/context/memory/issues.md
  • Decision made -> .claude/context/memory/decisions.md
ASSUME INTERRUPTION: If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.

平台分布

Codex

34.2%
按下载量换算70

Claude

31.95%
按下载量换算65

Cursor

17.04%
按下载量换算35

Gemini CLI

10.3%
按下载量换算21

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

权限未标注

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills