Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

regulatory-compliance(监管合规性)

regulatory-compliance 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

regulatory-compliance 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 47,657。

总安装 724周安装 29GitHub Stars 25下载 234核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:regulatory-compliance(监管合规性)
来源仓库:https://github.com/oimiragieo/agent-studio
仓库路径:skills/regulatory-compliance
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/oimiragieo/agent-studio --skill regulatory-compliance
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/oimiragieo/agent-studio --skill regulatory-compliance

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

regulatory-compliance 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位候选结果。适用于合规性检查、法规研究与政策匹配等场景。通过 npx skills add 命令从 GitHub 仓库安装并使用。

安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网或文件操作。建议结合原始 README 核验具体用法和功能边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/regulatory-compliance

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/oimiragieo/agent-studio --skill regulatory-com…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

regulatory-compliance 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/oimiragieo/agent-studio --skill regulatory-compliance。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

regulatory-compliance 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

regulatory-compliance 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

regulatory-compliance 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

regulatory-compliance 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 724 次,近一周安装 29 次,下载 234 次,GitHub 25 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

regulatory-compliance 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
regulatory-compliance

监管合规性 · 本页

72425需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Regulatory Compliance Skill

Overview

Assess systems, processes, and artifacts against major regulatory frameworks:

  • GDPR/CCPA — Data privacy compliance for EU and California/US state laws
  • Privacy-by-Design — Proactive privacy embedding following Ann Cavoukian's 7 principles
  • ADA/WCAG — Web and software accessibility under ADA and WCAG 2.1/2.2 AA standards
  • DPA Validation — Data Processing Agreement completeness and correctness checks
  • Regulatory Monitoring — Guidance on tracking regulatory changes across jurisdictions

Output is structured as PASS / CONDITIONAL / FAIL with severity-rated findings and actionable remediation tasks.

When to Use

  • Before deploying any feature that collects, processes, or stores personal data
  • During architecture review for systems touching PII or user data
  • When validating third-party vendor agreements and DPAs
  • Before launching products in EU, California, or any jurisdiction with active privacy law
  • When auditing accessibility compliance for public-facing interfaces
  • As part of CI compliance gates for data pipelines and APIs

Iron Laws

  1. NEVER report PASS on partial compliance — if any item fails, the result is CONDITIONAL or FAIL; partial compliance masks violations.
  2. ALWAYS include remediation tasks with specific owning agents — vague findings don't produce fixes; every FAIL/CONDITIONAL must specify who fixes it and how.
  3. NEVER skip multi-jurisdiction check — GDPR, CCPA, and 20+ US state laws may all apply; document scope clearly.
  4. ALWAYS verify privacy-by-design at design time — retrofitting privacy after deployment is significantly more costly and less effective.
  5. NEVER treat accessibility as optional — ADA/WCAG compliance carries active litigation risk (ADA lawsuits up 37% H1 2025); all public interfaces must be validated.
  6. ALWAYS document regulation version and date assessed — regulatory guidance evolves; stamp every report with the regulation version and assessment date.

Workflow

Step 1: Scope Definition

Define which regulations apply to the subject of the assessment:

## Compliance Scope

- Subject: [System / Feature / DPA / Interface being assessed]
- Jurisdictions: [EU / California / Virginia / Colorado / Other states]
- Applicable Regulations:
  - [ ] GDPR (EU General Data Protection Regulation)
  - [ ] CCPA/CPRA (California Consumer Privacy Act / California Privacy Rights Act)
  - [ ] US State Laws (VCDPA, CPA, CTDPA, etc.)
  - [ ] ADA / Section 508 (US accessibility)
  - [ ] WCAG 2.1/2.2 AA (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines)
  - [ ] DPA Review (vendor data processing agreement)
- Personal Data Categories Involved: [list data types]
- Assessment Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
- Regulation Versions Referenced: [e.g., GDPR as amended 2024, CPRA effective 2023]

Step 2: GDPR/CCPA Compliance Checklist

Execute checklist items relevant to the assessed subject:

Data Inventory & Mapping
  • All personal data types cataloged (name, email, IP, behavioral data, biometrics, etc.)
  • Data flows documented: collection → processing → storage → sharing → deletion
  • Purpose for each data type explicitly defined and limited
  • Legal basis for processing documented (consent, legitimate interest, contract, legal obligation)
  • Data retention periods defined per data type
Consent Management
  • GDPR: Granular consent obtained per processing purpose (not blanket acceptance)
  • GDPR: Consent as easy to withdraw as to give (one-click unsubscribe)
  • CCPA: Opt-out mechanism present for data sale/sharing ("Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information")
  • Consent records maintained (who consented, when, to what)
  • Cookie consent implemented for tracking cookies (GDPR only)
Consumer Rights Processing
  • Right of access request mechanism exists (DSR/DSAR portal or process)
  • Right to deletion honored within required timeframe (GDPR: 30 days, CCPA: 45 days)
  • Right to portability supported (GDPR: structured, machine-readable format)
  • Right to correct/rectify inaccurate data supported
  • DSR records maintained for 24+ months (audit trail)
Third-Party & Vendor Management
  • DPAs in place with all vendors processing personal data
  • Vendor list maintained and reviewed annually
  • Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) present for international data transfers
  • Sub-processor notifications in DPAs
Security Requirements
  • Reasonable security measures implemented (encryption at rest and in transit)
  • Access controls and principle of least privilege enforced
  • Breach notification procedure documented (GDPR: 72 hours to supervisory authority)
  • Security risk assessment conducted for processing activities

Step 3: Privacy-by-Design Review

Evaluate against Ann Cavoukian's 7 Foundational Principles:

PrincipleAssessment
1. Proactive, not reactiveIs privacy built in from design stage, not added after?
2. Privacy as defaultIs the most privacy-protective setting the default?
3. Privacy embedded in designIs privacy integral to system architecture, not a bolt-on?
4. Full functionalityDoes privacy coexist with legitimate business objectives?
5. End-to-end securityIs full lifecycle security ensured from collection to deletion?
6. Visibility & transparencyAre policies and practices open and verifiable?
7. Respect for user privacyIs user-centricity maintained in all design decisions?

Record each principle as: Implemented / Partial / Missing / Not Applicable

Step 4: ADA/WCAG Accessibility Audit

Evaluate against WCAG 2.1 AA (minimum standard) / WCAG 2.2 AA (current standard):

POUR Principles
  • Perceivable: All non-text content has text alternatives; audio/video has captions/transcripts; content is not restricted to color alone; minimum 4.5:1 contrast ratio for normal text
  • Operable: All functionality available via keyboard; no keyboard traps; skip navigation links present; sufficient time to interact; no content that seizures (no flashing >3Hz)
  • Understandable: Language of page set in HTML; error messages are descriptive and helpful; consistent navigation across pages; form labels and instructions clear
  • Robust: Valid HTML/ARIA; compatible with current assistive technologies; ARIA labels and roles correctly applied
AI Interface Specific (2025+)
  • Chatbot interfaces keyboard accessible and screen reader compatible
  • AI-generated content has proper semantic structure
  • Alt text provided for AI-generated images
  • Voice interfaces have visual alternatives
Severity Classification for Accessibility
  • CRITICAL: Completely blocks access for users with disabilities (missing keyboard navigation, no screen reader support)
  • HIGH: Significantly impedes usage (poor contrast, missing alt text on key images)
  • MEDIUM: Creates friction but workarounds exist (missing skip links, inconsistent labels)
  • LOW: Best practice improvement (decorative image has non-empty alt text)

Step 5: DPA Validation Checklist

If reviewing a Data Processing Agreement:

Required DPA Elements (GDPR Article 28)
  • Parties clearly identified (controller name/address, processor name/address)
  • Subject matter, nature, and purpose of processing defined
  • Type of personal data and categories of data subjects specified
  • Duration of processing specified
  • Controller obligations and rights documented
  • Processor obligations:

- Process only on documented controller instructions - Ensure confidentiality of processing personnel - Implement appropriate technical/organizational security measures - Sub-processor rules: require prior written consent; flow-down obligations - Assist controller with DSARs and Article 32-36 obligations - Delete or return data at end of service - Provide audit cooperation and information

  • International transfer mechanism specified (SCCs, adequacy decision, etc.)
  • Breach notification procedure: processor notifies controller without undue delay
  • DPA update trigger: reviewed annually or upon significant processing changes
DPA Quality Flags
  • No vague processing descriptions ("process data as needed") — specificity required
  • Security measures described with appropriate detail (encryption, access controls, staff training)
  • Sub-processor list available and maintained
  • Transfer Impact Assessment (TIA) conducted for high-risk countries

Step 6: Regulatory Monitoring Guidance

Provide guidance on maintaining ongoing compliance:

Monitoring Sources
Monitoring Cadence
  • Monthly: Review enforcement actions from supervisory authorities
  • Quarterly: Check for new or amended state privacy laws
  • Annually: Full DPA review with all processors; full accessibility audit
  • On Change: Re-assess whenever data processing activities, vendors, or interfaces change materially

Step 7: Produce Compliance Decision

Output one of three decisions:

{
  "decision": "PASS | CONDITIONAL | FAIL",
  "regulationsAssessed": ["GDPR", "CCPA", "WCAG 2.1 AA", "DPA"],
  "assessmentDate": "YYYY-MM-DD",
  "findings": [
    {
      "id": "RC-001",
      "regulation": "GDPR",
      "severity": "CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW",
      "category": "Consent Management",
      "description": "Cookie consent banner missing for analytics tracking cookies",
      "status": "FAIL",
      "remediation": "Implement cookie consent platform with granular purpose-based opt-in",
      "owner": "developer",
      "deadline": "Before next deployment"
    }
  ],
  "requiredMitigations": [],
  "evidencePaths": [".claude/context/reports/compliance/"],
  "regulatoryLinks": [
    "https://edpb.europa.eu/our-work-tools/documents/public-consultations/2023/guidelines-032023-deceptive-design-patterns_en"
  ],
  "nextReviewDate": "YYYY-MM-DD",
  "recommendedNextStep": "Assign RC-001 to developer agent; re-assess after remediation"
}

Decision Rules:

  • PASS: All applicable checklist items verified, no open findings
  • CONDITIONAL: Minor or medium findings present; allowed to proceed with documented remediation plan
  • FAIL: Critical or high findings present; must remediate before deployment

Output Protocol

Report Location

Save compliance reports to: .claude/context/reports/compliance/

Naming: {subject}-compliance-{YYYY-MM-DD}.md

Report Sections (Required)

  1. Scope definition (Step 1 output)
  2. GDPR/CCPA checklist results (Step 2)
  3. Privacy-by-design assessment (Step 3)
  4. Accessibility audit results (Step 4, if applicable)
  5. DPA validation (Step 5, if applicable)
  6. Structured decision JSON (Step 7)
  7. Remediation task list with owners and deadlines
  8. Regulatory monitoring recommendations

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It FailsCorrect Approach
Checking GDPR only, ignoring CCPA/state lawsMulti-jurisdiction exposure missedAlways assess all applicable jurisdictions
Reporting PASS when most items passPartial compliance is non-complianceCONDITIONAL/FAIL for any open finding
Generic "implement encryption" remediationDeveloper cannot act on vague guidanceSpecific: "AES-256 encryption for PII fields in users table"
One-time audit treated as ongoing complianceRegulations change quarterlyEstablish continuous monitoring cadence
Treating accessibility as a nice-to-haveADA lawsuits are an active legal riskWCAG 2.1 AA compliance is non-negotiable for public interfaces
DPA with vague processing descriptionRegulators reject vague DPAsSpecify exact data types, processing purpose, retention periods

Enforcement Hooks

Input validated against schemas/input.schema.json before execution. Output contract defined in schemas/output.schema.json. Pre-execution hook: hooks/pre-execute.cjs Post-execution hook: hooks/post-execute.cjs (emits observability event)

Memory Protocol

Before starting:

cat .claude/context/memory/learnings.md

Check for:

  • Previous compliance assessments on similar systems
  • Known regulatory patterns and documented decisions
  • Outstanding compliance blockers in issues.md

After completing:

  • New compliance findings → Append to .claude/context/memory/issues.md
  • Regulatory decisions → Append to .claude/context/memory/decisions.md
  • Successful compliance patterns → Append to .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
ASSUME INTERRUPTION: Your context may reset. If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.

平台分布

Codex

38.06%
按下载量换算89

Claude

31.09%
按下载量换算73

Cursor

17.35%
按下载量换算41

Gemini CLI

9.96%
按下载量换算23

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills