Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

binary-analysis-patterns(二进制分析模式)

binary-analysis-patterns 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

binary-analysis-patterns 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 38,938。

总安装 1,490周安装 64GitHub Stars 25下载 522核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:binary-analysis-patterns(二进制分析模式)
来源仓库:https://github.com/oimiragieo/agent-studio
仓库路径:skills/binary-analysis-patterns
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/oimiragieo/agent-studio --skill binary-analysis-patterns
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/oimiragieo/agent-studio --skill binary-analysis-patterns

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

binary-analysis-patterns 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。适用于二进制分析和模式识别相关的研究检索任务。

通过 GitHub 仓库安装,使用 npx skills add 命令添加技能。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/binary-analysis-patterns

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/oimiragieo/agent-studio --skill binary-analysi…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

binary-analysis-patterns 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/oimiragieo/agent-studio --skill binary-analysis-patterns。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

binary-analysis-patterns 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

binary-analysis-patterns 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

binary-analysis-patterns 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

binary-analysis-patterns 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,490 次,近一周安装 64 次,下载 522 次,GitHub 25 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

binary-analysis-patterns 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
binary-analysis-patterns

二进制分析模式 · 本页

1,49025调用外部服务未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Binary Analysis Patterns

Security Notice

AUTHORIZED USE ONLY: These skills are for DEFENSIVE security analysis and authorized research:

  • Authorized pentesting engagements with written authorization
  • CTF competitions and security research
  • Defensive security and malware analysis
  • Security research with proper disclosure
  • Educational purposes in controlled environments

NEVER use for:

  • Creating or enhancing malicious code
  • Unauthorized access to systems
  • Bypassing software licensing illegitimately
  • Intellectual property theft
  • Any illegal activities

Comprehensive patterns and techniques for analyzing compiled binaries, understanding assembly code, and reconstructing program logic.

Disassembly Fundamentals

x86-64 Instruction Patterns

Function Prologue/Epilogue
; Standard prologue
push rbp           ; Save base pointer
mov rbp, rsp       ; Set up stack frame
sub rsp, 0x20      ; Allocate local variables

; Leaf function (no calls)
; May skip frame pointer setup
sub rsp, 0x18      ; Just allocate locals

; Standard epilogue
mov rsp, rbp       ; Restore stack pointer
pop rbp            ; Restore base pointer
ret

; Leave instruction (equivalent)
leave              ; mov rsp, rbp; pop rbp
ret
Calling Conventions

System V AMD64 (Linux, macOS)

; Arguments: RDI, RSI, RDX, RCX, R8, R9, then stack
; Return: RAX (and RDX for 128-bit)
; Caller-saved: RAX, RCX, RDX, RSI, RDI, R8-R11
; Callee-saved: RBX, RBP, R12-R15

; Example: func(a, b, c, d, e, f, g)
mov rdi, [a]       ; 1st arg
mov rsi, [b]       ; 2nd arg
mov rdx, [c]       ; 3rd arg
mov rcx, [d]       ; 4th arg
mov r8, [e]        ; 5th arg
mov r9, [f]        ; 6th arg
push [g]           ; 7th arg on stack
call func

Microsoft x64 (Windows)

; Arguments: RCX, RDX, R8, R9, then stack
; Shadow space: 32 bytes reserved on stack
; Return: RAX

; Example: func(a, b, c, d, e)
sub rsp, 0x28      ; Shadow space + alignment
mov rcx, [a]       ; 1st arg
mov rdx, [b]       ; 2nd arg
mov r8, [c]        ; 3rd arg
mov r9, [d]        ; 4th arg
mov [rsp+0x20], [e] ; 5th arg on stack
call func
add rsp, 0x28

ARM Assembly Patterns

ARM64 (AArch64) Calling Convention
; Arguments: X0-X7
; Return: X0 (and X1 for 128-bit)
; Frame pointer: X29
; Link register: X30

; Function prologue
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!  ; Save FP and LR
mov x29, sp                 ; Set frame pointer

; Function epilogue
ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16    ; Restore FP and LR
ret
ARM32 Calling Convention
; Arguments: R0-R3, then stack
; Return: R0 (and R1 for 64-bit)
; Link register: LR (R14)

; Function prologue
push {fp, lr}
add fp, sp, #4

; Function epilogue
pop {fp, pc}    ; Return by popping PC

Control Flow Patterns

Conditional Branches

; if (a == b)
cmp eax, ebx
jne skip_block
; ... if body ...
skip_block:

; if (a < b) - signed
cmp eax, ebx
jge skip_block    ; Jump if greater or equal
; ... if body ...
skip_block:

; if (a < b) - unsigned
cmp eax, ebx
jae skip_block    ; Jump if above or equal
; ... if body ...
skip_block:

Loop Patterns

; for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
xor ecx, ecx           ; i = 0
loop_start:
cmp ecx, [n]           ; i < n
jge loop_end
; ... loop body ...
inc ecx                ; i++
jmp loop_start
loop_end:

; while (condition)
jmp loop_check
loop_body:
; ... body ...
loop_check:
cmp eax, ebx
jl loop_body

; do-while
loop_body:
; ... body ...
cmp eax, ebx
jl loop_body

Switch Statement Patterns

; Jump table pattern
mov eax, [switch_var]
cmp eax, max_case
ja default_case
jmp [jump_table + eax*8]

; Sequential comparison (small switch)
cmp eax, 1
je case_1
cmp eax, 2
je case_2
cmp eax, 3
je case_3
jmp default_case

Data Structure Patterns

Array Access

; array[i] - 4-byte elements
mov eax, [rbx + rcx*4]        ; rbx=base, rcx=index

; array[i] - 8-byte elements
mov rax, [rbx + rcx*8]

; Multi-dimensional array[i][j]
; arr[i][j] = base + (i * cols + j) * element_size
imul eax, [cols]
add eax, [j]
mov edx, [rbx + rax*4]

Structure Access

struct Example {
    int a;      // offset 0
    char b;     // offset 4
    // padding  // offset 5-7
    long c;     // offset 8
    short d;    // offset 16
};
; Accessing struct fields
mov rdi, [struct_ptr]
mov eax, [rdi]         ; s->a (offset 0)
movzx eax, byte [rdi+4] ; s->b (offset 4)
mov rax, [rdi+8]       ; s->c (offset 8)
movzx eax, word [rdi+16] ; s->d (offset 16)

Linked List Traversal

; while (node != NULL)
list_loop:
test rdi, rdi          ; node == NULL?
jz list_done
; ... process node ...
mov rdi, [rdi+8]       ; node = node->next (assuming next at offset 8)
jmp list_loop
list_done:

Common Code Patterns

String Operations

; strlen pattern
xor ecx, ecx
strlen_loop:
cmp byte [rdi + rcx], 0
je strlen_done
inc ecx
jmp strlen_loop
strlen_done:
; ecx contains length

; strcpy pattern
strcpy_loop:
mov al, [rsi]
mov [rdi], al
test al, al
jz strcpy_done
inc rsi
inc rdi
jmp strcpy_loop
strcpy_done:

; memcpy using rep movsb
mov rdi, dest
mov rsi, src
mov rcx, count
rep movsb

Arithmetic Patterns

; Multiplication by constant
; x * 3
lea eax, [rax + rax*2]

; x * 5
lea eax, [rax + rax*4]

; x * 10
lea eax, [rax + rax*4]  ; x * 5
add eax, eax            ; * 2

; Division by power of 2 (signed)
mov eax, [x]
cdq                     ; Sign extend to EDX:EAX
and edx, 7              ; For divide by 8
add eax, edx            ; Adjust for negative
sar eax, 3              ; Arithmetic shift right

; Modulo power of 2
and eax, 7              ; x % 8

Bit Manipulation

; Test specific bit
test eax, 0x80          ; Test bit 7
jnz bit_set

; Set bit
or eax, 0x10            ; Set bit 4

; Clear bit
and eax, ~0x10          ; Clear bit 4

; Toggle bit
xor eax, 0x10           ; Toggle bit 4

; Count leading zeros
bsr eax, ecx            ; Bit scan reverse
xor eax, 31             ; Convert to leading zeros

; Population count (popcnt)
popcnt eax, ecx         ; Count set bits

Decompilation Patterns

Variable Recovery

; Local variable at rbp-8
mov qword [rbp-8], rax  ; Store to local
mov rax, [rbp-8]        ; Load from local

; Stack-allocated array
lea rax, [rbp-0x40]     ; Array starts at rbp-0x40
mov [rax], edx          ; array[0] = value
mov [rax+4], ecx        ; array[1] = value

Function Signature Recovery

; Identify parameters by register usage
func:
    ; rdi used as first param (System V)
    mov [rbp-8], rdi    ; Save param to local
    ; rsi used as second param
    mov [rbp-16], rsi
    ; Identify return by RAX at end
    mov rax, [result]
    ret

Type Recovery

; 1-byte operations suggest char/bool
movzx eax, byte [rdi]   ; Zero-extend byte
movsx eax, byte [rdi]   ; Sign-extend byte

; 2-byte operations suggest short
movzx eax, word [rdi]
movsx eax, word [rdi]

; 4-byte operations suggest int/float
mov eax, [rdi]
movss xmm0, [rdi]       ; Float

; 8-byte operations suggest long/double/pointer
mov rax, [rdi]
movsd xmm0, [rdi]       ; Double

Ghidra Analysis Tips

Improving Decompilation

// In Ghidra scripting
// Fix function signature
Function func = getFunctionAt(toAddr(0x401000));
func.setReturnType(IntegerDataType.dataType, SourceType.USER_DEFINED);

// Create structure type
StructureDataType struct = new StructureDataType("MyStruct", 0);
struct.add(IntegerDataType.dataType, "field_a", null);
struct.add(PointerDataType.dataType, "next", null);

// Apply to memory
createData(toAddr(0x601000), struct);

Pattern Matching Scripts

# Find all calls to dangerous functions
for func in currentProgram.getFunctionManager().getFunctions(True):
    for ref in getReferencesTo(func.getEntryPoint()):
        if func.getName() in ["strcpy", "sprintf", "gets"]:
            print(f"Dangerous call at {ref.getFromAddress()}")

IDA Pro Patterns

IDAPython Analysis

import idaapi
import idautils
import idc

# Find all function calls
def find_calls(func_name):
    for func_ea in idautils.Functions():
        for head in idautils.Heads(func_ea, idc.find_func_end(func_ea)):
            if idc.print_insn_mnem(head) == "call":
                target = idc.get_operand_value(head, 0)
                if idc.get_func_name(target) == func_name:
                    print(f"Call to {func_name} at {hex(head)}")

# Rename functions based on strings
def auto_rename():
    for s in idautils.Strings():
        for xref in idautils.XrefsTo(s.ea):
            func = idaapi.get_func(xref.frm)
            if func and "sub_" in idc.get_func_name(func.start_ea):
                # Use string as hint for naming
                pass

Best Practices

Analysis Workflow

  1. Initial triage: File type, architecture, imports/exports
  2. String analysis: Identify interesting strings, error messages
  3. Function identification: Entry points, exports, cross-references
  4. Control flow mapping: Understand program structure
  5. Data structure recovery: Identify structs, arrays, globals
  6. Algorithm identification: Crypto, hashing, compression
  7. Documentation: Comments, renamed symbols, type definitions

Common Pitfalls

  • Optimizer artifacts: Code may not match source structure
  • Inline functions: Functions may be expanded inline
  • Tail call optimization: jmp instead of call + ret
  • Dead code: Unreachable code from optimization
  • Position-independent code: RIP-relative addressing

Iron Laws

  1. ALWAYS perform static analysis before any dynamic execution — disassemble and map control flow first; executing untrusted binaries without prior static analysis is a security risk and destroys reproducible evidence.
  2. NEVER trust decompiler output as ground truth — decompilers produce approximations; always cross-reference decompiled output with the raw disassembly for security-critical paths.
  3. NEVER assume sequential execution — indirect jumps, virtual dispatch tables, and JIT-compiled code all break linear flow; always check cross-references and jump tables before tracing a code path.
  4. ALWAYS document architecture and calling convention at the start — x86, x64, ARM, and MIPS have different calling conventions; misidentifying them causes every parameter and return-value analysis to be wrong.
  5. ALWAYS mark assumptions as unverified until confirmed by dynamic analysis — static analysis is incomplete; flag every inferred behavior with [STATIC-ONLY] and validate with dynamic trace evidence when possible.

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It FailsCorrect Approach
Executing binary before static analysisDestroys forensic state; safety riskMap entry points and control flow statically first
Trusting decompiler output verbatimDecompilers introduce artifacts and errorsCross-reference with raw disassembly for critical paths
Assuming linear code flowMisses indirect jumps, vtables, JIT pathsCheck all xrefs and jump tables before tracing
Skipping architecture documentationWrong calling convention invalidates all analysisDocument arch + ABI before starting any analysis
Treating static inferences as confirmedInferences can be wrong without dynamic validationMark as [STATIC-ONLY] until runtime trace confirms

Memory Protocol (MANDATORY)

Before starting: Read C:\dev\projects\agent-studio\.claude\context\memory\learnings.md

After completing:

  • New pattern -> C:\dev\projects\agent-studio\.claude\context\memory\learnings.md
  • Issue found -> C:\dev\projects\agent-studio\.claude\context\memory\issues.md
  • Decision made -> C:\dev\projects\agent-studio\.claude\context\memory\decisions.md
ASSUME INTERRUPTION: If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.

平台分布

Codex

34.63%
按下载量换算181

Claude

30.85%
按下载量换算161

Cursor

20.54%
按下载量换算107

Gemini CLI

10.01%
按下载量换算52

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills