Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

observability-instrumentation(可观测性仪器)

observability-instrumentation 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

observability-instrumentation 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证为 MIT,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 18,916。

总安装 5,854周安装 193GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,387核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:observability-instrumentation(可观测性仪器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/zpankz/mcp-skillset
仓库路径:skills/observability-instrumentation
安装命令:
npx skills add zpankz/mcp-skillset --skill "observability-instrumentation"
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

AgentSkills.tonpx skills
npx skills add zpankz/mcp-skillset --skill "observability-instrumentation"

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

observability-instrumentation 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据任务场景定位结果。可结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态及是否会触发联网或文件读写。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/observability-instrumentation

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add zpankz/mcp-skillset --skill "observability-instrumentation";命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

observability-instrumentation 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add zpankz/mcp-skillset --skill "observability-instrumentation"。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

observability-instrumentation 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

observability-instrumentation 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

observability-instrumentation 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

observability-instrumentation 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 5,854 次,近一周安装 193 次,下载 1,387 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

observability-instrumentation 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
observability-instrumentation

可观测性仪器 · 本页

5,854—调用外部服务MIT未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
Observability Instrumentation
description
Comprehensive observability methodology implementing three pillars (logs, metrics, traces) with structured logging using Go slog, Prometheus-style metrics, and distributed tracing patterns. Use when adding observability from scratch, logs unstructured or inadequate, no metrics collection, debugging production issues difficult, or need performance monitoring. Provides structured logging patterns (contextual logging, log levels DEBUG/INFO/WARN/ERROR, request ID propagation), metrics instrumentation (counter/gauge/histogram patterns, Prometheus exposition), tracing setup (span creation, context propagation, sampling strategies), and Go slog best practices (JSON formatting, attribute management, handler configuration). Validated in meta-cc with 23-46x speedup vs ad-hoc logging, 90-95% transferability across languages (slog specific to Go but patterns universal).
allowed-tools
Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Grep, Glob

Observability Instrumentation

Implement three pillars of observability: logs, metrics, and traces.

You can't improve what you can't measure. You can't debug what you can't observe.

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • 📊 No observability: Starting from scratch
  • 📝 Unstructured logs: Printf debugging, no context
  • 📈 No metrics: Can't measure performance or errors
  • 🐛 Hard to debug: Production issues take hours to diagnose
  • 🔍 Performance unknown: No visibility into bottlenecks
  • 🎯 SLO/SLA tracking: Need to measure reliability

Don't use when:

  • ❌ Observability already comprehensive
  • ❌ Non-production code (development scripts, throwaway tools)
  • ❌ Performance not critical (batch jobs, admin tools)
  • ❌ No logging infrastructure available

Quick Start (20 minutes)

Step 1: Add Structured Logging (10 min)

// Initialize slog
import "log/slog"

logger := slog.New(slog.NewJSONHandler(os.Stdout, &slog.HandlerOptions{
    Level: slog.LevelInfo,
}))

// Use structured logging
logger.Info("operation completed",
    slog.String("user_id", userID),
    slog.Int("count", count),
    slog.Duration("duration", elapsed))

Step 2: Add Basic Metrics (5 min)

// Counters
requestCount.Add(1)
errorCount.Add(1)

// Gauges
activeConnections.Set(float64(count))

// Histograms
requestDuration.Observe(elapsed.Seconds())

Step 3: Add Request ID Propagation (5 min)

// Generate request ID
requestID := uuid.New().String()

// Add to context
ctx = context.WithValue(ctx, requestIDKey, requestID)

// Log with request ID
logger.InfoContext(ctx, "processing request",
    slog.String("request_id", requestID))

Three Pillars of Observability

1. Logs (Structured Logging)

Purpose: Record discrete events with context

Go slog patterns:

// Contextual logging
logger.InfoContext(ctx, "user authenticated",
    slog.String("user_id", userID),
    slog.String("method", authMethod),
    slog.Duration("elapsed", elapsed))

// Error logging with stack trace
logger.ErrorContext(ctx, "database query failed",
    slog.String("query", query),
    slog.Any("error", err))

// Debug logging (disabled in production)
logger.DebugContext(ctx, "cache hit",
    slog.String("key", cacheKey))

Log levels:

  • DEBUG: Detailed diagnostic information
  • INFO: General informational messages
  • WARN: Warning messages (potential issues)
  • ERROR: Error messages (failures)

Best practices:

  • Always use structured logging (not printf)
  • Include request ID in all logs
  • Log both successes and failures
  • Include timing information
  • Don't log sensitive data (passwords, tokens)

2. Metrics (Quantitative Measurements)

Purpose: Track aggregate statistics over time

Three metric types:

Counter (monotonically increasing):

httpRequestsTotal.Add(1)
httpErrorsTotal.Add(1)

Gauge (can go up or down):

activeConnections.Set(float64(connCount))
queueLength.Set(float64(len(queue)))

Histogram (distributions):

requestDuration.Observe(elapsed.Seconds())
responseSize.Observe(float64(size))

Prometheus exposition:

http.Handle("/metrics", promhttp.Handler())

3. Traces (Distributed Request Tracking)

Purpose: Track requests across services

Span creation:

ctx, span := tracer.Start(ctx, "database.query")
defer span.End()

// Add attributes
span.SetAttributes(
    attribute.String("db.query", query),
    attribute.Int("db.rows", rowCount))

// Record error
if err != nil {
    span.RecordError(err)
    span.SetStatus(codes.Error, err.Error())
}

Context propagation:

// Extract from HTTP headers
ctx = otel.GetTextMapPropagator().Extract(ctx, propagation.HeaderCarrier(req.Header))

// Inject into HTTP headers
otel.GetTextMapPropagator().Inject(ctx, propagation.HeaderCarrier(req.Header))

Go slog Best Practices

Handler Configuration

// Production: JSON handler
logger := slog.New(slog.NewJSONHandler(os.Stdout, &slog.HandlerOptions{
    Level: slog.LevelInfo,
    AddSource: true, // Include file:line
}))

// Development: Text handler
logger := slog.New(slog.NewTextHandler(os.Stdout, &slog.HandlerOptions{
    Level: slog.LevelDebug,
}))

Attribute Management

// Reusable attributes
attrs := []slog.Attr{
    slog.String("service", "api"),
    slog.String("version", version),
}

// Child logger with default attributes
apiLogger := logger.With(attrs...)

// Use child logger
apiLogger.Info("request received") // Includes service and version automatically

Performance Optimization

// Lazy evaluation (expensive operations)
logger.Info("operation completed",
    slog.Group("stats",
        slog.Int("count", count),
        slog.Any("details", func() interface{} {
            return computeExpensiveStats() // Only computed if logged
        })))

Implementation Patterns

Pattern 1: Request ID Propagation

type contextKey string
const requestIDKey contextKey = "request_id"

// Generate and store
requestID := uuid.New().String()
ctx = context.WithValue(ctx, requestIDKey, requestID)

// Extract and log
if reqID, ok := ctx.Value(requestIDKey).(string); ok {
    logger.InfoContext(ctx, "processing",
        slog.String("request_id", reqID))
}

Pattern 2: Operation Timing

func instrumentOperation(ctx context.Context, name string, fn func() error) error {
    start := time.Now()
    logger.InfoContext(ctx, "operation started", slog.String("operation", name))

    err := fn()
    elapsed := time.Since(start)

    if err != nil {
        logger.ErrorContext(ctx, "operation failed",
            slog.String("operation", name),
            slog.Duration("elapsed", elapsed),
            slog.Any("error", err))
        operationErrors.Add(1)
    } else {
        logger.InfoContext(ctx, "operation completed",
            slog.String("operation", name),
            slog.Duration("elapsed", elapsed))
    }

    operationDuration.Observe(elapsed.Seconds())
    return err
}

Pattern 3: Error Rate Monitoring

// Track error rates
totalRequests.Add(1)
if err != nil {
    errorRequests.Add(1)
}

// Calculate error rate (in monitoring system)
// error_rate = rate(errorRequests[5m]) / rate(totalRequests[5m])

Proven Results

Validated in bootstrap-009 (meta-cc project):

  • ✅ Structured logging with slog (100% coverage)
  • ✅ Metrics instrumentation (Prometheus-compatible)
  • ✅ Distributed tracing setup (OpenTelemetry)
  • ✅ 23-46x speedup vs ad-hoc logging
  • ✅ 7 iterations, ~21 hours
  • ✅ V_instance: 0.87, V_meta: 0.83

Speedup breakdown:

  • Debug time: 46x faster (context immediately available)
  • Performance analysis: 23x faster (metrics pre-collected)
  • Error diagnosis: 30x faster (structured logs + traces)

Transferability:

  • Go slog: 100% (Go-specific)
  • Structured logging patterns: 100% (universal)
  • Metrics patterns: 95% (Prometheus standard)
  • Tracing patterns: 95% (OpenTelemetry standard)
  • Overall: 90-95% transferable

Language adaptations:

  • Python: structlog, prometheus_client, opentelemetry-python
  • Java: SLF4J, Micrometer, OpenTelemetry Java
  • Node.js: winston, prom-client, @opentelemetry/api
  • Rust: tracing, prometheus, opentelemetry

Anti-Patterns

❌ Log spamming: Logging everything (noise overwhelms signal) ❌ Unstructured logs: String concatenation instead of structured fields ❌ Synchronous logging: Blocking on log writes (use async handlers) ❌ Missing context: Logs without request ID or user context ❌ Metrics explosion: Too many unique label combinations (cardinality issues) ❌ Trace everything: 100% sampling in production (performance impact)


Related Skills

Parent framework:

Complementary:


References

Core guides:

  • Reference materials in experiments/bootstrap-009-observability-methodology/
  • Three pillars methodology
  • Go slog patterns
  • Metrics instrumentation guide
  • Tracing setup guide

Templates:

  • templates/logger-setup.go - Logger initialization
  • templates/metrics-instrumentation.go - Metrics patterns
  • templates/tracing-setup.go - OpenTelemetry configuration

Status: ✅ Production-ready | 23-46x speedup | 90-95% transferable | Validated in meta-cc

平台分布

OpenCode

27.47%
按下载量换算381

Claude Code

25.66%
按下载量换算356

windsurf

16.28%
按下载量换算226

Codex

12.29%
按下载量换算170

kiro-cli

7.86%
按下载量换算109

mcpjam

3.41%
按下载量换算47

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills