Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

oban-thinking(奥本思维)

oban-thinking 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

oban-thinking 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 17,948。

总安装 371周安装 15GitHub Stars 144下载 116核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:oban-thinking(奥本思维)
来源仓库:https://github.com/georgeguimaraes/claude-code-elixir
仓库路径:skills/oban-thinking
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/georgeguimaraes/claude-code-elixir --skill oban-thinking
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/georgeguimaraes/claude-code-elixir --skill oban-thinking

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

oban-thinking 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue 与 Pull Request 协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中整理代码变更事项。可协助围绕仓库状态与协作进展进行信息归纳。

通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装,需参考原始 README 核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围及是否会触发联网或文件读写操作。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/oban-thinking

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/georgeguimaraes/claude-code-elixir --skill oba…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

oban-thinking 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/georgeguimaraes/claude-code-elixir --skill oban-thinking。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

oban-thinking 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

oban-thinking 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

oban-thinking 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

oban-thinking 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 371 次,近一周安装 15 次,下载 116 次,GitHub 144 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

oban-thinking 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
oban-thinking

奥本思维 · 本页

371144需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Oban Thinking

Paradigm shifts for Oban job processing. These insights prevent common bugs and guide proper patterns.


Part 1: Oban (Non-Pro)

The Iron Law: JSON Serialization

JOB ARGS ARE JSON. ATOMS BECOME STRINGS.

This single fact causes most Oban debugging headaches.

# Creating - atom keys are fine
MyWorker.new(%{user_id: 123})

# Processing - must use string keys (JSON converted atoms to strings)
def perform(%Oban.Job{args: %{"user_id" => user_id}}) do
  # ...
end

Error Handling: Let It Crash

Don't catch errors in Oban jobs. Let them bubble up to Oban for proper handling.

Why?

  1. Automatic logging: Oban logs the full error with stacktrace
  2. Automatic retries: Jobs retry with exponential backoff
  3. Visibility: Failed jobs appear in Oban Web dashboard
  4. Consistency: Error states are tracked in the database

Anti-Pattern

# Bad: Swallowing errors
def perform(%Oban.Job{} = job) do
  case do_work(job.args) do
    {:ok, result} -> {:ok, result}
    {:error, reason} ->
      Logger.error("Failed: #{reason}")
      {:ok, :failed}  # Silently marks as complete!
  end
end

Correct Pattern

# Good: Let errors propagate
def perform(%Oban.Job{} = job) do
  result = do_work!(job.args)  # Raises on failure
  {:ok, result}
end

# Or return error tuple - Oban treats as failure
def perform(%Oban.Job{} = job) do
  case do_work(job.args) do
    {:ok, result} -> {:ok, result}
    {:error, reason} -> {:error, reason}  # Oban will retry
  end
end

When to Catch Errors

Only catch errors when you need custom retry logic or want to mark a job as permanently failed:

def perform(%Oban.Job{} = job) do
  case external_api_call(job.args) do
    {:ok, result} -> {:ok, result}
    {:error, :not_found} -> {:cancel, :resource_not_found}  # Don't retry
    {:error, :rate_limited} -> {:snooze, 60}  # Retry in 60 seconds
    {:error, _} -> {:error, :will_retry}  # Normal retry
  end
end

Snoozing for Polling

Use {:snooze, seconds} for polling external state instead of manual retry logic:

def perform(%Oban.Job{} = job) do
  if external_thing_finished?(job.args) do
    {:ok, :done}
  else
    {:snooze, 5}  # Check again in 5 seconds
  end
end

Simple Job Chaining

For simple sequential chains (JobA → JobB → JobC), have each job enqueue the next:

def perform(%Oban.Job{} = job) do
  result = do_work(job.args)
  # Enqueue next job on success
  NextWorker.new(%{data: result}) |> Oban.insert()
  {:ok, result}
end

Don't reach for Oban Pro Workflows for linear chains.

Unique Jobs

Prevent duplicate jobs with the unique option:

use Oban.Worker,
  queue: :default,
  unique: [period: 60]  # Only one job with same args per 60 seconds

# Or scope uniqueness to specific fields
unique: [period: 300, keys: [:user_id]]

Gotcha: Uniqueness is checked on insert, not execution. Two identical jobs inserted 61 seconds apart will both run.

High Throughput: Chunking

For millions of records, chunk work into batches rather than one job per item:

# Bad: One job per contact (millions of jobs = database strain)
Enum.each(contacts, &ContactWorker.new(%{id: &1.id}) |> Oban.insert())

# Good: Chunk into batches
contacts
|> Enum.chunk_every(100)
|> Enum.each(&BatchWorker.new(%{contact_ids: Enum.map(&1, fn c -> c.id end)}) |> Oban.insert())

Use bulk inserts without uniqueness constraints for maximum throughput.


Part 2: Oban Pro

Cascade Context: Erlang Term Serialization

Unlike regular job args, cascade context preserves atoms:

# Creating - atom keys
Workflow.put_context(%{score_run_id: id})

# Processing - atom keys still work!
def my_cascade(%{score_run_id: id}) do
  # ...
end

# Dot notation works too
def later_step(context) do
  context.score_run_id
  context.previous_result
end

Serialization Summary

CreatingProcessing
Regular jobsatoms okstrings only
Cascade contextatoms okatoms ok

When to Use Workflows

Reserve Workflows for:

  • Complex dependency graphs (not just linear chains)
  • Fan-out/fan-in patterns
  • When you need recorded values across steps
  • Conditional branching based on runtime state

Don't use Workflows for simple A → B → C chains.

Workflow Composition with Graft

When you need a parent workflow to wait for a sub-workflow to complete before continuing, use add_graft instead of add_workflow.

Key Differences

MethodSub-workflow completes before deps run?Output accessible?
add_workflowNo - just inserts jobsNo
add_graftYes - waits for all jobsYes, via recorded values

Pattern: Composing Independent Concerns

Don't couple unrelated concerns (e.g., notifications) to domain-specific workflows (e.g., scoring). Instead, create a higher-level orchestrator:

# Bad: Notification logic buried in AggregateScores
defmodule AggregateScores do
  def workflow(score_run_id) do
    Workflow.new()
    |> Workflow.add(:aggregate, AggregateJob.new(...))
    |> Workflow.add(:send_notification, SendEmail.new(...), deps: :aggregate)  # Wrong place!
  end
end

# Good: Higher-level workflow composes scoring + notification
defmodule FullRunWithNotifications do
  def workflow(site_url, opts) do
    notification_opts = build_notification_opts(opts)

    Workflow.new()
    |> Workflow.put_context(%{notification_opts: notification_opts})
    |> Workflow.add_graft(:scoring, &graft_full_run/1)
    |> Workflow.add_cascade(:send_notification, &send_notification/1, deps: :scoring)
  end

  defp graft_full_run(context) do
    # Sub-workflow doesn't know about notifications
    FullRun.workflow(context.site_url, context.opts)
    |> Workflow.apply_graft()
    |> Oban.insert_all()
  end
end

Recording Values for Dependent Steps

For a grafted workflow's output to be available to dependent steps, the final job must use recorded: true:

defmodule FinalJob do
  use Oban.Pro.Worker, queue: :default, recorded: true

  def perform(%Oban.Job{} = job) do
    # Return value becomes available in context
    {:ok, %{score_run_id: score_run_id, composite_score: score}}
  end
end

Dynamic Workflow Appending

Add jobs to a running workflow with Workflow.append/2:

def perform(%Oban.Job{} = job) do
  if needs_extra_step?(job.args) do
    job
    |> Workflow.append()
    |> Workflow.add(:extra, ExtraWorker.new(%{}), deps: [:current_step])
    |> Oban.insert_all()
  end
  {:ok, :done}
end

Caveat: Cannot override context or add dependencies to already-running jobs. For complex dynamic scenarios, check external state in the job itself.

Fan-Out/Fan-In with Batches

To run a final job after multiple paginated workflows complete, use Batch callbacks:

# Wrap workflows in a shared batch
batch_id = "import-#{import_id}"

pages
|> Enum.each(fn page ->
  PageWorkflow.workflow(page)
  |> Batch.from_workflow(batch_id: batch_id)
  |> Oban.insert_all()
end)

# Add completion callback
Batch.new(batch_id: batch_id)
|> Batch.add_callback(:completed, CompletionWorker)
|> Oban.insert()

Tip: Include pagination workers in the batch to prevent premature completion.

Testing Workflows

Don't use inline testing mode - workflows need database interaction.

# Use run_workflow/1 for integration tests
assert %{completed: 3} =
  Workflow.new()
  |> Workflow.add(:a, WorkerA.new(%{}))
  |> Workflow.add(:b, WorkerB.new(%{}), deps: [:a])
  |> Workflow.add(:c, WorkerC.new(%{}), deps: [:b])
  |> run_workflow()

For testing recorded values between workers, insert predecessor jobs with pre-filled metadata.


Red Flags - STOP and Reconsider

Non-Pro:

  • Pattern matching on atom keys in perform/1
  • Catching all errors and returning {:ok, _}
  • Wrapping job logic in try/rescue
  • Creating one job per item when processing millions of records

Pro:

  • Using add_workflow when you need to wait for completion
  • Coupling notifications/emails to domain workflows
  • Not using recorded: true when you need output from grafted workflows
  • Using Workflows for simple linear job chains
  • Testing workflows with inline mode

Any of these? Re-read the serialization rules.

平台分布

Codex

38.81%
按下载量换算45

Claude

27.31%
按下载量换算32

Cursor

19.04%
按下载量换算22

Gemini CLI

8.64%
按下载量换算10

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills