Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

de-slopify去斯洛化

Agent Skill

de-slopify 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

1,032

周安装

43

GitHub Stars

10

下载量

344
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:de-slopify(去斯洛化)
来源仓库:https://github.com/oakoss/agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/de-slopify
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/oakoss/agent-skills --skill de-slopify
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/oakoss/agent-skills --skill de-slopify

简介

de-slopify 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。

  • 它适合围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理和辅助决策。
  • 可通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装并使用该技能。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网或文件读写操作。
  • de-slopify 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

De-Slopify

Overview

De-slopify is a methodology for removing telltale signs of AI-generated content from documentation, prose, and code. LLMs produce statistically regular output with characteristic vocabulary, punctuation habits, and structural patterns that make text and code feel inauthentic. Some patterns appear over 1,000x more frequently in LLM output than human writing.

When to use: Before publishing READMEs, after AI-assisted writing sessions, during documentation reviews, when reviewing AI-generated code for over-engineering, before committing prose or code that an LLM touched.

When NOT to use: On code logic or algorithms where correctness matters more than style. On technical specifications where precision outweighs voice. On content that was already human-written and reads naturally.

Quick Reference

CategoryPatternFix
PunctuationEmdash overuseSemicolons, commas, colons, or split into two sentences
Phrase"Here's why" / "Here's why it matters"Explain why directly without the lead-in
Phrase"It's not X, it's Y""This is Y" or restate the distinction
Phrase"Let's dive in" / "Let's get started"Delete; just start the content
Phrase"It's worth noting" / "Keep in mind"Delete the hedge; state the fact
Phrase"At its core" / "In essence" / "Fundamentally"Delete; say the thing directly
Vocabulary"delve", "tapestry", "landscape", "nuanced"Replace with plain, specific language
Vocabulary"revolutionize", "cutting-edge", "game-changer"Replace with concrete claims or delete
StructureUniform sentence length throughoutMix short (5-word) and long (20+ word) sentences
StructurePerfectly balanced lists of exactly 3 itemsVary list length; humans use 2, 4, or odd counts
StructureGeneric claims without specificsAdd names, dates, numbers, or first-person detail
Sycophancy"Great question!" / "Absolutely!"Delete; answer the question directly
Meta"Let me break this down..." / "Let me explain"Delete the preamble; just break it down
StructureNumbered lists where a sentence sufficesUse a sentence; reserve lists for genuinely parallel items
Closer"In conclusion" / "To summarize"Delete or replace with a specific takeaway
CodeOver-commented trivial functionsRemove comments that restate the code
CodeUnnecessary abstractions and design patternsFlatten to the simplest working solution
CodeVerbose or overly descriptive variable namesUse domain-appropriate concise names
CodeDefensive error handling on every operationHandle errors only where failure is realistic

Common Mistakes

MistakeCorrect Pattern
Replacing every emdash mechanicallyEvaluate context; sometimes an emdash is the right choice
Editing code blocks for styleFocus on prose; leave code examples and technical syntax untouched
Removing all structure to sound casualKeep headers, tables, and lists intact; rewrite prose only
Over-correcting into choppy fragmentsRead aloud after editing; recombine sentences that lost flow
Applying fixes without defining target voiceSet persona, tone, and audience before starting edits
Running regex replacements instead of readingManual line-by-line review is required; context determines fixes
Ignoring AI code smellsReview AI-generated code for over-engineering, verbose names, and unnecessary abstractions
Removing all LLM-typical words unconditionallySome flagged words are perfectly natural in context; use judgment

Delegation

  • Scan a repository for documentation files that need de-slopifying: Use Explore agent
  • Rewrite an entire documentation site to remove AI artifacts: Use Task agent
  • Plan a documentation voice guide and editorial workflow: Use Plan agent
  • Review AI-generated code for slop patterns: Use code-reviewer agent
For systematic quality auditing across 12 dimensions (architecture, security, testing, performance, etc.), use the quality-auditor skill.

References

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

38.1%
按下载量换算131

Claude

30.76%
按下载量换算106

Cursor

19.03%
按下载量换算65

Gemini CLI

9.88%
按下载量换算34

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills